[00:00:05]
IF EVERYBODY WOULD PLEASE STAND.
[1. CALL TO ORDER]
I WANT TO OPEN THE SESSION UP AT 5:31.IF EVERYBODY PLEASE STAND FOR OUR INVOCATION AND OUR PLEDGES.
I HAVE BOB MASSEY WITH PASTOR EMERITUS WITH THE GRACE BIBLE FELLOWSHIP.
HEAVENLY FATHER, WHO ART IN HEAVEN.
AND WE HONOR. LORD, WE PRAY AS YOU ASK US TO PRAY.
YOUR WILL BE DONE ON EARTH AS IT IS IN HEAVEN.
AND SO, LORD, WE PRAY YOUR KINGDOM INFLUENCE OF RIGHTEOUSNESS, PEACE, AND JOY INFLUENCE EVERY AGENDA DISCUSSED AND EVERY DECISION MADE THIS AFTERNOON FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COMMUNITY. THE SATISFACTION, LORD OF THIS COUNCIL INTO THE HONOR OF YOUR NAME.
AND IT'S IN THE NAME OF JESUS CHRIST, OUR LORD AND SAVIOR THAT WE PRAY.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION TWO, PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS OF TONIGHT'S AGENDA.
[2.C.Community Interest Items]
FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE NOT TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF SEEING THE SILVER MEDAL UP CLOSE, MR. CONNOR PRINCE WILL BE IN THE PLAZA SEPTEMBER 7TH AT 4 P.M.WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A COMMUNITY CELEBRATION AND IT'LL BE FOLLOWED BY SOME BTX BEATS.
SO COME JOIN US AND SAY CONGRATS IN PERSON TO CONNOR PRINCE.
WHAT A TREMENDOUS WIN AND FEAT THAT HE HAS ACCOMPLISHED.
WE'RE HAVING THE EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FAIR SEPTEMBER 7TH, 9 TO 1 AT THE BRICK.
SO COME OUT AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THAT.
I KNOW THAT JOE DOES A GREAT JOB OF RECRUITING SOME VENDORS TO THAT.
AND SATURDAY WE HAD AN ICE CREAM TRUCK AT THE PLAZA, AND WE HAD ONE AT THE BRICK, AND WE PASSED OUT ICE CREAM TREATS. Y'ALL DIDN'T HAVE A SHADE, DID YOU? YOU DID HAVE A SHADE.
WE HAD A FEELING I HAD A LITTLE SPOT WHERE WE HAD A LITTLE BIT OF SUN, BUT IT WAS REALLY A BLAST.
WE PASSED OUT OVER 200 TREATS IN ABOUT 45 MINUTES, SO IT WAS A LOT OF FUN.
THANK YOU, EDIE, FOR DOING THAT.
THAT BRINGS US ON TO SECTION THREE.
[3.CHANGES TO POSTED AGENDA]
CHANGES TO THE POSTED AGENDA, THREE A IS ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN.ITEMS TO BE ADDED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA MAY BE DONE SO BY REQUEST OF ONE COUNCIL MEMBER.
IS THERE ANY CHANGES OR REQUESTS? IS THERE ANY REQUEST? I HAVE ONE ITEM HERE, A NOTE GIVEN TO ME ABOUT THE CONSENT AGENDA, ABOUT THE APPROVED CONSENT AGENDA, NOTING THAT ITEMS FIVE F AND FIVE H.
YES, SIR. WHEN WE GET TO THE CONSENT AGENDA, I BELIEVE STAFF WILL MAKE THOSE COMMENTS FOR YOU.
THANK YOU. THAT MOVES US ON TO SECTION FOUR, CITIZEN'S APPEARANCE.
[4.CITIZENS APPEARANCES]
EACH PERSON IN ATTENDANCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AN ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA, SHALL SPEAK DURING THIS SECTION.EACH PERSON IN ATTENDANCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AN ITEM POSTED ON THE AGENDA SHALL SPEAK WHEN THAT ITEM IS CALLED FORWARD FOR CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING, I DO HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD GARY SMITH.
AND MR. SMITH, YOU'LL HAVE TO PUSH THE BUTTON TO TURN ON THE MICROPHONE.
I JUST NOTICED THAT THE LIGHT WASN'T ON.
I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT.
[00:05:01]
I'M HERE FOR TO SPEAK ON SOMETHING THAT YOU ALL TALKED ABOUT ON AUGUST THE 12TH, IN YOUR AUGUST THE 12TH MEETING, AH, THE MAYOR PRO TEM BROUGHT UP ABOUT RENAMING OR NAMING THE CITY HALL.I PERSONALLY, AS A CITIZEN OF BURLESON, HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THIS.
TO ME, CITY HALL REPRESENTS EVERY CITIZEN IN BURLESON, NOT JUST ONE PERSON.
AND I KNOW IT'S JUST A NAME ON THE BUILDING, BUT ONE OF THE STATEMENTS THAT YOU MADE WAS THE CITY WILL DO A SERVICE TO ITS OWN HERITAGE BY NAMING MR. SCHEIDER'S NAME ON SOMETHING THAT IS LASTING AND WILL BE THERE FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS.
I THINK WE ALREADY DO THIS, AND I'M ALL FOR THE PLAQUES THAT'S PUT ON THE BUILDINGS THAT ARE BUILT.
THERE'S A PLAQUE OUT THERE THAT HAS YOUR NAMES OR THE CITY COUNCIL AT THAT TIME.
NOW, I PERSONALLY DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH YOU.
NAME THE PLAZA AFTER SOMEBODY.
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM IF YOU NAME THE BRICK AFTER SOMEBODY.
THE PROBLEM I GOT IS CITY HALL.
CITY HALL REPRESENTS ALL OF THE CITIZENS OF BURLESON.
MR. RUSSELL DID THE SAME THING THAT WE HAVE OTHER OPPORTUNITIES TO DO.
SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE OPPORTUNITIES TO NAME AND MR. SCHEDDER DID A LOT FOR THIS CITY.
PUT HIS NAME ON SOMETHING ELSE.
LIKE I SAID, IF YOU WANT TO GO BACK AND RENAME THE BRICK.
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THAT.
I'M JUST ONE, BUT I WANT TO COME AND SHARE.
I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH PUTTING HIS NAME ON CITY HALL THAT REPRESENTS EVERY CITIZEN IN THIS TOWN.
AND, MR. SMITH, I WANT TO SAY I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS AND THEIR NOTED, THANK YOU.
OKAY. THAT MOVES US ON TO SECTION FIVE.
[5.CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA.THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEMS. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AUTHORIZES THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT EACH ITEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS.
TONIGHT, THE CONSENT AGENDA CONSISTS OF ITEMS FIVE A THROUGH FIVE H.
MAYOR COUNCIL TO MAYOR FLETCHER'S POINT.
THERE'S A LANGUAGE BEFORE YOU REGARDING THE CONSENT AGENDA.
IS THERE A MOTION? IF YOU'LL WAIT JUST A MOMENT, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THE VOTING SYSTEM IS NOT DISPLAYING ON THE SCREEN FOR THE AUDIENCE.
OKAY. THANK YOU. NOW, IF YOU'LL CONTINUE.
IS THERE A SECOND? THERE WE GO.
I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY ALEXA.
PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.
THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION SIX DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS.
[6.DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS]
SIX A IS 3084 SOUTH BURLESON BOULEVARD, CASE 24-146.TONIGHT IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST FROM A, AGRICULTURE AND PD, PLANNED DEVELOPMENT TO JUST PD, PLAN PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR 5.153 ACRES.
THIS IS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST AND FINAL READING.
THE STAFF PRESENTER THIS EVENING IS TONY MCILWAIN, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
MR. MCILWAIN, YOU HAVE THE FLOOR.
[00:10:07]
SOMARAJAN, THE OWNER.THE INTENT IS TO EXTEND THE CURRENT PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING DISTRICT TO INCLUDE AN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICT ADJACENT TO THE SITE THAT YOU HAVE ON YOUR SCREEN.
THEY'VE BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH CITY STAFF ABOUT EXTENDING DEVELOPMENT ON THE SITE TO INCLUDE A DETENTION POND, AND THEY WANT TO UNIFY THE ZONING THAT'S ON THE PROPERTY. THE CURRENT PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALLOWS INDUSTRIAL USES WITH THESE RESTRICTIONS.
THAT WAS APPROVED A COUPLE OF YEARS BACK WITH THE CITY COUNCIL TO ALLOW SOME FLEXIBILITY, BUT SOME ASSURANCES THAT YOU WOULDN'T SEE THESE TYPES OF USES POP UP ON THE SITE. JUST BY WAY OF SOME PREVIOUS HISTORY, GOING BACK TO AUGUST 2008, THERE WAS AN INITIAL ZONING CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL ZONING TO SITE PLAN, AND THEN THE COUNCIL SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED THAT.
AND THEN BACK IN 2023, STAFF TOOK AN ITEM FORWARD TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION TO TRANSITION FROM SITE PLAN ZONING TO PLANT DEVELOPMENT, WHICH IS THE PLANT DEVELOPMENT ZONING THAT WE'RE RECOMMENDING, EXTENDING TO THE OTHER PORTIONS OF THE PROPERTY.
AGAIN, THIS IS JUST A HIGHLIGHT OF THE LAND IN QUESTION.
IT'S AN EMPLOYMENT GROWTH CENTER AREA IN THE CITY ON THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
WE NOTIFIED THOSE OWNERS OF THOSE TRACTS THAT YOU HAVE ON THE SCREEN.
THEY WERE ALL WITHIN 300FT OF THE SUBJECT SITE AND DID THE CUSTOMARY NOTICES IN THE NEWSPAPER.
AS FAR AS POSTING SIGNS ON THE PROPERTY AS WELL.
ANY QUESTIONS? I WANT TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:44.
IS ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? THEN I WILL CLOSE IT AT FIVE 44.5.
IS THERE A MOTION? I HAVE A MOTION BY ALEXA.
A SECOND BY VICTORIA. PLEASE VOTE.
I'M SORRY. CAN YOU STATE WHAT THE MOTION IS? ARE YOU TO APPROVE OR DENY? MOTION TO APPROVE. THANK YOU.
I'M SORRY. SO I'VE HAD A MOTION BY ALEXA AND A SECOND BY VICTORIA.
UNANIMOUS. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 6B3608 SOUTH BURLESON BOULEVARD.
TONIGHT'S TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE FOR A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST FROM A AGRICULTURE TO C COMMERCIAL FOR ALL OF LOT FIVE SPRING VALLEY EDITION.
THIS IS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST AND FINAL READING.
THE STAFF PRESENTED THIS EVENING IS TONY MCELWAIN.
MAYOR, COUNCIL THIS IS YOUR SECOND ZONING ITEM FOR THE EVENING.
MR. SMELTZER IS THE APPLICANT FOR PROPERTY OWNED BY MR. BILLY MEYERS. STAFF HAS BEEN WORKING WITH THEM FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW TO WORK SOME LAND USE CONDITIONS AND PERMITTING APPROVAL TO ALLOW THEM SOME FLEXIBILITY AS THEY FILL UP SOME OF THE LEASABLE AREA ON THE SITE.
AGAIN, JUST LIKE THE PREVIOUS CASE, THIS IS IN THE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH CENTER AREA OF THE CITY.
WE NOTIFIED INDIVIDUALS WITHIN THE 300-FOOT BOUNDARY OF THE SITE, POSTED SIGNS ON THE PAPER AND AT OUR PUBLIC NOTICE IN THE NEWSPAPER RECEIVED NO FORMAL OPPOSITION TO THE REQUEST. THIS WENT FORWARD TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AND AFTER THEIR DELIBERATION, THEY RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL ZONING FOR THE SITE.
[00:15:01]
STAFF ALSO SUPPORTS THIS REQUEST.WITH THAT, I'LL ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE PRIOR TO YOU OPENING THE PUBLIC HEARING.
COUNCIL. ANY QUESTIONS? JUST CURIOUS, BUT DID HE HAVE A RESPONSE TO THE QUESTION THAT A P&Z MEMBER ASKED AS FAR AS WHAT WE CAN? I'M JUST CURIOUS. I KNOW IT WAS PUT THERE AT ONE POINT IN TIME.
HE'S HERE, SO I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO TAKE THE TIME TO ANSWER THE QUESTION, SIR.
ROGER SCHMELZER, VISION COMMERCIAL.
THE BUYER ACTUALLY OWNS A SIGN BUSINESS CALLED VITAL SIGNS.
HE'LL OCCUPY ABOUT 33% OF THE BUILDING.
WE HAVE A BACK TENANT WHO IS A LAWN MAINTENANCE PERSON.
WE HAD A SMALL DAY SCHOOL OPERATOR THAT WAS LOOKING AT THE FRONT THAT CHOSE NOT TO, BUT JUST KIND OF ANCILLARY C CLASS TYPE OR C BUSINESSES. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:47.
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? AND THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:48.
IS THERE A MOTION? I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM SIX B.
I GOT A MOTION BY PHIL AND A SECOND BY LARRY.
PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.
THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 6C619, NORTHWEST RENFRO BOULEVARD.
THIS IS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST AND FINAL READING.
THE STAFF PRESENTER IS ONCE AGAIN TONY MCILWAIN, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
THE BEST THAT WE CAN SEE IS THAT SOMETIME IN APPROXIMATELY 1997, HER PROPERTY, WHICH WAS PREVIOUSLY ZONED SF SEVEN, WAS ZONED GENERAL RETAIL.
WE CAN'T FIND SPECIFIC CASE INFORMATION, BUT THAT'S WHEN THE TRAIL GOES COLD.
WE'RE TRYING TO WORK WITH HER TO GET THE ZONING BACK TO RESIDENTIAL.
THAT'S WHAT SHE HAS BEEN USING IT FOR IN THE TIME THAT SHE'S BEEN LIVING THERE.
SO, MISS PERKINS HAS BEEN ON THE PROPERTY UTILIZING IT SINCE 1974.
SO, SHE'S BEEN A NEIGHBOR IN ALL THAT TIME AND HAS UTILIZED IT JUST FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
WE TOOK IT TO THE PLANNING ZONING COMMISSION, RECOMMENDED YOU KNOW, UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
STAFF ALSO IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST.
AND SEE IF WE CAN HELP MISS PERKINS GET THE ZONING RECTIFIED.
ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
AND I WAS LIKE, NO, IT'S ZONED THAT.
AND THEN I READ IN YOUR NOTES LIKE THE IT WAS JUST LIKE IT HAPPENED AND IT'S BEEN COLD EVER SINCE, SO.
YEAH, WE THINK IT WAS A COMPREHENSIVE MAP UPDATE AS NEAR AS WE CAN FIGURE, BUT WE DON'T HAVE ANYONE.
WE MAY HAVE A COUPLE OF STAFFERS FROM 1997, BUT THEIR MEMORY IS A LITTLE FUZZY ON THIS ITEM, SO.
I'M SURE SHE WOULD JUST APPRECIATE IT BEING CLEARED UP.
I'M GOING TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:50.
IS THERE ANYONE IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? THANK YOU FOR LISTENING. MY NAME IS RICK PERKINS.
HIT YOUR, HIT YOUR MIC, YOUR BUTTON DOWN ON THE ON THE CONSOLE.
IDA IS MY MOTHER LIVED HERE, GREW UP HERE UNDER COACH ANDERSON.
WENT OFF FIGHTING FIRES IN 2000 AND JUST GOT BACK AND TAKING CARE OF MOM, AND WE FOUND THIS.
[00:20:03]
I CAN TELL YOU, MY DAD PASSED AWAY IN 2011, BUT WITHOUT KNOWING IF HE DID, I DON'T.I KNOW OF NOT ANY REASON WHY HE WOULD HAVE DONE THAT.
IT'S ALWAYS BEEN WHERE WE LIVE.
SO THAT'S I JUST WANTED TO SAY THANK YOU FOR THIS CONSIDERATION AND HELPING HER OUT ON THAT.
I KNOW IT'S EXPENSIVE TO TRY TO DO IT FOR HER, SO THANK YOU FOR THAT.
YES, SIR. IS THERE A MOTION ON SEVEN C.
OH, I'M SORRY, I GOT TO CLOSE THE.
I GOT I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 5:51.
I HAVE A MOTION BY VICTORIA, A SECOND BY ALEXA.
THAT BRINGS US TO SIX D, COWBOY EXPRESS CAR WASH AT 236 LOYAL STREET.
CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 63, SIGN REGULATIONS RELATED TO THE HEIGHT OF A MONUMENT SIGN WITHOUT MASONRY WRAPPING, ALLOWING FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A MONUMENT SIGN THAT IS APPROXIMATELY 18FT IN HEIGHT WITH METAL WRAPPING.
STAFF PRESENTER IS TONY MCELWAIN, ONCE AGAIN DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
MR. PURCELLI IS PETITIONING YOU TO REQUEST A VARIANCE FOR THE HEIGHT AND MASONRY WRAPPING REQUIREMENTS FOR A SIGN THAT HE WOULD LIKE TO PLACE AT HIS BUSINESS.
WE IDENTIFIED THE NEED FOR THE VARIANCE IN OUR REVIEW OF A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN, AND WE WENT AND WE ISSUED THE APPLICABLE BUILDING PERMITS AT THAT TIME.
A MONUMENT SIGN WAS NOT CONTEMPLATED.
NOW THAT THE BUSINESS IS OPERATING, OF COURSE, MR. PURCELLI WOULD LIKE TO INSTALL A SIGN AND HAS SUBMITTED A PERMIT.
GO TO THE NEXT ADVANCE TO THE NEXT PICTURE.
SO THIS IS THE PROPOSED COWBOY EXPRESS CAR WASH.
AND ALSO WE'VE GOT A MASONRY WRAPPING REQUIREMENT THAT'S IN SECTION 63-54 F OF THE CODE.
AND THEN WE HAVE A 100 EXCUSE ME.
SO IT'S TO ALLOW FOR A GOOD MIXTURE OF THE USE OF THE MATERIAL ON THE SITE.
SO I'LL JUST PAUSE HERE JUST TO GIVE YOU SOME OPPORTUNITY TO LOOK AT IT AND TAKE A LOOK AT THE DIMENSIONS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED WITH THE VARIANCE REQUEST.
THERE ARE SEVERAL CONSIDERATIONS THAT YOU WOULD NEED TO EVALUATE WHEN APPROVING A SIGN VARIANCE.
I HAVE THOSE LISTED ON THE SCREEN.
I'VE GONE THROUGH THIS ANY NUMBER OF TIMES WITH YOU ALL THAT HAVE BEEN ON THE COUNCIL FOR A WHILE.
IN OUR REVIEW OF THE CASE STAFF HAD NO ISSUE WITH THE VARIANCE FOR THE WRAPPING STAFF, COULD NOT SUPPORT THE DOUBLING OF THE HEIGHT AND OUR REVIEW AND DELIBERATION.
FROM A PLANNING STANDPOINT, THAT'S A 100% VARIANCE.
ESSENTIALLY, YOU'RE LOOKING TO EXCEED THE HEIGHT OF THE ALLOWABLE USE BY ESSENTIALLY DOUBLING IT.
WE IN OUR DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY MANAGER LOOKED AT PREVIOUS CASES OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS TO SEE IF THERE WAS SOME CONSISTENCY IN OUR RECOMMENDATIONS.
WE HAD TWO CASES COME BEFORE YOU.
THE SAME RETAILER REQUESTED A SIGN VARIANCE.
THAT BEING SAID, YOU ARE THE BODY THAT HAS THE AUTHORITY TO WAIVE ANY REQUIREMENT THAT YOU WANT.
[00:25:02]
I WILL SAY THAT IF IT IS YOUR DETERMINATION TO APPROVE THE VARIANCE, THIS IS NOT A ZONING CODE.SO THE VARIANCE DOES NOT RUN WITH THE LAND.
IF THAT SIGN COMES DOWN OR IS OTHERWISE ALTERED, THAT VARIANCE GOES AWAY.
SO I JUST WANT TO MAKE YOU AWARE OF THAT.
IN THE CASE THAT IT IS YOUR DECISION TO APPROVE IT.
WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE OF THE STAFF.
I DON'T KNOW IF MR. PACELLI IS. MR. PACELLI IS AN AUDIENCE.
HE'S. I'M SURE, AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE REGARDING THE SIGN.
I'M ASSUMING THIS THIS SIGN IS NOT IN THE WAY OF ADDING THE LANES TO THE.
IT'S ALREADY BEEN WORKED WITH ON TXDOT AS FAR AS ADDING LANES.
YEAH. I'M UNAWARE OF ANY DISCUSSIONS HE'S HAD WITH TXDOT AS FAR AS BEING ANY KIND OF IMPEDIMENT.
HE CAN PROBABLY DO A BETTER JOB OF ANSWERING IT THAN I CAN.
OKAY. WE WENT THROUGH A TAX CUT AND IT WAS ORIGINALLY IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, BUT WE CHANGED THE PLANS AND WE MOVED IT IN.
THAT REFLECTED ON THOSE ARE PLANS.
SO, THERE IS NO ISSUE ANYMORE WITH THE OKAY IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
ALL RIGHT. DID. DID YOU HEAR IT FIRST? SAY IT AGAIN, JAMIE. IT WAS IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
I'M THE GENERAL MANAGER, JASCO, JOHNNY.
YOU ALL BROUGHT THAT TO OUR ATTENTION.
AND TXDOT SAID, WELL, IT'S NO LONGER IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, SO WE HAVE NO SAY SO.
SO TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, IT IS OUT OF THAT TXDOT RIGHT OF WAY.
GOOD DEAL. IS THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTION.
BUT THIS IS NOT GOING TO STAND OUT CONSIDERING ITS SURROUNDINGS.
I DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH IT.
I DON'T EITHER. ANYBODY ELSE? IS THERE A REASON YOU'RE WANTING IT TO BE DOUBLE THE SIZE? THAT IS TO BE SEEN.
BUT ANYONE THAT'S OVER THERE GETTING GAS AT THE QT.
YES, MA'AM OR THE 7-ELEVEN? YES. IT IS EXPOSURE.
I MEAN, TO EXPLAIN THE FINISH ON IT.
AND IT DOES HAVE A BLACK METAL CAP ALL AROUND THE TOP OF THE BUILDING.
YES, MA'AM. ANYBODY ELSE? I'VE GOT A SMALL ISSUE WITH IT, WITH THE VARIANCES.
BECAUSE OF THE QUANTITY OF VARIANCES, IT'S 100% OF THE SIGN VARIANCE WITH THE HEIGHT AND THE WRAP.
BUT I CAN UNDERSTAND NEEDING THE HEIGHT OF THE SIGN, WHERE IT'S AT AND THE OTHER BUSINESSES AROUND THERE, SOME OF THEM HAVE BEEN AROUND A WHILE, SOME OF THEM ARE NEWER, AND I DROVE BY THERE EVERY DAY.
I LIVE IN THAT AREA AND I SEE THE POLE SIGNS AND THEY'VE NEVER BOTHERED ME.
BUT AS FAR AS A POLICY, IT DOESN'T MEET ANY OF THE STANDARDS AND THAT WOULD BE THE REASON I WOULD HAVE SOME ISSUES WITH IT AT THIS TIME. SO YOU'RE KIND OF TELLING US THAT THE DESIGN OF THE SIGN IS USING THE SAME MATERIALS, BASICALLY AS THE STRUCTURE ITSELF? IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT.
SO, MASONRY PROBABLY WOULDN'T MEET THE THEME ON THIS.
I MEAN, IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT I'M GOING TO LOSE SLEEP OVER AND IT'S GOING TO LOOK NICE.
THEY'VE ALREADY PROVEN THE FACT THAT THEY BUILT A NICE-LOOKING FACILITY.
IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS? I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE TO APPROVE IT.
I NEED A SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN. A SECOND BY ALEXA.
[00:30:05]
THANK YOU. THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM SIX E UNCHAINED SALON AND BOUTIQUE AT 201 WEST BUFORD STREET, CASE 20 4-159. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR A VARIANCE TO CHAPTER 63.SIGN REGULATIONS RELATED TO THE NUMBER OF CHANNEL LETTERS SIGNS PER ELEVATION, ALLOWING FOR AN ADDITION OF ONE CHANNEL LETTER SIGN FOR A TOTAL OF TWO ON THE NORTH BUILDING ELEVATION.
THE STAFF PRESENTER IS ONCE AGAIN TONY MCELWAIN, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
IT'S THE SECOND SIGN VARIANCE COUNCIL.
SO, THIS IS TO ALLOW FOR TWO CHANNEL LETTER SIGNS ON ONE ELEVATION OF A BUILDING HERE IN OLD TOWN TO A ONE WEST BEAUFORT STREET WITH TREY SPILLERS AS THE APPLICANT.
SO, YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THIS LOCATION AND THEY SUBMITTED FOR SIGN PERMITS, AND THERE'S A SALON AND SPA THAT OCCUPY THE SITE.
SO, SEVERAL YEARS AGO, CITIES LOST THEIR ABILITY TO REGULATE SIGNS BASED ON CONTENT.
SO, THEY BROKE UP THE NAME OF THE ESTABLISHMENT, BUT IT'S TWO SIGNS BEING PLACED.
SO, YOU'RE PROBABLY WONDERING WHY DO YOU NEED A VARIANCE? IT'S THE SAME BUSINESS, IT'S JUST THE PLACEMENT OF THE SIGNS.
SO THAT'S WHAT IS BEING PROPOSED.
AGAIN, THESE ARE YOUR CONSIDERATIONS WITH REGARD TO SIGN VARIANCES.
WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF THE VARIANCE IN THIS PARTICULAR CASE.
WE NOTE THAT IT'S A LITTLE UNUSUAL BECAUSE IT'S ALL ONE BUSINESS.
IT'S NOT TWO BUSINESSES, BUT IT'S JUST THE NOTION THAT THE SIZE OF THE LETTERS LENDS ITSELF TO BEING SOMETHING THAT'S STRETCHED OUT ACROSS THE FULL ELEVATION OF THE BUILDING. SO, OUR STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS PARTICULAR VARIANCE.
ANY QUESTIONS? IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS? SECOND. HAVE A MOTION BY VICTORIA.
AT THIS TIME, WE DO HAVE A NEED TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.
SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 5.51 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION IN THE CITY COUNCIL WORK ROOM IN CITY HALL TO CONDUCT TO CONDUCT A CLOSED MEETING IN C PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.071.
IS THERE A MOTION TO GO INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION? SO MOVED.
WE'RE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:05.
IS THERE A MOTION TO RECONVENE? MOTION. SECOND.
PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. WE'RE BACK IN SESSION AT 6:17.
THAT BRINGS US BACK TO SECTION SEVEN GENERAL.
[7.A.Consider approval of a resolution granting consent to the creation of the Southland Farm Municipal Utility District No. 2 of Johnson County in the city of Burleson extraterritorial jurisdiction, subject to various terms and conditions. (Staff Contact: Tony McIlwain, Development Services Director)]
SEVEN A IS TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT TO THE CREATION OF SOUTHLAND FARM MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER TWO OF JOHNSON COUNTY IN THE CITY OF BURLESON EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION, SUBJECT TO VARIOUS TERMS AND CONDITIONS.THE STAFF PRESENTER IS TONY MCELWAIN, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR.
[00:35:02]
THANK YOU, MISS CAMPOS.SOUTHERN FARM MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT NUMBER TWO OF JOHNSON COUNTY SUBMITTED A PETITION FOR THE CONSENT OF THE CREATION OF A MUD. WE RECEIVED THAT ON MAY 29TH.
AND THEN THERE WAS A SUBSEQUENT MEETING WHERE WE HAD MORE CITY STAFF TO FURTHER GET INFORMATION, AT OUR REQUEST, THAT THEY WERE KIND ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE US ON REGARDING THE PROPOSAL WE'VE GOT ON THE SCREEN A LOCATION MAP WHERE WE'VE GOT A GREEN STAR THAT GIVES YOU SOME IDEA OF WHERE THIS LOCATION IS, BUT IT'S ADDRESSED AS 8113.
LONG STORY SHORT, THIS IS WEST OF THE TOLL ROAD TO ORIENT YOU TO THE LOCATION OF THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED SITE FOR THE MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT SITS WEST OF THE TOLLWAY.
IT'S NOT ADJACENT TO CITY LIMITS.
SO THE DEVELOPER WAS KIND ENOUGH TO PROVIDE CITY STAFF WITH SOME INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROPOSAL.
SOUTHARD FARMS IS PROPOSED TO CONSIST OF APPROXIMATELY 284 ACRES.
BASED ON THIS PETITION, 13 TO 1400 LOTS, ALL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL, WITH THE APPROXIMATE LOT WIDTH RANGING FROM 40 TO 60FT WIDE.
EXCUSE ME? IN ABOUT A THIRD OF THE SITE IS GOING TO BE DEDICATED TO ROADWAYS AND EASEMENTS.
THE MUD WILL PROVIDE A PRIVATE WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY TO TREAT ITS WATER, AND JOHNSON COUNTY, SUD WILL BE THE WATER PROVIDER IN THIS AREA.
THIS IS JUST A CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT TO GIVE YOU SOME IDEA OF THE ORIENTATION OF THE ROADS, WITH 1014 BEING THE ROAD ORIENTED TOWARD THE SOUTH OF THE SITE.
THE AREA THAT YOU SEE NORTH FAR NORTH IS ACTUALLY OUTSIDE OF THE CITY'S ETJ.
SO, THEY'VE CROPPED IT AT THAT LOCATION, BUT THAT'S OUTSIDE OF OUR PURVIEW.
BUT YOU SEE THAT WE'VE GOT OPEN SPACE, DETENTION AMENITIES AREA AND THEN TWO ADDITIONAL OPEN SPACE COMPONENTS TO THE NORTH, AS WELL AS AN ADDITIONAL DETENTION AREA TO TREAT WATER RUNOFF.
STATUTORILY, WE HAVE 90 DAYS IN WHICH TO TAKE SOME FORM OF ACTION.
THE CITY CANNOT REQUIRE ANNEXATION AS A CONDITION OF CONSENTING TO A MUD.
THE PROJECT CAN OCCUR AND REMAIN OUTSIDE OF OUR CORPORATE LIMITS.
AND IF THAT HAPPENS, THE DEVELOPMENT WOULD BE EVALUATED AND REVIEWED LIKE ANY OTHER ETJ SUBDIVISION.
YOUR OPTIONS TONIGHT ARE YOU CAN EITHER APPROVE THE PETITION OR CONSENT TO THE PETITION.
THERE'S A THIRD ACTION THAT YOU CAN TAKE, WHICH IS NO ACTION REGARDING THE FARM PETITION.
THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION.
COUNCIL I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE? I BELIEVE THE DEVELOPMENT TEAM IS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OF THEM.
I'D LIKE TO SUGGEST LET'S TAKE NO ACTION ON THIS RIGHT NOW WITH THE COUNCIL.
IS HEARING CONSIDERATION ON THIS? NO. NO ACTION.
YOU GOOD WITH THAT. WE'RE GOING TO TAKE NO ACTION ON THIS RIGHT NOW, TONY.
OKAY. WELL, JUST BY WAY OF PROCEDURALLY, THERE'S STILL AN AVENUE FOR THE APPLICANT, THE DEVELOPER, TO CONTINUE DOWN THE PATH WITH THE CREATION OF THE MUD. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THE COUNCIL IS AWARE OF THAT.
[7.B.Hold a public hearing and consider approval of an ordinance approving the 2024-25 annual Service and Assessment Plan (SAP) update for the Parks at Panchasarp Farms Public Improvement District No. JC-1; making a finding of special benefit to the property in phase #3 of the district; levying special assessments against the property within phase #3 of the district and establishing a lien on the property; providing for payment of the assessments in accordance with Chapter 372, Texas Local Government Code, as amended; providing for the method of assessment and the payment of assessments; providing for penalties and interest on delinquent assessments; providing for severability; and providing an effective date. (Final Reading) (Staff Contact: Tony McIlwain, Development Services Director)]
SEVEN B IS TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE 20 2425 ANNUAL SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN UPDATE FOR[00:40:04]
THE PARKS AT PANTHER SHARP FARM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NUMBER JC-1.TONY MCELWAIN, DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.
MY LAST ITEM, WE'RE GOING BACK TO THE REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAM.
SO THIS IS THE SECOND PUBLIC HEARING FOR PANTRY FARMS. I WILL GO THROUGH THIS AT A BRISK PACE BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT YOU ALL HAVE SEEN IT BEFORE, AND YOU'RE PROBABLY A LITTLE TIRED OF MY PRESENTING TONIGHT.
SO JUST BY WAY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS IN ATTENDANCE TONIGHT CHAPTER 372 OF THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE ESTABLISHES THE LEGISLATION FOR THE CREATION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT DISTRICTS. THEY'RE ALLOWED TO DO ANY NUMBER OF THINGS TO INCLUDE THOSE BULLETED ACTIONS AND ITEMS ON THE ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS IS TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER THE ORDINANCE CONSIDERATION OF 11 ASSESSMENT AND AUTHORIZING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BY WAY OF A REFRESHER.
PANTRY SHARP FARMS IS 220.88 ACRES, 659 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, 250 MULTIFAMILY UNITS.
SO, I WILL GO THROUGH THIS VERY BRISKLY.
BUT BY WAY OF HISTORY, YOU INITIALLY APPROVED THE SERVICE AND ASSESSMENT PLAN FEBRUARY 3RD OF 2020.
THESE ARE THE ACTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN UNDERTAKEN SINCE THAT PERIOD OF TIME.
I THINK YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT.
THIS IS THE PERCENTAGE OF BUDGETED COST THAT MR. [INAUDIBLE] HAS SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE FIRST THREE PHASES OF HIS DEVELOPMENT, WITH THIS MOST RECENT PHASE OF ACCUMULATING 20.58% OF THE BUDGETED COST OF PARK IMPROVEMENTS. AND THIS TABLE JUST BREAKS THAT OUT AND GIVES YOU A DOLLAR AMOUNT THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT COUNCIL IN PHASES ONE AND TWO.
AND THEN FINALLY PHASE THREE TOTAL COST UPWARDS OF $2.9 MILLION.
AND THE SHARE OF PHASE THREE COST IS OVER $603,000.
THE PROPOSAL IS STILL IN LINE WITH THE CITY'S PID POLICY.
PLUS, THE PID RATE IS STILL LESS THAN THE HIGHEST TAX RATE THAT WE HAVE IN THE CITY.
AND SO THAT CHART GIVES YOU A BREAKDOWN OF HOW THAT WORKS.
AND I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE.
ANYBODY? I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:26.
IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK ON THIS? THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:27.
I GUESS WE'RE READY FOR A MOTION.
IS ANYBODY READY? YOU GOT AN ISSUE.
I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.
I GOT A MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY ALEXA.
PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.
THAT BRINGS US TO SEVEN C THIS EVENING.
[7.C.Consider and adopt an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of City of Burleson, Texas General Obligation Refunding and Improvement Bonds, Series 2024; levying an annual ad valorem tax and providing for the security for and payment of said bonds; approving the official statement; providing an effective date; and enacting other provisions relating to the subject. (First and Final Reading) (Staff Contact: Harlan Jefferson, Deputy City Manager) ]
WHAT I WILL DO IS CALL FORWARD ITEM SEVEN C AND SEVEN D FOR ONE PRESENTATION.HOWEVER, AT THE END WE WILL NEED TWO SEPARATE MOTIONS ON SEVEN C AND AN INDIVIDUAL MOTION FOR 7D.
7 C IS TO CONSIDER AND ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF CITY OF BURLESON, TEXAS GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2024, LEVYING AN ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR AND PAYMENT OF SAID BONDS.
[00:45:07]
APPROVING THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND ENACTING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT.[7.D.Consider and adopt an ordinance authorizing the issuance and sale of City of Burleson, Texas, Combination Tax and Limited Surplus Revenue Certificates of Obligation, Series 2024; levying an annual ad valorem tax and providing for the security for and payment of said certificates; approving the official statement; providing an effective date; and enacting other provisions relating to the subject. (First and Final Reading) (Staff Contact: Harlan Jefferson, Deputy City Manager) ]
TEXAS COMBINATION TAX AND LIMITED SURPLUS REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SERIES 2024.LEVYING AN AD VALOREM TAX AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR AND PAYMENT OF SAID CERTIFICATES.
THIS IS ALSO BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST AND FINAL READING.
TONIGHT STAFF PRESENTER IS HARLAN JEFFERSON, OUR DEPUTY CITY MANAGER.
GOOD EVENING. MAYOR, MEMBERS OF THE COUNCIL.
IN ADDITION TO THE NORMAL STAFF THAT ARE HERE TO HELP ME RESPOND TO QUESTIONS, WE ALSO HAVE SOME SPECIAL GUESTS WITH OUR BOND COUNSEL, MCCALL PARKHURST AND HORTON. WE HAVE SAM GILL AS WELL AS COOPER ANDERSON.
IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE HAVE MARTY SCHUH WITH OUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR, HILLTOP SECURITIES.
YOU GUYS HAVE MET MARTY BEFORE? MARTY IS GOING TO PRESENT THE SECOND HALF OF THE PRESENTATION.
THESE BONDS ARE SOME OF THE ITEMS THAT WERE APPROVED IN THE MAY 2022 GENERAL BOND ELECTION.
THE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATIONS FOR 2024 WERE NOT TO EXCEED $39 MILLION.
THEY COVER TAX SUPPORTED DEBT FOR THE GENERAL FUND, AS WELL AS 4 A, 4 B AND TIF2 OBLIGATIONS, AND WE HAVE THE LIST FOR EACH CATEGORY IN FRONT OF YOU.
AND I'LL REMIND YOU, WE'VE DECIDED TO GO WITH A STRATEGY TO DELAY UTILITY OF CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION FOR ONE YEAR AFTER THE REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION.
SO THAT'S WHY THEY'RE NOT INCLUDED.
WITH REGARD TO THE REFUNDING, WE LOOKED AT THE LAST ESTIMATES FROM JULY OF THIS YEAR AND WE THOUGHT THE SAVINGS AT THAT TIME WOULD BE $697,000 OVER A TEN YEAR PERIOD, ABOUT 70,000 A YEAR, WITH A PRESENT VALUE OF SAVINGS OF 4.39%.
THE CITY HAS BEEN LOOKING AT THIS REFUNDING OPPORTUNITY FOR AT LEAST A YEAR, OF SEPTEMBER OF LAST YEAR, WE LOOKED AT THE SAVINGS AND IT WAS OVER 900,000 OVER A TEN YEAR PERIOD, WITH THE PRESENT VALUE OF SAVINGS OF OVER 5%.
AND BY NOVEMBER, WE SAW A LITTLE RALLY UP TO $569,000 SAVINGS.
AND WE SET THIS MONTH AS THE TIME TO LOOK AT THE REFINANCING, THE ORDINANCE FOR THE CO AND GOS.
THEY COVER ITEMS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN A REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTIONS BACK IN OCTOBER OF 23, NOVEMBER 23RD AND APRIL OF THIS YEAR. AND YOU ALSO HAD INCLUDED A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL THE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION RESOLUTION THAT WAS APPROVED ON JUNE 17TH OF THIS YEAR, PROVIDING 45 DAYS NOTICE.
THIS IS A LIST OF THE TOP BOND RATINGS FROM THE THREE MAJOR TWO OF THE THREE MAJOR BOND RATING AGENCIES MOODY'S AND STANDARD AND POOR'S. WE HAVE THE THIRD HIGHEST RATING WITH THE AA 2 FOR MOODY'S AND A AA FOR STANDARD AND POOR'S.
SO, WE'RE JUST A COUPLE OF STEPS FROM THE HIGHEST RATINGS OVERALL ACROSS THE NATION WHEN THE TOP 5% AND IN TEXAS WHEN THE TOP 6% THAT RATING.
HERE'S THE HISTORY OVER TEN YEARS.
ON THE RIGHT COLUMN, YOU'LL SEE WE RECEIVED THE UPGRADE FOR MOODY'S IN 2022.
AND WE HADN'T RECEIVED AN UPGRADE FROM S&P IN OVER TEN YEARS.
SO THAT'S THE FIRM THAT PROBABLY GIVE US OUR NEXT BOND RATING UPGRADE.
[00:50:07]
FINANCIAL POSITION, PLANNING FOR THE FUTURE.AND THEN AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY PENSION LIABILITY ISSUES THAT WE HAVE TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT.
THIS IS A LIST OF THE ACTUAL CIP ITEMS THAT TIED TO THE BOND ISSUE.
SO GOES WITHOUT THE REFUNDING WAS A LITTLE OVER $6 MILLION.
AND FOR THE GENERAL GOVERNMENT SIDE, 9.4 MILLION FOR COS.
I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT WE DID HAVE SOME ITEMS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTIONS IN 2023 THAT WE DIDN'T ISSUE DEBT FOR, SO THAT'S WHY WE SHOWED TWO COLUMNS HERE. WE'RE INCLUDING ITEMS THAT WERE INCLUDED IN REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTIONS IN BOTH YEARS.
SO THE TOTAL IS 11.6 MILLION 4A AND 4B IS THE SAME SITUATION.
AND THEN TIF TWO IS JUST HALF $1 MILLION FOR WARRANT PARKING LOT.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, MARTY SCHUH WITH HILLTOP SECURITIES.
WE REPRESENT THE CITY AS YOUR FINANCIAL ADVISOR.
FOR A SECOND THERE, I THOUGHT MR. JEFFERSON WAS GOING TO STEAL MY THUNDER.
SO I'M REALLY HAPPY I GET TO PRESENT THE GOOD STUFF.
YOUR BONDS WERE SOLD THROUGH A COMPETITIVE SALE, AND WHAT THAT MEANS IS THEY WERE PUT OUT ON THE OPEN MARKET, AND ANY AND ALL UNDERWRITERS WERE INVITED TO SUBMIT A BID FOR THE RIGHT TO PURCHASE AND SELL YOUR BONDS TO THE PUBLIC.
THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT WAYS YOU CAN CONDUCT A COMPETITIVE SALE.
ONE IS TO DO A SEALED BID PLATFORM WHERE ALL OF YOUR PARTICIPANTS SUBMIT A BID.
AND THE DIFFERENCE IS THAT YOUR VARIOUS PARTICIPANTS, THEY ALL SUBMIT THEIR BIDS AND THEY CAN'T SEE THE OTHER BIDS, BUT THEY CAN TELL WHETHER OR NOT THEY'RE IN THE LEAD OR FIRST POSITION.
SO IT'S MORE OF A FUN KIND OF SALE BECAUSE IT CREATES A LITTLE BIT OF AN AUCTION OR BIDDING WAR THAT YOU SEE A FLURRY OF ACTIVITY WHERE YOUR PARTICIPANTS ARE ACTIVELY BIDDING TO KEEP IMPROVING THEIR RATES.
SO WE PREPARED THE SALE BOOKLETS IN FRONT OF YOU.
I'M GOING TO START WITH THE CO FIRST, WHICH IS ACTUALLY BEHIND TAB TWO.
THE VERY FIRST PAGE 2A IS YOUR RESULTS OF YOUR COS.
YOU HAD SEVEN DIFFERENT PARTICIPANTS OR FIRMS BIDDING.
AND JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA, WE LIKE TO SEE A MINIMUM OF THREE FIRMS FOR PARTICIPATION.
THAT'S WHAT WE WOULD CONSIDER A SUCCESSFUL SALE.
AND THEN IN ADDITION TO THAT, WE SAW BECAUSE OF THE AUCTION PLATFORM, 24 IMPROVEMENTS TO THEIR BIDS.
SO WE ARE VERY PLEASED WITH THESE RESULTS.
AFTER THEY WERE WORKING SO HARD TO GET INTO YOUR FIRST PLACE.
BOK FINANCIAL WAS CROWNED THE WINNER WITH A PROPOSED TRUE INTEREST COST OF 3.79%.
AND BEHIND THE BID RESULTS, WE HAVE INCLUDED THE FULL SET OF THE FINAL NUMBERS FOR YOU, SO YOU CAN SEE WHAT THAT INTEREST RATE TRANSLATES TO IN DOLLARS OVER THE LIFE OF THE BONDS. I'M JUST GOING TO FAST FORWARD HERE.
YOU HAD IN THIS TRANSACTION YOU HAD SIX DIFFERENT PARTICIPANTS.
AND WE SAW A TOTAL IMPROVEMENT OF 16 DIFFERENT BIDS.
KEYBANK CAME IN WITH THE LOWEST PROPOSED TRUE INTEREST COST OF A 3.44%.
THE REASON FOR THE DIFFERENCE IN THE RATES.
NORMALLY GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS AND CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SELL AT COMPARABLE RATES.
THE ONLY REASON WHY YOU'RE SEEING A DIFFERENCE THERE IS BECAUSE THE REFUNDING COMPONENT OF THE GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, BECAUSE THOSE REFUNDING BONDS ARE AMORTIZED SHORTER, IT CREATED A SHORTER OVERALL AVERAGE LIFE OF THE MATURITY OF THE BONDS.
THEREFORE, THE RATE WAS SLIGHTLY LOWER.
BUT YOUR REFUNDING REALLY DID BENEFIT FROM THE REDUCTION IN RATE.
[00:55:03]
AND THAT'S THE EXCITING NEWS BECAUSE WE JUST HEARD ABOUT HOW IT BOUNCED ALL OVER THE PLACE.YOUR FINAL SAVINGS IS JUST OVER $1,071,502.
YOUR POLICY IS A LITTLE BIT GREATER THAN THAT.
SO AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU'RE WELL ABOVE THAT.
SO THIS IS YOUR ACTUAL SAVINGS TO POCKET AFTER ALL EXPENSES OF THE TRANSACTION.
THERE'S BEEN NO EXTENSION OF THE FINAL MATURITY.
THE REFUNDING COMPONENT WAS JUST STRUCTURED TO MIRROR THAT OF THE OLD DEBT.
SO THE NEW DEBT IS JUST REPLACING THE OLD DEBT AT A LOWER INTEREST RATE.
AND SO ALL IN ALL, WE'RE REALLY PLEASED WITH THESE RESULTS.
A VERY LARGE PART OF THAT, AS MR. JEFFERSON ALREADY MENTIONED, WAS, IS LARGELY DUE TO THE STRONG CREDIT RATINGS OF THE CITY AS PART OF THE NORMAL BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS, YOU DO HAVE TO APPLY FOR AND PURCHASE A BOND RATING. BOTH STANDARD AND POOR'S AND MOODY'S CAME IN AND ASKED A LOT OF QUESTIONS.
STAFF HAD TO PROVIDE A LOT OF INFORMATION FOR THEM TO CONDUCT A FULL CREDIT ASSESSMENT ON THE CITY.
THEY DID AFFIRM YOUR RATINGS AT THE AA LEVEL FOR BOTH AGENCIES, AND IT'S VERY SIGNIFICANT.
I KNOW HE ALREADY MENTIONED IT, BUT YOU ARE ONLY TWO NOTCHES AWAY FROM A PERFECT SCORE.
YOU ARE IN A VERY ELITE CATEGORY OF RATINGS, AND WE THINK YOU SHOULD BE VERY PROUD OF THAT.
WE HAVE INCLUDED THE FULL RATING REPORTS BEHIND THE VERY LAST TAB FOR YOU.
I ENCOURAGE YOU TO READ THOSE IN FULL.
AND THIS IS THE FINAL STEP OF THE BOND ISSUANCE PROCESS.
SO BY ACCEPTING OR ADOPTING THE ORDINANCES BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, YOU ARE EFFECTIVELY ACCEPTING THESE BIDS AND LOCKING THESE INTEREST RATES INTO PLACE FOR THE LIFE OF THE BONDS. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MIGHT HAVE.
ARE WE READY? ARE YOU THROUGH, HARLAN? YES. OKAY.
WE HAVE TWO ITEMS. IS THERE A MOTION ON? SEVEN C FIRST.
YEAH. MAYOR, COUNCIL, THERE'S ANOTHER HANDOUT IN FRONT OF YOU.
THERE'S SPECIFIC MOTIONS THAT WE WOULD ASK YOU TO READ INTO THE RECORD THIS EVENING.
YOU GOT IT, DAN. AND TO DO SO I WOULD LIKE TO MOVE ON.
ITEM SEVEN C FOR APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF CITY OF BURLESON TEXAS GENERAL OBLIGATION REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT BONDS SERIES 2024 LEVYING AN ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR AND PAYMENT OF SAID BONDS.
IS THERE A SECOND MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY VICTORIA? PLEASE VOTE.
YEAH, BECAUSE IT'S ALREADY GONE THROUGH.
ALEXA, WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE YES. PASSES UNANIMOUS.
AND ALSO ON 7D, IS THERE A MOTION ON THAT? AGAIN, I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE AND SALE OF CITY OF BURLESON, TEXAS COMBINATION TAX AND LIMITED SURPLUS REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION SERIES 2024, LEVYING AN ANNUAL AD VALOREM TAX AND PROVIDING FOR THE SECURITY FOR AND PAYMENT OF SAID CERTIFICATES, APPROVING THE OFFICIAL STATEMENT, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND ENACTING OTHER PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE SUBJECT.
IS THERE A SECOND? I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN.
A SECOND BY ALEXA. PLEASE VOTE.
SHUT UP! SIRI! GOD ALL MIGHTY. I DON'T KNOW WHAT GOT HER STARTED.
THANK YOU, HARLAN. I GUESS SHE'S ABOUT TO READ ME AN ENTIRE WEBSITE.
[01:00:12]
THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM SEVEN.[7.E.Consider approval of an amendment to Chapter 6 Animal Care and Control, Section 6-16 Animal Shelter Advisory Committee, (c) Number of members; terms, exempting the licensed veterinarian, municipal officer, and daily operations position from term limits. (First Reading) (Staff Contact: Amanda Campos, City Secretary)]
E AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER SIX, ANIMAL CARE CONTROL, SECTION 6-16, ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE.THIS IS THE FIRST READING STAFF CONTACT IS AMANDA CAMPOS, CITY SECRETARY.
GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
I'M HAPPY TO PRESENT THIS ITEM TO THE CITY COUNCIL.
THEY'RE NOT SURPRISED, I HOPE THEY READ MY EMAIL.
SO WHAT ARE WE HOPING TO ACCOMPLISH TONIGHT? I THINK THIS IS JUST OUR FIRST OF SEVERAL ACTIONS THAT WE'LL TAKE CONSIDERING OUR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
SO, THESE ARE REQUIRED POSITIONS ON DIFFERENT BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.
THIS IS JUST THE ONE WE'RE STARTING WITH.
WE'RE STARTING WITH THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
SO WHAT IS THE SOLUTION IN ORDER TO DO THAT? SO ONE OF THE SOLUTIONS IS TO AMEND THE ORDINANCE, PARTICULARLY AMENDING CHAPTER SIX, SECTION 616.
AND IT'S THE TERMS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE FOCUSING ON FOR THIS ACTION.
CURRENTLY, THE TERMS FOR THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOLLOWED THE SAME TERMS AS EVERY OTHER BOARD FOLLOWING CHAPTER TWO, ARTICLE TWO, WHICH LIMITS THEIR TERMS TO THREE, I'M SORRY, TWO, THREE-YEAR TERMS. WHAT WE WOULD PROPOSE WITH THIS AMENDMENT IS TO EXEMPT THESE THREE SPECIFIC BOARD MEMBERS.
SO, THE LICENSED VETERINARIAN, THE MUNICIPAL OFFICER, AND THE PERSON THAT'S IN CHARGE OF DAILY OPERATIONS, THIS WOULD NOT AFFECT ANY OTHER MEMBERS ON ANY OTHER BOARD, NOR ON THE REMAINING MEMBERS OF THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE.
SO WHAT'S THE PROCESS TO GET THIS DONE SO THAT WE CAN GET? SO THE FIRST THING WAS THAT THE COMMITTEE MET THE COMMUNITY AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS COMMITTEE MET ON AUGUST 7TH, AND YOU'LL SEE THE MEMBERS LISTED THERE ON THE SLIDE TO THE RIGHT.
WHEN THEY WERE REVIEWING ALL THE APPOINTMENTS FOR BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS, IT WAS BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION THAT RETAINING A LICENSED VETERINARIAN FOR THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE WAS BECOMING MORE DIFFICULT, GIVEN THE FACT THAT WE HAD THE TERM LIMITS WHEN WE HAD A PERFECTLY QUALIFIED LOCAL VETERINARIAN WHO WAS WILLING TO SERVE BUT HAD TERMED OUT, ACTUALLY, DOCTOR CAMP HAS ACTUALLY SERVED AS THE CHAIR FOR MANY YEARS, VERY KNOWLEDGEABLE, HAS BEEN WITH ON THE ANIMAL SHELTER ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR MANY YEARS. AND SO HE'S SEEN ALL THESE DIFFERENT GROWTHS AND ISSUES THAT HAVE COME UP.
SO THE COMMITTEE, IN REFLECTING THAT SAID, HOW CAN WE BEST DO THAT? AND ONE OF THE WAYS WAS TO DO THIS AND THEY ASKED ME TO BRING THIS FORWARD TO THE FULL COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION.
SO IT IS BEFORE YOU FOR CONSIDERATION ON FIRST READING.
THEN IT WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE.
AND THEN WE CAN LOOK AT APPOINTING A LICENSED VETERINARIAN, BECAUSE WE DID, HOWEVER, JUST RECENTLY LOSE OUR LICENSED VETERINARIAN FOR ATTENDANCE. AND SO AND NO FAULT OF THAT VETERINARIAN, WE UNDERSTAND THAT THEY HAVE A BUSY SCHEDULE AND IT WAS HARD TO COORDINATE ALL THE MEMBERS.
SO. SO I WILL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ITEM.
I GUESS I'M JUST MAKING SIMPLE SIMPLIFY A LOT OF STUFF.
OR YOU NEED DIRECTION OR A VOTE, A MOTION PLEASE SIR, A VOTE.
IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS? I MOVE TO APPROVE.
A SECOND BY ALEXA. PLEASE VOTE.
THANK YOU. I BELIEVE I HAVE THE NEXT ITEM TOO.
[7.F.Consider approval of a minute order electing a councilmember to serve as Mayor Pro Tem for a term of one year. (Staff Contact: Amanda Campos, City Secretary)]
CONSIDER A MINUTE ORDER ELECTING A COUNCIL MEMBER TO SERVE AS MAYOR PRO TEM FOR A TERM OF ONE YEAR.STAFF CONTACT IS AMANDA CAMPOS, CITY SECRETARY.
I HAVE NO POWERPOINT PRESENTATION.
I'M NOT QUITE AS GOOD AS TONY TO HAVE ONE FOR EVERY ITEM I HAVE BEFORE Y'ALL.
[01:05:03]
DAN MCCLENDON.AND SO AT THIS TIME, WHAT I'LL DO IS JUST OPEN IT UP TO THE REST OF THE COUNCIL, IF THERE'S ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS OR IF SOMEBODY WOULD LIKE TO REAFFIRM THE NOMINATION, THAT IS BEFORE YOU CAN DO THAT AT THIS TIME.
IT TAKES FOREVER TO TRAIN HIM.
THAT'S THE PROBLEM I GOT WITH STILL LEARNING.
I'M FOR DAN. I MEAN, HE I'M FOR DAN AND WE ALL ON BOARD ON THAT.
GENUINELY APPRECIATE YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE IN THAT CAPACITY.
THANKS. AND I WILL NEED A MOTION.
IS THERE A MOTION ON THIS? MOTION TO APPROVE.
SECOND. I GOT A MOTION BY ALEXA IN A SECOND BY VICTORIA.
PLEASE VOTE. I HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THIS ONE FOR A MINUTE.
THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION EIGHT REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS.
[8.A.Receive a report and watch a demonstration of a new feature on the city’s website allowing the public to see if their address is eligible to vote in the city election. (Staff Contacts: Monica Solko, Deputy City Secretary and James Grommersch, Chief Technology Officer)]
VOTE IN THE CITY ELECTIONS.THE STAFF CONTACTS ARE MONICA SILKO, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY, AND IT SAYS JAMES.
THIS IS HUGO RODRIGUEZ, THE DEPUTY CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER.
ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
WE COME BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO BRING YOU A NEW AND EXCITING SOLUTION FOR ELECTIONS.
IT'S ELIGIBLE ADDRESSES FOR CITY VOTING.
WE AS A CITY WANT TO CONTINUE TO IMPROVE ELECTIONS.
AND THIS ONE IS OUR FIRST NEW IDEA.
THE CITY SECRETARY'S OFFICE RECOGNIZED AN ONGOING PROBLEM WITH EACH ELECTION, AND REACHED OUT TO OUR IT DEPARTMENT TO SEE IF WE COULD WORK IN PARTNERSHIP TO CREATE A SOLUTION. THIS SOLUTION WILL HELP VOTERS UNSURE OF THEIR ADDRESS IS LOCATED INSIDE THE CITY LIMITS OF BURLESON.
SOMETIMES OUR ETJ LINES ARE HARD TO READ ON A MAP, SO WE WOULD PRINT OUT MAPS DURING OUR ELECTION AND THE ELECTION WORKERS WOULD TRY AND FIGURE OUT IF THEY WERE IN THE CITY LIMITS.
AND THEN IT WAS ALSO CONFUSING WITH ADDRESSES.
BURLESON. MAILING ADDRESSES CAN BE IN THE ETJ, AS WELL AS THE CITY OF FORT WORTH.
UM JOSHUA MAILING ADDRESSES CAN ALSO BE INSIDE THE CITY OF BURLESON.
THIS TOOL IS DESIGNED TO VERIFY ADDRESSES ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IN CITY OF BURLESON ELECTIONS.
THE WEBSITE OFFERS AUTOFILL TOOLS TO ASSIST IN RESIDENTS LOCATING THEIR ADDRESS.
ONCE IT'S SELECTED, IT WILL DISPLAY THE ADDRESS ON THE MAP.
AND WE'VE ALSO CREATED A QR CODE THAT CAN BE USED.
THE RESIDENTS CAN USE IT TO ACCESS DURING OUR POLLING AT OUR POLLING LOCATION.
THIS TOOL DOES NOT LOOK UP VOTER STATUS, SO WE CAN'T TELL IF THEY'RE REGISTERED TO VOTE.
THIS IS JUST SO THAT THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN VOTE IN OUR CITY ELECTIONS.
SO, IT WILL TELL THEM IF THEY ARE IF THEIR ADDRESS IS IN OUR CITY.
SO WE HAVE A LITTLE DEMO FOR Y'ALL COUNCIL.
SO ONCE YOU SCAN THE QR CODE, IT WILL TAKE YOU TO THIS WEBSITE.
AND IF RESIDENTS ARE WONDERING IF THEY'RE REGISTERED, WE ADDED A LINK THAT SAYS AM I REGISTERED? AND IT WILL TAKE THEM STRAIGHT TO THE STATE OF TEXAS WEBSITE TO VERIFY THAT THEY ARE REGISTERED.
SO, THIS IS JUST SIMPLE ENOUGH.
SO WE'RE GOING TO PUT IN OUR LOVELY CITY HALL ADDRESS.
AND IT WILL PUNCH YOU AND IT WILL APPEND YOUR ADDRESS AND SAY, HEY, YOU ARE ELIGIBLE FOR VOTING.
AND THEN IF YOU'RE NOT ELIGIBLE, IT WILL SAY YOU'RE NOT ELIGIBLE.
I'M SORRY. YOU'RE IN THE, YOU'RE OUTSIDE OF THE CITY LIMITS AND YOU CAN'T VOTE FOR CITY ELECTIONS.
I MEAN, WE ARE INUNDATED EVERY TIME IT VOTERS WANT TO VOTE AND THEY WANT TO PARTICIPATE.
[01:10:06]
WHAT COUNTY DO YOU SIT IN, TARRANT OR JOHNSON? SO THE MORE TOOLS AND ACCESSIBILITY WE CAN GIVE PEOPLE TO LOOK UP IF THEY'RE ELIGIBLE AND HELP SMOOTH THINGS FOR THE VOTERS, THE BETTER.SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THE EFFORTS THAT HAVE GONE INTO THIS.
I APPRECIATE BOTH THESE DEPARTMENTS LEADING THIS.
THANK YOU. I THINK THE NEXT STEPS FOR US IS JUST WORKING WITH OUR COMMUNICATIONS DEPARTMENT ON A MARKETING CAMPAIGN TO GET OUR THE QR CODE AND GETTING IT ON OUR SOCIAL MEDIA, THE WEBSITE, OUR NEWSLETTER, MAYBE A HOW TO VIDEO SO THAT THE RESIDENTS CAN ACCESS IT, AS WELL AS GIVE THE WEBSITE LINK TO OUR 311.
I WOULD LIKE TO, AT SOME POINT IN TIME, TAKE A LOOK AT OUR WEBSITE.
I'VE HAD A FEW COMPLAINTS ABOUT IT BEING CUMBERSOME AND HARD TO NAVIGATE, SO THIS IS GREAT.
AND THANK YOU, MONICA AND HUGO.
GREAT JOB. THAT BRINGS US TO 8B.
[8.B.Receive a report, hold a discussion, and provide staff feedback regarding grant funding potential for the FY25 Centennial Park renovation. (Staff Contact: Jen Basham, Director of Parks and Recreation)]
RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND PROVIDE STAFF FEEDBACK REGARDING GRANT FUNDING POTENTIAL FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 25 CENTENNIAL PARK RENOVATIONS.THE STAFF PRESENTED THIS EVENING IS JEN BASHAM, DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION.
MS. BASHAM. GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.
WE ARE EXCITED TO BRING SOMETHING A LITTLE DIFFERENT UP THIS EVENING.
WE HAVE RECEIVED AN AWARD THROUGH GAME TIME FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADD A NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION SITE INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUND TO ONE OF OUR PARKS. SO I'LL JUST GO AHEAD AND JUMP RIGHT IN.
AND THIS IS THE PARK IN THE BACKGROUND.
IT'S ACTUALLY ONE OF OUR ORIGINAL INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUNDS THAT WE HAD.
WE HAD ACTUALLY RECENTLY JUST HAD THEM OUT TO DISCUSS WHAT THE SEVEN PRINCIPLES OF INCLUSIVE DESIGN WERE TO OUR PARK BOARD, AND SO WE CALLED THEM UP AND SAID, HEY, WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO GET THIS GRANT? AND THEY SAID, WELL, APPLY.
AS LONG AS YOU HAVE EVERYTHING AND YOU CAN MEET OUR DEADLINES.
SO WE SUBMITTED OURS THE VERY NEXT DAY AND MADE SURE THAT WE WERE QUALIFIED FOR THAT APPLICATION.
SO THE BIG THING WITH THIS IS THAT IT'S A NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION SITE.
I WENT OVER THEM WHEN WE WENT THROUGH MEADOWCREST PARK LAST MONTH, BUT THEY'RE BE FAIR, BE INCLUDED, BE SMART, BE INDEPENDENT, BE SAFE, BE ACTIVE AND BE COMFORTABLE. AND CURRENTLY YOU CAN SEE THAT THERE'S SOME NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION SITES PEPPERED AROUND.
THIS IS A BACKED OUT VERSION OF IT.
SO IT LOOKS LIKE THERE'S LESS.
THERE'S ACTUALLY THREE IN BURLESON.
HOWEVER, THEY ARE ALL AT SCHOOL DISTRICTS.
THEY'RE AT MOUND, FRAZIER AND TAYLOR, SO THEY'RE NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC.
HOWEVER, WE DO HAVE SOME IF YOU WANT TO GO LOOK AT WHAT A GAME TIME PLAYGROUND LOOKS LIKE.
THAT IS A NATIONAL DEMONSTRATION SITE.
SO WE'RE EXCITED TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THIS THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS GRANT, YOU HAD TO HAVE A MINIMUM OF $75,000 MATCHING AND IT'S UP TO 100% MATCHING. SO WE ANTICIPATE THIS BEING ABOUT $250,000 IN TOTAL AWARD.
BUT WE WANTED TO MATCH UP TO 250 FOR THIS GRANT.
AND SO THE LAST APPLICATIONS ARE DUE BY OCTOBER 18TH, BUT WE HAVE ACTUALLY ALREADY RECEIVED OUR AWARD AND WE HAVE TO HAVE SUBMITTED OUR PO ESSENTIALLY BY OCTOBER OR BY OCTOBER 31ST, WITH IT COMING IN BY DECEMBER 31ST.
SO, WE ARE KIND OF ESCALATING THE PROCESS ON THIS.
[01:15:03]
SO, THEY ARE CURRENTLY CREATING THREE UNIQUE CONCEPTS.CAN WE DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT? AND THEY SAID, ABSOLUTELY YOU CAN.
AND AS I SAID, THIS IS THE WAY THAT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PROCESS WILL CHANGE.
TYPICALLY, WE GO FORWARD TO THE COMMUNITY BEFORE WE EVER TALK ABOUT THE PLAYGROUND AND SAY, HEY, WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE IN THIS PARK? THAT STEP WILL NOT EXIST IN THIS ONE BECAUSE WE WILL JUST BE REDOING THE PLAYGROUND, BUT WE WILL STILL HAVE THAT COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT COMPONENT.
AND THEN THIS IS THE TIMELINE.
SO WE PRESENTED THIS TO PARK BOARD ON THE 15TH.
THEY UNANIMOUSLY SUPPORTED THIS.
WE'RE BRINGING IT TO COUNCIL SO THAT YOU GUYS ARE AWARE THAT THIS IS IN THE WORKS THIS EVENING.
BRING THAT CONCEPT FORWARD TO PARK BOARD ON THE 10TH, PRESENT IT TO COUNCIL ON THE 21ST, AND THEN TURN RIGHT AROUND AND GET IT ORDERED ON BEFORE THE 31ST SO THAT THAT IT'S IN BY EARLY SPRING 2025, WHICH IS ALSO EXCITING BECAUSE WE HAVE THAT CONDENSED TIMELINE.
WE TYPICALLY DON'T GET THESE IN UNTIL THE MIDDLE OF SUMMER, IF NOT AFTER SUMMER.
THIS ONE WILL BE IN AND READY BEFORE THE KIDDOS GET OUT FOR SUMMER.
ANY QUESTIONS? IT MUST BE GOOD. VICTORIA IS DOWN THERE GRINNING EAR TO EAR.
THIS IS PHENOMENAL. I'M REALLY EXCITED THAT WE COULD WIN THIS OPPORTUNITY.
AND KUDOS TO STAFF FOR HAVING ALL THE INFORMATION READY TO GO AND BEING ABLE TO GAME TIME AND APPRECIATE GAME TIME, BEING AMENABLE TO US CREATING SOMETHING DIFFERENT AND UNIQUE TO BURLESON, BECAUSE WE'RE ALWAYS TRYING TO BE AHEAD OF THAT CURVE AND PROVIDE A SPACE THAT IS OPEN AND ACCESSIBLE TO EVERYONE IN THIS COMMUNITY.
AND SO WE'RE REALLY EXCITED TO SEE THIS HAPPEN.
YOU'RE ASKING FOR DIRECTION, BUT IT SOUNDS LIKE YOU JUST NEED TO TURN YOU LOOSE.
YES, IS THE PARK WITH THE BOARD THAT THE GIRL SCOUTS PUT TOGETHER.
THE COMMUNICATION BOARD? YES. SO THAT'S CEDAR RIDGE PARK.
A BIG BLOCK PARTY FOR EVERYBODY.
THAT'S SUCH A WIN. AND I DON'T THINK COUNCIL AS A WHOLE HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP TO WHAT THAT PROJECT IS.
SO MAYBE WE CAN HAVE THAT ON A FUTURE AGENDA.
JUST LIKE, EVEN IF IT'S JUST A MAYBE IN OUR FRIDAY REPORT OR SOMETHING, BECAUSE IT WAS.
YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION NINE LEGISLATIVE REPORTS
[9.LEGISLATIVE - REPORTS AND RELATED ACTION ITEMS]
AND RELATED ACTION ITEMS. THIS IS A STANDING ITEM ON THE AGENDA OF EVERY REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL THAT ALLOWS THE CITY COUNCIL TO RECEIVE REPORTS, HOLD DISCUSSIONS, AND GIVE STAFF DIRECTION REGARDING ANY LEGISLATIVE MATTERS PERTAINING TO THE 89TH TEXAS LEGISLATIVE SESSION.ADDITIONAL ACTION ITEMS MAY BE SPECIFICALLY LISTED WHEN REQUIRED.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL. WE DON'T HAVE ANYTHING SPECIFIC TO SPEAK TO THIS EVENING PER SE OR TO PRESENT.
WE DID MEET EMAIL OUT A DRAFT POLICY AS A FOLLOW UP TO OUR MEETING FROM LAST WEEK.
SO IF THERE'S QUESTIONS WITH REGARDS TO THAT OR FURTHER DISCUSSION, I DID ASK CHIEF DAVIS TO BRIEFLY COME UP AND PRESENT SOME INFORMATION TO THE COUNCIL ON AN ITEM THAT MAY BE OF NOTE FOR YOU AS WELL.
AND BEFORE YOU GET STARTED, CASEY, I WANT TO RECOGNIZE HELEN KIRWAN IN OUR AUDIENCE.
THERE'S THREE PEOPLE IN AUSTIN THAT'S GOING TO BE HELPING US OVER AND OVER, AND SHE'S ONE OF THEM.
SHE'S GOING TO BE OUR NEW REP, HER WITH DAVID COOK AND SENATOR KING.
GLAD YOU'RE HERE. I DIDN'T KNOW YOU WAS COMING.
YOU WANT TO SAY ANYTHING? SURE. COME ON.
I AM NOT CUTTING THE LINE, AM I? NO. OKAY.
YEAH. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL.
VERY EXCITED TO SEE THAT ITEM ON THE AGENDA.
AND TO HEAR OF ANY PLANS FOR 89TH LEGISLATIVE AGENDA THAT I CAN HELP YOU WITH.
I, I AM WORKING ON SOMETHING RIGHT NOW THAT I DON'T KNOW.
ARE YOU ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE BIO WASTE PROBLEM IN JOHNSON COUNTY? HAVE YOU HEARD ABOUT WHAT'S GOING ON?
[01:20:02]
NO. OKAY.OKAY, WELL, I WAS AT COMMISSIONERS COURT ABOUT SIX WEEKS AGO, AND CONSTABLE FULLER AND HIS DEPUTY, DANA AMES, PRECINCT FOUR, GOT UP AND DID A PRESENTATION ABOUT THE BIO WASTE COMING FROM THE CITY OF FORT WORTH AND COMING IN LARGE TRUCKS DEPOSITING ON THE FARMLANDS IN JOHNSON COUNTY.
RIGHT NOW, THERE HAS ALREADY BEEN ONE FARM THAT'S IDENTIFIED.
WE HAVE IDENTIFIED A SECOND FARM.
WE'VE IDENTIFIED ANOTHER ONE IN SOMERVILLE COUNTY.
HERE'S WHAT'S SO SCARY ABOUT IT.
AND I LEFT SHOCKED THAT DANA HAS BEEN INVESTIGATING THIS PARTICULAR FARM IN GRANDVIEW BECAUSE OF THE NEIGHBORING COMPLAINTS OF SMOKE IN THE AIR AND A HORRENDOUS ODOR, AND NEIGHBORS WERE BRINGING IN PICTURES OF DEAD, DEAD CALF AND DEAD ANIMALS. WILDLIFE DISAPPEARED.
IT WENT ON AND ON, SO SHE PROCEEDED TO HAVE TESTING DONE SENT THE TEST TO TEXAS A&M LABS.
AND THE PRESENTATION THAT I WITNESSED THAT DAY WAS THE RESULTS OF THE A&M LAB.
SHE ROLLED OUT A TABLE WITH FOUR VASES WITH WOULD BE WHITE CARNATIONS.
THE FIRST VASE CLEAR WATER WHITE, AND THEN SUCCESSIVELY TAN, BROWN AND DARK BROWN, TAKEN FROM THE STREAM DIRECTLY RUNNING OFF OF THIS FARM.
THE CHEMICALS IN THESE TESTS PROVED THAT THEY WERE SO TOXIC THEY WERE OFF THE ACCEPTABLE CHARTS.
EVEN WORSE, SOME OF THEM CAME BACK WHAT IS CONSIDERED FOREVER CHEMICALS.
SO I HAVE GONE AHEAD AND MADE CONTACT WITH A COUPLE OF REPS IN AUSTIN AND PARKER COUNTY, HOOD COUNTY, WISE COUNTY, MCLENNAN COUNTY TO GET AHOLD OF THEIR COMMISSIONERS AND JUST SEE, KEEP AN EYE OUT IF THERE IS ANYTHING THAT THEY KNOW OF THAT IS COMING FROM THIS BIO WASTE TREATMENT PLANT IN FORT WORTH.
THE NAME OF THE COMPANY THAT IS TREATING IT IS CALLED SYNAGRO AND THEY ARE NEW.
WE ARE TALKING ABOUT IDENTIFYING MORE FARMLANDS.
ANY QUESTIONS? ANYBODY? I APPRECIATE IT, THANK YOU.
GLAD YOU'RE HERE. AND LET ME KNOW.
THANK YOU. AND LET ME KNOW IF YOU ALL HAVE ANY ISSUES, FOR THE 89TH.
I KNOW I HAVE TO GET ELECTED FIRST, BUT JANUARY 14TH WOULD BE THE BEGINNING DATE OF THE SESSION.
THANK YOU MA'AM. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING TO YOU ANY OF THE CONCERNS FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. I DON'T HAVE A PREPARED PRESENTATION FOR YOU, BUT JUST A BRIEF HIGHLIGHT, I THINK, FROM YOUR LAST MEETING, IT SOUNDS LIKE THAT YOU WERE INTERESTED IN UNDERSTANDING A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THE WORKER'S COMP CONCERNS THAT WE HAD AS IT RELATED TO FIREFIGHTERS.
AND THE BIG ISSUE FOR FIREFIGHTERS AROUND CANCER IS FIREFIGHTERS ARE 9% HIGHER AT RISK OF GETTING CANCER AND 14% HIGHER CHANCE OF DYING OF CANCER THAN THE GENERAL POPULATION.
CANCER IS REALLY THE BIG ISSUE CONCERNING FIREFIGHTERS NOW BEING EXPOSED TO TOXIC CHEMICALS, AND FIREFIGHTERS ARE AT AN INCREASED RISK OF DEVELOPING DIFFERENT CANCERS THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY WHAT WE CALL THE PRESUMPTIVE BILL.
[01:25:02]
CERTAIN BODY PARTS AND CANCER TYPES THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED PRESUMPTIVE, THAT YOU GOT THAT WHENEVER YOU WERE ON THE JOB.AND SO SOME OF THE TALKS IN THE INDUSTRY IS THAT THE DAY YOU RETIRE, REALLY THAT PROTECTION STOPS.
AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IMPORTANT IN OUR INDUSTRY TO ADVOCATE FOR IS THAT THERE BE MAYBE A WINDOW OF TIME AFTER AN EMPLOYEE RETIRES OR RESIGNS FROM THE FIRE SERVICE THAT THEY COULD BE COVERED UNDER THE PRESUMPTIVE BILL.
SO I KNOW THE TEXAS STATE FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION, THE TEXAS STATE FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, DIFFERENT GROUPS LIKE THAT ARE ADVOCATING FOR A WINDOW OF TIME, MAYBE IN, YOU KNOW, SINCE THERE'S A FIVE YEAR LAG ON THE FRONT END, MAYBE A FIVE YEAR ON THE BACK END FOR THAT WORKER'S COMP COVERAGE FOR THAT, AND THEN JUST THERE'S NO KIND OF REGISTRY IN TEXAS TO CAPTURE WHEN FIREFIGHTERS ARE GETTING CANCER OR WHAT TYPES OF CANCER THEY'RE GETTING RESEARCH INTO GOING INTO THAT.
SO WE WANT TO ADVOCATE FOR THAT AS WELL.
AND THEN THE OTHER CONCERN IS WHEN WE GO ON STATEWIDE DEPLOYMENTS WITH TIFMAS, WHICH IS OUR TEXAS INNER FIRE, INTERSTATE FIRE MUTUAL AID SYSTEM. SO IF ANOTHER COMMUNITY HAS A BIG MAJOR WILDLAND FIRE OR HURRICANE ISSUE, SOMETHING LIKE THAT.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE RUNNING INTO IS THE WORKER'S COMP LAW DOESN'T REALLY COVER FIREFIGHTERS AS WELL AS IT SHOULD, AS IF THEY GOT HURT BACK IN THEIR OWN HOME DISTRICT. SO, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME TALKS ABOUT FIXING THAT LEGISLATION, BECAUSE SOME CITIES AND DEPARTMENTS ARE HESITANT TO CONTINUE TO PARTICIPATE IN THOSE DEPLOYMENTS, WHETHER IT'S TIFMAS OR LIKE THE TEXAS TASK FORCE ONE OR TASK FORCE TWO TEAM.
SO WE'RE HOPING THAT THEY'LL BE ABLE TO FIX THOSE WORKER'S COMP ISSUES AS WELL.
AND THIS IS LIKE WE RECENTLY HAD MR. SINGLETON, RIGHT, ASSIGNED TO TASK FORCE.
CORRECT. I THINK AT THAT POINT IT TREATS IT AS IF THEY WERE A STATE EMPLOYEE FOR THAT.
AND SO IT'S LIKE THEY WEREN'T EVEN WORKING FOR US.
SO, WE WANT TO WE WANT TO FIX THAT COVERAGE.
SO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, WHEN I WAS MEETING WITH OUR LEGISLATIVE ADVOCACY GROUP, THAT IT WAS JUST BRINGING THESE THINGS TO MIND TO, TO MONITOR, TO, TO ADVOCATE FOR, FOR FIREFIGHTERS AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE.
SO, CHIEF DAVIS, WOULD YOU BRIEFLY SPEAK TO THE BALANCED BILLING ACT, THAT LAW THAT SET THE SUNSET AS WELL? YES. SO THE OTHER ONE THAT IS CONCERNING FOR US IS SENATE BILL 2476, WHICH WENT IN THE LAST LEGISLATIVE SESSION.
SO IT'S NOT ALL INSURANCE COMPANIES THAT WE DEAL WITH.
AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT IT DOES IS ALL AMBULANCE BILLS ARE OUT OF NETWORK.
YOU KNOW, MORE SO THAN WHAT THEY WERE PAYING FOR AN OUT-OF-NETWORK TYPE CLAIM.
AND THIS BILL IS SET TO EXPIRE IN SEPTEMBER OF 2025.
SO, THE IN THE INDUSTRY, THE HOPE IS THAT THEY WILL EXTEND THIS BILL, YOU KNOW, TO CONTINUE THAT IN TEXAS AS TO WHICH TIME THERE MAY BE FEDERAL LEGISLATION THAT, YOU KNOW, HAS SOMETHING COMMON ACROSS THE WHOLE UNITED STATES.
HAVE I GOT ANY QUESTIONS? GOOD JOB KATE. COUNCIL IS THERE ANY FEEDBACK WITH REGARDS TO THE DRAFT POLICY THAT WE SUBMITTED, OR IS STAFF ON THE RIGHT TRACK? IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU THINK THAT WE'RE READY TO BRING FORWARD FOR A FORMAL ADOPTION?
[01:30:04]
YEAH. ALL THREE PAGES LOOKED ADEQUATE TO ME.VERY ADEQUATE. IF THERE ARE OTHERS OTHER BILLS THAT YOU WOULD LIKE FOR US TO FOCUS IN ON EITHER SEEKING THE INTRODUCTION OR SUPPORTING OR ACTIVELY MONITORING WE'LL HAPPILY DO THAT.
WE CAN MAKE CHANGES BETWEEN NOW AND THE NEXT TIME WE BRING AN ITEM FOR YOU, BUT WE'LL CONTINUE TO HAVE THIS PORTION OF THE AGENDA SET FOR YOU GUYS TO CONTINUE TO TALK THROUGH THE DURATION OF THIS SESSION.
THANK YOU. ANYBODY ELSE? THANK YOU. CASEY. OKAY, THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION TEN.
CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS.
DAN. ANYBODY? GO AHEAD. OKAY, THEN THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION 11 EXECUTIVE SESSION.
[11.RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION]
AND WE DO HAVE A NEED FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION IN THE CITY COUNCIL WORK ROOM AND CITY HALL TO CONDUCT A CLOSED MEETING TO DISCUSS ANY ITEMS LISTED ON THE AGENDA OR ANY ITEMS PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.071, 551.072.IS THERE A MOTION TO MOVE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION? I HAVE A MOTION BY VICTORIA.
A SECOND BY PHIL. PLEASE VOTE.
WE'RE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 7:14.
IS THERE A MOTION TO RECONVENE INTO REGULAR SESSION? SO MOVED. ONE MORE.
I NEED A SECOND. I GOT ONE BY ALEXA AND A SECOND BY DAN.
IS THERE A MOTION TO CONVENE? TO ADJOURN. THAT'S WHAT I SAID, ADJOURN.
WE'RE OUT OF HERE AT 7:57.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.