[3.A. Consider approval of the minutes from the November 18, 2024 Economic Development Corporation (Type A) meeting. (Staff Contact: Monica Solko, Deputy City Secretary)]

THOSE MINUTES ARE PRINTED OUT IN FRONT OF YOU.

IF Y'ALL HAVE A CHANCE TO READ THEM OR TO STUDY THEM I'LL BE READY FOR A MOTION.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE MINUTES.

I'LL SECOND. OKAY.

I HAVE A MOTION BY PHIL, A SECOND BY ADAM TO APPROVE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

MOTION PASSES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

NEXT UP IS TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT, CSO NUMBER

[3.B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing an amendment to the professional services contract CSO#5045-03-2023 for $120,277.00 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for a total contract amount of $1,211,192.00 for the design of the extension of Lakewood Drive from FM 1902 to Chisholm Trail Parkway. (Staff Contact: Michelle McCullough, P.E., CFM, City Engineer)]

5045-03-2023 FOR $120,277 WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.

FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF 1,000,002 11 192 FOR THE DESIGN OF THE EXTENSION OF LAKEWOOD DRIVE FROM FM 1902 TO CHISHOLM TRAIL PARKWAY.

THIS WILL BE PRESENTED BY MICHELLE MCCULLOUGH, CITY ENGINEER.

GOOD EVENING, BOARD MEMBERS.

AS YOU SAID, MY NAME IS MICHELLE MCCULLOUGH, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES.

AND I'M GOING TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE LAKEWOOD DRIVE EXTENSION AND ALSO GIVE A BRIEF UPDATE.

SO, AS YOU KNOW, LAKEWOOD IS INCLUDED ON THE CITY'S MTP MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN.

IT'S A FOUR LANE ARTERIAL WITH AN ESTIMATED FUTURE 20,000 TO 24,000 VEHICLES PER DAY.

CONSTRUCTION IS CURRENTLY UNDERWAY BETWEEN 1020 AND FM 1902.

THE SECTION BETWEEN 1020 AND 1016 IS OPEN AND FOR USE FOR VEHICLES, AND THEY ARE STILL WORKING ON SIDEWALK.

AND THEN WE WILL BE MOVING FORWARD WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CONNECTION TO FM 1902.

IN THE NEXT MONTH OR SO, LAKEWOOD DOES SERVE AS THE DIRECT CONNECTION FROM SH 174 AND SALISBURY BOULEVARD AND HULEN STREET, OR WILL FOR 174, AND IT IS CONSIDERED CRITICAL TO THE ROADWAY NETWORK AS DEVELOPMENT CONTINUES WITHIN THE CITY AND THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.

THIS ALSO SERVES AS THE PRIMARY ACCESS OR GATEWAY TO THE HOOPER BUSINESS PARK, AND ON MARCH 20TH, 2023, THE CITY COUNCIL DID APPROVE THE CONTRACT FOR THE DESIGN OF THE LAKEWOOD DRIVE EXTENSION.

AWARDED IT TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES.

THIS IS THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT.

SCOPE INCLUDES THE DESIGN SURVEY TRAFFIC STUDY SCHEMATIC.

FM 1902 REALIGNMENT, UTILITY COORDINATION, AMONG OTHERS.

SO THE TRAFFIC STUDY WAS COMPLETED.

IT'S A DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY RIGHT NOW.

THE SCOPE DID INCLUDE TO ANALYZE THE EXISTING AND FUTURE CONDITIONS IN THE STUDY ALSO CONFIRMED THAT THE ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT WAS THE MOST EFFICIENT CONFIGURATION FOR TRAFFIC FLOW, AND THE HIGHLIGHTED GRAPHIC THERE TO THE LEFT.

THE REALIGNMENT OF FM 1902 TO TN2 LAKEWOOD BOULEVARD IS THE MOST EFFICIENT FOR TRAFFIC FLOW.

WE DID LOOK AT ROUNDABOUT.

WE ALSO LOOKED AT TN LAKEWOOD INTO FM 1902, BUT THIS WAS THE MOST EFFICIENT.

MEETING WITH TXDOT AND GOING OVER THE DRAFT RESULTS OF THE STUDY.

TXDOT DID AGREE THAT THE ALTERNATIVE ALIGNMENT IS THE PREFERRED IS THE PREFERRED.

AND AS I MENTIONED, THE BUILD OUT VOLUME IS GREATER THAN 20,000 VEHICLES.

SO A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE TRAFFIC STUDY.

THE INITIAL DATA INDICATED, WHICH SURPRISED US A LITTLE BIT HIGHER VOLUMES THAN WE HAD ANTICIPATED ALONG COUNTY ROAD 915 AND 1902.

KIMLEY-HORN DID INDICATE THAT A TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAY BE WARRANTED DUE TO VOLUMES AND CRASH DATA THAT THEY HAD.

BUT THIS ANALYSIS WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT SCOPE.

WE WERE NOT EXPECTING TO GO FURTHER THAN WEST OF CHISHOLM TRAIL PARKWAY.

TRAFFIC FLOW AND OPERATION MAY BE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED IF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL IS NOT CONSIDERED IN THE OVERALL SCHEMATIC.

KIMLEY-HORN DID MEET WITH STAFF AND THEY DID RECOMMEND INCLUDING THE INTERSECTION IN THE ANALYSIS.

THE CONTRACT SCOPE INCLUDED DESIGN THE ORIGINAL DESIGN OF INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS AT THE TOLLWAY INTERSECTION.

SO WHEN WE TOOK A LOOK AT THAT, WE THOUGHT SOME OF THAT COST COULD BE OFFSET BECAUSE SINCE THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATED THAT THE SIGNALS WERE NOT WARRANTED UNTIL 2045. WE WOULD NOT INCLUDE THOSE SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS IN THE FINAL DESIGN.

[00:05:05]

SO AS I MENTIONED, THE FUNDS FROM THOSE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS COULD BE USED TO OFFSET THOSE COSTS.

SO WITH THAT INFORMATION, WE DID MEET WITH TXDOT AND WE DID MEET WITH COG.

WE HAVE MET NUMEROUS TIMES OVER THE LAST YEAR.

WE DID PRESENT THE CONCEPTUAL LAYOUT OF COUNTY ROAD 915 AND FM 1902 REALIGNMENT TO TXDOT.

THE DISCUSSIONS THAT WE WERE HELD REGARDING THE TRAFFIC, THE DRAFT TRAFFIC STUDY, WHICH OF COURSE INCLUDED THE RESULTS OF THE ANALYSIS, ALL ENTITIES DID AGREE THAT THE WEST SIDE OF THE TOLLWAY SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN.

JUST TO DUE TO THE TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND THE CURRENT NEED FOR THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL.

SO IF WE WERE TO ONLY CONSIDER THE EAST SIDE AND NOT CONSIDER THE WEST SIDE, THEN IT'S VERY POSSIBLE THAT THE DESIGN ON THE EAST SIDE WOULD HAVE TO BE MODIFIED IN THE FUTURE AFTER CONSTRUCTION.

SO CITY STAFF DID AGREE TO PROVIDE AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING DESIGN CONTRACT TO INCLUDE ONLY THE SCHEMATIC ON THE WEST SIDE TO CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION, AND TXDOT AGREED THAT THEY WOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE DETAILED DESIGN ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE TOLLWAY, INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION, INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS.

AND WE ALSO LOOKED AT REALIGNING 915 OR 1902 INTO 915 BECAUSE AS WE LOOK FURTHER INTO IT, 915 WAS ACTUALLY THE MAJOR MOVEMENT, JUST LIKE LAKEWOOD WAS ON THE EAST SIDE.

SO YOU HAVE BASICALLY THE SAME CONFIGURATION ON EITHER SIDE.

AND AS YOU CAN SEE, FM 1902 IS MOVED OVER TO THE WEST A LITTLE BIT MORE BECAUSE YOU WANT TO GET IT AWAY FROM THE INTERSECTION OF THE EXIT FROM THE TOLLWAY.

IN ORDER FOR IT TO OPERATE EFFICIENTLY NOW, TXDOT WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATION WITH THE PROPERTY OWNERS.

BUT WE HAVE BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THEM AND WE HAVE SHARED THIS INFORMATION.

THEY ARE OPEN TO THIS CONFIGURATION.

AND AS WE CONTINUE THROUGH THIS, IF THIS AMENDMENT IS APPROVED, WE'LL WORK WITH THAT PROPERTY OWNER AS WELL.

SO I KNOW THE BOARD IS AWARE OF THE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

YOU KNOW, AS CONSTRUCTION COSTS CONTINUE TO INCREASE, WE LOOK FOR DIFFERENT WAYS FOR FUNDING TO HELP OFFSET THE CITY COST.

SO THE TIP FOR TXDOT, IT'S THEIR FOUR YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN.

IT'S THEIR SHORT TERM PROGRAMING DOCUMENT, MUCH LIKE OUR FIVE YEAR IS.

IT DOES SUPPORT THE LONG RANGE STATEWIDE TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND PROJECTS INCLUDED IN THE TIP IN THE TIP ARE EXPECTED TO BEGIN CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THAT FOUR YEARS. PROJECTS ELIGIBLE TO BE PROJECTS ARE ELIGIBLE TO BE PARTIALLY OR FULLY FUNDED IF INCLUDED IN A TIP, AND SO REQUIREMENTS FOR ELIGIBILITY. THE ROADWAY HAS TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FEDERAL FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEMS AS A MAJOR COLLECTOR OR ABOVE INCLUDED IN COGS MOBILITY PLAN AND INCLUDED IN A TIP. SO WE ARE WORKING TOWARDS ALL OF THAT.

WE SHOULD BE SUBMITTING A REQUEST TO CHANGE THE FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR LAKEWOOD.

WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN IN DISCUSSIONS WITH COG AND HAVE PROVIDED THEM ALL THE INFORMATION FOR THEIR MODEL TO UPDATE IT, AND WE SHOULD BE WORKING TOWARDS SUBMITTING TO MODIFY A TIP IN I THINK IT'S MARCH IS WHAT I HAVE IN THERE, AND I DO HAVE A MISTAKE IN THIS NEXT STATEMENT.

SO THE TRAFFIC STUDY WITH THE CONCEPTUAL PLAN AND THE HIGH LEVEL COST, THOSE ARE THE FIRST STEPS TOWARDS THE DISCUSSIONS WITH COG.

AND SO WE HAVE COMPLETED THE TRAFFIC STUDY.

WE DO HAVE AN OPCC AND THIS SHOULD SAY, OF REQUESTING LAKEWOOD TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FUNCTIONAL CLASS AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE TIP PROGRAM.

SO THE REQUEST, THE REQUESTED ACTION TONIGHT IS TO APPROVE AN AMENDMENT TO THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR A IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,277,000, FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT AMOUNT OF $1,211,192.00 EXCUSE ME FOR THE DESIGN OF THE EXTENSION OF THE LAKEWOOD DRIVE FROM FM 1902 TO CHISHOLM TRAIL PARKWAY.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, AND I DO HAVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM KIMLEY-HORN HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM.

THANK YOU, MICHELLE. QUESTIONS, ANYONE? I MEAN, YOU'VE DONE A GREAT PRESENTATION, MADE US AWARE OF THIS CHANGE IN THE ALIGNMENT.

I IT IS WHAT IT IS AND I'M SURE THIS WILL BE A MORE EFFICIENT LAYOUT.

[00:10:02]

BUT TXDOT HAS COMMITTED FOR CONSTRUCTION COSTS WEST OF THE CHISHOLM TRAIL PARKWAY.

SO WE'RE ACTUALLY DESIGNING WITH THE HOPE THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE THE EXTENT OF HOW FAR WE HAVE TO GO.

WE'RE DOING THE 30 IT'S BASICALLY 30% SCHEMATIC DESIGN.

SO WE'LL HAVE IT ALL LAID OUT WITH THE ALIGNMENT, HOW MANY LANES WE NEED, WHERE THE SIGNAL IS GOING TO BE, WHERE THE INTERSECTIONS.

AND THEN THEY WILL DO THE DETAILED DESIGN PSA AND THEY'LL DO THE THEY'LL ALSO DESIGN THE INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS, WHICH WILL INCLUDE THE SIGNALS THERE. AND THEN THEY WILL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION.

OKAY. EXCELLENT.

THANKS. THERE ARE NO MORE QUESTIONS.

I'LL TAKE A MOTION. I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION BY ADAM, SECOND BY LARRY.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

THANK YOU, MICHELLE. NEXT UP IS ITEM THREE C TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT

[3.C. Consider approval of a Performance Agreement between The Burleson 4A Economic Development Corporation and the Bethesda Water Supply for infrastructure to support industrial development in the City of Burleson, Texas. (Staff Contact: Alex Philips, Economic Development Director)]

BETWEEN THE BURLESON FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND THE BETHESDA WATER SUPPLY FOR INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY OF BURLESON.

PRESENTED BY ALEX PHILLIPS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR.

GOOD EVENING, MR. PRESIDENT AND BOARD MEMBERS.

ALEX PHILLIPS, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR FOR THE CITY.

HERE TO PRESENT TO YOU THE PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH BETHESDA WATER SUPPLY.

SO BETHESDA WATER SUPPLY, THEY SOURCE THEIR ALL OF THEIR MAJORITY OF THEIR WATER FROM THE CITY OF FORT WORTH.

THEY DO STILL HAVE SOME WELLS.

BETHESDA HAS BEEN AN INCREDIBLE PARTNER FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS PARK.

THEY HAVE INSUFFICIENT FLOW RIGHT NOW TO PROVIDE THE 1500 GALLONS PER MINUTE OF FIRE FLOW, PLUS THE ADDITIONAL MAX DAY PEAK HOUR FLOW TO SERVE THIS PROJECT AND ANY OTHER FUTURE PROJECT.

SO THE ADDITIONAL PUMP WILL BE ABLE TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL 1000 GALLONS PER MINUTE OVER WHAT IS NEEDED FOR ANYTHING IN THE FUTURE.

BETHESDA HAS MADE NUMEROUS UPGRADES TO THEIR SYSTEM OVER THE YEARS WITH ANY, WITH NO KIND OF ASSISTANCE FROM US TO DO SO.

THIS NEW PUMP WILL PROVIDE THE CAPACITY NEEDED FOR THE PROJECT AND OTHER USERS.

FUTURE USERS IN THE PARK AS WELL.

THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT, WE WOULD COMMIT $250,000 TOWARDS THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF THE PUMP.

WE'LL MAKE THAT PAYMENT ONCE THE PUMP HAS BEEN INSTALLED AND IN SERVICE.

THEY HAVE UNTIL THE END OF 26 TO PUT THAT IN.

BUT TALKING TO BETHESDA, STEVE SAID, BASICALLY, AS SOON AS THIS GETS, IF THIS GETS APPROVED, THEY'LL START HITTING THE GO BUTTON.

SO I WOULD ASSUME THAT THEY WOULD BE GETTING THAT DONE A WHOLE LOT SOONER.

PAYMENT WOULD BE MADE AFTER WE VERIFY THAT THE WATER PUMP IS FULLY FUNCTIONAL AND CAPABLE OF PROVIDING THAT SUFFICIENT FIRE FLOW.

REQUESTED ACTION TONIGHT IS TO APPROVE OR DENY THE PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND BETHESDA WATER SUPPLY AND STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL.

HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ALEX. DOES THIS WATER AVAILABILITY IS NECESSARY NOT JUST FOR PROPERTY WITHIN OUR BUSINESS PARK, BUT ALSO OTHER PROPERTIES AS WELL THAT COULD BE REDEVELOPED FOR MORE DEMAND USES, BUT COULDN'T BE NOW BECAUSE THE SUPPLY IS NOT THERE.

JUST ON THE FIRE FLOW STANDPOINT, THE SUPPLY IS THERE FOR USAGE FROM DAY TO DAY, BUT FOR THE MAX DAY PER HOUR FOR FIRE FLOW, IT'S MORE IT'S NEEDED TO HAVE THAT ADDITIONAL PUMP AT THEIR NEW PUMP HOUSE.

OKAY. IT SEEMS TO ME LIKE IF WE WERE THE WATER PROVIDER IN THAT AREA, THAT WE WOULD HAVE TO DO THE SAME THING THAT THEY'RE DOING.

THEY'RE GOING TO SELL WATER, BUT WE'RE GOING TO HOPEFULLY DEVELOP PROPERTY THAT IS BOTH IN THE CITY AND OR IN THE CITY'S OWNERSHIP AT THE TIME, BUT ALSO PRIVATE PROPERTIES THAT WILL REDEVELOP AND PERHAPS BRING MORE TAX BASE.

AND SO, THIS IS THIS IS SOMETHING THAT SOMEBODY'S GOT TO MAKE THE FIRST MOVE.

WE'RE IN A POSITION TO DO IT.

YES, SIR. I THINK THIS WILL TRIGGER MORE ADDITIONAL BENEFITS IN THE CITY THAN WE'RE EVEN TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT.

DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. I HAVE NO QUESTIONS FROM ANYONE.

THEN I'LL TAKE A MOTION.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF BURLESON AND BETHESDA.

WATER SUPPLY, THE PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT.

I HAVE A MOTION BY LARRY, A SECOND BY ADAM TO APPROVE.

ALL THOSE IN FAVOR? AND I SEE ALL THE HANDS UP.

SO THAT PASSES BY UNANIMOUS VOTE.

THANK YOU. NEXT UP WILL BE ITEM THREE D TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE BURLESON FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND PARIS BAGUETTE

[3.D. Consider approval of a Performance Agreement between the Burleson 4A Economic Development Corporation and Paris Baguette U.S.A., Inc. for a 267,000 square foot food manufacturing facility located on Vantage Drive in Highpoint Business Park in Burleson, Texas. (Staff Presenter: Alex Philips, Economic Development Director)]

USA, INC.

FOR A 267,000 SQUARE FOOT.

DID YOU LIKE THE [INAUDIBLE] LOVE THAT.

[00:15:02]

I THOUGHT YOU MIGHT. YEAH.

FOR A 267,000 SQUARE FOOT FOOD MANUFACTURING FACILITY LOCATED ON VANTAGE DRIVE IN HIGH POINT BUSINESS PARK IN OUR CITY OF BURLESON, PRESENTED BY THE INIMITABLE ALEX PHILLIPS.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU.

MR. PRESIDENT, BOARD MEMBERS.

HERE TO PRESENT, WE'VE HEARD PROJECT DOUGH.

I MEAN, EVERYBODY'S BEEN.

WE'VE TALKED ABOUT PROJECT DOUGH FOR A LONG TIME, BUT IT IS PARIS BAGUETTE.

THEY ARE LARGE, A LARGE BAKED GOODS MANUFACTURER.