[00:00:04] FOR THE INVOCATION. BETH IS GOING TO GRACE US. [1. CALL TO ORDER] PLEASE. THERE WE GO. THANK YOU. DEAR GOD, WE ARE GRATEFUL FOR THE CHANGE OF SEASONS AND THE HOPE OF RAIN AND SERVE IN A GROWING AND THRIVING CITY. PLEASE GRANT US YOUR WISDOM AND GUIDANCE HERE TONIGHT AND IN THE COMING DAYS TO BUILD A GREAT COMMUNITY THAT HONORS YOU. AMEN. AMEN. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. HONOR THE TEXAS FLAG. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THEE TEXAS. ONE STATE, ONE GOD AND INDIVISIBLE. GOOD JOB. NOW IS THE PORTION OF OUR AGENDA FOR CITIZEN APPEARANCES, AND SEEING AS THERE IS NONE, WE'LL MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA. [3. CONSENT AGENDA] ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND WILL BE ENACTED WITH ONE MOTION UNLESS THERE IS SOMETHING THAT'S ONE OF THE COMMISSIONERS WANTS TO PULL OUT. ARE WE READY FOR A MOTION? I MOTION TO APPROVE. ASHLEY HAS A MOTION. I'LL SECOND. SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL PASSED UNANIMOUSLY. THERE IS NO PUBLIC HEARING. AND SO WE ARE, MOVE ON TO GENERAL KPM LOCATION. [6.A. KMP located at 5500 Vantage Drive (CSP26-019): Consider and take possible action on a recommendation on a resolution for a Commercial Site Plan with a variance to fencing materials allowed in the Business Park Design Standards. (Staff Contact: Emilio Sanchez, Deputy Director)] IT'S 5500 VANTAGE DRIVE. CSP 26-019. CONSIDER AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON A RECOMMENDATION ON A RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO FENCING MATERIALS ALLOWED IN THE BUSINESS PARK DESIGN STANDARDS. STAFF CONTACT EMILIO SANCHEZ. MR. SANCHEZ. GOOD EVENING, MR. CHAIRMAN. COMMISSIONERS. THE REQUEST THAT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS FOR 5500 VANTAGE DRIVE. IT IS A NEW COMMERCIAL HEADQUARTERS FOR KMP PLUMBING. THE APPLICANT IS RUSTAN MAIZE WITH KMP PLUMBING AND HEATING AND AIR. THIS IS A RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO THE SECURITY FENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BUSINESS PARK'S DESIGN STANDARDS. THIS IS THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN. JUST TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT MORE HISTORY, THEY HAVE AN APPROVED COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS A DECORATIVE FENCE. THEY CAME BACK TO AMEND THAT COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN TO SHOW A CHAIN LINK FENCE AROUND THEIR LAY DOWN YARD IN THE REAR OF THEIR PROPERTY. AGAIN, THIS IS THEIR PROPOSED LANDSCAPING PLANS. THEY DO MEET ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE BUSINESS PARK. AS A MATTER OF FACT, THEY'RE A LITTLE OVER WHAT'S REQUIRED BY THE BUSINESS PARK STANDARDS FOR LANDSCAPING. THESE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND THEN I PUT A SMALL TABLE TOGETHER FOR SITE CONFORMANCE. THEY'RE COMPLIANT WITHIN THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THEIR PROPOSED PROPOSED 68 SPOTS REQUIRED 68. THEIR WAREHOUSE AREA IS REQUIRED. 13 THEY'RE PROVIDING THOSE 13 AND THEN LANDSCAPING PROPOSED 164,000FT². THEY'RE ONLY REQUIRED TO DO 61,000FT². WHERE THEY'RE NOT COMPLIANT IS IN THE SECURITY FENCING IN THE REAR. THEY'RE PROPOSING A VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE WHERE THE BUSINESS PARK STANDARDS REQUIRE WROUGHT IRON, DECORATIVE METAL, OR A SIMILAR QUALITY MATERIAL. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO THE FENCING MATERIALS FOR KMP HEADQUARTERS DEVELOPMENT. CMP26019. THE APPLICANT IS NOT IN THE AUDIENCE, BUT I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT I CAN OR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE ON THIS PARTICULAR CASE. WELL, I'M CURIOUS. I MEAN, THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE IN THE WAY THE FENCE WILL LOOK RATHER THAN WHAT IS RECOMMENDED TO BE COMPLIANT AND WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING. SO IF IF THAT IS APPROVED, THEN REALISTICALLY, ANYBODY IN THE BUSINESS PARK CAN DO THE SAME THING. I MEAN. NOT NECESSARILY. THEY WOULD HAVE TO COME THROUGH THE SAME PROCESS TO AMEND. YEAH THEY WOULD. BUT IF WE MADE THE DECISION FOR THIS ONE, THEN WE WOULD FAIRLY WE WOULD BE FAIR AND MAKE THE SAME KIND OF DECISION IN THE SAME SITUATION AGAIN. SO I MEAN, FOR THE BUSINESS PARK, WAS IT REALLY IMPORTANT THAT THEY HAVE THE WROUGHT IRON FENCE AND, [00:05:03] AND THAT? I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE INITIAL THOUGHTS ON, ON THE DECORATIVE FENCING, BUT I CAN SAY THAT THERE ARE OTHER SITUATIONS SIMILAR TO THIS IN THE AREA. GOLDEN STATES FOOD HAS A CHAIN LINK FENCE. ONE OF THE OTHER SITES I KNOW HAS A CHAIN LINK FENCE AROUND IT. SO THE REQUEST HAS BEEN ASKED, JUST AS YOU SAID IN THE PAST. AND I BELIEVE THAT IS WHY THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THIS, IS THAT IT'S, IT'S SOMETHING THAT IS, HAS BEEN ALLOWED OUT THERE. BUT I CAN'T SPEAK TO THE INITIAL CONCEPT OF WHY THE WROUGHT IRON OR DECORATIVE FENCE WAS REQUIRED OTHER THAN IT'S, IT'S A, IT'S AN ESTHETIC LOOK. AND THE BUSINESS PARK WAS DESIGNED FOR A PARTICULAR TYPE OF ESTHETIC. THE DESIGN STANDARDS WERE PUT IN PLACE FOR THAT PARTICULAR REASON TO MAKE IT LOOK DIFFERENT. NOT YOUR TYPICAL INDUSTRIAL TIN BUILDING, SO TO SPEAK. IT'S REQUIRED TO HAVE CAST OR CONCRETE STONE BUILDINGS, AS YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU DRIVE BY THERE. THOSE ARE THE PREDOMINANT TYPES OF BUILDINGS THAT YOU SEE. THERE ARE SOME REGULATIONS NOW THAT THE STATE HAS IMPLEMENTED THAT DOES NOT ALLOW FOR THE MUNICIPALITY TO ENFORCE THAT PORTION. BUT A LOT OF THOSE BUILDINGS WERE DESIGNED PRIOR TO THAT. WELL, IF IT HAD BEEN DONE BEFORE, THEN IT MAKES IT OPTIONAL. IT JUST COME. SO YES, MA'AM. AND THEY ARE BUILDING A. PREDOMINANTLY CONCRETE METAL. EXCUSE ME, EXCUSE ME. CONCRETE AND SPLIT STONE SPLIT. STONE BUILDING. SO THE MAJORITY OF THEIR PROPERTY WILL BE IN COMPLIANT WITH THAT MASONRY REQUIREMENT. THEY DO HAVE ONE BUILDING THAT'S GOING TO BE STEEL. BUT AGAIN, THAT IS ALLOWED BY STATE LAW. COMMISSIONER. JUST TO KIND OF ADDRESS. SORRY, I'M OVER HERE. I KNOW IT'S HARD TO YEAH. YEAH. JUST I THINK THAT'S A VERY GOOD POINT THAT YOU'RE RAISING. AND WHAT MAKES THIS SITUATION DIFFERENT THAN OTHERS? I THINK WHAT'S UNIQUE, AT LEAST WHAT I CATCH IS THAT WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE AREA TO BE FENCED, MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT'S IT'S AWAY FROM THE ROAD. SO A LOT OF THOSE WROUGHT IRON STANDARDS THAT YOU SEE THERE, DECORATIVE STANDARDS, IT'S WHAT YOU SEE AS YOU'RE DRIVING THROUGH THE PARK. THIS ONE IT IS. IT'S A POWDER COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE. IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH. VINYL COATED. VINYL COATED. YES. YEAH. BUT BUT IT'S, IT'S KIND OF SCREENED. IT'S, IT'S IN THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, NOT NEAR THE ROADWAY IN ORDER TO PRESERVE, I GUESS, SOME OF THAT. AND I THINK THERE'S PROBABLY SOMETHING TO THAT. THE FACT THAT THEY'RE LANDSCAPING LIKE MORE THAN DOUBLES OR MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. BUT I THINK WHEN YOU LOOK TO DIFFERENTIATE, WHEN DO WE GRANT IT AND WHEN DO WE WHEN DO WE NOT GRANT IT? AS A COMMISSIONER, I THINK YOU LOOK AT WHAT'S UNIQUE ABOUT THE SITUATION, WHAT'S DIFFERENT? I THINK MAYBE ONE OF THE BIGGEST THINGS, IF YOU WERE TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT, IS THE FACT THAT IT'S ON THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY DOESN'T FACE THE ROAD, THE FENCING. IF I, WHEN I FIRST READ THROUGH THIS I WAS NOT REALLY PARTICULARLY INCLINED TO GO WITH A YES VOTE ON THIS. SO I DUG INTO IT A LITTLE BIT. I DID READ THAT HIGH POINT BUSINESS PARK IS A PREMIER DESTINATION FOR BUSINESSES. AND I DROVE AROUND OUT THERE, AND IT CERTAINLY IS THAT IT REALLY IS OUTSTANDING. AND I DON'T WANT TO TAKE ANYTHING AWAY FROM WHAT THEY'VE ALREADY STARTED. BUT LIKE IT'S BEEN MENTIONED I KNOW AFTER. AT FIRST I SAW WROUGHT IRON AND STONE WALLS. IT WAS SO BEAUTIFUL. BEAUTIFUL LANDSCAPING. BUT THEN I LOOKED A LITTLE FARTHER, AND I DID SEE THE, YOU KNOW, THE BLACK COATED CHAIN LINK FENCE AT TWO BUSINESSES. IT'S NOT IN A PROMINENT LOCATION OR EASE OF EASY VISIBILITY. THIS PARTICULAR ONE, IF YOU CAN GO BACK TO THE SITE PLAN AND LOOK COMPARE TO THE OTHER LOCATIONS THE CURVED AREA HERE IS JUST THEY HAVE THE METAL FENCING AND A BEAUTIFUL STONE WALL, BUT IT IS AT A HIGHER ELEVATION AS YOU CROSS THE ROAD INTO THIS APPLICANT'S PROPERTY. THIS IS A LOWER LOCATION. BUT EVERYWHERE YOU LOOK AROUND THERE'S BEAUTIFUL LANDSCAPING. SO IF THAT'S REALLY WAY AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY, THIS IS A VERY HIGHLY TRAFFICKED ROAD AND WITH AN INTERSECTION OF ANOTHER ROAD COMING IN. SO I WAS SORT OF AGAINST IT. BUT I SEE THAT IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED. AND IF IT'S DEFINITELY AT THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY. [00:10:04] NOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY PLAN WITH THE. THIS IS ONLY A SITE PLAN FOR THE BUILDING AND THE BACK OF THE PROPERTY NOW, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE THEY OWN MORE PROPERTY THERE ON THE SOUTH SIDE, AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY PLAN TO DO WITH THAT EVENTUALLY. THAT IS ACTUALLY A SECOND LOT THAT'S OWNED BY THE CITY. OKAY. WITHIN THAT SQUARE, THAT GREEN SQUARE RECTANGLE. OH NO, I APOLOGIZE. I THOUGHT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THIS AREA. NO, NO. THE THE SOUTH SIDE DOWN BELOW GREENFIELD, THERE'S, THERE'S GREENERY, BUT I DON'T SEE A PLAN FOR THAT AT THE MOMENT. BUT I GUESS THEY OWN THAT PROPERTY. I WOULD HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE PLAT. I BELIEVE THERE WAS SOME DEDICATION OF THAT AREA FOR SOMETHING AN EASEMENT. SO THIS OUTLINE PREDATES THE PLAT. SO THE OUTLINE IS ACTUALLY A LITTLE FURTHER BEYOND WHAT THE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINES ARE. OKAY. SO LONG AS THEY WERE AT LEAST AS COMPLIANT AND, AND COMPLIMENTARY LANDSCAPING AROUND THE AREA AS THE OTHERS. I THINK I WOULD I WOULD BE OPEN TO CONSIDERING THIS REQUEST. IT SOUNDS LIKE THE MAIN CONCERN IS WHETHER OR NOT IT IS VISIBLE. BUT IF YOU LOOK AT THE PLAN FOR THE BUILDING AND THE LOCATION OF WHERE THE FENCE WILL BE, I DON'T THINK THAT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE MUCH OF THE FENCE UNLESS YOU ARE AT A CERTAIN ANGLE ON THE ROAD, OR YOU'RE LIKE ACTIVELY TRYING TO LOOK AT BECAUSE THE BUILDING IS TWO STORIES, THIS IS JUST GOING TO BE A STANDARD CHAIN LINK FENCE. SO I THINK IF THAT IS A CONCERN OF WHETHER OR NOT IT LOOKS NICE, I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT DUE TO THE LOCATION, I DON'T THINK IT'S THAT. I DON'T WANT TO SAY IT'S NOT THAT BIG OF A DEAL, BUT IT SHOULDN'T BE. WHAT DRIVES THE DECISION? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? COMMENTS? I JUST HAVE ONE. DO WE HAVE AN IDEA OF WHAT WILL BE BEHIND THE FENCING? WHAT KMP DOES? SO THAT THAT BUILDING THERE, THEIR PROPOSED STEEL STRUCTURE IS ACTUALLY GOING TO BE WHERE THEY DO MAINTENANCE ON THEIR FLEET VEHICLES. BEHIND THAT IS WHERE THEY'RE GOING TO STORE SOME OF THEIR EQUIPMENT THAT THEY USE FOR THEIR PLUMBING PORTION OF THE, OF THE, I THINK TRAILERS, THOSE TRAILERS. YES, SIR. OKAY. I DROVE BY THE CURRENT BUSINESS ON EXCHANGE HERE IN BURLESON, AND THEY HAVE A NUMBER OF SERVICE TRUCKS. VERY NEAT PROPERTY. AGAIN, A SMALL HEADQUARTERS BUILDING AND THEN THE METAL BUILDING FOR SERVICE. SO YEAH, THEY'RE JUST TRYING TO EXPAND. STAY IN BURLESON I LIKE IT. ENTERTAIN A MOTION. MOTION TO APPROVE. MOTION BY CLINT, SECOND BY BETH. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE. UNANIMOUS. MOVE ON TO ITEM B. [6.B. Wonder, located approximately at 725 SW Wilshire Blvd (CSP26-020): Consider and take possible action on a recommendation on a resolution for a Commercial Site Plan with a variance to the number of minimum parking spaces required for the change of use of the existing commercial building to include a physical therapy clinic, retail and restaurant. (Staff Contact: Emilio Sanchez, Deputy Director)] WONDER, LOCATED APPROXIMATELY AT 725 SOUTHWEST WILSHIRE. CASE NUMBER CSP 26-020. CONSIDER AND TAKE POSSIBLE ACTION ON RECOMMENDATION AND RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH A VARIANCE TO THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR A CHANGE USE OF THE EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO INCLUDE A PHYSICAL THERAPY CLINIC RETAIL AND RESTAURANT. STAFF PRESENTER EMILIO SANCHEZ. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. AGAIN, THIS IS A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN REQUEST WITH VARIANCES FOR CSP 26-020 AT 725 SOUTHWEST WILSHIRE BOULEVARD. APPLICANTS ARE MATT WILSON WITH CONNECTED ACQUISITION SERVICES, LLC. THE APPLICANTS AND THEN EXCHANGE RIGHT NET LEASE PORTFOLIO TEN DST ARE THE OWNERS. AGAIN A RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH VARIANCES TO THE NUMBER OF MINIMUM PARKING SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE CHANGE OF USE OF AN EXISTING COMMERCIAL BUILDING TO INCLUDE A PHYSICAL THERAPY CLINIC, RETAIL AND RESTAURANT. THIS IS THE SITE PLAN THAT WAS ORIGINALLY APPROVED WITH THE THREE BUILDINGS. I'M NOT SURE IF YOU GUYS REMEMBER THEM COMING THROUGH, BUT THIS WAS DONE IN, I BELIEVE TWO DIFFERENT PHASES AND THEY HAD A PARKING REDUCTION AS WELL. BUT THEY, THEY BROUGHT ALL THREE BUILDINGS IN AT THE SAME TIME. [00:15:02] UNFORTUNATELY, THEY NEVER FILED THEIR SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT WITH JOHNSON COUNTY. IT'S MENTIONED IN SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS THAT YOU CAN FIND, BUT IT'S NOT FILED AT THE COURTHOUSE TO WHERE WE CAN SAY THEY WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE LEGAL RIGHTS TO PARK ON THE OTHER TWO LOTS OF PATRONS OF THE BUILDING. A LITTLE MORE BACKGROUND. THIS IS THE FORMER ADVANCED AUTO SPOT, AUTO AUTO PARTS. THEY ARE LOOKING AT TAKING THE ENTIRE BUILDING, DIVIDING IT INTO THREE SECTIONS TO ALLOW FOR THE PHYSICAL THERAPY, THE RESTAURANT, AND THEN THE RETAIL SPACE THAT'S LEFT OVER. THE CHANGE OF USE IS WHAT'S REQUIRING THE PARKING INCREASE AND THE NEW SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL TO YOU. THE CODE REQUIRES THAT ANY TIME THAT THERE IS A CHANGE IN USE THAT REQUIRES MORE PARKING, THAT THE APPLICANTS ARE REQUIRED TO PRESENT A NEW COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN. IN THIS INSTANCE, THEY'RE NOT MAKING ANY PHYSICAL CHANGES TO THE ACTUAL LANDSCAPING OR PARKING AREAS. THEY'RE JUST CHANGING THE ACTUAL DEMISING WALLS WITHIN THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT, THE EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT, SO THEY'RE NOT ADDING SQUARE FOOTAGE TO THE EXISTING BUILDING. THEY'RE JUST PUTTING DEMISING WALLS WITHIN ITS WALLS THAT ARE EXISTING NOW. CLINIC AND DOCTOR'S OFFICES REQUIRE 200FT² FOR TOTAL FLOOR AREA. WHAT THEY'RE PROPOSING WAS REQUIRING 15 SPACES. THEY'RE COMPLIANT THERE. THE RESTAURANT AND CAFETERIA IS ONE SPACE FOR EVERY THREE SEATING. THEY'RE REQUIRING 42 SPACES. THEY'RE ONLY PROPOSING TEN SPACES, SO THEY'RE DEFICIENT BY 32 SPACES. STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION FOR A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN, WITH VARIANCES TO THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR WONDER DEVELOPMENT, WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS THAT A CHANGE IN LAND USE OR FILING OF A NEW CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, WHICH TRIGGERS ADDITIONAL REQUIRED PARKING IN EXCESS OF 25 SPACES, WILL REQUIRE CONSIDERATION OF A NEW PARKING VARIANCE. WE FELT THAT THAT IS NECESSARY TO TO ENSURE THAT THE REST OF THE PHYSICAL THERAPY DOES NOT BECOME AN ADDITIONAL RESTAURANT THAT WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL VARIANCE REQUESTS FOR MORE PARKING. THE APPLICANT IS IN THE AUDIENCE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND I WOULD BE HAPPY TO ENTERTAIN ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU MAY HAVE AS WELL. DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU WANT TO PROPOSE TO SAY, OR ARE YOU JUST HERE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS? I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, BUT NO, I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING THAT I NEED TO SAY. YEAH, I HAVE A QUESTION. IT SEEMS LIKE TEN SPACES FOR THE RESTAURANTS COULD BE WAY TOO SMALL, BUT I'M ALSO THINKING THAT YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE HANDICAPPED PARKING AS WELL, WHICH WILL REDUCE THE NUMBER OF TEN, YOU KNOW, SO THAT PEOPLE WHO ARE TRYING TO COME TO THE RESTAURANT MAY NOT HAVE ENOUGH PARKING SPACES. THERE'S CURRENTLY ONE HANDICAPPED SPACE. I DON'T KNOW IF WE WOULD BE ADDING ANY ADDITIONAL. I MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSWER THAT ONE BETTER. AS FAR AS THE, THE CODE AS WE GROW. BUT BUT THE, THE INTENT IS YES, THAT RIGHT NOW THE, THE LEFTOVER, I CALL IT LEFTOVER PARKING FROM THE PHYSICAL THERAPY WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, IT WOULDN'T COME CLOSE TO WHAT WE THINK AS FAR AS LIKE RESTAURANT DEMAND AND WHAT THE RESTAURANT TENANTS THINK THAT THEY WOULD NEED. AND LIKE YOU MENTIONED BEFORE, BACK IN 2015 OR SO, LARKSPUR CAME AND DEVELOPED THIS COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN AS A, AS A PACKAGE. SO THIS PARTICULAR BUILDING WAS ALWAYS INTENDED TO BE ADVANCED AUTO FROM THE VERY BEGINNING. AND SO THEY MOVED THE PARCEL LINES DOWN TO WHERE THE ABSOLUTE MINIMUM FOR A FIVE PER THOUSAND USE. AND SO IT KIND OF HANDICAPS US AS FAR AS WHAT WE CAN DO TO, TO LEASE UP THE REST OF THE BUILDING. I CAN SAY THAT THE PHYSICAL THERAPY HAS BEEN LEASED AS OF LAST WEEK. AND SO WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO, WE KIND OF GET INTO A CHICKEN OR EGG SITUATION, AND WE'RE TRYING TO HAVE AS MUCH FLEXIBILITY WITH THE REMAINING SPACE. WE DO HAVE A RESTAURANT TENANT INTERESTED. WE HAVEN'T SIGNED A LEASE WITH THEM YET. BUT UNTIL WE HAVE THIS IN OUR, IN OUR BACK POCKET, YOU KNOW, KIND OF LAY THE GROUNDWORK FOR ENTITLEMENTS IT'S GOING TO BE HARD TO GET RESTAURANTS VERY ENGAGED. SO IT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT. YEAH, I HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS. ONE I'VE ASKED EMILIO ALREADY, BUT I'M JUST GOING TO ASK A LITTLE BIT IN PUBLIC IN A DIFFERENT WAY. SO THAT WAS NOT FILED WITH JOHNSON COUNTY FOR AN EXCEPTION FOR US TO CONSIDER TONIGHT. BUT IS IT TOO LATE TO FILE SUCH A PARKING ARRANGEMENT WITH THE COUNTY AND WHAT YOU KNOW, HOW [00:20:06] WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK LIKE? SO I WOULD HAVE TO DEFER TO THE APPLICANT ON THOSE DISCUSSIONS THAT HE WOULD HAVE, BUT THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT THE THREE PROPERTY OWNERS WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE TO AGREE TO ALLOW FOR THAT PARKING AGREEMENT TO GO DOWN TO JOHNSON COUNTY COURTHOUSE AND BE FILED. AND THERE'S THREE SEPARATE PROPERTY OWNERS. THAT'S CORRECT. WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS. AND OUR ROLE IN THIS, IN THIS SCENARIO IS WE'RE A DEVELOPER. WE'RE PURCHASING IT FROM A, A REIT WHO HAS NO YOU KNOW, DEVELOPMENT EXPERTISE. AND SO NO, WE HAVEN'T HAD ANY COMMUNICATIONS WITH THE ADJACENT OWNERS. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. AND TO UNDERSTAND, I WAS TRYING TO UNDERSTAND YOUR BUSINESS, THE WONDER, WHICH IS, I GUESS NOT AS AN IMMEDIATE NEED IS WHAT I'M HEARING FROM YOU. BUT IS THAT A DELIVERY ONLY BUSINESS OR WOULD YOU HAVE A DRIVE THROUGH WINDOW OR WHAT WOULD THAT LOOK LIKE? WONDERS, WONDERS BUSINESS MODEL IS PRIMARILY, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HEARD THE TERM GHOST KITCHEN. IT'S NEW TO ME, BUT YES. YEAH, IT'S IT'S ACTUALLY A LOW SEATING ON PREMISES. AND IT'S PRIMARILY KITCHEN SPACE OFFERS A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT CONCEPTS. WE HAVE NOT SIGNED A LEASE WITH THEM. BUT THEY, THEY'RE THE ONES THAT HAVE APPROACHED US ABOUT THIS LOCATION. THAT'S WHAT KIND OF INITIATED THIS CONVERSATION. YOU KNOW, THEY COULD BE IN THE BIG PICTURE. WE DON'T KNOW YET. I CAN'T TELL YOU THAT, THAT'S FOR SURE. BUT BUT AS FAR AS WONDER'S BUSINESS MODEL, YEAH, THEY'RE THEY'RE A LOW SEATING COUNT. OKAY. THANK YOU. IT WOULD BE GOOD TO SEE YOUR BUSINESS THERE. YOUR BUSINESS SOUNDS RATHER AMBITIOUS FOR THAT, YOU KNOW, SORT OF SMALLISH BUILDING THERE. BUT YOU KNOW YOUR BUSINESS MUCH BETTER THAN ME. AS IT IS CURRENTLY, I'VE USED MULTIPLE BUSINESSES ALONG THAT STRIP CENTER. I'VE NEVER SEEN THE BACK PARKING SPACES EVER USED. I'VE HARDLY EVER SEEN ANY CONGESTION AND THE PARKING, BUT THAT'S BASED ON THE PAST. AND NOW YOU'RE TRYING TO DO SOMETHING NEW AND DIFFERENT. AND OF COURSE, WE WANT YOUR BUSINESS TO BE RADICALLY SUCCESSFUL. AND SO I'M A LITTLE BIT LEERY OF, YOU KNOW, GIVING A VARIANCE IN, IN A, IN A WAY, BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, ALL THE ONLY OTHER CHOICES WOULD BE FOR PEOPLE TO EITHER GET TOWED OR PARKED DOWN ALONG THE IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THOSE DON'T REALLY SEEM SUPER ATTRACTIVE TO ME. SO I, I HAVE SOME MIXED FEELINGS ABOUT ABOUT IT. ONE CONSOLATION I CAN GIVE YOU IS WITH THE PHYSICAL THERAPY TENANT ATI WHO'S A FIRST CLASS TENANT, THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF LOCATIONS NATIONWIDE. THEY HAVE PRETTY LOW FOOT TRAFFIC THAT'S JUST INHERENT WITH THEIR BUSINESS MODEL, EVEN A SUCCESSFUL SITUATION. SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'LL ONLY BE A HANDFUL OF PEOPLE IN THERE OPENING UP SOME, SOME ROOM, BUT YOU KNOW, YEAH, OUR INTENT IS NOT TO OVERFILL THE PARKING LOT. AND I THINK A LOT OF MY PERSONAL OPINION IS A LOT OF THE FOOD CUSTOMERS THESE DAYS ARE VERY PICK UP CURBSIDE AND GO. SO WE'RE NOT LOOKING TO PUT LIKE A TEXAS ROADHOUSE IN THERE, RIGHT? LIKE THAT. THAT WOULDN'T WORK, I THINK FOR ANYONE'S SITUATION, INCLUDING TEXAS ROADHOUSE WOULDN'T WANT TO GO IN THERE BECAUSE THEY HAVE PARKING REQUIREMENTS THAT THEY SET FOR THEIR OWN, YOU KNOW, BUSINESS FUNCTIONALITY. SO YOU KNOW, WE'RE TRYING TO MAKE THINGS AS BALANCED AS POSSIBLE. DOES THIS PARKING INCLUDE THE THE WORKERS, THE PROFESSIONAL PEOPLE, THE EMPLOYEES? SO IN THIS PARKING SPACE. YES, YES. BECAUSE I WAS JUST THINKING PHYSICAL THERAPY, EVEN IF THEY DON'T HAVE A LOT OF FOOT TRAFFIC, THEY DO HAVE SEVERAL EMPLOYEES THAT ARE GOING TO BE WORKING IN THERE. I CAN'T YES, I CAN'T GIVE YOU AN ACCURATE NUMBER OF HOW MANY EMPLOYEES THEY HAVE, BUT I DON'T THINK FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, IT'S NOT VERY MANY. IT'S, IT'S MORE SPACE FOR THE ACTUAL ACT OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, BUT THERE'S ONLY A HANDFUL OF EMPLOYEES AS FAR AS I KNOW. TO GIVE YOU ALL SOME UNDERSTANDING OF WHAT HE'S SAYING IS THE PHYSICAL THERAPY I, FRIENDS WITH DOCTOR PEPPER PHYSICAL THERAPY DOWN THE ROAD. THEY MAY HAVE THREE PEOPLE IN THERE AT ANY GIVEN TIME. HOW MANY SPACES TOTAL ARE WE TALKING ABOUT? SO CURRENTLY ON SITE TODAY THERE ARE 25 SPACES AND THERE'S 15 OF THOSE ARE ARE COMPLIANT WITH THE PHYSICAL THERAPY USE. THEN WE HAVE A DELTA WITH A TEN PLUS WHAT WE WOULD TRY TO BACK INTO LIKE A MORE CONVENTIONAL PARKING CODE. [00:25:02] SO THE VARIANCE IS 42 SPACES TECHNICALLY. SO WELL SORRY 30. 30 OR SO SPACES ON TOP OF THE TEN THAT ARE CURRENTLY AVAILABLE. WHEN YOU TAKE AWAY THE PHYSICAL THERAPY. RIGHT. BUT I MEAN, IF IT LOOKS LIKE DOCTOR PEPPER'S, UNLESS THEY'VE GOT AN AMAZING AMOUNT OF PEOPLE DOING PHYSICAL THERAPY IN THERE AND A LOT OF APPOINTMENTS, I DON'T THINK THEY'LL USE FIVE OF THEM, YOU KNOW. SO AND GHOST KITCHENS ARE NOT MEANT TO HAVE DINE IN. IT'S NOT A MAJOR DINE IN RESTAURANT. IT'S LIKE IT WAS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED. IT IS MORE OF A PICK UP AND GO. MOST OF THE SPACE WILL BE UTILIZED AS A KITCHEN WITH MAYBE LIKE A HANDFUL OF SEATING, JUST MAYBE THINKING OF LIKE A SMALLER COFFEE SHOP WHERE THERE MIGHT BE FIVE TABLES JUST IN CASE SOMEONE DOES WANT TO EAT THERE. BUT WHEN IT COMES TO THAT, PEOPLE ARE JUST GOING TO GRAB THEIR FOOD AND IMMEDIATELY LEAVE. AND SO I FEEL LIKE WITH ACCOUNTING FOR THAT, AS WELL AS THE PHYSICAL THERAPY, I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING. I DON'T THINK THE PARKING IS GOING TO BE THAT MUCH OF AN ISSUE. BUT I DO RECOMMEND THAT THEY'RE POSSIBLY GOING THROUGH THE COUNTY AND MAKING SURE THAT IF IT DOES COME ABOUT, THAT THE THE SURROUNDING BUSINESSES DO ALLOW SHARED PARKING. I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD JUST EASE EVERYBODY'S MINDS, ESPECIALLY ON THIS COMMISSION AND PROBABLY ALSO CITY COUNCIL. SO I THINK THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE POSSIBLY A NECESSITY FOR THE NEAR FUTURE. CAN YOU BRING UP THE STAFF RECOMMENDATION. SO SAY WONDER DOESN'T MAKE IT THEN SOME OTHER RESTAURANT WANTS TO GO IN. THEN THEY'D STILL HAVE TO COME BACK AND ASK FOR A VARIANCE FROM PARKING. NOT NECESSARILY DEPENDING ON THE SEATING ARRANGEMENT. SO IT'S ONE SPACE FOR EVERY THREE SEATS IF THEY COULD BE COMPLIANT WITH THE REQUEST. IF YOU GUYS GRANTED THAT AND COUNCIL APPROVED GRANTING THAT RESOLUTION FOR THE, I THINK IT WAS 32 SPACES. MAYBE IT'S 25, BUT I'LL HAVE TO VERIFY THAT. BUT I THINK I BELIEVE THE RESOLUTION SAYS 32 SPACES. AND IF THE FUTURE RESTAURANT STAYED BELOW THAT, THEN THEY WOULD BE ALLOWED TO COME IN. NOW, IF THEY EXCEEDED THAT, IF THEY PUT IN MORE SEATING, THAT WOULD REQUIRE MORE PARKING, MORE THAN THE 32, THAN THEY WOULD BE REQUIRED TO COME BACK FOR ANOTHER VARIANCE FOR PARKING. BUT WOULD IT BE SMART FOR THE LONG TERM TO GET TO GO TO THE JOHNSON COUNTY WITH THIS THINKING THAT, SAY, FIVE YEARS FROM NOW, IT COULD BE DIFFERENT BUSINESSES IN THERE THAT WOULD NEED THE SHARED SPACE. I THINK YOU'RE ON THE RIGHT TRACK AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS GOING TO PURSUE THAT, BUT NOT UNTIL THEY PURCHASE THE PROPERTY. THEY'RE NOT CURRENTLY THE THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY. SO I'LL ASK THE THE QUESTION THAT'S CAN WE MAKE THAT AS PART OF THE RESOLUTION? I DON'T BELIEVE CONTINGENT ON. I'M GOING TO HAVE TO FILING WITH THE WITH THE COUNTY. I COULD NOT MAKE THAT. YEAH. I WOULD NOT MAKE THAT BECAUSE THAT'S OUTSIDE OF THEIR CONTROL. OKAY. IT'S NOT AGAIN, IT'S NOT AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY. IT'S AN AGREEMENT WITH THE TWO NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS THAT EVERYBODY CAN SHARE EACH OTHER'S PARKING SPACES BECAUSE THERE'S THERE'S BASICALLY THREE LOTS RIGHT THERE. YEAH. WHAT I WAS THINKING OF IS MAKE IT CONTINGENT UPON THE THREE OWNERS GETTING TOGETHER AND. YEAH. NO, I THINK IF YOU MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE MISTER CHAIR WOULD BE IF YOU WANT THEM TO PURSUE A PARKING AGREEMENT, NOT TO GRANT THE VARIANCE REQUESTED. IF I CAN ADD INTO THAT MY EXPERIENCE WHEN YOU NOT THAT THESE ARE BAD ACTORS. I HAVEN'T TALKED TO THEM, BUT TYPICALLY WHEN YOU GO TO OTHER NEIGHBORING OWNERS IN THE COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE BUSINESS, IT USUALLY COMES WITH STRINGS AS IN, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO ASK. THEY COULD BE VERY REASONABLE. THEY COULD NOT BE VERY REASONABLE, I DON'T KNOW. SO IT KIND OF MAKES ME A LITTLE ANXIOUS TO THINK ABOUT TRYING TO TIE THEM DOWN ON SOMETHING LIKE THAT. MAYBE THEY'RE, MAYBE THEY'D BE GREAT, I DON'T KNOW. IT'S JUST THE FEAR OF THE UNKNOWN. [00:30:02] SO DO WE KNOW HOW MANY SEATS WONDER WOULD REQUIRE? WONDER. WONDER IS CLOSE. SO RIGHT NOW WE ARE BASICALLY SAY IT'S ENTITLED FOR 30 SEATS AND WONDER AS A CONCEPT THEMSELVES ARE NOT VERY FAR BEYOND THAT. OUR THOUGHT PROCESS ON THIS WAS THE WAY BURLESON PARKING CODE IS. IT'S ONE PARKING SPACE FOR EVERY THREE SEATS. AND WE KIND OF REVERSE ENGINEERED IT WITH A PARKING CODE THAT WE SEE ELSEWHERE, WHERE IT'S RESTAURANTS TYPICALLY LIKE TEN PER 1000FT². SO WE TOOK THAT LOGIC OF THREE SEATS AND WE TRIED TO BACK INTO WHAT WE THOUGHT WAS, YOU KNOW, THE REMAINING SPACE OF 4000 OR APPROXIMATELY 4000FT², TEN PER THOUSAND TIMES THREE SEATS TO GET UP TO THAT 126 SEATS THAT YOU SEE UP THERE. SO OUR, OUR INTENT IS TO ENTITLE IT AS LIKE A TRADITIONAL FULL SCALE RESTAURANT, EVEN THOUGH WONDER AT THIS POINT IN TIME ACTUALLY HAS A MUCH LOWER SEAT REQUIREMENT. THAT'S JUST TO HAVE AS MUCH FLEXIBILITY. AND IF FOR SOME REASON, WONDER DOESN'T WORK OUT, THE CHANCES OF FINDING A ONE 4000 MEGA RESTAURANT IS VERY, VERY LOW. I WOULD SAY THAT IT'S GOING TO TURN INTO A 1500 SQUARE FOOT COFFEE SHOP, BUT, YOU KNOW, 2500 SQUARE FOOT, YOU KNOW, MEXICAN RESTAURANT. IT KIND OF CHOPS IT UP AND AND BRINGS THE SEATING DOWN ANYWAY BECAUSE YOU'RE GONNA HAVE MORE, EVEN MORE KITCHEN SPACE. SO WILL THERE BE 126 SEATS THERE? I, I DOUBT IT, BUT YOU KNOW, I CAN'T THAT'S PREDICTING THE FUTURE. SO. SO MAYBE I'LL PUT YOU ON THE SPOT. WHAT I'M HEARING IS, IS WE'RE OPENING THE DOOR SIGNIFICANTLY HERE. WHAT IS THE RATIONALE BETWEEN BEHIND STAFF SAYING GRANT THE VARIANCE. IF YOU'LL NOTICE THIS IS A PORTION OF THEIR TIA THEIR TRAFFIC ENGINEER SUBMITTED THIS REQUEST OR THIS INFORMATION. SO STAFF WAS LOOKING TO BRING THIS NEW CONCEPT TO THIS AREA. THIS IS NOT ONE THAT IS IN THE DFW AREA, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY. IT'S ON THE EAST COAST. THE DETACHMENT THERE, MAINLY IN NEW YORK, NEW YORK ON THE EAST COAST. SO THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST PREMIER WONDER LOCATION WITHIN THE KIND OF THE SOUTHWEST. STAFF WAS LOOKING TO KIND OF GO ALONG WITH, YOU KNOW, BRINGING MORE COMMERCIAL BUSINESSES IN TO BURLESON. AND THAT WAS WHERE THE REQUEST WAS COMING FROM. SO THAT IS WHY WE PUT THAT STIPULATION ON. IF THERE WAS ANOTHER RESTAURANT THAT CAME IN THAT NEEDED A HIGHER SEATING CAPACITY, THAT THEY WOULD COME BACK FOR AN ADDITIONAL VARIANCE. YEAH. IT FEELS A LITTLE BIT LIKE THIS IS SORT OF EARLY, AND I THINK I WOULD BE OPEN TO APPROVING IF ALL YOU HAD COMING IN WAS THE DEFINITE PHYSICAL THERAPY OFFICE. BUT THE OTHER PART OF IT IS, IS WHAT'S CONFUSING ME BECAUSE IT COULD BE THIS OR IT COULD BE THAT. AND WE'RE SITTING HERE TRYING TO MAKE A DECISION ON APPROVING SOMETHING. WE DON'T KNOW WHETHER WHAT, WHAT IT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE EXACTLY. THE CITY ITSELF HAS SPENT A LOT OF MONEY ON PARKING IN OLD TOWN TO, TO BUILD UP YOU KNOW, THE ABILITY TO, TO SERVE PEOPLE IN A KIND OF A YOU KNOW, REBUILT AREA THAT WAS USED TO BE MORE OR LESS DENSE COMMERCIAL. BUT THAT'S NOT IN OLD TOWN. THAT'S A SPOT. IT FEELS LIKE THERE SHOULD BE AGREEMENTS IN PLACE AMONG THE OWNERS TO ALLOW SOME PARKING THERE OR ELSE, YOU KNOW, IT COULD TURN INTO A CHALLENGE. ANYWAY, THAT'S HOW I'M FEELING. YEAH, I REALLY FEEL LIKE IT'S GOING TO BE EXACTLY LIKE WHAT WE SEE BEFORE US TONIGHT IN EXACTLY THE WAY EMILIO HAS DESCRIBED IT IN THAT THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, IF IT DOES, IT IS WHAT IT IS. WE CAN APPROVE IT THE WAY IT IS. AND IF IT CHANGES, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO COME BACK AND SUBMIT FURTHER APPLICATION FOR MORE PARKING AND VARIANCE FOR ALL THAT. SO I REALLY FEEL LIKE BASED ON WHAT I'M SEEING AND WHAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR, IT'S FINE TO GO WITH IT. [00:35:02] I MEAN, WE DON'T KNOW WHAT OTHER OPTIONS DO WE HAVE HERE. YOU KNOW, THAT'S KIND OF WHERE I'M AT. WELL, I'M WONDERING, I MEAN, AND I'M ASKING YOU WHAT WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE AGREEMENT WITH WONDER? I MEAN, I MEAN, IS IT ARE THERE DOCUMENTS SIGNED OR COULD IT BE, THEY MIGHT FIND ANOTHER PLACE TOMORROW. I MEAN, BECAUSE TO ME, I MEAN, WE'RE WE'RE APPROVING A MAYBE. YEAH. NO, WE'VE WE'VE HAD TO SIGN WE'VE BEEN LEASE NEGOTIATIONS. SO IT'S NOT SIGN ON THE DOTTED LINE JUST TO BE FRANK. BUT YOU KNOW, WHAT, WITH HOW THE SITE IS SET UP WITH THE, WITH THE TAX PARCEL AND HAVING THAT PHYSICAL THERAPY SIGNED, THAT LEASE IS SIGNED AND READY TO GO. YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE CAN ONLY DO TYPICAL RETAIL OR MEDICAL SPACE YOU KNOW, PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS 4000FT² THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. AND, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO HAVE THE BEST CHANCES OF FINDING, YOU KNOW, A TAX, A SALES TAX PRODUCING TENANT FOR THIS SPACE, RIGHT? AND IF WE DON'T HAVE THIS, GOING BACK TO YOUR POINT BETH, IT'S LIKE THE CHICKEN AND EGG. IF WE DON'T HAVE THIS KIND OF GROUNDWORK, ESSENTIALLY SAY, HEY, RESTAURANT TENANTS. YES, BY CODE, THAT TAX PARCEL IS UNDER UNDER PART FOR RESTAURANT. BUT WE'VE GOT THIS WITH THE CITY. WE'VE ALREADY STARTED THIS CONVERSATION THAT THERE IS ACTUAL ENTITLEMENT TO IT. PLEASE STAY ENGAGED WITH US BECAUSE THEY MAY GO, YOU KNOW, THAT'S TOO MUCH. THAT'S TOO MUCH RISK FOR US TO INVEST OUR TIME TO TALK TO YOU. AND SO WE'RE TRYING TO LIMIT, WE'RE TRYING TO MITIGATE THAT, THAT PUSHBACK FROM THEM. SO HOPEFULLY THAT ANSWERS YOUR QUESTION, CYNTHIA, BUT YOU DIDN'T HAVE ANY PUSHBACK FROM PHYSICAL THERAPY. I MEAN, THEY SIGNED. SO NO. AND YEAH, I MEAN, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE 15 SPACES PER CODE. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO THEY THAT'S MORE THAN SUFFICIENT FOR THEIR NEEDS. COMMISSIONERS. IF I CAN JUST ADD. THE QUESTIONS, THE LINE OF QUESTIONING, THE QUESTIONS THAT YOU HAVE ARE VERY RELEVANT. AND I JUST WANTED TO GIVE YOU A. LET'S SAY THESE ALL OF THESE FOLKS WALK. AND THIS IS LEFT WITH AN EMPTY 6800 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. IF A RETAIL RETAILER CAME IN AND WANTED TO FILL THAT SPACE AT 1 SPACE FOR EVERY 200FT², THAT'S 34 PARKING SPACES. THEY ONLY HAVE 25 ON THE SITE. SO WHOEVER FILLS THAT SPACE WILL MOST LIKELY HAVE TO COME BACK FOR A PARKING VARIANCE. I'M OPEN TO A MOTION. I JUST HAVE ONE. I JUST HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION AND SAY, IF SOMEONE ELSE WERE COMING IN AND THEY NEEDED NEEDED MORE SPACE, WE WOULD STILL HAVE TO HAVE THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE OWNERS AND THAT IT COULD THEY COULD DO SHARED SPACE, RIGHT? BECAUSE IN THAT SCENARIO, IF WHOEVER WAS GOING TO PURCHASE THE PROPERTY WANTED TO PURSUE THE OTHER TWO PROPERTY OWNERS FOR A PARKING AGREEMENT TO FORMALIZE IT AND MEMORIALIZE THAT AT THE COUNTY COURTHOUSE. THEY MAY NOT NEED TO COME FOR A VARIANCE IF THE THREE PROPERTY OWNERS COULD AGREE TO UTILIZE EACH OTHER'S PARKING. OKAY. WELL, I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION FOR CSP26-20. IS THAT A MOTION TO APPROVE? MOTION TO APPROVE. I'LL SECOND. MOTION BY CLINT. SECOND. SECOND. BRANDON. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR, SAY AYE OR RAISE YOUR HAND. OPPOSED? PASSES. THERE ARE NO COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS. THERE IS NO NEED FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION. WE DO HAVE A COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEM. JUST ONE COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEM WOULD LIKE TO FORMALLY INTRODUCE OUR NEW SENIOR PLANNER TO THE COMMISSION. [7. COMMUNITY INTERESTS ITEMS] WE ARE FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO HAVE BRIAN CAMPBELL JOIN OUR TEAM. HE'S ABOUT TWO WEEKS IN, SO WE HAVEN'T RUN HIM OFF YET. BUT PLEASE WELCOME BRIAN CAMPBELL, OUR NEW SENIOR PLANNER [APPLAUSE]. WELCOME, BRIAN. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU ALL. COMMISSION. VERY NICE TO MEET YOU FORMALLY AND I'LL KEEP THIS BRIEF. I JUST WANTED TO THANK MR. SANCHEZ AND MR. FISHER. AND MATT, YOUR LAST NAME ESCAPES ME AT THE MOMENT. AND ALL THE STAFF HERE. YOU ALL HAVE BEEN GREAT. LOOKING FORWARD TO MY TIME HERE WITH THE CITY. SO THANK YOU ALL SO MUCH, I APPRECIATE IT. DON'T LET HIM WORK YOU TOO HARD. I'LL DO MY BEST. [00:40:05] ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COMMUNITY ITEMS? NONE. THERE IS NO NEED THAT I'M AWARE OF FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION. WE'LL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:40. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.