Link

Social

Embed

Disable autoplay on embedded content?

Download

Download
Download Transcript

[1. CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:06]

I'M GOING TO OPEN THE SESSION UP AT 5:33.

WE HAVE GOT THE HONOR OF MAYOR PRO TEM MCCLENDON IS GOING TO SAY OUR INVOCATION.

WOULD EVERYBODY PLEASE RISE FOR THE PRAYER AND ALSO THE PLEDGES? LET'S PRAY. DEAR LORD, WE COME BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING AS HUMBLE PEOPLE CHARGED WITH ADMINISTRATION OF OUR CITY AND DECISIONS THAT WE HAVE TO MAKE.

TONIGHT, I'D LIKE TO ASK THAT YOU HELP US TO LEARN TO FOLLOW THE EXAMPLE THAT YOUR SON, JESUS, GAVE US, TEACHING US THAT TO BE EFFECTIVE LEADERS, WE MUST ALWAYS BE DILIGENT SERVANTS.

WE THANK YOU FOR THE GRACE AND THE BLESSING THAT YOU'VE BESTOWED UPON OUR CITY.

WE ASK THAT YOU HELP US BE MINDFUL OF THOSE WHO FEEL NOT AS BLESSED.

HELP US TO BE THE CITY ON THE HILL THAT WE ASPIRE TO BE, BUT ALWAYS WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT TO BE A BEACON OF LIGHT, THAT WE MUST ALSO BE A BEACON TO ALL AND INCLUSIVE TO ALL.

WE ASK THAT YOU PROTECT THOSE WHO PROTECT US.

PUT YOUR HAND OF AID AND CONTROL AROUND THEM TO KEEP THEM SAFE FROM HARM AS THEY GUIDE AS THEY GUARD OUR STREETS AND GUARD OUR NEIGHBORHOODS IN THE HOURS OF DAY AND THE HOURS OF NIGHT.

WE ASK NOW THAT YOU GUIDE OUR MINDS AND HEARTS.

LET US LEAD WITH WISDOM AND COMPASSION.

WATCH OVER US, GUIDE US AND DIRECT US.

IN JESUS NAME, WE PRAY.

AMEN. AMEN.

[2.A. Proclamations]

THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION TWO PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS.

2A IS PROCLAMATIONS.

WE HAVE TWO PROCLAMATIONS THIS EVENING.

THE FIRST ONE IS A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING MAY 7TH THROUGH MAY 13TH AS PUBLIC SERVICE WEEK IN THE CITY OF BURLESON, I CALL FORWARD RICK DEORDIO, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES. I GUESS TO COORDINATE THIS AND SAY A FEW WORDS, AND THEN THE MAYOR WILL SAY SOMETHING TOO.

THANK YOU, AMANDA.

MAYOR, COUNCIL, APPRECIATE YOU ALL BEING HERE AND APPRECIATE THE RECOGNITION.

MAY 7TH THROUGH THE 13TH IS RECOGNIZED AS PUBLIC SERVICE EMPLOYEES APPRECIATION WEEK.

WE TRY AND CELEBRATE THOSE EMPLOYEES THAT WORK FOR THE CITY AND GIVE DAY IN AND DAY OUT TO EVERYBODY THAT COMES THROUGH HERE, BOTH CITIZENS AND VISITORS, EVERYBODY THAT NEEDS OUR HELP.

WE'RE ALWAYS HERE FOR THEM AND WE WANT TO RECOGNIZE THEM AS WE CAN.

TONIGHT, WE HAVE FOR THE PROCLAMATION A CONTINGENT OF EMPLOYEES COVERING MOST OF THE DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE CITY JUST SO THAT WE CAN SAY TO THEM, THANK YOU FOR EVERYTHING YOU DO FOR EVERYBODY THAT COMES THROUGH OUR TOWN.

SO IF I COULD GET THE TEAM TO COME UP HERE AS WE'RE BEING RECOGNIZED.

MAYOR, IF YOU'D LIKE TO DO THE PROCLAMATION.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, MAYOR CHRIS FLETCHER AND THE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL ARE PROUD TO PROCLAIM MAY 7TH THROUGH MAY 13TH OF 2023 AS BURLESON PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK.

COUNCIL, IF YOU WOULD GO DOWN AND TAKE A PICTURE.

THIS NEEDS TO BE CALCULATED.

[00:05:04]

THE NEXT PROCLAMATION THAT WE HAVE, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, IS A PROCLAMATION RECOGNIZING CINCO DE MAYO IN THE CITY OF BURLESON.

COUNCIL MEMBER PLACE ONE VICTORIA JOHNSON WILL PRESENT AND HERE TO RECEIVE IS PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT.

THANK YOU.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, COUNCILWOMAN VICTORIA JOHNSON, ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF BURLESON AND THE ENTIRE CITY COUNCIL, HEREBY PROCLAIM MAY 5TH, 2023, AS CINCO DE MAYO DAY IN THE CITY OF BURLESON, AND URGE ALL CITIZENS TO JOIN US AT THE CINCO DE MAYO CONCERT THIS FRIDAY, MAY 5TH, FROM 7:30 TO 9 P.M.

IN THE MAYOR VERA CALVIN PLAZA.

IF JEN, MISS JESSICA AND ELIZABETH COULD COME DOWN TO GET A PICTURE.

COME ON, [INAUDIBLE]. THEN THE REST OF THE COUNCIL, PLEASE GO DOWN AND TAKE A PICTURE OR TWO FOR THE PROCLAMATION.

[2.B. Presentations]

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 2B, PRESENTATIONS.

WE DO HAVE A PRESENTATION THIS EVENING.

IT'S TO RECEIVE A REPORT TO RECOGNIZE THE SELECTED EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2023.

STAFF PRESENTER IS RICK DEORDIO, DIRECTOR OF HUMAN RESOURCES.

MR. DEORDIO. THANK YOU.

BACK AGAIN.

WELL, WHEN WE'RE THINKING ABOUT ALL THE EMPLOYEES THAT WE'VE JUST RECOGNIZED, EVERY QUARTER, THERE'S A COMMITTEE, EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER COMMITTEE, THAT LOOKS AT ALL THE ITEMS THAT COME IN FRONT OF US, ALL THE GOOD DEEDS THAT THE EMPLOYEES HAVE DONE, AND THEY NOMINATE AN INDIVIDUAL FOR EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER BASED ON SOMETHING THAT HAS HAPPENED DURING THAT TIME PERIOD THAT PERSON DID, TO REALLY STAND ABOVE EVERYBODY ELSE IN TAKING CARE OF OUR CITIZENS AND OUR VISITORS.

THIS FIRST QUARTER OF THE YEAR WAS A VERY UNIQUE SITUATION WHERE THERE WAS NOT ONE INDIVIDUAL, BUT TWO THAT TIED BY EVERY VOTE THAT THEY HAD FOR EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER.

SO TONIGHT WE'RE GOING TO PRESENT TWO EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER FOR THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2023.

THE FIRST ONE, MARCUS JACKSON, VIDEO PRODUCTION SPECIALIST IN THE MARKETING AND COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION OF THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

MARCUS WAS SELECTED FOR HIS INNOVATIVE IDEAS, WHICH HAVE MADE AN IMPACT ON THE CITY, BUSINESSES AND CITIZENS.

THE DEPARTMENT IS TASKED WITH COUNTLESS PROJECTS HIGHLIGHTING OUR CITY AND DEPARTMENTS.

DESPITE THAT, MARCUS HITS THE WORK HEAD ON, ALL WHILE BEING KNOWN FOR HIS POSITIVITY AND GOING ABOVE AND BEYOND IN HIS JOB, LEAVING A MARK ON ALL THOSE THAT HE MEETS.

MARCUS HAS BROUGHT A FRESH PERSPECTIVE TO THE TEAM AS QUICKLY BECOME WELL KNOWN BY THE CITIZENS AND BUSINESSES.

THE SECOND INDIVIDUAL IS COLBY SMITH.

COLBY SMITH IS A POLICE OFFICER IN OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT.

COLBY WAS SELECTED FOR HIS LONG TRACK RECORD OF EXCELLENCE AND CONTRIBUTIONS STARTING BEFORE HE WAS A PAID EMPLOYEE WITH THE CITY.

COLBY WAS A BURLESON POLICE EXPLORER AT AGE 15 AND SERVED AS POST CAPTAIN, PARTICIPATING IN MANY EVENTS.

HE WORKED HARD AND BECAME A POLICE OFFICER IN 2017, GRADUATED AS [INAUDIBLE] OF HIS CLASS--SALUTATORIAN, EXCUSE ME--MADE DETECTIVE TWO YEARS LATER WORKING TIRELESSLY TO CLOSE CASES AND RECENTLY WAS MADE AN OFFICER IN CHARGE SERVING IN A SUPERVISORY CAPACITY.

COLBY NOW GIVES BACK TO THE EXPLORER POLICE EXPLORER PROGRAM AS AN ADVISOR TO MOLD THE NEXT GENERATION OF OFFICERS.

PLEASE LET US CONGRATULATE BOTH MARCUS AND COLBY FOR EMPLOYEE OF THE QUARTER, THE FIRST QUARTER OF 2023.

MARCUS, AND IF WE COULD, I KNOW, COULD WE GET ANOTHER PICTURE WITH Y'ALL, ONE MORE TIME? THANK YOU.

[00:11:17]

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

[2.C. Community Interest Items]

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 2C COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS. CITY COUNCIL.

WE HAD A GREAT TIME AT ARBOR DAY.

YOU HAD, I BELIEVE IT WAS TEN TREES THAT WERE PLANTED.

I DIDN'T SHOVEL A SCOOP OF DIRT, BUT THE REST OF THE KIDS DID FROM HIKE MIDDLE SCHOOL AND DID A GREAT JOB.

SO NOW I REALLY ENJOYED IT.

WIFE WAS WITH ME AND IT WAS VERY, VERY NICE.

I KNOW NO ONE IS UNAWARE, BUT WE HAVE AN ELECTION THAT IS ABOUT TO CONCLUDE.

EARLY VOTING ENDS AFTER TOMORROW, AND AFTER THAT YOU WILL HAVE ONLY SATURDAY, 7 A.M.

TO 7 P.M.

TO VOTE. VOTING LOCATIONS ARE AVAILABLE ONLINE.

I THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE AN IMPORTANT VOTE.

I THINK THIS VOTE WILL SAY SOMETHING SERIOUS ABOUT THE ETHOS OF THE CITY, AND I'M VERY INTERESTED IN SEEING JUST WHAT THAT IS, AND I GUESS IF WE HAVE A LOW VOTER TURNOUT, THAT'S GOING TO KIND OF SAY SOMETHING, TOO, BUT I HOPE THAT'S NOT THE MESSAGE THAT WE GET AS COUNCIL PEOPLE UP HERE.

WE RELY ON INPUT TO KNOW JUST WHAT OUR CITIZENS WANT OF US AND EXPECT OF US, AND THE BEST WAY YOU CAN GIVE THAT INPUT IS TO COME AND CAST A VOTE, AND I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO SAY THREE OF OUR MEMBERS UP HERE WILL BE DEPARTING.

THIS WILL BE THEIR LAST FULL MEETING, AND IF I DON'T GET ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO SAY IT, I WANT TO THANK YOU ALL, AND I'M NOT GOING TO LOOK THIS WAY OR THIS WAY BECAUSE I'M NOT SURE WHICH ONE I'M SAYING IT TO, BUT I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR HARD WORK, FOR YOUR DILIGENT EFFORT, AND IT'S BEEN A GREAT PLEASURE TO WORK WITH YOU GUYS AND GIRLS, AND EVEN THOUGH WE'VE STRUCK SPARKS A FEW TIMES, THEY'VE BEEN GOOD.

THEY'VE BEEN GOOD FOR THE DEBATE, GOOD FOR FINDING THE JUST WHERE OUR CITY IS AND CHARTING A COURSE GOING FORWARD.

THANK YOU. I'LL PIGGYBACK ON THAT, DAN, JUST TO SAY THAT FOR JOHNSON COUNTY VOTERS, THE BURLESON SUB COURTHOUSE ON THE SECOND FLOOR IS YOUR VOTING LOCATION FOR EARLY VOTING. LAST DAY IS TOMORROW, 7 TO 7, AND THEN, OF COURSE, ELECTION DAY, 7 TO 7 SAME LOCATION.

FOR TARRANT COUNTY RESIDENTS, YOU CAN GO TO ANY POLLING LOCATION, BUT THE CLOSEST TO BURLESON IS THE CROUCH EVENT CENTER AT BICENTENNIAL PARK CROWLEY.

SO WITH THAT, THIS IS MY LAST FULL COUNCIL MEETING.

SO I DO WANT TO SAY TO BRYAN, SINCE I WON'T BE ABLE TO SIT THROUGH THE NEXT FULL MEETING, BUT THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE TO OUR CITY AND WE WISH YOU THE BEST OF LUCK IN KYLE.

YOU DID A LOT OF WORK WITH ME IN THE BEGINNING AS A ROOKIE AND A NEWBIE, AND I APPRECIATE THAT.

SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THAT.

FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO DON'T KNOW THE SPARRING THAT MAYOR PRO TEM AND I DO IS BECAUSE WE WERE BORN ON THE SAME DAY.

SO IT WAS A LITTLE BIT OF THAT LEO IN US AND WE BUT WE REALLY ENJOY IT.

THERE'S A LOT OF IT. [CHUCKLING] YES.

I DO WANT TO THANK CITIZENS WHO HOSTED A THANK YOU GATHERING FOR ME LAST NIGHT.

IT WAS A LOVELY EVENING AND IT MEANT A LOT TO ME.

SO THANK YOU FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO WERE ABLE TO DO THAT.

TO THE NEW COUNCIL, BEST OF LUCK IN THE UPCOMING ELECTION.

I HOPE YOU SERVE SELFLESSLY AND WITH THE PEOPLE OF BURLESON IN MIND ALWAYS, AND I'VE ALREADY KIND OF SAID I REALLY HAVE APPRECIATED THIS OPPORTUNITY AND I'M NOT GOING ANYWHERE.

I'M STILL GOING TO BE HERE AND I WILL BE BRINGING FORWARD A LOT OF SMALL BUSINESS STUFF THAT I'M WORKING ON.

SO THAT'LL BE REALLY GOOD.

SO THE ANIMAL SHELTER ON ANOTHER NOTE IS FULL.

IT MIGHT HAVE GOTTEN 1 OR 2 SINCE I READ THAT LAST POST, BUT IT'S AT CAPACITY, SO THAT MEANS THERE ARE A LOT OF OPTIONS FOR YOU TO ADOPT.

[00:15:04]

SO STOP BY TO MAKE YOUR SELECTION FOR YOUR NEW BEST FRIEND, AND THE SHELTER IS WAIVING ADOPTION FEES RIGHT NOW, AND I WENT AND LOOKED AND AS SOMEONE WHO RECENTLY LOST HER FUR BABY, I WAS LIKE.

OH, I COULD TAKE ONE HOME, BUT WE SAID, NO, WE CAN'T DO IT FOR A WHILE BECAUSE WE'RE JUST TOO HEARTBROKEN OVER OUR BABY, BUT THERE ARE SOME ADORABLE DOGS AND I THINK THERE'S TWO CATS. SO GET OUT TO THE ANIMAL SHELTER, AND AGAIN, I WANT TO THANK THE STAFF, REALLY FOR YOUR SUPPORT OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS AND TO MY FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS.

TO PIGGYBACK ON A COMMENT MS. PAYNE MENTIONED, THIS IS NATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS WEEK AND THERE ARE A LOT OF ACTIVITIES GOING ON IN OUR COMMUNITY.

WE'RE BLESSED WITH SOME TREMENDOUS SMALL BUSINESSES.

SO SHOP, LOCAL SUPPORT, LOCAL, PARTICIPATE IN WHATEVER ACTIVITIES, EVENTS, GIFT CARD DRAWS, THAT KIND OF STUFF.

I DEFINITELY DID MY PART.

I GOT MY OIL CHANGED LOCALLY THIS MORNING AND THEN I ORDERED SOMETHING FROM A LOCAL BOUTIQUE.

SO JUST HELP SUPPORT LOCAL BECAUSE WE DEFINITELY WANT THEM TO THRIVE.

THEY'RE THE HEARTBEAT OF OUR COMMUNITY.

IN ADDITION TO SUPPORTING LOCAL, THIS THURSDAY YOU CAN SHOP LOCAL AT CITY MARKET THEY WILL HAVE TIP A COP AND YOU CAN GET SOME GROCERY SHOPPING DONE AND THEN WE'LL HAVE POLICE OFFICERS THERE TO CARRY OUT YOUR GROCERIES, AND IT'S A FUNDRAISING EVENT FOR OUR AWESOME POLICE FOUNDATION.

THAT'S FROM 3 P.M.

TO 7 P.M.

THIS THURSDAY AT CITY MARKET.

THE LIBRARY CURRENTLY HAS AN ORIGAMI ART INSTALLATION THAT THEY'RE WORKING TOWARDS.

SO IF YOU LIKE TO FOLD PAPER, YOU CAN DROP BY THE LIBRARY AND THEY HAVE INSTRUCTIONS AND SHEETS OF PAPER FOR YOU TO CREATE ORIGAMI ART WHILE YOU'RE THERE OR YOU CAN DROP AN ORIGAMI CREATURE OFF AT THE LIBRARY AND THEN THEY'RE GOING TO CREATE A WHOLE INSTALLATION.

IT'S THIS WHOLE MONTH OF MAY, SO HELP SUPPORT OUR LIBRARY IN THAT ENDEAVOR.

IT SOUNDS SUPER FUN AND I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT ALL OUR COMMUNITY COMES UP WITH.

ON THE 13TH IN THE PLAZA, WE WILL HAVE A MOTHER'S DAY OUT OUTING FROM 6 TO 8 P.M.

SO DROP IN MAMAS AND FAMILIES AND SUPPORT THOSE MAMAS AND ENJOY AN EVENING RIGHT HERE IN OUR HOMETOWN.

I HAVE ONE LAST THING WE LEARNED EARLY IN APRIL, AND THEN IT'S JUST IT CAME TO MIND AGAIN WHEN WE WERE OUT AT EARTH DAY CELEBRATION AT RUSSELL FARM, BUT WE RECEIVED A GOVERNOR'S COMMUNITY ACHIEVEMENT AWARD FOR OUTSTANDING COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENT.

THE KEEP TEXAS BEAUTIFUL, IN PARTNERSHIP WITH TXDOT AWARDS COMMUNITIES THAT HAVE MADE DIFFERENT TYPES OF IMPROVEMENTS WITH LANDSCAPING AND THINGS, AND SO BURLESON WILL RECEIVED $250,000 FOR A LANDSCAPING PROJECT TO BE COMPLETED BY TXDOT ALONG A STATE MAINTAINED RIGHT OF WAY, AND WE HAVE PLENTY OF THAT HERE IN TOWN, SO I CAN'T WAIT TO SEE WHAT GETS PICKED TO GET IMPROVED, BUT I JUST WANT TO THANK THE BURLESON BEAUTIFUL VOLUNTEERS, OUR AMAZING PARKS AND PUBLIC WORKS AND ALL THE GREAT DEPARTMENTS AND VOLUNTEERS THAT HELP MAKE THIS POSSIBLE, AND SO KUDOS TO OUR COMMUNITY ON RECEIVING THAT AWARD.

I DO HAVE TO SAY THAT VICTORIA KEEPS HTO OPEN.

[CHUCKLING] SHE'S A FREQUENT FLIER.

SO THERE YOU GO. THAT'S IT.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION THREE.

CHANGES TO THE POSTED AGENDA.

3A IS ITEMS TO BE CONTINUED OR WITHDRAWN.

I DON'T KNOW OF ANY OF THOSE ITEMS. 3B IS ITEMS TO BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA FOR SEPARATE DISCUSSION BY THE CITY COUNCIL, BY STAFF OR BY MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC IN ATTENDANCE.

ITEMS CAN BE ADDED TO THE CONSENT AGENDA, BUT THEY DO REQUIRE AN OFFICIAL VOTE BY THE CITY COUNCIL.

ARE THERE ANY ITEMS TO BE WITHDRAWN FROM THE CITY COUNCIL CONSENT AGENDA THIS EVENING? ANYBODY? ANYBODY FROM THE AUDIENCE? OKAY, I SEE NONE.

THAT'LL MOVE US ON TO SECTION FOUR REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS.

[4.A. Receive a report, hold a discuss and possible request for future agenda item concerning the Burleson Better Together Committee. (Presenter: Tamara Payne, Council Place 4)]

4A IS TO RECEIVE A REPORT, HOLD A DISCUSSION AND THE POSSIBLE REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS CONCERNING THE BURLESON BETTER TOGETHER COMMITTEE.

THE PRESENTER THIS EVENING IS COUNCIL PLACE FOR TAMARA PAYNE.

TREY, CAN YOU MAKE SURE HER PRESENTATION IS PULLED UP? WHERE'S THE KEYBOARD? OH, THERE IT IS.

THANK YOU. I GOT IT.

I DON'T PRESENT FROM UP HERE VERY MUCH.

HELLO, FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS AND TO THE CITIZENS WATCHING THOSE IN THE ROOM TODAY, I'M HERE TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THE BURLESON BETTER TOGETHER COMMITTEE.

[00:20:07]

LET ME GIVE YOU A QUICK BACKGROUND ON THIS.

COUNCIL MEMBER TAMARA PAYNE AND VICTORIA JOHNSON.

WE SEPARATELY REQUESTED THIS ITEM MANY YEARS AGO, AND ON JULY 12TH, 2021, A WORK SESSION ITEM WAS PRESENTED ABOUT DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION WITHIN THE CITY OF BURLESON. THEN AFTER THAT, COUNCIL MEMBER VICTORIA AND MYSELF WORKED WITH THE CITY STAFF TO CREATE A MISSION AND A CHARGE OUTLINE TO PRESENT TO THE REST OF THE COUNCIL ALONG WITH THE NAME OF A NEW COMMITTEE NOVEMBER 8TH, 2021, WHICH IS REALLY KIND OF SAD.

I THINK THAT IT'S SO FAR AWAY THAT WE PRESENTED THIS.

A PRESENTATION WAS GIVEN TO THE FULL COUNCIL ON THE NAME OF THE NEW COMMITTEE ALONG WITH THE MISSION AND THE CHARGE COUNCIL AGREED TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THE COMMITTEE STRUCTURE.

HOWEVER, I THINK WE HAD A LOT OF OTHER PRIORITIES THAT GOT IN THE WAY AND SO AS MY FINAL FAREWELL, I WANTED TO BRING THIS FORWARD AS SOMETHING THAT WAS VERY IMPORTANT TO ME. WHEN I WAS RUNNING, I HAD TALKED ABOUT CREATING SOME SORT OF COMMITTEE LIKE THIS, AND WE DON'T ALWAYS GET EVERYTHING DONE IN OUR FIRST TERM, BUT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT AND I DID NOT WANT TO LET THIS GO.

I OBVIOUSLY WILL NOT BE A PART OF MAKING THE DECISION MOVING FORWARD.

SO I'M JUST ASKING FOR YOU TO REVISIT THIS AND TAKE A LISTEN TO WHAT THIS IS ALL ABOUT.

SO WE TALKED ABOUT WHAT WAS IN A NAME, AND WHEN DISCUSSING A NEW STYLE OF COMMITTEE THAT WOULD ENCOMPASS ALL PEOPLE IN OUR COMMUNITY WITH A MISSION TO CELEBRATE EACH OTHER AND A CHARGE TO INVOLVE THE GREATER COMMUNITY.

A NAME WAS CHALLENGING.

THE WORD THAT WAS CONTINUALLY USED WAS TOGETHER.

THIS IS A COMMITTEE TO BRING US TOGETHER AS A CITY WHERE EVERYONE BENEFITS FROM EACH OTHER IN BURLESON OUR CITIZENS, BUSINESS OWNERS, CITY STAFF AND LOCAL OFFICIALS ARE TRULY BETTER TOGETHER.

SO LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT WORD.

THAT'S KIND OF A CATCH PHRASE, WORD THAT MIGHT CATCH YOU IN A NEGATIVE CONNOTATION, BUT I WANT TO BRING TO YOU WHAT I BELIEVE THE BEST WAY TO LOOK AT THIS DIVERSITY, A BROAD SET OF ATTRIBUTES, CHARACTERISTICS AND EXPERIENCES THAT ENCAPSULATES OUR SIMILARITIES AND OUR DIFFERENCES.

FOR EXAMPLE, AGE, ETHNICITY, EDUCATION, RELIGION, NATIONALITY, LANGUAGE EXPERIENCES, INTERESTS, SEXUAL PREFERENCES, SOCIOECONOMIC, GENDER, AND IT COULD GO ON AND ON.

OKAY, THAT IS WHAT DIVERSITY IS.

THIS IS ABOUT WHAT YOU SEE SITTING UP AT THE COUNCIL.

THERE IS HAVING A DIVERSE COUNCIL THAT REPRESENTS OUR CITY, HAVING DIVERSE STAFF.

IT'S ALSO ABOUT INCLUSION.

IT'S ABOUT HAVING A VOICE IN THE PROCESS, A VOICE THAT IS HEARD AND VALUED AND RESPECTED , AND THAT'S FOR ALL PEOPLE OF ALL AGES, OF ALL COLOR OF ALL BACKGROUNDS, TO FEEL LIKE THEY HAVE A VOICE IN OUR COMMUNITY AND THAT THEY FEEL VALUED AND RESPECTED, AND THEN EQUITY.

THIS IS ABOUT TAKING ACTION TO CREATE A FAIR AND UNBIASED ENVIRONMENT WHERE WE CAN ALL THRIVE, RIGHT? THIS IS ABOUT CREATING A THRIVING COMMUNITY.

SO TO SUMMARIZE THAT DIVERSITY IS ABOUT PEOPLE AND PERSPECTIVES.

EQUITY IS IN POLICY AND IN PRACTICE, AND INCLUSION IS OF ALL VOICES AND VISIONS.

SO THAT'S WHERE THE PROPOSED MISSION AND CHARGE CAME FROM.

THE MISSION STATEMENT TO GROW, NURTURE AND SUSTAIN THE COMMUNITY BY CELEBRATING AND EMBRACING THE MOSAIC OF LIVED EXPERIENCES AND VARIED PERSPECTIVES OF ALL BURLESON CITIZENS, AND I WANT TO STOP ON THAT AND FOCUS ON THE WORD MOSAIC, RIGHT? BECAUSE WE BATTED AROUND A LOT OF TERMS AND MOSAIC AND WHEN YOU LOOK AT THAT PICTURE IS REALLY A GREAT SUMMARIZATION OF WHAT ANY CITY IS AND ANY COMMUNITY IS.

IT'S ALL DIFFERENT PIECES COMING TOGETHER TO MAKE WHO BURLESON IS, AND THEN THE CHARGE IS TO ACTIVELY, ACTIVELY AND I WOULD ALSO USE THE WORD INTENTIONALLY LOOK FOR AVENUES TO CREATE OPPORTUNITIES TO ENGAGE WITH OUR COMMUNITY AND PROMOTE VARIED PERSPECTIVES AND LIVED EXPERIENCES WITH MEASURABLE OUTCOMES TO FULFILL OUR MISSION.

KEY THING THERE AGAIN BEING MEASURABLE OUTCOMES.

WE DON'T WANT TO CREATE A COMMITTEE THAT'S JUST A FLUFF COMMITTEE.

WE WANT TO HAVE OUTCOMES THAT WE'RE SEEKING TO WORK ON.

SO CELEBRATING BURLESON IS TO EMPLOY A WIDE VARIETY OF ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES THROUGH VISUAL ART, FOOD, THEATER, MUSIC AND CONVERSATION THROUGHOUT EACH YEAR.

SO HERE'S THE PILLARS TO SUCCESS.

THE FIRST ONE IS TO COLLABORATE WITH THE CITY'S VARIED COMMUNITY GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO STRENGTHEN COMMUNITY CONNECTIONS.

THE SECOND IS TO FOSTER A SENSE OF UNITY, ACCEPTANCE AND BELONGING THROUGH INTERACTION, APPRECIATION AND ACKNOWLEDGMENT WITH ALL CITIZENS, AND THEN THIRD IS TO ESTABLISH GOALS, OPPORTUNITIES AND MEASURABLE OUTCOMES TO FULFILL THE MISSION.

SO WHERE DO WE GO MOVING FORWARD?

[00:25:02]

THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO DEVELOP THE COMMITTEE STRUCTURE.

WE HAVE TO CREATE A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A NEW COMMITTEE AND APPOINT THE MEMBERS COMMITTEE CREATES PILLARS OF SUCCESS TO SUPPORT THE CHARGE.

SO THE COMMITTEE THEN WILL, BASED ON THE CHARGE AND THE MISSION, WILL CREATE THE PILLARS OF SUCCESS THAT THEY BELIEVE WILL SUPPORT THESE THREE MAIN PILLARS.

SUBCOMMITTEES TO PROMOTE AND SUPPORT EACH PILLAR AND THEN COMMITTEE TO BEGIN WORKING IN COMMUNITY AND REPORTING TO THE COUNCIL BASED ON THE OUTCOMES THAT THEY'RE TRYING TO ACHIEVE AND ESTABLISH COUNCIL MEETING REPORT DATES.

SO LET ME TELL YOU A STORY REAL QUICK.

A BOY MOVES TO BURLESON WITH HIS FAMILY FROM NORTH CAROLINA IN HIS FRESHMAN YEAR OF HIGH SCHOOL.

THAT'S A TOUGH TRANSITION AT THAT AGE ESPECIALLY.

HE'S A WELL-SPOKEN, EXTREMELY INTELLIGENT, BLACK, GAY TEENAGER.

IN 2020, HE WENT ON A LOCAL RADIO SHOW TALKING ABOUT BLACK ISSUES AND THINGS HE HAS EXPERIENCED IN HIS LIFE.

SHORTLY AFTER HE STARTED WORKING FOR THAT SAME LOCAL SMALL BUSINESS.

ONE DAY HE MEETS A MIDDLE AGED WHITE WOMAN WHO IS RUNNING FOR CITY COUNCIL.

THEY HAVE A GREAT CONVERSATION FILLED WITH INQUISITIVE QUESTIONS ON BOTH ENDS.

IT BECAME CLEAR THEY WERE ON DIFFERENT ENDS POLITICALLY ON A NATIONAL LEVEL, BUT THERE WERE SO MANY OTHER THINGS IN COMMON REGARDING LOCAL ISSUES.

PLUS, THERE WAS A GENUINE LIKE AND RESPECT FOR EACH OTHER RIGHT FROM THE BEGINNING.

A FEW MEETINGS LATER, THE HONOR SOCIETY JUNIOR FROM CENTENNIAL HIGH SCHOOL IS THE CAMPAIGN MANAGER FOR ME.

THIS IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF BETTER TOGETHER IN BURLESON CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR PEOPLE FROM DIFFERENT WALKS OF LIFE, VARYING AGES, ETHNICITIES, COLOR, CULTURE, ETCETERA TO CONNECT, LEARN FROM ONE ANOTHER, LIFT EACH OTHER, AND OUR COLLECTIVE VOICES TO BE HEARD.

THIS COMMITTEE CAN BE A STRONG FOUNDATION FOR THE FUTURE OF BURLESON AND HELP TO TRULY CREATE A COMMUNITY THAT IS BETTER TOGETHER.

WHERE IS THAT IMPRESSIVE YOUNG MAN NOW? HE'S IN HIS THIRD YEAR AT HOWARD UNIVERSITY AND I WAS HONORED TO WRITE A RECOMMENDATION LETTER FOR HIM AND SO PROUD TO SEE THE MAN THAT HE HAS GROWN INTO TODAY.

WE EVEN HAD DINNER IN MARCH WHEN I WAS IN DC.

SHORTLY AFTER THAT DINNER, HE WAS ELECTED AS THE 63RD HOWARD UNIVERSITY STUDENT ASSOCIATION VICE PRESIDENT.

I AM BETTER FOR KNOWING THIS MAN, FOR OUR DIFFERENCES, AND FOR ALL THE THINGS THAT WE HAVE IN COMMON.

THE END OF HIS STORY IS STILL BEING WRITTEN, AS IS MINE AND AS IS THE CITY OF BURLESON.

BURLESON IS BETTER TOGETHER.

QUESTIONS. COMMENTS.

STILL GET THE MOSAIC WORD, JUST LIKE YOU SAID.

IT'S JUST SOMETHING THAT WILL STAND OUT, AND IT EMPHASIZES EXACTLY WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT OVER A NUMBER OF MEETINGS, AND I THINK WHAT COMES UP IN A LOT OF OUR COUNCIL MEETINGS AS WELL AS FAR AS LIKE ISSUES THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, THE COMMUNITY, THE NEIGHBORHOODS THAT WE'RE ADDRESSING IF SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE FIXED OR SOMETHING THAT'S GROWING.

SO I'M VERY PROUD OF THE WORD THAT WE WERE ABLE TO COME TO.

I THINK THE STICKING POINT FOR ME HAS BEEN HOW DO WE TURN THIS INTO MEASURABLE? AND THAT'S WHY I THINK IT DIDN'T LIKE, WHAT DO WE DO? HOW DOES WHAT WE'RE DOING BECOME MEASURABLE? BECAUSE I'M BEYOND PROUD OF IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS HOW DEPARTMENTS WITHIN THE CITY HAVE EMBRACED THE IDEA OF CELEBRATION AND WE THIS JUNE WILL HAVE OUR FIRST JUNETEENTH EVENT, AND WE CELEBRATED HISPANIC HERITAGE MONTH IN OCTOBER AND WE HAD A MASSIVE TURNOUT IN THE PLAZA FOR A SELENA COVER BAND, BUT THERE'S MORE TO CELEBRATE, MORE TO ACKNOWLEDGE, MORE TO RECOGNIZE, AND THERE'S SO MANY AVENUES TO DO IT.

WE TALKED ABOUT IT WITH MUSIC, WITH ART, WITH CONVERSATIONS, AND I THINK THE PART NEXT IS TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO MAKE WHAT WE WANT TO SEE MEASURABLE, AND I THINK THAT IS A DIFFICULT THING FOR AS A COUNCIL, FOR YOU TO SIT HERE AND TRY TO FIGURE THAT OUT.

I WOULD SUGGEST THAT WE PUT THE COMMITTEE TOGETHER.

THESE THINGS DON'T ALWAYS WORK, BY THE WAY, RIGHT? NOT EVERYTHING WE TRY IN ANY ORGANIZATION WORKS.

IT'S AN IDEA, BUT IF YOU CAN PUT A COMMITTEE TOGETHER AND ALLOW THE COMMITTEE TO TRY TO COME UP WITH THE OUTCOMES, MAYBE POSSIBLY THAT BRAINCHILD WILL BE BETTER THAN WHAT WE CAN DO UP THERE WITH THEM COMING TOGETHER AND SAYING, WHAT DOES THIS LOOK LIKE? SO I GET IT.

I TOTALLY DO, AND IF IT DOESN'T WORK, IT DOESN'T WORK.

I'M NOT, YOU KNOW, IT'S NONE OF US IS TIED TO ANY ONE IDEA THAT WE BRING FORWARD.

HOWEVER, I THINK IF WE AT LEAST GIVE IT A TRY AND ALLOW THE PEOPLE TO SEE WHAT THEY CAN COME UP WITH, BECAUSE WE WANT IT TO BE

[00:30:08]

MORE THAN CELEBRATIONS AND EVENTS, OR IS IT THEM THAT COMES TO THE PODIUM AND TALKS ABOUT THE CINCO DE MAYO AND THAT COMMITTEE IS HELPING TO COME UP HERE AND SAY, HEY, DID YOU KNOW ABOUT THIS? AND REMEMBER, TOO, IT'S ABOUT THEIR VOICES BEING HEARD.

SO THEY'RE GOING TO BRING TOGETHER THINGS THAT WE MAYBE DON'T THINK OF, YOU KNOW.

MAYOR PRO TEM TALKS ABOUT HIS SON AND HIS DISABILITY.

WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT THAT BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THAT SITUATION IN OUR LIVES.

THAT'S THE KIND OF THINGS WE NEED.

WE NEED PEOPLE TO COME FORWARD AND TALK ABOUT THEIR ISSUES OR THEIR THINGS THEY EXPERIENCE AS AN EDUCATION.

TO US, THAT IS HOW WE GROW CLOSER AS A COMMUNITY.

I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR PASSION ON EVERYTHING YOU DO, AND I DON'T WANT THIS TO FALL SHORT OF YOUR EXPECTATIONS.

SO I'M GOING TO ASK VICTORIA TO KIND OF TAKE THE TORCH ON THIS AND RUN WITH IT.

SO WE DON'T WE DON'T DROP THE BALL IF THAT'S OKAY.

I'D BE PROUD TO.

THANK YOU, AND I KNOW YOU'LL DO A GREAT JOB.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

AT THIS TIME, WE DO HAVE A NEED TO RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION.

[9. RECESS INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION]

SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551 OF THE TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, THE CITY COUNCIL WILL CONVENE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION IN THE CITY COUNCIL WORK ROOM IN CITY HALL TO CONDUCT A CLOSED MEETING TO DISCUSS THE ITEMS LISTED BELOW.

PURSUANT TO SECTION 551.071, 551.072, 551.074 AND 551.087. MAYOR, IF YOU COULD ASK FOR A VOTE ON THIS ITEM.

IS THERE A MOTION? WELL, I TRIED TO MOVE.

SO MOVE. WHATEVER.

SECOND.

ARE THE BUTTONS, THE DIGITAL NOT WORKING? OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY VICTORIA.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES UNANIMOUS.

WE'RE GOING INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION AT 6:05.

ARE YOU READY? YES, SIR. IS THERE A MOTION TO RECONVENE? SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN, A SECOND BY TAMARA.

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.

WE'RE BACK IN SESSION AT 6:43.

[5. CITIZENS APPEARANCES]

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION FIVE CITIZENS APPEARANCE.

EACH PERSON IN ATTENDANCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON AN ITEM NOT POSTED ON THE AGENDA SHALL SPEAK DURING THIS SECTION.

THE SPEAKER CARD MUST BE FILLED OUT AND TURNED IT TO THE CITY SECRETARY PRIOR TO ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL, AND EACH SPEAKER WILL BE ALLOWED THREE MINUTES TO SPEAK.

EACH PERSON IN ATTENDANCE WHO DESIRES TO SPEAK TO AN ITEM THAT IS POSTED ON THE AGENDA SHALL SPEAK WHEN THAT ITEM IS CALLED FORWARD FOR CONSIDERATION.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, I DO HAVE ONE SPEAKER CARD.

ROBERT PAYNE.

IS THIS THING ON? OKAY, MY NAME IS ROBERT PAYNE.

I LIVE AT 1125 WINDY MEADOWS DRIVE.

I AM THE HUSBAND OF COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE.

I'M VERY THANKFUL YOU ALL WENT TO EXECUTIVE SESSION SO I DIDN'T HAVE TO FOLLOW HER PRESENTATION JUST IMMEDIATELY.

SHE HAS A LOVE FOR PUBLIC SPEAKING AND A POWERPOINT.

I HAVE NEITHER.

SO I HAVE CHOSEN TO SPEAK PUBLICLY THOUGH, BUT I AM SPEAKING DIRECTLY TO HER, AND I'VE TAKEN SOME NOTES HERE BECAUSE I DON'T HAVE A POWERPOINT.

THERE WERE MANY MALICIOUS MOTIVES ASSIGNED AS TO WHY YOU RAN FOR COUNCIL.

NONE OF THOSE WERE TRUE.

OF COURSE, WE KNOW THE ONLY REASON THAT YOU RAN WAS A DESIRE TO SERVE, AND YOU'VE ALWAYS HAD A SERVANT'S HEART.

I'M THANKFUL FOR YOUR SERVICE, AND I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT I'M THANKFUL FOR YOUR HARD WORK AND YOUR DEDICATION TO THE POSITION.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR LEADERSHIP.

THANK YOU FOR SERVING WITH INTELLIGENCE.

THANK YOU FOR ALWAYS ASKING WHAT'S BEST FOR THE CITIZENS.

THANK YOU FOR SERVING WITH TENACITY AND SPIRIT AND FIGHTING FOR THE THINGS THAT YOU BELIEVE IN AND FIGHTING AGAINST THE THINGS THAT YOU THOUGHT WERE NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITIZENS.

THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE AND DEDICATION TO THE CITY.

[00:35:06]

PERSONALLY, I WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT WE AS A FAMILY ARE PROUD OF YOU , AND YOU'VE DONE A GREAT JOB, AND THE CITY OF BURLESON WAS LUCKY TO HAVE YOU.

THANK YOU.

I'M NOT CRYING; YOU'RE CRYING.

[CHUCKLING] WELL, I MIGHT START CRYING.

OKAY, I HAVE NO OTHER SPEAKER CARDS.

IS THERE ANYBODY IN THE AUDIENCE WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE CITY COUNCIL ON AN ITEM THAT IS NOT LISTED ON THE AGENDA FOR ACTION? SEEING NONE. THAT'LL MOVE US ON TO SECTION SIX CONSENT AGENDA.

[6. CONSENT AGENDA]

ALL ITEMS LISTED BELOW ARE CONSIDERED TO BE ROUTINE BY THE CITY COUNCIL AND WILL BE ENACTED WITH ONE MOTION.

THERE WILL BE NO SEPARATE DISCUSSION OF THE ITEMS. APPROVAL OF THE CONSENT AGENDA AUTHORIZES THE CITY MANAGER TO IMPLEMENT EACH ITEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS TONIGHT.

THE CONSENT AGENDA IS 6A THROUGH 6M.

MAYOR, IF YOU COULD ASK FOR A MOTION ON THIS.

IS THERE A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA? MOVE TO APPROVE.

I HAVE A MOTION BY TAMARA, A SECOND BY RICK.

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO SECTION SEVEN, GENERAL.

[7.A. Consider approval of an amendment to the Engineering Services Contract (CSO#1408-06- 2020) with Kimley-Horn and Associates for design of the SH174 Widening project in the amount of $449,985.00 for a total contract amount of $1,335,485.00. (Staff Presenter: Errick Thompson, Deputy Director of Public Works - Engineering)]

7A IS CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT.

CSO 14-08-06 2020 WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES FOR THE DESIGN OF STATE HIGHWAY 174 WIDENING PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $449,985 FOR A TOTAL CONTRACT OF $1,335,485. STAFF PRESENTER THIS EVENING.

ERIC THOMPSON, DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING.

MR. THOMPSON, YOU'RE UP.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

BEFORE YOU, WE HAVE TONIGHT AN AMENDMENT TO A DESIGN CONTRACT FOR THE WIDENING OF WILSHIRE BOULEVARD.

STATE HIGHWAY 174.

SO 174 IS REALLY DIVIDED INTO TWO PROJECTS FOR THE CITY OF BURLESON.

BEING THAT IT'S ON A STATE ROUTE, TXDOT REQUIRES SCHEMATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN PROCESS IN ADDITION TO FULL DESIGN CONSTRUCTION PLANS.

SO THE SCHEMATIC DESIGN AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE FOR THE FIRST PHASE WAS PROGRAMED AS BEING FROM ELK DOWN TO WICKER HILL TO THE SOUTH, AND WE'RE ABOUT 95% COMPLETE WITH THAT PROCESS.

SO ON THE SLIDE HERE, THAT'S SHOWN BY THE BLUE LINE, A LITTLE UNDER TWO MILES IN LENGTH.

THESE NEXT SEVERAL SLIDES ARE GOING TO KIND OF WALK YOU THROUGH THE DIFFERENT PIECES OF THE PROJECT AND WE'LL EVENTUALLY GET TO WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR THE DESIGN AMENDMENT FOR.

SO IN THE RED LINE ON THIS CURRENT SLIDE, THIS IS THE SECTION FROM ELK TO JUST SOUTH OF HULEN THAT HAS BEEN UNDER FULL DESIGN FOR QUITE SOME TIME NOW.

THAT FULL DESIGN IS ABOUT 90% COMPLETE AT THIS POINT.

SO YOU'LL NOTICE THERE'S A LITTLE BIT OF A GAP BETWEEN WHAT'S BEEN THROUGH THE TXDOT PROCESS FOR SCHEMATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE AND WHAT'S BEEN IN AN ACTUAL DESIGN CONTRACT.

BASICALLY, WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR NOW, BASED ON SOME ADDITIONAL FUNDING BEING BROUGHT FORWARD, FEDERAL FUNDING IS THAT WE'D BE ABLE TO EXTEND THE FULL DESIGN FOR THE RED SECTION TO MAKE IT LINE UP WITH THE WITH THE BLUE LINE.

SO I MENTIONED THAT THERE'S A SECOND PHASE OF THE PROJECT.

SO FROM WICKER HILL, WHICH IS WHERE THE CURRENT SCHEMATIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL APPROVAL ENDS DOWN TO THE CITY LIMIT.

THAT'S IN THE 2022 GO BOND PROGRAM FOR DESIGN THAT'S ANTICIPATED TO START SOMETIME IN THE NEXT FISCAL YEAR IN THE CURRENT PLAN THAT'S SHOWN BY THE YELLOW LINE.

SO THE BLUE LINE IS STILL WHAT'S ALREADY ABOUT 95% THROUGH THE TXDOT PROCESS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE.

THE RED LINE, AGAIN, IS THE PORTION THAT'S ACTUALLY HAVING FINAL DESIGN PLANS DEVELOPED, AND THEN THE YELLOW LINE WOULD BE THE FUTURE PHASE.

[00:40:01]

SO IN ALL, YOU WOULD HAVE JUST UNDER THREE AND A HALF MILES OF 174 FROM ELK DOWN TO THE CITY LIMITS WHEN BOTH OF THESE PHASES WERE COMPLETED.

ONE MORE COLOR IF THAT WASN'T ENOUGH.

SO, AS THINGS STAND TODAY, IF WE KEPT THE PROJECT AS IS TODAY, THAT WOULD BE ABOUT ONE AND A QUARTER MILES.

AT SOME POINT, WE WOULD NEED TO COME BACK TO EITHER EXTEND THE LIMITS OF THE YELLOW SECTION.

OR WE COULD MAKE THAT A LITTLE SIMPLER AND JUST HAVE BOTH PROJECTS LINE UP WITH HOW THEY WERE ORIGINALLY ENVISIONED WELL BEFORE MY TIME YEARS AGO, BUT TO HAVE THE BLUE AND THE YELLOW BASICALLY BE THE TWO SEPARATE PROJECT LIMITS.

SO THIS IS THE LAST COLOR.

I ALMOST PROMISE.

[CHUCKLING] THE GREEN SECTION IS THE GAP THAT'S MISSING.

[CHUCKLING] ARE WE STRESSING YOU OUT? [CHUCKLING] ON THE CONTRARY.

THIS IS PROBABLY ABOUT TO GET FUN.

I ONLY HAVE TO COME UP TWICE MORE TONIGHT.

THE GREEN SECTION IS THE GAP THAT'S MISSING RIGHT NOW, SO IT'S NOT IN THE CURRENT CONTRACT FOR FULL DESIGN.

THAT WOULD BE THE RED SECTION.

SO WE'RE ASKING FOR THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT WITH THE SAME DESIGNER WHO'S DESIGNING THE RED SECTION TO EXTEND THEIR LIMITS BY 0.68 MILES SO THAT WE COULD CATCH THAT UP WITH THE RED PIECE, AND IF WE DO ALL THIS, IT MAKES ALL OF OUR LIVES EASIER GOING FORWARD BECAUSE NOW YOU HAVE TO WORK A HILL AND THEN WICKER HILL TO THE CITY LIMITS, WHICH WAS WHAT SOMEONE ENVISIONED A LONG TIME AGO, BUT SOMEHOW IT GOT SCREWED UP YEARS AGO.

SO THIS CONTRACT AMENDMENT IS ABOUT $450,000.

UH, AND WE'RE BASICALLY, YOU KNOW, IT'S GOT THE TYPICAL DESIGN ELEMENTS THAT TXDOT WOULD REQUIRE, INCLUDING AN EXTENSIVE AMOUNT OF COORDINATION WITH TXDOT AT SOME POINT.

I MENTIONED EARLIER THAT THE CURRENT PROJECT IS APPROACHING ABOUT 60% DESIGN.

WELL, WE WOULD BASICALLY NOT SLOW IT DOWN, BUT COMBINE THE TWO PROJECTS TOGETHER SO THEY WOULD BOTH GET TO 100% AT THE SAME TIME AND LIKELY BE READY FOR CONSTRUCTION BY TXDOT AGAIN, TXDOT IS FUNDING THE CONSTRUCTION.

THAT WOULD BE SUMMER OF '24.

SO THE PROJECT COST TO DATE CITY OF BURLESON IS PAYING FOR DESIGN.

SO THE CURRENT CONTRACT IS $885,500.

IT'S READY TO IT'S CLOSE TO WRAPPING UP FIRST OF NEXT YEAR.

WE'VE GOT THIS $450,000 AMENDMENT PROPOSED TO THAT CONTRACT, AND AGAIN, CONSTRUCTION WOULD BE LED BY TXDOT IN SUMMER OF '24 AND WRAPPING UP APPROXIMATELY SUMMER OF '25.

IT'S ALMOST A $30 MILLION CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, AND THE CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETELY FUNDED BY TXDOT AND THE COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS.

SO THEIR BASIC OPTIONS ARE TO EITHER APPROVE THE DESIGN CONTRACT AMENDMENT OR DENY IT, AND STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT YOU APPROVE IT.

WITH THAT, I'D BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.

ANYBODY? I'M READY. I'M READY FOR A MOTION.

I WAS WAITING TO SEE IF [INAUDIBLE] TOOK ALL THE COGNITIVE ABILITY THAT I COULD MUSTER TO FIGURE THIS OUT, BUT I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

[CHUCKLING] YEAH, I AGREE WITH THE.

HOW DID THAT ONE SECTION GET LEFT OUT? AND HOW DOES THAT COST ALMOST $450,000? THIS IS ANOTHER ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE WE DON'T WANT TO LOOK BACK AND GO, WHY DID WE NOT FINISH THE DESIGN WHEN WE WERE RIGHT THERE WORKING ON IT? YEAH, THAT'S AN ISSUE WE BROUGHT UP, DAN'S BROUGHT UP SEVERAL TIMES, SO.

WE DID DO PART OF IT.

WE DID THE ENVIRONMENTAL PART, BUT NOT THE ROADWAY PART.

MICROPHONES. OKAY, I'VE GOT A--IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? YEAH. OKAY, I GOT A MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY TAMARA.

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU, MAYOR. THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 7B.

[7.B. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing an application for TxDOT’s 2023 Transportation Alternatives (TA) Call for Projects for a Citywide project to complete the 10-mile pedestrian and bicycle loop with City of Burleson matching contributions not to exceed $3,200,000. (Staff Presenter: Errick Thompson, Deputy Director of Public Works - Engineering)]

THIS IS TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR TXDOT'S 2023 TRANSPORTATION ALTERNATIVES CALL FOR PROJECTS FOR A CITYWIDE

[00:45:06]

PROJECT TO COMPLETE THE TEN MILE PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE LOOP WITH THE CITY OF BURLESON MATCHING CONTRIBUTIONS NOT TO EXCEED $3.2 MILLION.

THANK YOU FOR THE EVEN NUMBER THERE.

STAFF PRESENTER IS ERIC THOMPSON, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING.

LET'S SEE HOW MANY COLORS WE'RE GOING TO DO THIS NEXT ONE 7B LET'S GO.

OH, HE'S GOT COLORS AND DOTTED LINES.

HE'S GOT A LOT COMING HERE.

SO. ERIC THOMPSON, "DEPUTY" DIRECTOR SO THAT MY BOSS DOESN'T GET A LITTLE [CHUCKLING] I DIDN'T GET THAT MEMO EITHER, BUT THERE ARE A LOT OF COLORS IN THIS PRESENTATION, BUT I'M NOT PLANNING TO POINT ALMOST ANY OF THEM OUT.

SO, I'M HOPING THAT YOU'LL AGREE THIS IS A...

OKAY, THANKS FOR THE ENCOURAGEMENT.

[CHUCKLING] SO WE HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY, VERY HIGH LEVEL TO SPEND ABOUT $3.2 MILLION. MOST OF THAT WE'VE ALREADY HAD PROGRAMED IN ORDER TO, IN EXCHANGE, GET ABOUT $16 MILLION WORTH OF TRAIL AND SIDEWALK AND PEDESTRIAN ENHANCEMENTS ALL OVER THE CITY, INCLUDING COMPLETION OF THE TEN MILE BIKE LOOP PROJECT.

SO, TXDOT HAS A OR HAS HAD A CALL FOR PROJECTS OUT FOR SEVERAL MONTHS. THEY'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DISTRIBUTE ABOUT $250 MILLION IN BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECT FUNDING.

SO THE CITY.

SUBMITTED A PRELIMINARY APPLICATION TO TXDOT BACK IN JANUARY.

THAT'S BEEN REVIEWED AND WE'VE BEEN NOTIFIED THAT WE'RE SELECTED TO MOVE ON TO THE TO THE SECOND AND FINAL PHASE.

SO THAT APPLICATION IS ACTUALLY DUE IN JUNE.

SO BASICALLY, WE'RE HERE TONIGHT TO GET YOUR CONCURRENCE AND SUPPORT TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THAT FINAL PROJECT APPLICATION.

AS I MENTIONED BEFORE, CITY CONTRIBUTION WILL BE CAPPED AT 3.2 MILLION, WHICH WOULD REPRESENT ABOUT A 20% MATCH ON A $16 MILLION PROJECT. IF WE'RE SELECTED, WE WOULD FIND OUT OR THE CURRENT SCHEDULE INDICATES WE WOULD FIND OUT IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR, AND YOUR RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT IS A CRITICAL PIECE TO THE OVERALL APPLICATION.

THIS SLIDE SHOWS YOU PORTIONS OF THE TEN MILE LOOP TODAY, BUT AGAIN, IF THIS APPLICATION IS ACCEPTED AND WE GET FUNDING, WE'D BE ABLE TO COMPLETE THE LOOP FOR THE MISSING PORTIONS, AND THIS SLIDE KIND OF GIVES YOU AN IDEA OF THE COMPLETED LOOP. WE WERE TALKING ABOUT 4.6 MILES OF SIDEWALK, AND ABOUT 3.9 MILES OF TEN FOOT WIDE SHARED USE PATH TRAILS. SIDEWALKS.

THIS BASICALLY COMES FROM THE MOBILITY PLAN.

YOU'VE SEEN SOME INFORMATION, A STATUS UPDATE ON THIS SOME MONTHS BACK.

SO THAT HASN'T CHANGED.

WE'RE STILL LOOKING TO ADDRESS AS MANY OF THE CONNECTING SIDEWALK SEGMENTS AS WE CAN.

SIDEWALK SECTIONS THAT CONNECT TO THE LOOP TRAIL.

THIS SLIDE GIVES YOU A LITTLE BIT OF AN IDEA.

REVIEW INFORMATION, BUT HOW? WE'VE PRIORITIZED THE 121 MILES OR SEGMENTS OF SIDEWALK ACROSS THE CITY.

WE'VE IDENTIFIED SOME SHORT TERM THAT COULD BE THAT WERE RECOMMENDED TO BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

MIDTERM AND THE 5 TO 10 YEAR TIME FRAME, AND THEN LONGER TERM THAT WE RECOMMEND BE COMPLETED IN THE NEXT 20 YEARS.

SO THOSE PREVIOUS TWO SLIDES WERE FROM THE MOBILITY PLAN.

NOW, THIS IS HOW THIS GRANT APPLICATION, THIS $16 MILLION PROJECT, WOULD IMPACT WHAT'S IN THE MOBILITY PLAN AND BASICALLY NINE OUT OF THE 12 SHORT TERM PROJECTS WOULD BE COMPLETED WITH THE WITH THE GRANT AND TWO OF THE SIX MID TERM BE COMPLETED.

AGAIN, IF WE'RE SUCCESSFUL.

SO OUR GOAL WOULD BE TO COMPLETE THE TEN MILE LOOP AND 80% OF THE SHORT TERM PROJECTS WITH THE CURRENT FUNDING THAT'S ALREADY ALLOCATED IN THE CAPITAL PROGRAM. SO I MENTIONED THE 20% OR FUNDING THAT THE CITY ALREADY HAS IN THE GO BOND PROGRAM AS YOU'RE AWARE, THERE'S JUST UNDER 1.3 MILLION ALLOCATED FOR SIDEWALKS.

[00:50:04]

SO WE'VE COME BACK TO YOU PREVIOUSLY AND SAID THAT WE WERE GOING TO PUT SIDEWALK PROJECTS BASICALLY ON HOLD PENDING THIS THIS GRANT APPLICATION BECAUSE WE WOULD NEED THAT FUNDING AS MATCHING FUNDS.

THERE'S ALSO A LITTLE BIT OF TIF FUNDING FOR RENFRO STREET, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENT OF ALMOST $200,000, AND THEN THERE'S FUNDING FOR ELK DRIVE, HILLSIDE DRIVE AND FM 931, ALSO IN THE GO BOND PROGRAM.

THAT TOTAL PROJECT'S ABOUT A LITTLE OVER A MILLION, BUT THE SIDEWALK PORTION OF IT IS JUST OVER $500,000.

SO WE'RE ONLY COUNTING THE SIDEWALK PORTION TOWARDS THIS POTENTIAL MATCHING FUNDING.

SO IF YOU ADD THOSE THREE, WE GET JUST UNDER $2 MILLION FOR THE EXISTING FUNDING, MEANING WE'RE A LITTLE BIT SHY, ABOUT $1.2 MILLION SHY OF THE 20% MATCH.

WE'RE WORKING PRETTY HARD TO TRY AND UPDATE THE FIVE YEAR CIP.

NOW THAT'LL COME BACK TO COUNCIL IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS.

FEELS LIKE A COUPLE DAYS, BUT WE'RE WORKING TO BRING THAT BACK AND THIS WOULD BE ONE OF THE ADJUSTMENTS THAT WE WOULD ASK YOU TO CONSIDER IN THAT NEW CIP SO THAT WE WOULD ACTUALLY HAVE THE FULL 3.2 AVAILABLE FOR THE MATCH.

WE'LL HAVE THAT. WE'LL MAKE THAT ASK OF YOU BEFORE WE KNOW ABOUT THE GRANT, BECAUSE WE WON'T KNOW.

THEY WON'T MAKE THEIR DECISIONS UNTIL OCTOBER.

SO WE'LL LIKELY BRING YOU RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE UPDATED CIP THAT INCLUDE THAT INCLUDE THE GRANT BEING SUCCESSFUL, THE APPLICATION BEING SUCCESSFUL, AND THEN IF FOR SOME REASON WE'RE NOT SUCCESSFUL WITH THE APPLICATION, WE WOULD COME BACK WITH FUTURE ADJUSTMENTS TO REALLOCATE THOSE FUNDS.

A LITTLE BIT OF TIMELINE.

WE'VE COVERED SOME OF THIS, BUT JANUARY WE SUBMITTED THE INITIAL APPLICATION.

MARCH, WE WERE NOTIFIED THAT WE WERE SELECTED TO PROCEED TO THE NEXT ROUND.

HERE TODAY, WE'RE SEEKING YOUR RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT AND AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE DETAILED APPLICATION, WHICH IS DUE IN JUNE.

OCTOBER, WE'LL FIND OUT IF WE ARE SUCCESSFUL AND THEN ASSUMING THAT WE'RE SUCCESSFUL JANUARY, WE WOULD LIKELY BE BACK TO COUNCIL WITH AN ADVANCED FUNDING AGREEMENT AND A DESIGN CONTRACT TO GET THE PROJECT STARTED.

DECEMBER OF '24, WE ANTICIPATE BEING PREPARED TO PUT THE PROJECT OUT FOR CONSTRUCTION BIDS APPROXIMATELY IN FEBRUARY OF '25 OR THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AND THEN SPRING OF '26 COMPLETE THE PROJECT.

SO TWO VERY HIGH LEVEL OPTIONS FOR YOU, YOUR CONSIDERATION EITHER TO APPROVE THE RESOLUTION OR DENY IT AND OBVIOUSLY WE RECOMMEND YOU APPROVE IT.

I'D BE HAPPY TO TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.

SO THE ONE THAT'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE GRANT WOULD BE TXDOT? IT'S A TXDOT PROGRAM.

YES, SIR.

IS COG INVOLVED IN THAT AT ALL? NO, SIR.

ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? YES.

OH, I JUST WENT BLANK.

OKAY, REAL QUICK, ON THE SHARED USE PATH PROJECTS, I KNOW WE'RE TALKING ABOUT MONEY HERE, BUT I JUST WANT TO ASK ABOUT THOSE.

WHAT DOES THAT MEAN AND WHAT DOES THAT LOOK LIKE? WHAT I'M CONCERNED WITH IS THAT WE'RE AND I KNOW YOU BROUGHT THIS UP A COUPLE OF MEETINGS AGO, BUT I WILL STATE IT AGAIN THAT WE'RE SHARED USE MAKES ME THINK OF WHAT WE BUILT OVER THERE ON IRENE AND THE NUTTINESS OF WHAT THAT WAS.

THINK OF SHARED USE AS A MUCH WIDER.

IT'S NOT WELL, IT'S WIDER THAN A SIDEWALK.

SO IT'S EITHER GOING TO BE WELL, IT'S GOT TO BE AT LEAST EIGHT FEET WIDE, BUT WE'RE LOOKING AT TEN FEET WIDE AND IT'S BASICALLY A TRAIL NOT THE ON-STREET.

SO IT'S FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLE? SURE. YES. OKAY.

OKAY, THE OTHER QUESTION I HAVE ABOUT THIS GRANT IS DO WE BY ANY CHANCE BECAUSE REMEMBER, WE VOTED A COUPLE A YEAR OR SO AGO TO LET GO OF A GRANT.

DO WE KNOW BY CHANCE IF THERE'S ANY CRAZY HOOPS WE'VE GOT TO JUMP THROUGH TO ACTUALLY ACCEPT THIS GRANT? BECAUSE YOU KNOW HOW THEY LIKE TO GIVE US GRANTS AND THEN SAY, BUT YOU HAVE TO DESIGN THIS WAY OR BUILD THIS WAY OR DO THIS AND THIS.

IS THERE ANYTHING TIED TO THIS THAT WE SHOULD BE AWARE OF? YES, IN MY POSITION, IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE THE BEST THING FOR ME TO DESCRIBE IT AS CRAZY, BUT THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND SOME THINGS THAT MIGHT NOT ALWAYS APPLY, BUT ALL THE FUNDING AND ALL THIS IS SET UP WITH ALL THAT IN

[00:55:07]

MIND. SO I THINK THE I DIDN'T MEAN TO CUT YOU OFF, ERIC.

I WOULD JUST SAY THE DIFFERENCE HERE IS THE AMOUNT OF FUNDS THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, $16 MILLION IS SIGNIFICANT.

I THINK THE ONE YOU'RE REFERRING TO WAS ON THE ALSBURY BRIDGE, AND IF I REMEMBER RIGHT, IT WAS ABOUT $1 MILLION WAS THE GRANT, WHICH ADDED A LOT OF COST AND TIME HERE.

IT'S A LOT OF MONEY THAT WOULD WE BELIEVE IT'S WORTH CHASING A LOT.

EVEN IF THERE'S A FEW HOOPS, IT'S 16 MILLION.

WE'LL CHECK A FEW BOXES FOR THAT.

YEAH. SO AS LONG AS IT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT WOULD GO AGAINST LIKE UPDATING THIS DESIGN FROM WHAT WE DID OVER THERE AND WE WOULD START THIS DESIGN WITH ALL THAT IN MIND. SO IT WOULDN'T INCREASE OUR COSTS BEYOND WHAT WE'RE PLANNING.

OKAY, GREAT. THANK YOU.

WILL WE SEE THE DESIGN OR THE LAYOUT BEFORE IT'S IMPLEMENTED? OH, ABSOLUTELY.

OKAY, I JUST DON'T WANT TO--I DON'T WANT ANOTHER IRENE.

WE'RE WELL OVER A YEAR FROM EVEN.

WELL, WE'RE ALMOST A YEAR AWAY FROM EVEN HAVING THE DESIGN CONTRACT START, SO WE WOULD DEFINITELY COME BACK AND GIVE YOU AN UPDATE THROUGHOUT AND WE'LL DEFINITELY HAVE TO BUILD TO I HOPE IT WILL NOT BE TO THE EXTENT OF IRENE.

I THINK THIS WHOLE COMMUNITY COULD AGREE THAT WAS JUST WONKY, BUT THIS WILL HAVE TXDOT THERE WILL BE SOME ELEMENTS OF TXDOT STIPULATION.

THEY WANT IT TO BE UNIFORM FOR WHATEVER, YOU KNOW, THE TYPE OF PROJECT IS ACROSS THE BOARD, BUT JUST LIKE BRYAN SAID, I THINK THE OPPORTUNITY TO GO AFTER A LARGER SUM OF MONEY BEFORE IT WAS THAT WAS A SMALL AMOUNT OF MONEY FOR A LOT OF WORK, AND THIS IS, YOU KNOW, A LOT OF MONEY, AND ALTHOUGH JUST LIKE ERIC WAS SAYING, AS WE'RE DOING THIS, IT'S GOOD TO HEAR THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO ADD ANY WORK OR ADD ANY DOLLAR FIGURES TO WHAT WE'RE ALREADY PLANNING TO DO, BUT IT IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO CHECK OFF SOME OF THOSE SHORT TERM PROJECTS, NINE OF 12 AND SOME MID-TERM.

I THINK THAT'S REALLY EXCITING, AND TO COMPLETE THAT TEN MILE LOOP IS JUST IT'S KNOWING HOW POPULAR OUR TRAILS ARE AND HOW WELL USED ALL OF THAT IS IN THIS COMMUNITY.

I'M EXCITED FOR IT.

SO THANKS. THESE GRANTS ARE A LOT OF WORK AND I APPRECIATE STAFF IN THE AMOUNT OF TIME LIKE ONE JUMPING ON THE OPPORTUNITY WHEN YOU SAW IT BECAUSE I GET EMAILS JUST TXDOT ANNOUNCES THIS GRANT OPPORTUNITY AND SO IT'S AWESOME IT'S A LOT TO KEEP A PULSE ON AND SO WE APPRECIATE YOU FOR DOING THAT SEEKING OUT THIS OPPORTUNITY AND FINDING VALUABLE PROJECTS THAT COULD BENEFIT FROM IT.

THANK YOU. I'LL BE SURE TO PASS THAT ALONG TO THE TEAM.

ANYBODY ELSE? YEAH, I'M GOING TO I'M NOT GOING TO REPEAT EVERYTHING I SAID ABOUT THE PROJECT THAT WE'VE DONE ALREADY, BUT I JUST I WANT TO SEE AS MUCH COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT, NOT NECESSARILY JUST THE COUNCIL, BUT I THINK EVERYBODY IN THE COMMUNITY NEEDS TO HAVE A LOOK AT THE CONCEPT DESIGNS AND THE VERY, VERY BASICS THAT WE'LL GET, AND THAT COULD BE AS EARLY AS JANUARY OF NEXT YEAR AS I'M READING YOUR TIMELINE.

SO I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN UP CLOSE LOOK AT THIS BEFORE THE PLANS START TO REALLY GET DRAWN.

YOU KNOW THIS I DON'T KNOW IF THIS INCLUDES A SEGMENT ALONG ALSBURY, BUT THAT'S GOING TO BE ONE OF THE MOST CHALLENGING THINGS WE'VE EVER TRIED TO ENGINEER, AND THAT'S GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF STAKEHOLDERS, A LOT OF JUST ABOUT EVERY ELEMENT TO A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT THAT CAN MAKE IT DIFFICULT AND HARD TO DO AND HARD TO COME UP WITH A USER FRIENDLY DESIGN.

SO THAT'S ALL.

JEN BASHAM HAS COME OUT REALLY, REALLY GOOD AT SHOWING STUFF TO THE TO THE CITIZENS.

SO WE'RE GOING TO FOLLOW HER LEAD.

OKAY, VERY GOOD, BUT THAT DESIGN CONTRACT, AGAIN, IT COMES BACK HOPEFULLY IN THE JANUARY 24TH TIME FRAME.

SO SHORTLY AFTER THAT, I THINK WE WOULD HAVE SOMETHING THAT WE WOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE SOME PUBLIC MEETINGS ON AND GET MORE FEEDBACK FROM YOU AND THE COMMUNITY TO MAKE SURE WE'RE ALL MOVING IN THE SAME DIRECTION.

ANYBODY ELSE? IS THERE A MOTION? OKAY, I GOT A MOTION BY VICTORIA AND A SECOND BY RICK.

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 7C.

CONSIDER APPROVAL OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING GRANTING A FRANCHISE TO WASTE CONNECTION LONE STAR, INC.

[7.C. Consider approval of an ordinance granting a franchise to Waste Connections Lone Star, Inc. for residential solid waste and recycling collection services in the City, authorizing an amendment to an existing solid waste franchise agreement with Waste Connections Lone Star, Inc. by amending the renewal date and extending the term five years pursuant to renewal terms under the current contract in the amount of $23,731,155.34, and finding that this ordinance may be considered and approved at only one meeting of the City Council. (First and Final Reading) (Staff Presenter - Eric Oscarson, Director of Public Works)]

FOR RESIDENTIAL SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES IN THE CITY.

AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH WASTE CONNECTION, LONE STAR INC.

BY AMENDING THE RENEWAL DATE AND EXTENDING THE TERM FIVE YEARS PURSUANT TO RENEWAL TERMS UNDER THE CURRENT CONTRACT IN THE AMOUNT OF $23,731,155 AND THE ALL IMPORTANT $0.34, AND FINDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE MAY BE CONSIDERED AND APPROVED AT ONLY ONE MEETING IN THE CITY COUNCIL.

THIS IS BEFORE CITY COUNCIL ON FIRST AND FINAL READING.

[01:00:02]

THE STAFF PRESENTER IS THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, ERIC OSCARSSON.

UH, GOOD EVENING.

THANK YOU, AMANDA, AND SORRY FOR THAT CRAZY NUMBER.

I APOLOGIZE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR.

GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL.

TONIGHT, I'M HERE TO PRESENT TO YOU ABOUT THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING CONTRACT.

EVERYBODY'S FAVORITE TOPIC.

JUST A QUICK BACKGROUND ABOUT OUR SOLID WASTE SERVICES.

SO PRIOR TO 2009, THE CITY COLLECTED SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING SERVICES IN-HOUSE WITH IN-HOUSE STAFF.

IN 2009, IT WAS TRANSITIONED TO A SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING CONTRACT.

THE CURRENT CONTRACT WE ARE UNDER WAS SIGNED IN 2019 WITH WASTE CONNECTIONS AND THE CURRENT CONTRACT ENDS IN 2024, MAY OF THAT YEAR , AND WE HAVE THE OPTION WITHIN THAT CONTRACT TO EXTEND IT FOR FIVE YEAR TERMS. SO YOU MIGHT BE WONDERING WHY WE'RE BRINGING THIS BACK TO YOU A YEAR BEFORE THE END OF THE CONTRACT, AND THE REASON WE DO THAT IS IN THIS INDUSTRY, THE LEAD TIME FOR THESE CONTRACTS, FOR BIDDING AND GETTING THEM ON BOARD IS CAN BE UP TO 18 TO 24 MONTHS.

SO WE NEED TO TAKE ACTION WELL BEFORE THE END OF THE CONTRACT.

JUST TO GO OVER A FEW THINGS ON RATES AND CHARGES, JUST TO REMIND EVERYONE THAT WE PROVIDE WE DO THE BILLING FOR THESE SERVICES, BUT WE DO NOT PROVIDE THESE SERVICES.

WE BILL SORRY, WE BILL THAT THROUGH OUR WATER BILL.

SO WE CHARGE THE RESIDENTS A FEE.

WE COLLECT THAT FEE AND THEN WE PAY THE MONTHLY FEES OVER TO WASTE CONNECTIONS.

THE FEES ARE ESTABLISHED THROUGH THE ANNUAL RATE STRUCTURE.

WE CHARGE THE COLLECTION FEES WHICH IS PASSED THROUGH TO WASTE CONNECTIONS, AND THEN WE ALSO CHARGE ADMINISTRATIVE AND FRANCHISE FEE ON TOP OF THAT AND THOSE ARE SET DURING THE BUDGET PROCESS AND WE'LL BE COMING BACK TO YOU AT A LATER DATE TO SET THOSE FEES.

JUST A RECAP OF WHAT OUR CURRENT CONTRACT OFFERS, ON THE SOLID WASTE SIDE, YOU HAVE BAGS OR CART SERVICE.

THEY ARE PROVIDED TWICE WEEKLY.

WE HAVE A 65 GALLON RECYCLE CART THAT'S COLLECTED ONCE WEEKLY.

WE DO BRUSH AND YARD WASTE, WHICH IS COLLECTED WEEKLY AS WELL.

ON THE SECOND DAY, UP TO THREE CUBIC YARDS, WE DO A BULKY PICKUP ONCE A MONTH.

YOU SET IT OUT ON MONDAY.

IT'LL BE PICKED UP ON FRIDAY AND THAT ROTATES THROUGH THE DIFFERENT AREAS OF THE CITY ON A WEEKLY BASIS, AND THEN WE DO ALSO A SMALL--OFFER, A SMALL COMMERCIAL OPTION, WHICH IS EITHER TEN BAGS OR 20 BAGS.

SO IT'S TWO DIFFERENT FEES, AND THAT'S OFFERED AS A TWICE A WEEK SERVICE.

JUST A REMINDER, WE DID A CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY.

SO OUR CUSTOMER SERVICE DEPARTMENT, LED BY JESSE ELIZONDO, WENT AHEAD AND DID A SURVEY, AND THE HIGHEST RANKED SERVICE AT THE CITY PROVIDE WAS SOLID WASTE WITH A 92% SATISFACTION RATE WITH 50% BEING VERY SATISFIED AND 42% BEING SATISFIED WITH THE CURRENT SERVICE THAT WE PROVIDE TODAY. SO BEFORE YOU TONIGHT IS A CONTRACT EXTENSION; THIS CONTRACT WOULD BE EXTENDED THROUGH SEPTEMBER OF 2029. WE SHIFTED THE END DATE OF THE CONTRACT FROM MAY UNTIL SEPTEMBER, SO IT LINED UP WITH OUR FISCAL YEAR, SO IT WAS EASIER FOR THE BUDGETING PROCESS WITH THAT WASTE CONNECTIONS WAS REQUESTING A MINIMUM OF A 6% OR CPI INCREASE, WHICHEVER IS GREATER FOR IN OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR AS WELL AS OCTOBER OF 2024 AND THEN OCTOBER 2025 THROUGH 2028 WOULD JUST BE A STANDARD CPI INCREASE, AND THEN ON THE SMALL COMMERCIAL SIDE, THEY WOULD JUST BE DOING A CPI INCREASE ON AN ANNUAL BASIS.

BASED ON THE NUMBERS THAT WE HAVE TODAY.

THESE ARE THE ESTIMATED CONTRACT COSTS AND I WANT TO SAY ESTIMATED WE HAD TO MAKE SOME ASSUMPTIONS.

SO AS THIS BEING A PASS THROUGH CONTRACT, WE DO ANTICIPATE A 2% CUSTOMER GROWTH.

SO 2% EVERY YEAR IS BEING ADDED.

THAT'S JUST BECAUSE WE'RE ADDING ABOUT 2% MORE POPULATION TO THE CITY.

SO WE SEE ABOUT 400 NEW HOMES BEING BUILT ANNUALLY.

THEY GET GARBAGE SERVICE, OUR COSTS GO UP.

WE JUST IT'S AGAIN, IT'S A PASS THROUGH, AND THE FIRST TWO YEARS WE ARE ANTICIPATING A 6% CPI IS IN THE NEW CONTRACT, AND THEN YEARS THREE, FOUR AND FIVE, WE DO A 2% GROWTH PLUS A 5% CPI INCREASE.

YEAR FIVE, YOU'LL SEE THE NUMBERS ARE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER.

AGAIN, WE'RE TAKING THE CONTRACT AND EXTENDING IT FROM MAY UNTIL SEPTEMBER.

WE'RE TRYING TO GET THE CONTRACTS ON A FISCAL BASIS RATHER THAN IN A MID-YEAR JUST MAKES IT EASIER FOR BUDGETING PURPOSES, AND WITH THAT, STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE AS WELL AS THE AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT TONIGHT AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS.

ANYBODY? IS THERE A MOTION? SO MOVE.

SECOND.

I HAVE A MOTION BY DAN AND A SECOND BY TAMARA.

[01:05:02]

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 7D.

[7.D. Consider approval of a contract with Siddons Martin Emergency Group to purchase two Pierce-Custom Velocity PUC engines, and communication components through a cooperative purchasing agreement with Houston Galveston Area Council in the amount not to exceed $2,600,000. (Staff Presenter: Josh Jacobs, Assistant Chief)]

THIS IS TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A CONTRACT WITH SEEING MARTIN EMERGENCY GROUP TO PURCHASE TWO PIERCE CUSTOM VELOCITY PUC ENGINES AND COMMUNICATION COMPONENTS THROUGH A COOPERATIVE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH HOUSTON GALVESTON AREA COUNCIL IN THE AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $2.6 MILLION.

I WAS GOING TO SAY STAFF PRESENTER IS JOSH JACOBS AS ADVERTISED, THE ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF , BUT APPARENTLY WE'RE GOING TO GET THE FIRE CHIEF, KT FREEMAN.

HI, CHIEF. HI, AMANDA.

THANK YOU. I'M JUST GOING TO OPEN WITH A FEW COMMENTS AND TURN THE REINS OVER TO JOSH JACOBS.

I JUST WANT TO SHARE SOME THINGS, AND AS YOU KNOW, JOSH IS ONE OF OUR ASSISTANT CHIEFS, OBVIOUSLY, AND THIS AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY IS IN HIS PORTFOLIO.

SO I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR HIM TO SHARE THE LION'S SHARE OF IT, BUT I DO WANT TO SHARE SOME IMPORTANT CONTEXT IN TONIGHT'S DISCUSSION, AND THE REASON WHY WE'RE BRINGING THIS TO YOU TONIGHT INSTEAD OF WHAT WOULD NORMALLY BE MY STRATEGIC PRESENTATION DURING DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS, IT'S BECAUSE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE.

WE FOUND THIS OUT JUST ABOUT 3 OR 4 WEEKS AGO, AND WE'RE GOING TO GO INTO SOME DETAIL ABOUT THIS PURCHASE AGAIN, WHY TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE IN THIS.

WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TONIGHT, SUBJECT TO YOUR APPROVAL, TO SAVE SOME SIGNIFICANT DOLLARS, ABOUT $250,000.

ALSO, AS WE ALL KNOW, SUPPLY CHAINS, MARKET FORCES CONTINUE JUST TO CREATE AND WREAK HAVOC ON US IN GENERAL AT ANY GIVEN TIME.

I CAN'T FIND FRITOS OR BEAN DIP, YOU KNOW, AT THE STORE.

SO BUT IT CERTAINLY HAVING SIGNIFICANT IMPLICATIONS IN OUR OPERATIONS, BUT THE GOOD THING IS THAT WE ARE POISED AND WE STAY ALIGNED AND WE STAY ABREAST OF WHAT THE ISSUES ARE, AND SO IT ALLOWS US TO FORECAST AND TO PLAN STRATEGICALLY FARTHER IN THE FUTURE, AND THAT'S WHAT WE MUST DO TONIGHT AND WHAT WE'RE DOING IN OUR IN ALL OF OUR OPERATIONS.

IT'S GOING TO TAKE ABOUT THREE YEARS IF IT'S APPROVED.

THIS IS SOME STAGGERING UPDATES THAT IT'S GOING TO TAKE ABOUT THREE YEARS TO GET THIS THESE APPARATUSES DELIVERED.

ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I THINK IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT FROM A POLICY DECISION, A FISCAL DECISION, IS THE FUNDING IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE.

THE PRICE WILL BE LOCKED IN.

THERE'S NO MONEY THAT WILL BE REQUIRED TO PUT DOWN PAYMENT WILL NOT BE DUE UNTIL WE RECEIVE THE APPARATUS.

AGAIN, WE ANTICIPATE IT COULD BE UP TO THREE YEARS, AND WE'VE WORKED WITH MARTIN'S GROUP AND THEY'RE GOING TO BE UPDATING EVERYONE THAT AGAIN, NOT TAKING JOSH'S THUNDER AWAY, BUT WE'RE GOING TO OUR GOAL IS TO HIT A RESET ON HOW WE PLAN TO REPLACE OUR APPARATUS AND WE'LL BE MOVING FROM A 20 YEAR RECOMMENDATION OR PRACTICE TO A 16 YEAR RECOMMENDATION.

AGAIN, JOSH IS GOING TO GIVE YOU ALL THOSE DETAILS AND A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THE WHYS BEHIND IT.

SO I JUST WANTED TO HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO LEAD OFF WITH COUNCIL TONIGHT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT WE WOULD NOT BE HERE BRINGING THIS TO YOU UNLESS WE FELT THERE WAS AN URGENT NEED TO DO SO, AND BECAUSE TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE AND WHAT'S AT STAKE.

SO I'LL BE AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS, AND WITH THAT, I'M GOING TO TURN THIS OVER TO ASSISTANT CHIEF JOSH JACOBS.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

JOSH JACOBS, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF.

I'M GOING TO EXPAND A LITTLE BIT ON WHAT CHIEF FREEMAN SHARED WITH YOU ON WHY WE'RE BRINGING THIS TO YOU NOW AND WHY IT'S SO IMPORTANT FOR US.

SO SOME OF THE OBJECTIVES I WANT TO COVER WITH YOU IS THE HISTORICAL BACKGROUND, HOW WE'VE TYPICALLY REPLACED APPARATUS, THE TIMELINES WHERE WE'RE CURRENTLY AT, THE STATUS OF OUR FLEET, THE PLAN FOR SUCCESS WE'VE COME UP WITH WORKING WITH FINANCE AND PUBLIC WORKS AND EVERYBODY, AND THEN PRESENT AN ACTION ITEM FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION. SO HISTORICALLY, OUR APPARATUS, OUR LARGER APPARATUS HAVE A 20 YEAR LIFE SPAN.

THEY'LL SPEND TEN YEARS FRONTLINE.

SO THOSE ARE THE TRUCKS THAT THE GUYS ARE ON EVERY DAY, HEADING OUT TO THE CALLS AND THEN SPEND TEN YEARS IN RESERVE STATUS.

SO THEY'RE THE BACKUP APPARATUS WHEN WE HAVE TO DO THE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE OR IF THERE'S AN ISSUE WITH OUR FRONTLINE APPARATUS.

SO SOME OF THESE KIDS HERE POTENTIALLY WATCHING A FIRE TRUCK, THEY COULD BE RIDING ON ONE DAY.

THE LAST ENGINE WE PURCHASED WAS IN 2019.

IT COST US ABOUT $780,000, AND AT THAT TIME, WHEN YOU ORDERED ONE OF THESE LARGER APPARATUS, IT WAS ABOUT 12 MONTHS FOR DELIVERY AFTER YOU ORDERED THE APPARATUS.

SO SOME OF THE CHALLENGES THAT WE'RE FACING WHILE WE'RE BRINGING THIS TO YOU, WE'RE EXPERIENCING A RISE IN BOTH FREQUENCY AND LENGTH OF THE OUT-OF-SERVICE EVENTS ON THESE APPARATUS. FOR EXAMPLE, JUST A MONTH AGO, WE HAD A RESERVE ENGINE THAT WAS OUT OF SERVICE FOR OVER A MONTH, JUST WAITING ON A PART.

[01:10:07]

FLEET DOES THEIR PART.

THEY ARE AWESOME AND THEY'VE DONE REALLY WELL IN KEEPING THESE IN SERVICE WHEN THEY CAN, BUT WHEN THESE TRUCKS EXPERIENCE OUT-OF-SERVICE ISSUES WITH ELECTRONICS AND STUFF LIKE THAT, WE'RE WAITING ON A PART FOR MONTHS ON END SOMETIME, AND THESE THESE TRUCKS CAN'T RESPOND TO CALLS.

ANOTHER CAUSE FOR THIS IS BURLESON FIRE HAS SEEN A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN CALL VOLUME SINCE THIS RULE WAS IMPLEMENTED? THIS 20 YEAR RULE, THIS 20 YEAR TIMELINE HAS BEEN IN PLACE SINCE I STARTED HERE IN 2004 AND OUR CALL VOLUME HAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY.

SO WE'RE PUTTING MORE MILES AND MORE HOURS ON THESE TRUCKS AND THEN THE COMPLEXITY OF THE FIRE APPARATUS, MORE MOVING PARTS, MORE COMPUTERS AND CHIPS AND BUTTONS AND EVERYTHING, MORE POINTS OF FAILURE THAT ARE CAUSING THESE ISSUES.

SO THE SAME ENGINE TODAY, THE ONE WE JUST TALKED ABOUT FROM 2019, COSTS A LITTLE OVER $1 MILLION AT THIS 32% PRICE INCREASE, AND SO TO PROVIDE A LITTLE BIT OF BALANCE TO THIS SLIDE, THAT SHOCKING NUMBER, I INCLUDED A PICTURE OF A PUPPY THAT YOU CAN REFER TO AND KIND OF BALANCE OUT THAT SHOCKING NUMBER THERE, AND IT HAPPENS TO BE A HUSKY PUPPY BECAUSE IT'S MY NINE YEAR OLD DAUGHTER'S FAVORITE TYPE OF PUPPY.

SO, AGAIN, A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE SINCE THE YEAR OF 2019, 32% INCREASE IN PRICE AND A 26 TO 27 MONTH PROPOSED DELIVERY TIME FRAME, AND WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY SEEING IS SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE MONTHS BEYOND THAT.

TYPICALLY IT GETS PUSHED BACK.

SO WE'RE LOOKING CLOSER TO 32 TO 36 MONTHS.

SO UPON FINDING OUT THIS INFORMATION ABOUT THE PRICE AND DISCUSSING THE ISSUES WE'VE BEEN HAVING WITH THESE RESERVE APPARATUS, WE SET UP MEETINGS WITH FINANCE AND PUBLIC WORKS AND CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE, AND WE MUTUALLY AGREED UPON.

A LIFE SPAN FOR A LARGE APPARATUS NEEDS TO BE REDUCED FROM 20 YEARS TO 16 YEARS.

THIS WOULD BE EIGHT YEARS FRONTLINE AND EIGHT YEARS RESERVE SO THAT WE'RE NOT REACHING THE END OF LIFE UTILITY OF THESE TRUCKS AND AREN'T HAVING THE NUMBER OF ISSUES AND THE PARTS ISSUES THAT WE'VE BEEN EXPERIENCING WITH THESE RESERVE APPARATUS AND WE'RE STAFF IS UNIFIED AND MOVING FORWARD WITH THE 16 YEAR LIFESPAN, THE EIGHT YEAR FRONTLINE, EIGHT YEAR RESERVE IN ORDER TO ENHANCE THE CONTINUITY OF SERVICE OF OUR PRIMARY TRUCKS.

HOW DID YOU COME UP WITH EIGHT? WHY IS THAT A MAGICAL NUMBER? SO WE STARTED OFF WITH A 20.

WE KIND OF NEED EVEN NUMBERS SO THAT IT SPENDS THE SAME NUMBER OF YEARS IN THE FRONT AS THE RESERVE SO THAT WHEN THE RESERVE GOES OUT, THAT FRONT LINE IS MOVING TO THE SECOND, THE RESERVE.

WE DISCUSSED 15 AND SO YOU CAN DO LIKE A SEVEN AND A HALF, SEVEN AND A HALF, BUT THAT WAS KIND OF THE NUMBER BETWEEN THE 15 AND 20 THAT WE FELT LIKE WE COULD GET THE MOST USEFULNESS OUT OF IT.

I PRESUME THE FIRST ROUND OF HAVING THIS EIGHT AND EIGHT IS KIND OF EXPERIMENTAL SOMETHING YOU'LL COME BACK AND UPDATE AS FAR AS LIKE, YES, THAT WAS ENOUGH, RIGHT ON KEY OR NO, IT WAS STILL OVERDOING IT BECAUSE WE'RE ONLY GOING TO GROW.

WE'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE TO COVER MORE MILEAGE.

WE'RE ONLY GOING TO HAVE THESE BASICALLY, IT'S YOUR OFFICE ON WHEELS RUNNING, YOU KNOW, ALL THE TIME.

SO I PRESUME IT'S JUST KIND OF LIKE A SHOT IN THE DARK.

IT IS SOMEWHAT, BUT OUR CURRENT RESERVE APPARATUS, ONE OF THEM IS RIGHT ABOUT 16 YEARS NOW AND ANOTHER ONE IS COMING UP ON 14 AND THAT'S KIND OF WHEN WE STARTED NOTICING, BUT I THINK ONCE WE GET SOME OF THE SOFTWARE IN PLACE WITH CARTEGRAPH, WITH PUBLIC WORKS, WE'LL BE ABLE TO TRACK THESE ISSUES MUCH BETTER AND BE ABLE TO QUANTIFY THOSE AND KIND OF SEE WHEN THAT COST AND OUT OF SERVICE TIME REALLY STARTS AFFECTING US.

GREAT. WHAT DO WE DO AFTER A TRUCK ROLLS OUT OF RESERVE? WE USUALLY WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS.

WE HAVE A LOT OF OPTIONS. IT CAN GO TO AUCTION.

SOMETIMES WE CAN SELL IT BACK TO THE DEALER FOR A CREDIT ON THE TRUCK OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, BUT WE USUALLY WORK WITH PUBLIC WORKS FOR SOME TYPE OF SALE.

OKAY, THANK YOU, JOSH. OKAY, REQUIRED EQUIPMENT.

HISTORICALLY, WHEN BURLESON BUYS FIRE TRUCKS, THEY BRING THE FIRE TRUCK FORWARD AND IT DOESN'T HAVE ANY OF THE NECESSARY EQUIPMENT ON IT, AND WHAT WE'VE DONE IS WE'VE KIND OF PIECEMEALED IT TOGETHER.

THE LARGER TICKET ITEMS, WE WOULD PULL OFF THAT FRONT LINE TRUCK THAT WAS GOING TO RESERVE STATUS.

SOME OF THE SMALLER ITEMS WE'D TRY TO USE OUR MINOR TOOLS LINE ITEM AND BUY WHAT WE COULD IF BUDGET ALLOWED, AND SO WHAT WE WANT TO DO MOVING FORWARD, OUR RECOMMENDATION IS TO THINK OF THESE FIRE TRUCK PURCHASES AS A PROJECT.

SO ALL ENCOMPASSING THE FIRE TRUCK AND ALL THE REQUIRED CRITICAL FIRE AND EMS AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE FIRE TRUCK.

SO LIKE YOUR HOSES, YOUR NOZZLES, RESCUE TOOLS, ALL OF OUR MEDICAL EQUIPMENT, LIKE OUR LUCAS DEVICE AND HEART MONITOR RADIOS, WHICH THOSE DEVICES RIGHT NOW ARE REACHING END OF LIFE, SO WE NEED TO REPLACE THOSE ANYWAY, AND THEN CRADLE POINTS AND IPADS, WHICH WE USE FOR DISPATCH SERVICES, AND THAT'S

[01:15:09]

ABOUT $240,000 PER UNIT.

SO THESE ARE THE TWO APPARATUS THAT WE'RE DISCUSSING REPLACING NOW.

THESE ARE RESERVE APPARATUS.

ENGINE 194 ON THE 20 YEAR TIMELINE WAS PROJECTED TO BE REPLACED IN 2027, AND THEN ENGINE 528 WAS PROJECTED TO BE REPLACED IN 2029 UNDER THE NEW PROPOSED TIMELINE.

THIS WOULD GET US TO AUGUST OF 25 TO APRIL OF 26.

AUGUST 25TH IS THE TIMELINE ON THE PROPOSAL WE'VE RECEIVED FROM SIDDONS-MARTIN BUT OVER THE LAST 2 OR 3 PURCHASES WITH THEM, EVERYTHING'S BEEN PUSHED BACK 7 OR 8 MONTHS.

SO WE'RE PROJECTING EARLY 26 TO MID 26, AND THIS WOULD PUT ENGINE 194 AT ABOUT 18 TO 19 YEARS OLD AT THE TIME OF REPLACEMENT UNDER THE NEW TIMELINE, AN ENGINE 528 AT ABOUT 16 TO 17.

SO IT GETS US CLOSER TO THAT NUMBER THAT WE'RE TRYING TO AIM FOR.

SO THE COST AND THE SAVINGS.

SO WE'RE ASKING FOR TWO ENGINES AND THEN ALL OF THE CRITICAL AND FIRE EMS COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT THAT GO ALONG WITH EACH OF THOSE AND A TOTAL NOT TO EXCEED 2.6 MILLION.

THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR SAVINGS PENDING YOUR APPROVAL TONIGHT, AND THAT WOULD BE IN THE AMOUNT OF A MINIMUM OF $223,000 AND WHERE THAT COMES FROM IS WE WERE ADVISED THAT THE EPA HAS CHANGED THE STANDARDS FOR THE ENGINES COMING OUT IN 2027.

THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A NEW [INAUDIBLE] SYSTEM AND THOSE ENGINES ARE GOING TO BE ABOUT $70,000 MORE A PIECE, AND THE ORDERS THAT THEY'RE TAKING FOR FIRE TRUCKS ESSENTIALLY BEGINNING TODAY ARE GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO HAVE THOSE 27 ENGINES BECAUSE THAT'S HOW FAR THEY ARE OUT ON THE BUILDS FOR THEM.

SO ANY ENGINE YOU ORDER TODAY WILL HAVE A 27 ENGINE IN IT.

THERE'S ALSO QUARTERLY PRICE INCREASES.

THEY'VE TOLD US THEY'VE BEEN EXPERIENCING ABOUT 6% PRICE INCREASE ANNUALLY OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS AND THEY'VE BROKEN THEM DOWN QUARTERLY, AND THE NEXT ONE IS DUE IN AUGUST 21ST. SO THAT'S WHERE THE $223,000 COMES FROM PROJECTING OUT BETWEEN NOW AND, SAY, OCTOBER OF THIS YEAR.

IF WE PUSHED IT FURTHER OUT, THE NUMBER WOULD GO UP MORE, AND THEN AGAIN, I JUST WANT TO REITERATE WHAT CHIEF SAID.

FUNDING FOR THE TRUCKS IS NOT DUE UNTIL THE TRUCKS ARE DELIVERED.

SO JUST A QUICK SUMMARY.

WE'VE HISTORICALLY OPERATED ON A 20 YEAR TIMELINE.

WE'RE RECOMMENDING A 16 YEAR TIMELINE.

PRICES HAVE BEEN AVERAGING 6% OR HIGHER ANNUAL INCREASES THAT ARE BEING ASSESSED QUARTERLY.

WE'RE DEALING WITH LONGER LEAD TIMES, AND SO I THINK THAT REQUIRES US TO TAKE A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO REPLACING THESE APPARATUS.

I MEAN, GOD FORBID THAT ONE WAS IN A WRECK, AND WE HAD WE WERE DOWN ONE COMPLETELY AND HAD TO ORDER ONE AND WAIT THREE YEARS.

CURRENT RESERVE OUT OF SERVICE HAPPENS MORE FREQUENTLY AND FOR LONGER PERIODS OF TIME WITH PARTS MORE DIFFICULT TO SOURCE , AND WE'D LIKE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH APPARATUS AS A PROJECT, BUYING EQUIPMENT AND EVERYTHING ALTOGETHER.

SO THE ACTION REQUESTED OPTION ONE APPROVE AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 2.6 MILLION FOR THE PURCHASE OF TWO NEW PIERCE VELOCITY PUMPERS AND REQUIRED FIRE EMS AND RADIO EQUIPMENT.

OPTION TWO DENY THE PURCHASE OF THE PIERCE VELOCITY PUMPERS AND REQUIRED FIRE EMS AND RADIO EQUIPMENT AND STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS FOR APPROVAL OF OPTION ONE, AND THAT'S ALL I HAVE.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.

WELL, I CAN ONLY SAY THAT OUR NUMBER ONE PLACE IN THIS COMMUNITY IS SAFETY, AND THIS IS ONE TIME WE CAN'T LET, LIKE MYSELF, LET THE MONEY GET IN OUR EYE IF WE NEED IT AND THEY SAY WE NEED IT, THEN WE NEED TO GET IT.

THANK YOU. I APPRECIATE YOU GUYS ANALYZING THE 20 YEAR TO THE 16 YEAR.

I THINK IT'S A VALUABLE POINT.

I BROUGHT THIS UP A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO, AND I'M CURIOUS AGAIN, IN OUR EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND, WE DON'T SPECIFICALLY HAVE A BUCKET FOR FIRE TRUCKS, AND I REQUESTED THAT BECAUSE THESE ARE THE LARGEST PIECES OF EQUIPMENT THAT WE PURCHASE AND THAT THERE'S SOMEWHERE THAT WE SHOULD BE BUDGETING FOR THESE LONG TERM.

WE DO. CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG.

WE DO FACTOR THEM IN THERE.

WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT RIGHT NOW THEY'RE IN A 20 YEAR REPLACEMENT CYCLE.

SO THE CHANGES TONIGHT WILL NECESSITATE A CHANGE TO OUR REPLACEMENT FUND, WHICH MARTIN AND I AND BRYAN ARE ALREADY WORKING ON.

[01:20:06]

SO JOSH HAS ALREADY ALLUDED THAT WE WILL HAVE THREE YEARS LIKELY TO, YOU KNOW, HAVE ADDITIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FUND.

SO WE'RE NOT CONCERNED ABOUT THIS AMOUNT COMING OUT OF THE FUND, BUT THERE WILL BE DISCUSSION ABOUT THAT, BUT WE DO ALL THE EQUIPMENT THAT WE FORECAST FOR REPLACEMENT IS IN THE REPLACEMENT FUND. OKAY, THANK YOU.

COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE, I THINK JUST MY RECOLLECTION OF THE CONVERSATIONS, YOU BROUGHT IT UP 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO WHEN YOU FIRST CAME ON COUNCIL.

THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE CHANGED WAS TO ADD IT.

IT USED TO BE IT WASN'T IN THE ERF, BUT THAT WAS ONE OF THE CHANGES THAT WE MADE LAST 2 OR 3 YEARS, IF I REMEMBER CORRECTLY.

I MAY HAVE JUST FORGOTTEN THAT, BUT GOOD.

I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT. SO YEAH, THIS IS GREAT, AND OF COURSE WE HAVE TWO YEARS TO FIGURE OUT THE FUNDING FOR IT, SO THAT'S GOOD.

ANYBODY ELSE. IS THERE A MOTION? THIS IS GOING TO REACH THE POINT WHERE YOU HAVE TO TAKE DELIVERY ON THIS ONE AND PLACE THE ORDER FOR THE NEXT ONE AT THE SAME TIME.

[CHUCKLING] MAYBE.

IT'S GETTING A LITTLE CRAZY.

I'LL MOVE TO APPROVE.

TOO LATE. I'LL SECOND.

MOVE TO APPROVE.

I'VE GOT A MOTION BY THE MAYOR AND A SECOND BY DAN.

PLEASE VOTE. PASSES UNANIMOUS.

GOOD JOB, JOSH.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM 7E CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A PROFESSIONAL SERVICES CONTRACT WITH KOMATSU/RANGEL INCORPORATED FOR THE DESIGN OF

[7.E. Consider approval of a professional services contract with Komatsu/Rangel, Inc. dba Komatsu Architecture for design of the Burleson Fire Station 1 Renovation project in the amount of $219,831. (Staff Presenters: Errick Thompson, Deputy Director of Public Works, K.T. Freeman, Fire Chief)]

BURLESON FIRE STATION NUMBER ONE RENOVATIONS PROJECT IN THE AMOUNT OF $219,831.

THE STAFF PRESENTED TONIGHT IS ERIC THOMPSON, "DEPUTY" DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS, ENGINEERING AND FIRE CHIEF KATIE FREEMAN.

DYNAMIC DUO THERE.

GOOD EVENING AGAIN.

I THINK THIS WILL BE VERY BRIEF.

VERY IMPORTANT PROJECT, THOUGH.

I CAN HIT THE RIGHT BUTTON.

A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUND.

THE CURRENT FIVE YEAR CIP INCLUDED $2 MILLION FOR RENOVATION OF FIRE STATION ONE ON SOUTHWEST ALSBURY BOULEVARD, AND THAT PROJECT WAS INTENDED TO ADDRESS THINGS SUCH AS BETTER WORKOUT SPACE FOR THE FIREFIGHTERS.

ADDITIONAL RESTROOMS AND SHOWERS CONVERTING SINGLE OR DUAL DOUBLE DORM ROOMS TO SINGLES.

ADDING A STORM SHELTER.

ENHANCING FIRE SUPPRESSION.

ADDITIONAL MEDICAL STORAGE SPACE, AND BETTER REPORT WRITING SPACES, AND THEN TO ALSO ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE OF THE BUILDING, RECONFIGURE SOME UNDERUTILIZED ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE.

SO IN SEPTEMBER, WE HIRED KOMATSU ARCHITECTS TO CONDUCT A PROGRAMING STUDY, AND REALLY THIS WAS TO HELP US TO IDENTIFY AND DOCUMENT AND THEN PRIORITIZE THE NEEDS FOR THE RENOVATION PROJECT.

WE HAD A FEELING THAT THE OVERALL PROJECT WAS PROBABLY BEYOND THE BUDGET THAT WAS AVAILABLE.

SO THIS STUDY WAS VERY IMPORTANT TO HELP FINE TUNE WHAT THOSE NEEDS WERE.

THE STUDY INCLUDED A SERIES OF WORKSHOPS WITH STAFF, INCLUDING STATION PERSONNEL.

WE HAD SOME WORKSHOPS THAT GATHERED INFORMATION AND THEN THE ARCHITECTS AND THEIR TEAM WENT OFF AND DID SOME WORK AND THEN LATER THEY CAME BACK WITH OPTIONS AS WELL AS SOME EARLY COST INFORMATION SO THAT WE COULD EVENTUALLY COME UP WITH THE FINAL RECOMMENDED PROJECT SCOPE THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THE DESIGN CONTRACT THAT WE HAVE BEFORE YOU.

SO AT THE END OF THE PROGRAMMING STUDY, WHICH RAN BASICALLY FROM OCTOBER THROUGH ABOUT LATE MARCH OF THIS YEAR OR MARCH THIS YEAR, THE STUDY FOCUSED ON THE HOUSE SIDE OF THE STATION, THE LIVING QUARTERS, YOU MIGHT CALL THEM, PLUS THE DORMITORIES AND PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING FROM THAT EARLIER LIST THAT I MENTIONED, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE.

WE WERE ABLE TO ALMOST FIT INTO THE CURRENT $2 MILLION BUDGET.

WE'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT THAT IN A FEW MINUTES, BUT THIS IS A VERY HIGH LEVEL OVERVIEW OF SORT OF WHAT'S AT THE STATION NOW VERSUS WHAT WOULD BE AT THE STATION AFTER THIS DESIGN CONTRACT DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

SO RIGHT NOW, THE WORKOUT SPACE AND CHIEF FREEMAN WILL TALK MORE ABOUT THIS IN A SECOND, BUT THE WORKOUT SPACE NOW IS BASICALLY IN ONE OF THE FIVE APPARATUS BAYS.

SO IT'S NOT CONDITIONED SPACE.

THEY'RE POTENTIALLY WORKING OUT IN THE SAME AREA AS POTENTIAL EXHAUST FROM SOME OF THE EQUIPMENT.

[01:25:03]

IN THE PROPOSED PLAN, WE'D HAVE A DEDICATED AND CONDITIONED WORKOUT SPACE FOR THEM.

THERE ARE SIX TWO BUNK DORM ROOMS NOW.

IN THE AFTER, THERE WOULD BE NONE BECAUSE EACH WOULD HAVE THEIR OWN SINGLE ROOM.

SO THAT'S THE NINE GOING FORWARD.

RIGHT NOW, THERE'S ONE OFFICER SUITE.

WE WOULD HAVE THREE AFTER THE PROJECT.

RIGHT NOW, THERE ARE THREE SHOWERS, THREE TOILETS AND TWO URINALS, AND WE WOULD REVISE THAT TO BE FIVE SHOWERS, SIX TOILETS AND NO URINALS.

CURRENT SPACE DOESN'T HAVE A STORM SHELTER.

SO BY CODE WE'RE REQUIRED TO AND I THINK EVERYBODY AGREES THAT WE SHOULD HAVE A SHELTER IN THE SPACE.

SO THAT'S PART OF THE PROJECT.

RIGHT NOW. THERE'S ONE WASHER AND ONE DRYER FOR EVERYBODY ON SHIFT, AND IN THE PROPOSED PROJECT, AFTER THE PROPOSED PROJECT, WE'D HAVE TWO EACH.

SORRY. I HAVE ONE QUESTION, CHIEF.

ARE THE EXTRACTORS THE ONES THAT THEY CAN PUT THEIR UNIFORMS IN? DO WE ONLY HAVE ONE SET OF THOSE AT 16? YES, GOOD QUESTION AND A VERY IMPORTANT QUESTION.

WE'RE VERY BLESSED IN OUR DEPARTMENT THAT WE HAVE EXTRACTORS IN ALL THREE STATIONS, AND THOSE ARE THE FOR A LACK OF TERM, SUPER DUTY COMMERCIAL GRADE WASHERS THAT ACTUALLY GET ALL THE BIOLOGICALS, ALL THE CANCER CONTAMINANTS OUT OF THE FIREFIGHTERS' BUNKER GEAR AND SO WHAT ERIC WAS ALLUDING TO, I BELIEVE, IS WE HAVE NORMAL WASHER AND DRYERS FOR EVERY DAY FOR EVERYDAY WEAR, AND WE DON'T WE DON'T ASK OUR STAFF TO PUT ANYTHING CRITICAL TO THEIR JOB, THEIR UNIFORM, THE FIRE EQUIPMENT IN THOSE WASHERS.

CORRECT, WE HAVE SPECIAL WASHERS FOR THAT.

SO WE KEEP THE CONTAMINATED IN THE PROPER CLEANING PROCESS AND DRYING.

WE HAVE DRYERS. AGAIN, WE'RE VERY, VERY FORTUNATE IN THIS CITY THAT THE THIS COUNCIL AND PREVIOUS COUNCILS HAS ALWAYS SUPPORTED US IN OUR NEEDS.

SO WE'RE VERY BLESSED TO HAVE THAT BECAUSE MANY FIRE DEPARTMENTS DO NOT HAVE THESE EXTRACTORS OR DRYERS AND ALL THE FIRE STATIONS, BUT THESE ARE THE DRYERS.

IF I CAN GO BACK JUST TO TOUCH ON THIS FOR A LITTLE BIT, AS FOR YOUR TOWELS, YOUR THINGS THAT AREN'T CONTAMINATED, JUST LIKE AT HOME, BUT THERE'S TWO SETS, WHICH IF IT'S OKAY, JUST I CAN GO AHEAD AND JUMP IN MAYBE TO GIVE YOU A BIGGER PERSPECTIVE HERE.

WHEN WE DID THE PROGRAMING, AS ERIC SAID, WE REALLY SIT DOWN AND WE FOCUSED ON, WELL, BOTH SIDES, BUT, YOU KNOW, THIS STATION IS 20 YEARS OLD, AND 20 YEARS AGO, THIS CITY LOOKED A WHOLE LOT DIFFERENT, AND THE VISION AND JUST I THINK THE REALITIES, THEN WE KNOW WE'RE TOTALLY DIFFERENT THAN NOW.

EXCUSE ME. SO WHEN WE SIT DOWN, WE LOOKED AT THIS THE INCREASED CAPACITY, I'M VERY, VERY CONFIDENT NOT ONLY TO THIS COUNCIL BUT IN THE COUNCILS TO COME, I BELIEVE WE HAVE THE CAPACITY.

WE THOUGHT IT OUT, AND ON THE RESPONSE SIDE, I THINK WE'VE GOT THE CAPACITY FOR 50 YEARS.

I KNOW THAT'S A LARGE NUMBER, BUT I REALLY BELIEVE THAT WE'VE GOT THE SLEEPING QUARTERS FOR UP TO 12.

EVENTUALLY THAT STATION IS GOING TO BE A DOUBLE COMPANY.

THAT STATION IS NOT GOING TO GO ANYWHERE.

IT IS SO STRATEGIC TO MEETING THE DEMANDS OF THIS CITY.

IT WOULD BE, I THINK, REALLY ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO REPLACE, IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE.

SO WE SAT DOWN, WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME ESPECIALLY FOCUSED ON THE FIRE SIDE TO WHERE WE HAVE THE CAPACITY TO HOUSE 12 AND THE FEATURES THAT ARE IN HERE.

GOING BACK TO THE WORKOUT SPACE, THAT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT.

IT'S INDUSTRY STANDARD, IF AT ALL POSSIBLE, TO GET YOUR FIREFIGHTERS OUT OF WORKING OUT IN AN AREA THAT'S CONTAMINATED WITH DIESEL FUMES.

THIS PROVIDES THAT THE SINGLE BUNK ROOMS, AS I THINK EVERYBODY'S BEEN TO STATION 16.

AGAIN, THERE'S SOME VERY, VERY POSITIVE BENEFITS FOR BEING IN YOUR OWN DORM ROOM, AND WITH OUR G2 WITH SOME OF THE AGAIN, THE ENHANCEMENTS THAT THIS COUNCIL AND OTHERS HAVE HELPED US WITH FUNDING.

IT ALLOWS AS MULTIPLE COMPANIES ARE UP TO BE DISPATCHED ONLY THAT COMPANY THE FIREFIGHTERS WILL HAVE THE ABILITY TO PROGRAM THEIR DORM WHAT APPARATUS THEY'RE IN, AND THEN THROUGH TECHNOLOGY, THEY WOULD BE DISPATCHED AND IF IT'S NOT ON YOUR COMPANY, YOU WON'T BE, YOU KNOW, AWOKE AT NIGHT.

SO VERY, VERY IMPORTANT FOR, YOU KNOW, THE MENTAL HEALTH AND STRESS, THE GOING BACK TO THE OFFICERS' QUARTERS.

WE HAVE PLANNED TO HAVE THE CAPACITY FOR THREE OFFICERS EVENTUALLY A CAPTAIN, A LIEUTENANT BATTALION CHIEF IS THERE RIGHT NOW.

SO AGAIN, WE'VE GIVEN IT A LOT OF THOUGHT FROM A STRATEGIC STANDPOINT, THAT CAPACITY, STORM SHELTER, WE SAID ABSOLUTELY.

[01:30:08]

JUST LIKE AT 16, THIS IS A FEMA RATED F5, GOD FORBID, BUT IF WE EVER HAD A NEED TO PUT OUR FOLKS IN THERE, THEY WOULD BE AS PROTECTED AS ANYONE COULD PROVIDE THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF PROTECTION, AND THEN AGAIN, THE WASHER AND DRYER.

SO LOOKING AT IT, WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING IS THIS BAY WOULD BE TURNED INTO LIVING SPACE, AND THEY'VE GOT SOME REALLY GOOD GRAPHICS HERE, JUST A LITTLE BIT HERE.

OUR FIREFIGHTERS ARE WORKING OUT.

YOU CAN SEE THAT'S IN THE BAY.

THAT'S OVER IN THE FAR NORTHERN BAY.

AGAIN, WE HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO GET OUR FIREFIGHTERS THE CAPABILITY TO WORK OUT, BUT IN A PROTECTED ENVIRONMENT.

OUR KITCHEN, YOU KNOW, IT IS WHAT IT IS.

NOBODY REALLY COMPLAINS ABOUT IT, BUT IT'S STRETCHED RIGHT NOW, TO SAY THE LEAST.

WHEN WE'RE WE HAVE ALL THE APPARATUS, WHEN THE SQUAD'S UP AND WHEN WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO TURN ON AN EXTRA PIECE OF EQUIPMENT THERE DURING INCLEMENT WEATHER OR WHATNOT, WE'RE JUST REALLY STRETCHED FOR HAVING MORE THAN FIVE PEOPLE IN THERE, SEVEN, EIGHT.

I MEAN, IT REALLY GETS TIGHTER THAN WHAT IT IS.

OUR OFFICE SPACE OVER THERE IS WHERE THE FIREFIGHTERS DO THEIR REPORTS TO MY RIGHT, YOUR LEFT.

THIS IS A GOOD COMPARISON OF THE EXISTING FLOORPLAN OVER THE LEFT HAND SIDE.

IT'S VERY STRAIGHTFORWARD.

YOU SEE YOUR DOUBLE DORMS AND THE VARIOUS ARRANGEMENT INSIDE THE PATIO IS GOING TO BECOME VERY CRITICAL IN JUST A MOMENT AS WE MOVE THROUGH THE DESIGN. HERE'S A REALLY GOOD VIEW OF THE POTENTIAL HOW OF THE ENHANCEMENTS THAT WHEN WE LOOK AT THE QUARTERING CAPACITY, AGAIN UP TO 12 AND THIS IS AN INCREDIBLE ENHANCEMENT FOR OUR FIREFIGHTERS.

WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE LIVING QUARTERS, WHAT I CALL THE TABLE OF WISDOM, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE IS THE DINNER TABLE WHERE ALL THE WORLD'S PROBLEMS AND FIRE DEPARTMENT PROBLEMS ARE DISCUSSED AND SOLVED, BUT THIS IS AN INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT AREA.

IT'S SO MUCH LARGER NOW TO SERVE THE NEEDS OF OUR FIREFIGHTERS.

THE PANTRIES ARE VERY, VERY SIGNIFICANT AS WELL.

THEY'RE DESIGNED WITH REALLY GOOD CAPACITY TO WHERE WE HAVE A REFRIGERATOR IN EACH FOR EACH SHIFT.

WE HAVE, AGAIN, A GREAT ACCESS TO GET BACK OUT INTO THE TRUCK ROOM, OUR HARDENED AREA, BUT AGAIN, COMPARED TO WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW, I MEAN, THIS IS AN INCREDIBLE BLESSING FOR OUR FIREFIGHTERS.

LOOKING AT OUR OFFICER SPACE, IT'S IMPORTANT HERE THAT THE OFFICER HAS THEIR--THEY HAVE A WORKSTATION RIGHT HERE, A DESK, AND WE DESIGNED IT A LITTLE BIT LARGER BECAUSE THERE'RE TIMES WHEN OFFICERS NEED TO HAVE MEETINGS.

THEY NEED TO HAVE CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE THAT ONLY THEMSELVES AND WHOEVER THAT PERSON, WHATEVER IT INVOLVES, THEY HAVE THE PRIVACY TO SPEAK.

LOOKING OVER HERE IS OUR DORM ARRANGEMENT, SINGLE BED LOCKERS.

THEY HAVE GREAT ACCESS TO SHOWERS AND THE RESTROOMS. WHY THAT'S IMPORTANT.

THE ENHANCEMENTS AND THE NUMBER OF SHOWERS IS INCREDIBLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE WHEN OUR FIREFIGHTERS ARE CONTAMINATED, THEY COME BACK FROM A FIRE.

THE QUICKER WE CAN GET THEM IN A SHOWER AND GET THEM COMPLETELY [INAUDIBLE] AND REALLY, YOU KNOW, A THOROUGH CLEANING WHERE THEY'RE NOT HAVING TO WAIT.

IT'S JUST BETTER FOR OUR FIREFIGHTERS.

IT'S SAFER AND IT'S A BEST PRACTICE.

SO I'M REALLY THANKFUL THAT WE WERE ABLE TO GET ADDITIONAL SHOWERS AND A SIGNIFICANT INCREASE IN THE SHOWERS AND THEN--I WENT THROUGH THEIR LAST WEEK AND I BELIEVE MRS. PAYNE DID AS WELL, AND THAT'S EXACTLY THE IMAGE THAT CAME TO MIND OF LOOKING IN THAT TEENY BATHROOM AND THINKING LIKE IS THERE WHEN THEY COME BACK FROM A RESPONSE, DO THEY JUST STAND IN LINE AND WAIT THEIR TURN AND THEY'RE ALL LIKE JUST MARINATING IN THESE TERRIBLE CHEMICALS AND WAITING THEIR TURN AND IT'S PRETTY SMALL QUARTERS IN THERE, PRETTY TIGHT, SO IT'S NOT LIKE YOU CAN ESCAPE FROM ANYONE.

YEAH, IT'S OUR WE AFFECTIONATELY, IT'S OUR ONE OWNER, BUT IT'S HOME.

[CHUCKLING] IT'S HOME.

SO AGAIN, WHEN WE JUST BREAK IT DOWN TO THE CAPACITY THAT THIS STATION WILL HAVE AGAIN, I FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE STANDING BEFORE THIS COUNCIL AND THE COMMUNITY THAT THIS IS DONE RIGHT.

WE ARE GOING TO BE ABLE TO SERVE AND ENHANCEMENTS BRING A SOLID RESPONSE FORCE IN THE DECADES TO COME.

NOW, YOU SAID I WANT TO REITERATE THAT IT'S AMAZING TO ME THAT THIS STATION IS 20 YEARS OLD BECAUSE IT STILL ON THE OUTSIDE, LOOKS LIKE IT WAS JUST BUILT, YOU KNOW, FIVE, TEN YEARS AGO, BUT IT'S 20 YEARS OLD, AND IT'S ALSO AMAZING TO THINK 20 YEARS AGO WE WERE NOT A COMPLETELY PROFESSIONAL FIRE DEPARTMENT.

[01:35:07]

THERE WAS AN ELEMENT OF US THAT WERE STILL VOLUNTEERS.

SO THERE WAS NOT A NEED FOR 12 DORMITORIES BECAUSE THAT MANY INDIVIDUALS WERE NOT THERE OVERNIGHT.

IT WAS PRETTY MUCH JUST 1 OR 2, AND SO TIMES ARE VERY DIFFERENT.

WE HAVE A LOT LARGER COMMUNITY THAT WE'RE SERVING.

WE HAVE A LOT MORE STAFF, AND SOMETHING I'M PARTICULARLY PROUD OF IS HOW MANY WOMEN WE HAVE AS PART OF OUR FIRE DEPARTMENT, AND SO WHEN I ALSO TOOK A GLIMPSE INTO THAT SHOWER, I HAD A THROWBACK TO MY FRESHMAN DORM DAYS AT TEXAS STATE, LIKE, YOU KNOW, STALLS AND THINGS, BUT IT LIKE THE FACT THAT WE HAVE MALES AND FEMALES THAT HAVE TO TAKE TURNS THAT HAVE, YOU KNOW, LIKE IF SOMEBODY IS, YOU KNOW, LIKE I SAID, STANDING WAITING TO TAKE THEIR TURN TO GET ALL THOSE CHEMICALS OFF OR THERE, THAT'S WHERE THE RESTROOM LIKE THAT'S WHERE THE TOILETS.

EVERYTHING'S COMBINED IN THERE AND IT'S NOT A TRULY WORKING SYSTEM, RIGHT? THERE'S, YOU KNOW, WE MAKE IT WORK, AND AGAIN, THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY NOW THAT THE NEEDS ARE HERE, AND THIS DEPARTMENT, THIS CITY HAS EVOLVED TO WHERE IT IS NOW AND WHERE WE'RE GOING.

THIS WILL TAKE CARE OF TAKE CARE OF THOSE THINGS.

SO YOU DO FORESEE IT? YOU THINK THIS IS AN ANSWER FOR WHAT AT LEAST THE HOUSING SIDE? I THINK THE HOUSING SIDE, IT'S ANSWERING US FOR SO MANY YEARS IN A LIKE WELL THOUGHT OUT, WELL PLANNED FOR FUTURE. I AM COMFORTABLE BASED ON MY EXPERIENCE AND HOW I SEE EVEN THOUGH I WILL NOT BE HERE.

I FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE THAT ON THE STATION SIDE, THE RESPONSE SIDE, WE HAVE GOT THE CAPACITY, WE'VE GOT THE RIGHT LAYOUT IN THERE THAT'S GOING TO ALLOW AS THE CITY GROWS AND WE NEED MORE RESOURCES WE BRING ON AT SOME POINT. THERE'S NO DOUBT IN MY MIND, STATION ONE WILL BE WHAT WE CALL A DOUBLE COMPANY.

RIGHT NOW IT'S A ONE AND A HALF COMPANY.

IT'S THE ENGINE WITH THE SQUAD, WHICH THE SQUAD WILL BECOME AN AMBULANCE.

I HAVE NO DOUBT IN MY MIND THAT IN THE FUTURE STATION ONE WILL HAVE AN AMBULANCE, IT WILL HAVE AN ENGINE AND IT WILL HAVE A QUINT AND THEN THE BATTALION CHIEF WOULD EITHER STAY THERE, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, DEPENDING ON HOW THE CITY DEVELOPS, AND DO WE PUSH OUR BATTALION CHIEFS OUT TO THE FRINGES, MAYBE ONE AT FOURS OR SIX, BUT ONES IS SUCH A CRITICAL STATION, LOGISTICALLY, THIS WILL TAKE CARE OF THE CAPACITY FOR THAT STATION TO PROVIDE INCREDIBLE SUPPORT AND RESPONSE CAPABILITIES AS IT GOES WEST DOWN ALSBURY TO THE CHISHOLM AREA, CENTRAL CITY, AND SO AGAIN, IT'S JUST THE IDEAL LOCATION.

IN FORT WORTH, WE HAD STATION FIVE THAT I WORKED AT.

STATION FIVE IS JUST RIGHT IN THE CENTER OF EVERYTHING, AND SO ONE IS LIKE OUR STATION FIVE BECAUSE IT'S LIKE THE HUB AND THE SPOKE.

IT'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO GO AND WILL GO TO SO MANY DIFFERENT PARTS OF THE CITY QUICKLY.

SO I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS AND I WAS GOING TO TURN IT BACK OVER TO ERIC FOR HIS PORTION AND I'LL BE AVAILABLE OBVIOUSLY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

I'M SORRY, I DO HAVE A QUESTION BEFORE YOU SNEAK AWAY, CHIEF, WHY ARE WE NOT DISCUSSING THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE? GOOD QUESTION.

I THINK TO PIGGYBACK ON WHAT ERIC HAS SAID, THE BUDGET THAT HAS BEEN ALLOCATED DOES NOT SUPPORT DOING THE BUILDOUT FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE AT THIS TIME.

THE PROGRAM WE DO HAVE A GOOD PROGRAM.

IT'S JUST NOT HERE IN THIS PRESENTATION.

WE'RE PLEASED WITH WHAT KOMATSU HAS DONE FOR THE ADMIN SIDE.

I WOULD JUST SAY THAT AGAIN, JUST LIKE THE FIRE STATION, WE HAVE A MORE LIMITED BECAUSE WE'VE ONE OF THE THINGS THE PARAMETERS WE SHARED WITH THEM WAS IDEALLY KEEP IT ON THE CURRENT FOUNDATION BECAUSE WE KNOW TRYING TO GO OUT IT'S GOING TO BE MORE EXPENSIVE BUT KOMATSU HAS DONE A REALLY GOOD JOB ON OUR SIDE OF IT, AND I WOULD SAY WE DO HAVE NEEDS.

THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.

OR WE WOULDN'T HAVE ASKED THEM TO DO OUR SIDE, BUT IT COMES DOWN TO THE ALLOTMENT.

THE CAPACITY THAT WE GAIN ON OUR SIDE IS WE PICK UP TWO OFFICES AND THREE WORKSTATIONS, BUT WE HAVE A COMPLETE RECONFIGURATION, AND AGAIN, I APOLOGIZE FOR NOT HAVING IT.

I CAN COME BACK WITH THAT OR WE CAN COME BACK WITH IT BECAUSE IT IS A KOMATSU DID A REALLY GOOD JOB OF WORKING WITH WHAT THEY HAVE TO WORK WITH.

[01:40:05]

DO WE HAVE A TOTAL OF WHAT THAT WHAT BOTH WOULD BE? I'M SORRY. YEAH.

IF I MIGHT ASK WHILE YOU'RE.

I'M SORRY. YOU GO AHEAD.

I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO LOOK SOMETHING UP.

NO, I WAS READY.

THAT'S PROBABLY ABOUT AT LEAST ANOTHER MILLION DOLLARS TO DO THE ADMIN SIDE, AND I THINK FROM OUR PERSPECTIVE, IT'S SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.

WE THINK WE CAN BRING IT BACK TO YOU AS PART OF THE NEXT CIP PROGRAM, AS PART OF THE FIVE YEAR CIP, AND THERE'S DEFINITELY SOME LOGISTICAL CHALLENGES.

THIS IS A BUILDING THAT'S GOT TO OPERATE 24 OVER SEVEN, AND SO ONE OF THE THINGS WE WANTED TO DO WAS POTENTIALLY RELOCATE THE FIREFIGHTERS INTO THE ADMIN AREA WHILE WE RECONSTRUCT ALL OF THE SPACE THAT'S THERE, AND THEN ONCE THEY MOVE BACK IN, THEN YOU WOULD HAVE A CHANCE TO THEN DO THE ADMIN AREA AT THAT TIME.

I THINK THE OTHER THING THAT COUNCIL NEEDS TO SEE, I THINK THERE'S A NEED, AS THE CHIEF SAID, WE CERTAINLY WANT TO LOOK AT IT, BUT YOU NEED TO SEE ALL THE OTHER PROJECTS THAT ARE OUT THERE AS WELL. THERE'S A LOT OF OTHER NEEDS ACROSS THE CITY, INCLUDING IN THE PD EXPANSION THAT WILL HAVE THERE MAY BE MAY NEED TO BE SOME ADDITIONAL DOLLARS FOR THAT.

I THINK ONE OF THE QUESTIONS COUNCIL HAS ASKED ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR FACILITY IS CAN YOU HAVE A SEPARATE COMMUNICATIONS BUILDING? WHAT WOULD THE COST OF THAT BE? AND WE NEED TO SEE ALL THAT TOGETHER.

SO THEN YOU COULD MAKE THAT FUNDING ALLOCATION, BUT IT'S REALLY JUST A TIMING QUESTION I THINK, RIGHT NOW FOR THE FIRE STATION TO GET THE BUNKS AND THE OPERATIONS AREAS IMPROVED AND THEN LOOK AT THE NEXT PHASE OF THAT GOING FORWARD.

THAT'S AT LEAST HOW WE'VE THOUGHT OF IT.

IS THAT 1 MILLION FOR BUILDOUT OR IS THAT 1 MILLION FOR DESIGN AND BUILD? I THINK IT'S A I'LL ASK ERIC TO CLARIFY THAT TO MAKE SURE I'M CORRECT ON.

I THINK IT'S $1 MILLION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, CORRECT? CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN FOR THE ADMIN.

YOU KNOW WHAT THE DESIGN BREAKOUT IS BY ANY CHANCE? IT'S A LITTLE LESS LESS THAN 200,000.

OKAY, SO MY SUGGESTION IS THAT INSTEAD OF US VOTING ON THIS RIGHT NOW, TO ME THIS IS A LITTLE BIT OF SOMETHING WE'VE SEEN A LOT OF OVER THE LAST SEVERAL YEARS.

WHY DON'T WE DESIGN THE WHOLE CONCEPT, INCLUDING THE ADMIN SIDE, AND HAVE IT READY FOR PHASING IN WHEN THE MONEY IS THERE? BUT TO HAVE TO GO BACK THEN AND REENGAGE IN 2 OR 3 YEARS, KOMATSU TO NOW DESIGN THE ADMIN SIDE, WE'VE GOT IT DESIGNED AND THEN WE CAN PUT IT INTO THE CIP TO SET THE MONEY ASIDE WHEN THE TIME COMES.

WE'VE GOT A DESIGN THERE AND WE, WE'VE GOT OPTIONS.

WE HAVEN'T EVEN BEEN BROUGHT FORWARD OPTIONS RIGHT NOW TO, TO EVEN LOOK AT THIS, BUT WHAT I FEAR IS THAT WE'RE SITTING IN A SITUATION WHERE 20 YEARS AGO, FOR WHATEVER REASON, WE PUT A POLICE DEPARTMENT INTO A MAKESHIFT BUILDING, THAT NOW WE'RE SPENDING AN UNGODLY AMOUNT OF MONEY TO GIVE THEM WHAT THEY NEED.

AS YOU TALK ABOUT THE FIRE SIDE AND BEING ABLE TO HANDLE THE AMOUNT OF STAFF YOU'LL NEED FROM THE FIRE DEPARTMENT SIDE, THE ACTUAL GUYS ON THE FIELD, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE A LARGE INCREASE IN YOUR STAFF ON THE ADMIN SIDE AND THIS IS OUR ADMIN BUILDING.

SO FOR ME, I FEEL LIKE WE NEED TO BE FORWARD THINKING RIGHT NOW AND PUT THE DESIGN PART IN IT AND GET THAT PART GOING AND THEN WE CAN PHASE IN THE BUILD OF IT SO THAT LIKE YOU SAID, SO THE GUYS CAN STAY ON THE ONE SIDE WHILE YOU'RE BUILDING OUT THE, THE NEW QUARTERS FOR THEM, THE NEW LIVING QUARTERS. I JUST WOULD HATE TO BE BACK HERE IN THREE YEARS, AND NOW THE $200,000 DESIGN COST IS $500,000, AND WE DON'T KNOW WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH THIS.

WITH ALL THAT BEING SAID, I WOULD SUGGEST THIS IS WHAT I THAT WE TABLE THIS UNTIL, I DON'T KNOW, SOMETIME IN JUNE.

ONE, WHEN THE NEW COUNCIL IS ON BOARD.

TWO, WHEN THEY'VE HAD TIME TO REALLY SIT DOWN AND ANALYZE AT THE ADMIN SIDE OF IT AND DISCUSS THIS.

IS THAT SOMETHING THAT WE COULD DO? I APPRECIATE THE FEEDBACK. COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE.

IF THAT'S THE WILL OF THE COUNCIL, WE CAN ABSOLUTELY DO THAT.

I THINK WHAT I WOULD TELL YOU IS MY INTENTION IS TO BRING YOU GUYS IN JUNE THE DEBT SIDE OF THE CIP.

WHAT I WOULD RECOMMEND AS AN ALTERNATIVE IS TO GO AHEAD AND TAKE ACTION TONIGHT ON THIS ON THIS ACTION, WE CAN DO A CHANGE ORDER AND ADD IN THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE IF THAT'S WHAT THE COUNCIL WANTS TO DO THAT WAY YOU'RE NOT STACKING TIME.

WE GO AHEAD AND GET THE PROCESS STARTED WITH THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND THEN IF COUNCIL WANTS TO IN JUNE, DIRECT US TO AND YOU ALLOCATE ADDITIONAL FUNDING FOR THE PROJECT, THEN WE CAN SIMPLY DO A CHANGE ORDER AND MOVE FORWARD, BUT THAT'S JUST A SUGGESTION.

WHAT WOULD BE THE PROCESS FOR THE FUTURE COUNCIL THEN TO BRING THAT FORWARD IN JUNE? WOULD THEY HAVE TO REQUEST IT TO BE PUT ON THE AGENDA? IF THE COUNCIL IDENTIFIED THAT AS A PROJECT THAT THEY FOUND MERIT AND WANT TO ADD IT TO THE CIP, THAT WOULD BE OUR DIRECTION AT THAT POINT TO BRING AN ITEM BACK FOR A ENGINEERING DESIGN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHANGE ORDER.

GO AHEAD. WELL, I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY, I CONCUR WITH TOMMY'S RECOMMENDATION, AND I THINK IT GIVES YOU A CHANCE TO SEE THE OFFSET.

[01:45:04]

THIS IS REAL MONEY AND IT'S A REAL NEED, BUT YOU NEED TO UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE THE OTHER OFFSETS IN THE CIP.

YOU HAVE TO MAKE SOME CHOICES.

WE'D LIKE TO BE ABLE TO LAY THOSE OUT FOR YOU SO YOU CAN UNDERSTAND THOSE FROM A CIP PERSPECTIVE, A TAX RATE PERSPECTIVE.

YOU CAN HAVE ALL THOSE OPTIONS FOR YOU IN FRONT OF YOU, AND THEN I THINK IT'S VERY SIMPLE.

WE CAN JUST BRING FORWARD THE CHANGE ORDER IF THAT'S THE COUNCIL'S DESIRE.

DAN HAS BROUGHT THIS UP SEVERAL TIMES ABOUT US GOING IN AND DOING A ROAD AND NOT GOING AHEAD AND GET THE DESIGN DONE AND THEN IT COST US EXTRA.

YOU KNOW, WHEN THEY GET INTO THIS, I DON'T KNOW THE LAYOUT OF THE ADMIN, BUT THERE'S GOT TO BE SOME COMPONENTS IN THERE WHERE THEY CAN GO AHEAD AND GET IT READY FOR THE NEXT STEP INSTEAD OF STARTING OVER ON A WALL OR SOMETHING [INAUDIBLE] AND IT'S MINIMAL STUFF.

I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT I LIKE THE IDEA OF WHAT TAMARA HAS BROUGHT UP, THE FACT THAT WE KNOW WE'RE GOING TO NEED IT.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND KIND OF PREPARE.

DESIGN FOR IT. I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU GUYS ARE SAYING ABOUT THE CIP AND LOOKING AT ALL OF THAT, AND I EVEN UNDERSTAND ABOUT THE CHANGE ORDER.

I DO FEEL THAT'S STILL DOING A DISSERVICE HERE.

I THINK THAT IF WE COULD I KNOW THAT WE'VE GOT A TIME FRAME TO TRY TO UPGRADE THESE LIVING QUARTERS.

THESE GUYS HAVE BEEN LIVING LIKE THIS FOR A WHILE AND I KNOW WHAT IT'S LIKE FOR MY HUSBAND TO HAVE BEEN IN SOME STATIONS THAT WERE LESS THAN PAR AT TIMES IN HIS CAREER, BUT I TRULY BELIEVE INSTEAD OF US SAYING YES AND PUSHING THIS, I DON'T THINK A DESIGN PART OF THIS 200,000 SHOULD BE WAITING ON THE CIP ANALYSIS.

IF WE CAN HOLD THIS, IF YOU GUYS ARE IN AGREEANCE AND BRING IT FORWARD AT A TIME SET FORTH WHICH YOU THINK WILL BE ENOUGH TIME TO GET WITH KOMATSU AND DISCUSS THIS, POSSIBLY ONE AFTER THE NEW COUNCIL IS IN AND SETTLED AND THEN TWO WHEN THEY'VE HAD SOME TIME TO REALLY GO BACK AND LOOK AT THIS AND FIGURE OUT HOW YOU CAN DO THIS AND PHASE THIS IN.

SO YOU'VE GOT THE DESIGN ALREADY FOR IT.

ARE YOU NOT WANTING TO VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT? NO, I WOULD LIKE TO TABLE THIS TO A FUTURE DATE.

I'M KIND OF LEANING MORE TOWARDS WHAT TOMMY IS SAYING, THE CHANGE ORDER TO GET SOME ACTION GOING TONIGHT, AND THEN WE GOT THE CHANGE ORDER WE COULD DO.

I DON'T SEE WHY THAT WOULDN'T HURT ANYTHING.

SO I GUESS THE QUESTION IS TO YOU ON IT.

IF WE DO THIS TONIGHT AND THEN WE GO BACK TO THEM AND SAY, WELL, WE WANT TO DO THE ADMIN AS WELL, WHAT WOULD THAT, WHAT'S THE NEXT PROCESS? DO WE GET THEM TO GIVE US AN ESTIMATED BID ON WHAT THE DESIGN FOR THE ADMIN WOULD BE, THE CHANGE ORDER? WELL, SOME OF THAT WORK IS ALREADY SOME OF THAT WORK IS ALREADY IN PLACE.

SO I DON'T THINK IT WOULD TAKE TERRIBLY LONG TO COME UP WITH THAT.

ONE THING I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT, THOUGH, IS THAT WE WERE VERY FOCUSED ON TRYING TO GET AT LEAST THE FIREHOUSE SIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION.

TO FRUITION AS SOON AS WE COULD.

SO BY AWARDING THIS DESIGN TONIGHT, YOU WOULD ALLOW US TO STAY ON SCHEDULE TO HAVE THAT OUT FOR CONSTRUCTION FIRST THE NEXT YEAR IF WE WANT TO WAIT A COUPLE OF MONTHS OR SO TO HAVE THE LARGER DESIGN CONTRACT, WE COULD DO THAT BUT THAT PROBABLY MEANS THAT NOTHING GOES TO CONSTRUCTION BIDDING UNTIL LATE NEXT SPRING, AND POSSIBLY THE SUMMER JUST DEPENDS ON THE EXTENT OF WHAT THE LARGER PROJECT COMES UP TO BE.

THE ONLY PERSON I'D SAY TO MAKE THAT DECISION IS FOR THE CHIEF TO SAY YAY OR NAY.

I DON'T WANT TO MAKE THAT CALL.

YOU'RE THE ONE DEALING WITH YOUR GUYS IN THIS SITUATION.

YEAH, HOW LONG FOR THE DESIGN, WHAT KIND OF DELAYS THAT THIS COULD HAVE IS OUT OF MY WHEELHOUSE.

I THINK THE POINT THAT I WANT TO MAKE CLEAR IS THAT WE HAVE PLANNED FROM THE BEGINNING TO HAVE THIS PHASED IN.

THERE'S NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.

WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF THE DESIGN FOR THE ADMIN SIDE THAT WE HAVEN'T SHOWN TONIGHT.

I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH WHATEVER PLAN IS THAT THE ADMIN SIDE AND I THINK COUNCIL MEMBER JOHNSON WAS ASKING SPECIFICALLY ABOUT THE FIRE RESPONSE SIDE, I FEEL VERY COMFORTABLE ABOUT THAT.

OUR BASES ARE COVERED THERE.

OUR BASES ARE COVERED TO A DEGREE ON THE ADMIN SIDE BECAUSE WE'VE STILL WHATEVER WE DO ON THE ADMIN SIDE WILL BE AN IMPROVEMENT AND WE NEED SOMETHING.

IT IS CRAMPED.

WE'RE NOT COMPLAINING THOUGH HOWEVER, IS I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE MAKE A DISTINCTION THAT THE ADMIN SIDE IS NOT A 50 YEAR LONG, IT'S NOT A 20 YEAR.

WE HAVE GOT CAPACITY BUILT IN SOME EXTRA CAPACITY BUILT IN, BUT IT IS NOT A FIX LIKE THE FIRE SIDE. SO THOSE ARE GOING TO BE CONVERSATIONS TO PROBABLY OTHER COUNCILS AND OTHER FIRE CHIEFS, BUT I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IN TONIGHT'S DISCUSSION THAT I'M TRANSPARENT WITH THE SCOPE THAT WE HAVEN'T SEEN IT.

[01:50:01]

IT PROVIDES.

WE'RE VERY THANKFUL FOR IT.

WE HAVE ALWAYS FIGURED ON PHASING IT IN BECAUSE WHEN THE BUDGET WAS SET, BUT THE ADMIN SIDE, THERE WILL BE FUTURE DISCUSSIONS ON WHAT IS ACTUALLY NEEDED AS THIS DEPARTMENT CONTINUES TO GROW, AS IT BRINGS ON A FOURTH STATION, IT BRINGS ON A FIFTH STATION THAT WE HAVE FULL CONFIDENCE THAT A FIFTH STATION IS COMING.

MORE PEOPLE AND THEN OUR ADMIN SIDE IS GOING TO HAVE TO EXPAND.

THERE'S JUST NO QUESTION.

WE ARE LEAN AND WE'VE BEEN LEAN.

SO THE PHASING, WE PLAN THAT FROM THE BEGINNING AND I WILL HAVE TO DEFER TO WHAT TYPE OF IMPACT IT WOULD HAVE FOR THE SCHEDULING AS FAR AS THE CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN.

SO CHIEF, ARE YOU KIND OF LEANING TOWARDS NOT TYING THE TWO TOGETHER? IS THAT GOING TO PUT IF WE START TRYING TO DESIGN THE ADMIN AT THIS TIME, IS THAT IS THAT RUSHING IT? WELL, FROM MY STANDPOINT, [INAUDIBLE] I DON'T HAVE AN OPINION.

I'M GOING TO HAVE TO GIVE AN OPINION.

[CHUCKLING] I CAN'T BELIEVE WE'RE TRYING TO GIVE MORE THAN YOU ASK FOR.

FROM A DESIGN STANDPOINT I THINK THERE'S VALUE IN DOING IT ALTOGETHER SOONER RATHER THAN LATER.

NOW THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THIS SHOWING THE ADMIN SIDE SO WE CAN AT LEAST DISCUSS THIS IS WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE.

THESE ARE THE BENEFITS, JUST LIKE WE DID THE FIRE SIDE AND WE KNOW IT'S GOING TO BE ABOUT $1 MILLION MORE, 800,000 FOR THE ACTUAL RENOVATION, AND THEN WHEN YOU FIGURE IN SOME OF THE OTHER THINGS.

SO YEAH, SO WE KNOW IT'S ABOUT $1 MILLION TO DO THE ADMIN SIDE, BUT SO IF THERE'S ADVANTAGES TO I'VE HEARD AS WHAT'S BEEN DISCUSSED HERE COUNCIL MEMBER MCCLENDON'S VIEWS ON DOES IT MAKE SENSE TO WITH ROAD PROJECTS AND WHATNOT TO DESIGN IT ALL AT ONE TIME? IF THERE'S IF IT SAVES THE CITY MONEY, THEN AS A TAXPAYER I SUPPORT IT.

[CHUCKLING] AS THE FIRE CHIEF, I THINK I CAN SUPPORT THAT AGAIN AND WILL SUPPORT IT.

IF THAT'S THE COUNCIL'S DECISION.

IF THAT'S THE COUNCIL'S DIRECTION, THEN I FULLY SUPPORT THAT.

THERE'S AN ELEMENT OF BEING READY TO GO WHEN WE IDENTIFY THE FUNDING ALREADY HAVING THE DESIGN.

SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE IF WE WENT WITH THE ROUTE THAT TOMMY SUGGESTED OF APPROVING TONIGHT'S DESIGN CONTRACT WITH THE IDEA THAT IN A COUPLE OF MEETINGS WE'RE GOING TO BRING BACK A CHANGE ORDER, DOES IT LIKE SO IT WOULD ACCOMPLISH? DOES IT ACCOMPLISH THE GOAL OF DESIGNING THE ENTIRE PROJECT WITH THE APPROVAL OF A CHANGE ORDER? AND IS THE CHANGE ORDER GOING TO COST US MONEY TO BRING FORWARD? AND IF IT WILL, IS THERE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAYBE JUST SAY, HEY, WE ALREADY KNOW WE'RE BRINGING THIS BACK TO COUNCIL? THEY'VE EXPRESSED INTEREST IN DESIGNING THE ENTIRE THING.

CAN WE WAIVE THOSE FEES? HOW DOES ALL THAT WORK? THE SCOPE OF THE CONTRACT THAT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, 219,000, I THINK THAT IS STRICTLY FOR WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT TONIGHT.

IF WE WANT TO ADD ANYTHING TO IT, WE DON'T THERE'S NOT FINAL DESIGN FOR ANYTHING.

ON THE ADMIN SIDE. THERE'S A SCHEMATIC OF KIND OF A CONCEPT.

SO YES, THE 219 WILL DEFINITELY INCREASE IF YOU WANT TO COME BACK WITH A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO ADD THAT ADDITIONAL SCOPE TO THE CONTRACT IN THE JULY TIME FRAME. SO WHAT IS 219 IF THIS SAYS 358? WELL, 358 IS EVERYTHING THAT'S CONSIDERED DESIGN.

SO THAT'S OTHER OWNER COSTS THE PROGRAMING THAT KOMATSU HAS ALREADY DONE.

OKAY, SEPARATE JUST TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION AND THE PLANNING EFFORTS.

DOES THE CHANGE ORDER IDEA ACCOMPLISH DESIGNING THE ENTIRETY? SO THE CHANGE ORDER WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO WHAT WE'RE ASKING YOU TO APPROVE TONIGHT, BUT IT ACCOMPLISHES DESIGNING ADMIN AND THE FIREHOUSE SIDE.

WELL, THE CHANGE ORDER ITSELF IS WOULD JUST BE FOR THE ADMIN SIDE.

WE ALREADY HAVE THE COMPONENT FOR THE FIREHOUSE COMBINED TOGETHER.

I THINK, COUNCIL MEMBER JOHNSON, COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE, COUNCIL, WHERE MY SUGGESTION WAS COMING FROM WAS SIMPLY JUST TO GET THE BALL ROLLING ON THE DESIGN.

ANY WORK THAT THEY DO WON'T BE LOST.

WORK IS STILL GOING TO APPLY TOWARD THE RESPONSE SIDE OF THE HOUSE WHEN WE DO THE CHANGE ORDER.

ERIC, YOU'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS WITH KOMATSU THAT I'VE NOT THE COST FOR THAT SCOPE OF WORK IS JUST GOING TO BE THE COST FOR THAT SCOPE OF WORK.

IF WE MOVE QUICKLY, I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO INCUR ADDITIONAL COSTS BECAUSE YOU DON'T TAKE ACTION TONIGHT.

SO REALLY IT'S A POLICY DECISION.

I JUST WAS TRYING TO FIND A PATH FORWARD WHERE WE DON'T LOSE TIME IN THE DESIGN.

[01:55:02]

I THINK TOMMY'S GIVEN US OPTIONS AND I APPRECIATE THAT BECAUSE I THINK GIVEN THEIR LIVING SITUATION, THAT IS SOMETHING I DON'T WANT TO STALL.

I UNDERSTAND WE HAVE NEEDS ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE SIDE AND BOY, DO WE.

WE HAVE SOME LADIES WORKING IN A HALLWAY AND MAKESHIFT CUBBY HOLES, AND SO WE KNOW THAT'S NEEDED, BUT WHERE THEY'RE LIVING AND SPENDING THE MOST TIME, IT'S JUST TRULY UNFAIR THE CONDITIONS THAT WE HAVE I'M WORKING OUT OF.

YEAH, I DON'T DISAGREE WITH THAT.

I THINK ONE OF THE THINGS THAT'S IMPORTANT FROM MY STANDPOINT TO SHARE WITH THE COUNCIL IS THAT THE PRELIMINARY DESIGN FOR THE ADMIN SIDE, AS I THINK I SHARED EARLIER, WE'RE VERY COMFORTABLE WITH THAT. I THINK KOMATSU HAS DONE AN EXCELLENT JOB OF GETTING THE MOST OUT OF THE AREAS OVER THERE TO MEET THE NEEDS THAT WE SHARED, AND WE'VE DISCUSSED IT NOT AD NAUSEUM BUT THOROUGHLY WITH STAFF, AND WE BELIEVE THAT'S PROBABLY AS EFFICIENT AND THE BEST THEY CAN GET OUT OF IT.

IT WILL GIVE US TWO EXTRA OFFICES AND AS I SAID EARLIER, THREE ADDITIONAL WORKSPACES, AND SO IT DOES INCREASE OUR CAPACITY, BUT, YOU KNOW, AT SOME POINT , BUT THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT THE FULL.

THAT'S NOT THE FULL.

YEAH. SO THAT'S WHERE I WANT TO BE REALLY CLEAR THAT WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT HERE IS WE'VE ALREADY GOT A DESIGN CONCEPT FOR RECONFIGURING ADMIN RIGHT NOW, CORRECT? YES, BUT THAT'S NOT ENOUGH.

THAT'S A VERY SHORT TERM FIX, NOT A LONG TERM FIX, AND WHAT I AM PROPOSING IS A NEW DESIGN ALTOGETHER THAT ADDS ON EVEN MORE SPACE BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WE'RE DOING IS WE'RE MAKESHIFT SHIFTING FOR I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG IT'S GOING TO LAST.

I AM SUGGESTING THAT WE ACTUALLY GO FORTH AND CREATE A NEW DESIGN THAT ACTUALLY ENTAILS.

SO WE'VE ALREADY ESSENTIALLY PAID FOR THIS PART OF THE DESIGN.

WE WERE SHOWN THAT, RIGHT? THAT'S THIS HERE.

YEAH. OKAY, I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT CLARIFICATION BECAUSE.

SORRY, I ALMOST THINK THAT I'M HEARING NOW THAT THERE IS A DESIRE TO LOOK AT AN EXPANSION.

CORRECT. WHICH IS NOT WHAT KOMATSU HAS LOOKED AT.

RIGHT. YES. WE'VE GOT A SPEAKER CARD.

SO NOW LISTEN TO THE SPEAKER CARD OVER HERE.

YOU HAVE A SPEAKER CARD.

SO NOW INSTEAD OF BEING 500,000 OVER WHAT WE PLANNED AND BUDGETED, IT'S NOT GOING TO BE JUST ANOTHER MILLION.

I'M PRETTY SURE IT WILL BE MULTIPLES.

WELL, I THINK, AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE FOCUSING WHAT FOR ME, WHAT I WANT TO FOCUS ON HERE IS THE IS THE ACTUAL DESIGN OF THE FULL SPACE OF WHICH WE NEED FOR A 25 YEAR RUN IN ADMIN IN THIS SPACE.

OKAY, BECAUSE OTHERWISE, AGAIN, WE'RE GOING TO WE'RE GOING TO BE BACK HERE IN, WHAT, FIVE YEARS? SIX YEARS? I DON'T HAVE A CLUE.

I DON'T KNOW.

YOU KNOW. SO YEAH, MY WHAT I AM SUGGESTING IS WHAT WE SHOULD HAVE DONE YEARS AGO WITH THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THAT WE ARE GOING TO PUT OURSELVES IN THIS SITUATION IN 5 TO 10 YEARS WHERE WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH ADMIN SPACE FOR OUR FIRE.

CONSIDER WHAT WE'RE BUILDING OUT ON THE WEST SIDE WHEN WE BUILD THE OTHER STATION AND ALL THE ADMIN THAT'S GOING TO BE NEEDED, CONSIDER WHAT'S NEEDED FOR AMBULANCE SERVICES.

WE NEED ADDITIONAL SPACE.

UNDERSTOOD. SO, THE NUMBERS THAT MR. THOMPSON WAS SPEAKING TO TONIGHT WAS ASSUMING SAME FOOTPRINT.

I CAN TELL YOU THAT I DON'T THINK EITHER ONE OF US WILL LIKELY BE COMFORTABLE TO SPEAK TO WHAT THE ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN CHANGE WOULD BE AS A RESULT OF THAT AND CERTAINLY NOT CONSTRUCTION.

SO WE CAN GET WITH KOMATSU AND GET BACK TO YOU ON THAT, BUT ERIC, DO YOU I MEAN, DO YOU HAVE A BETTER INDICATION OF COST THAN WHAT I HAVE? NO, OTHER THAN I THINK GIVEN THAT CLARIFICATION, WE MIGHT WE MIGHT BE BETTER SERVED TO REALLY LOOK AT MORE OF A REALLY MORE OF A PLANNING EFFORT BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NEW STATION ON THE WEST SIDE AND POTENTIAL OTHER MAYBE COMMUNICATION BUILDING AND OTHER THINGS [INAUDIBLE] ON THE HEAD.

EXCUSE ME. YOU HIT THE NAIL ON THE HEAD WITH THAT IS BETTER PLANNING.

I BELIEVE THAT WE WERE BROUGHT A VERY MINIMAL PLAN WITHOUT FUTURE THINKING ON THIS, AND I DON'T MEAN BY YOU, I JUST MEAN THAT WE SHOULD HAVE CAUGHT THIS EVEN BACK THEN AND SAID, HEY, WAIT A MINUTE.

HOLD ON. THIS IS NOT LONG TERM.

WHAT WE'RE GOING TO NEED HERE, AND WE ARE MAKE SHIFTING SOMETHING THAT'S ACTUALLY NOT GOING TO SUIT THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.

YEAH, AND I REALLY I REALLY THINK AND A LOT OF THIS PRECEDED ME, BUT I REALLY THINK THE 2 MILLION WAS TO KIND OF BE THE.

SHORT TERM SOLUTION TO GIVE SOME MUCH NEEDED RELIEF TO THE HIGHEST PRIORITY.

WE WENT THROUGH THE PROGRAMMING STUDY WHICH INDICATED THAT THE RESPONSE SIDE OF THE BUILDING WAS THE HIGHER PRIORITY.

SO THEN TRYING TO SORT OF STAY WITHIN THE FUNDING ALLOCATED.

THAT'S HOW WE CAME UP WITH THE CONTRACT BEFORE YOU.

[02:00:03]

I APOLOGIZE, I KNOW YOU'RE TRYING TO GET THE SPEAKER UP THERE.

IT SOUNDS LIKE NOW THERE MIGHT BE A DESIRE TO GO FAR BEYOND WHAT WE WHAT OUR WHAT I INTERPRETED OUR ORIGINAL MARCHING ORDERS TO BE.

MAYOR AND COUNCIL, WE DO HAVE A SPEAKER.

MIKE JONES.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

MIKE JONES BURLESON PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTER ASSOCIATION.

SO I PUT IN A CARD TONIGHT TO SPEAK ON THE ISSUE FIRST WITH THE NOT TO GET OUT OF ORDER WITH THE AGENDA, BUT ON THE FIRE TRUCKS.

I'M THINKING YOU GUYS, THE COUNCIL ARE ALWAYS SUPPORTING THE OUR FIREFIGHTERS AND OUR MEMBERS, AND, YOU KNOW, WITH THE STATION, AS YOU CAN SEE, I MEAN, YOU DRIVE BY, IT'S A NICE LOOKING BUILDING, BUT AS COUNCIL MEMBER JOHNSON SAID, THAT'S A BUILDING THAT WAS 20 YEARS OLD THAT FIT 20 YEARS AGO.

I DO APPRECIATE CITY MANAGER LANGLEY.

WE HAD MET WITH HIM AND TALKED ABOUT IT DURING THE BOND AND STUFF ABOUT, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE SOME NEEDS OVER THERE, AS YOU CAN SEE, THE KIND OF THE LIVING CONDITIONS, AND THEN I GUESS [INAUDIBLE] TONIGHT ON ON ADMIN SIDE.

SO I GUESS I'LL COMMENT ON THAT AS WELL.

[INAUDIBLE] INSIDE, A LOT OF TIMES YOU'LL THINK ABOUT JUST THE CHIEFS.

WE DO HAVE MEMBERS THAT WORK ON THAT SIDE BECAUSE AS WE AND I APOLOGIZE, MY VOICE IS GOING TODAY, BUT WE HAVE MEMBERS THAT ARE ON THAT SIDE AS WELL.

SO IF I COULD JUST WEIGH IN A LITTLE BIT ON THAT.

OUR ONLY QUESTION WOULD BE AS AND WE GOT MEMBERS WATCHING, SO THEY'RE SENDING ME TEXTS.

THE QUESTIONS WOULD BE WOULD BE, YOU KNOW, IS THAT LATER ON GOING TO BE MORE COST TO DO A CHANGE ORDER RIGHT TO DO THE DESIGN, AND THEN I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING MR. LANGLEY ABOUT THE FUTURE AND NOT KNOWING COST OF PD AND COMMUNICATIONS AND ALL THAT, BUT I CAN PROMISE YOU, AS YOU GUYS HEARD, THERE'S NEEDS THERE AS WELL. I MEAN, WE HAVE PEOPLE HOUSING IN HALLWAYS AND STUFF, SO I DIDN'T REALLY GET UP HERE TO SPEAK ON THAT SIDE, BUT I CAN TELL YOU, LIKE MY FATHER IN LAW, WHO WAS A BUILDER, WOULD SAY, YOU KNOW, MEASURE TWICE, CUT ONCE, AND SO JUST HEARING FROM THE MEMBERS THAT ARE WATCHING AND MEMBERS THAT I HAVE HERE IN THE AUDIENCE, WE'RE AT THE WILL OF WHATEVER YOU GUYS SEE BEST.

IT'S GOING TO COST THE LEAST AMOUNT OF MONEY, BUT IT'S GOING TO BETTER BENEFIT US BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, WHILE WE'RE BUILDING OUT IN OTHER AREAS FOR 15, 20 YEARS AND ALL THAT, WE HAVE NEEDS RIGHT NOW ACROSS THE BOARD, BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT, CHIEF TOUCHED ON IT FOR YOU GUYS TO HEAR, YOU KNOW, ME BEING A FIRE COMMISSIONER IN TEXAS.

YOU HEAR STORIES ALL OVER THE STATE AND YOU HEAR ABOUT FIREFIGHTERS HAVING TO WATCH THEIR BUNKER GEAR AND STUFF AND LAUNDROMATS AND BECAUSE OF PREVIOUS COUNCILS AND THIS COUNCIL THAT WE HAVE TWO SETS OF GEAR AND WAYS TO CLEAN OUR GEAR AND GET THE STUFF OFF OF US.

WE'RE REALLY MAXIMIZING THE WAY WE CAN TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE DOING THE BEST WE CAN TO REDUCE CANCER.

IT DOES BECOME ALMOST LIKE A LINE.

I JOKED WITH COACH ANDERSON BACK HERE THAT A LOT OF US PLAYED SPORTS, SO WE JUST KNOW HOW TO GET IT DONE, BUT FOR SHOWERS, BUT ANYWAYS, WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF WHATEVER YOU GUYS, WE APPRECIATE EVERYTHING YOU DO FOR US, BUT WHY? IT IS A GREAT LOOKING BUILDING ON THE OUTSIDE.

IT DOES NOT FIT THE NEEDS ON EITHER SIDE OF IT, AND IF I COULD HAVE A LITTLE LATITUDE MR .

MAYOR AND CITY SECRETARY AMANDA, SINCE I'M UP HERE AND IT MAY BE A LITTLE OUT OF ORDER, BUT COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN.

WE APPRECIATE YOUR LONG YEARS OF SERVICE AND ALWAYS BEING A SUPPORT OF US, AND YOU KNOW, I'VE KNOWN YOU AND YOUR FAMILY A LONG TIME.

YOU KNOW, MY DAUGHTER THAT YOU KNEW WHEN SHE WAS BORN IS NOW GOING TO DENVER FOR A JOB.

SO WE APPRECIATE YOUR TIME HERE, AND YOU'VE ALWAYS BEEN A BIG SUPPORT TO US, AND COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE, WE APPRECIATE YOUR SERVICE.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU, AND OUR MEMBERS DO WE APPRECIATE YOU, COUNCIL MEMBER PAYNE.

WE APPRECIATE YOU AND THE SHORT TIME WE'VE HAD YOU, BUT YOU'VE BECOME A FRIEND LIKE COUNCIL MEMBER GREEN AND YOU WILL BE MISSED BUT LIKE I SAID, I KNOW YOU'LL BE AROUND AND YOU ALL BE YOU ALWAYS BOTH OF YOU GUYS WILL BE A CHAMPION FOR OUR MEMBERS AND FOR THE TIME THAT YOU SERVED, AND WITH BOTH OF YOU, WE MAY NOT HAVE ALWAYS AGREED ON THINGS.

I THINK THE IMPORTANT THING FOR EVERYBODY THIS DAY AND AGE TO KNOW IS ALL OF US COULD ALWAYS BE FRIENDS AND AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE COULD GO HAVE A MEAL TOGETHER OR TALK AND BE OKAY EVEN IF WE DIDN'T AGREE ON THINGS.

SO ANYWAYS, I APOLOGIZE GETTING A LITTLE OFF THE AGENDA, BUT AS FAR AS THE STATION, WE APPRECIATE THE, YOU KNOW, COUNCIL MEMBER LANGLEY BRINGING IT AND DEPUTY CITY MANAGER LUDWIG I'M SORRY CITY MANAGER LANGLEY.

WE'LL GET YOU BACK IN YOUR TIME [INAUDIBLE].

WE'LL PUT YOU UP HERE, BUT ANYWAYS, WE'RE IN SUPPORT OF WHATEVER YOU GUYS DO.

YOU KNOW, WE'VE LIVED IN THESE CONDITIONS FOR A WHILE, SO I WOULD JUST OUR SUGGESTION AS MEMBERS WOULD BE WHATEVER YOU GUYS FEEL COMFORTABLE THAT IS BEST SUITED FOR THAT FUTURE THAT COSTS THE CITY THE LEAST AMOUNT OF MONEY IS WHAT WE'RE FOR.

SO YOU GUYS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR ME OR? OKAY, ALL RIGHT, THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR GUYS' SUPPORT.

I'M GOING TO RECOMMEND WE GO AHEAD AND MAKE A MOTION ON JUST THE MOTION WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US

[02:05:03]

AND THEN IN COUNCIL COMMENTS, WE CAN ASK FOR A CONSIDER A CHANGE ORDER.

WELL, I THINK AT THIS POINT, NOW THAT I'VE EXPLAINED THAT IT'S AN ACTUAL EXPANSION, IT WOULD BE MORE THAN A CHANGE ORDER.

THIS IS A FULL EXPANSION THAT THEY HAVE TO GO REDESIGN AND ADD IT IN.

IT WILL CHANGE THIS WHOLE THING RIGHT HERE.

SO IT HAS TO BE DONE.

IT HAS TO BE DONE AND LOOKED AT.

WE HAVEN'T LOOKED AT THE BIG PICTURE YET.

WE'VE LOOKED AT MAKE JUST TRYING TO MAKE THIS WORK, BUT WE'RE HAVING WE'VE GOT AN IMMEDIATE NEED RIGHT NOW.

WELL, I'M GOING TO TAKE SOME SAY THAT I'VE MET WITH STAFF AND THEY ARE OKAY WITH THIS.

I MEAN, I BELIEVE THAT THEY WOULD RATHER SEE THIS FULLY PLANNED OUT AND PUSHED TWO MONTHS ON CONSTRUCTION OF THE LIVING QUARTERS THAN.

COME BACK TO THIS LATER ON AND NOT HAVE IT DONE.

I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY AND I'LL ASK SOME OF THE TECHNICAL STAFF TO CORRECT ME IF I'M WRONG, BUT IF YOU'RE LOOKING AT EXPANDING THE FOOTPRINT OF THIS BUILDING, CHANGING ROOF LINES, MOVING WALLS OUTSIDE THE FOOTPRINT THAT'S THERE.

IT'S NOT JUST TWO MONTHS, AND I'M NOT SAYING THAT'S THE WRONG DECISION, BUT THAT COULD BE A MONTH-LONG ACTIVITY TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT IS, AND THE COST WILL BE SIGNIFICANTLY HIGHER THAN WHAT WE'VE SHOWN YOU HERE.

THE MILLION DOLLAR RENOVATION OF THE ADMIN IS A RENOVATION OF THAT FACILITY.

IT'S NOT ADDING STRUCTURAL.

YOU'RE MOVING STRUCTURAL WALLS AND DOING ALL KINDS OF THINGS, AND ERIC, IF I'M MISSTATING THAT, PLEASE LET ME KNOW, BUT I JUST WANT TO BE CLEAR.

IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BLOWING THIS BUILDING OUT AND EXPANDING THE BUILDING, THAT'S A VERY DIFFERENT CONVERSATION.

I'VE NEVER SEEN ANYTHING GO DESIGNED SINCE I'VE BEEN ON COUNCIL IN TWO MONTHS.

I AGREE. WE'RE ADDING ON TO IT.

IT MAY NOT BE TWO MONTHS, BUT IF YOU'RE NOT GOING TO DESIGN, OKAY, YOU'RE NOT SETTING THEM UP FOR LONG TERM SUCCESS.

WE ARE NOT LOOKING AT THE BIG PICTURE HERE.

WE'RE LOOKING AT A SMALL PICTURE OF JUST TRYING TO MAKE THIS WORK.

SO, CHIEF, AS FAR AS THE ARE WE GOING TO PUT ALL THE ADMIN IN THAT ONE BUILDING? IS THAT THE PLAN, THIS ONE? BECAUSE AS WE BRING THESE NEW STATIONS ON, WHY CAN'T WE ADD ADMIN WITH THOSE NEW STATIONS AND SAVE MONEY THAT WAY RATHER THAN JUST PUT IT ALL IN ONE BUILDING? I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW.

I'M NOT A FIREFIGHTER, SO YOU TELL ME.

SO THE QUESTION WOULD BE, CONCEPTUALLY, AS WE ADD NEW STATIONS, IS THERE A POSSIBILITY TO DEDICATE SPACE IN THOSE STATIONS TO HOUSE ADMIN OR ADMINISTRATIVE STAFF? YEAH, I THINK THERE IS A POSSIBILITY JUST FROM A CONVERSATIONAL STANDPOINT AND WE ARE DECENTRALIZED TO BEGIN WITH. THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT AND WE COULD POTENTIALLY DO THAT.

I WANT TO MAKE SURE THE CAVEAT WOULD BE BECAUSE WE'RE TALKING HIGH LEVEL CONCEPTS HERE, BUT WITH SIGNIFICANT IMPLICATIONS.

THERE IS VALUE IN HAVING THE CENTRAL LIKE YOUR CHIEFS, YOUR RANKING OFFICERS IN ADMIN BECAUSE WE WORK IN CLOSE PROXIMITY.

I WOULDN'T WANT TO HAVE AGAIN, I'M NOT GOING TO BE HERE, BUT JUST SPEAKING FROM MY EXPERIENCE, I WOULD NOT WANT TO SAY HAVE OUR EMS DIVISION BECAUSE THE DIVISIONS ARE GOING TO GROW.

I KNOW I'M GOING TO GET GRANULAR, BUT THE TRAINING DIVISION, THE EMS DIVISION RIGHT NOW WITH ONE PERSON THAT'S GOT TO SPLIT OFF EVENTUALLY AS THIS ORGANIZATION GROWS AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SEPARATE I WOULD SUSPECT THERE SHOULD BE SEPARATE DIVISIONS, A TRAINING DIVISION THAT'S GOING TO HAVE A LEADER AND SUPPORT STAFF.

THERE'S GOING TO BE AN EMS DIVISION THAT WILL HAVE A LEADER AND SUPPORT STAFF.

IT'S NOT IDEAL TO HAVE THOSE STAFF AND THOSE DIVISIONS IN A PLACE, SAY, LIKE FOUR, REMOTE AWAY, THAT FAR AWAY.

IT'S NOT IDEAL TO HAVE THEM WHERE STATION FIVE IS GOING TO BE, BUT IT WOULDN'T BE THE INSURMOUNTABLE BUT IT WOULD NOT BE I THINK AS EFFICIENT, BUT I THINK THE CRUX OF IT IS THAT'S BEEN BROUGHT UP WHAT DO WE DO FOR THE FUTURE, WHICH I DON'T THINK WE'RE GOING TO SOLVE IT TONIGHT ABOUT LOOKING AT THE FUTURE NEEDS OF THE ADMIN BEYOND THE FIVE THAT WE GAIN WITH THIS DESIGN.

THIS DESIGN IS A GOOD DESIGN.

IT GIVES US A LOT OF ENHANCEMENTS, BUT AGAIN, BEING TRANSPARENT, WHETHER IT'S ME OR WHOEVER, IT'S GOING TO BE STANDING UP HERE IN THE YEARS TO COME.

[02:10:02]

AT SOME POINT THAT FIVE IS NOT GOING TO BE ENOUGH, AND SO I THINK WE NEED TO HAVE A BROADER CONVERSATION, AS HAS BEEN POINTED DIRECTED AT TONIGHT, OF WHAT ARE WE GOING TO NEED FOR 15 YEARS, 20 YEARS, 25 YEARS? AND I'VE ALLUDED TO THIS IN A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT DISCUSSION OPPORTUNITIES OF HAVING BEFORE WE PASS THE BOND OR SOME OF THE ISSUES I HAD WITH THE BOND PACKAGE WAS WERE WE TRULY VETTING THE IDEA OF HAVING A FIRE ADMINISTRATION, AN OPPORTUNITY FOR COMMUNICATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION IN SOME TYPE OF PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY LIKE GRAND PRAIRIE AND MANSFIELD HAVE? I DON'T WANT TO HOLD UP THE FIREHOUSE SIDE OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WE KNOW YOU HAVE SAID TONIGHT AND IN CONVERSATIONS WITH STAFF, WE KNOW THAT'S ADDRESSING THERE'S ROOM FOR GROWTH THERE.

IT'S GOING TO ACCOMMODATE WHAT WE NEED IT TO ACCOMMODATE, BUT I AGREE.

THE ADMINISTRATION SIDE. IT IS A COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAT'S A START FROM THE GROUND UP.

WHAT ARE ALL OF OUR OPTIONS? WHAT ARE ALL OF OUR OPPORTUNITIES? WHEN WE LAST SPOKE ABOUT THE PD DESIGN, I ASKED, WILL THERE BE OPPORTUNITIES TO SAY LIKE, ARE THEY GOING TO COME BACK AND SAY, NO, THIS ISN'T ABSOLUTELY ISN'T GOING TO WORK IN THIS EXISTING BUILDING? YOU KNOW, WHAT WILL WHAT ROOM DO WE HAVE? I WANT TO THINK BIG SO THAT WE'RE TAKING CARE OF ALL FUTURE NEEDS.

AS FAR AS PUBLIC SAFETY GOES, YOU KNOW, IS IT A WILD, "OUT THERE" DREAM TO ONE DAY HAVE THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING AND THE EXISTING PD BUILDING AND SOMETHING BUILT IN BETWEEN THAT EVENTUALLY CONNECTS THE TWO? I JUST I THINK THAT THERE'S BIG, BROAD CONVERSATIONS WE NEED TO HAVE AND I DON'T WANT TO PUT A BAND-AID.

I'M IN AGREEMENT WITH THAT.

I DON'T WANT TO PUT A BAND-AID ON THE EXISTING ADMINISTRATION SITUATION.

I KNOW IT'S NOT THE MOST ACCOMMODATING, BUT YOU'RE ABLE TO MAKE IT WORK FOR RIGHT NOW, BUT WE NEED TO HAVE BIG CONVERSATIONS ABOUT WHAT DO WE SEE FIRE NEEDING, AND I FEEL LIKE WE MISSED THE BOAT IN BUILDING STATION 16.

YOU KNOW, MAYBE THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN TO ME THAT WOULD HAVE BEEN A GOOD SPOT FOR ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATION, BUT THAT SHIP SAILED.

SO IF IT'S NOT, IF STATION FOUR IS TOO FAR OUT THERE, THEN WHAT OPPORTUNITY DO WE HAVE IN LINE WITH WE JUST PASSED A BOND PACKAGE.

OUR CITIZENS SAID, YES, WE HAVE PUBLIC SAFETY NEEDS.

WE AGREE WITH THAT, BUT IT WAS AMBIGUOUS IN PD AND FIRE GENERAL, AND SO MAYBE WE CAN BEFORE WE ABSOLUTELY ARE ALL IN ON ONE EXPANSION OR THE OTHER, WE CAN LOOK AT ALL OF THESE THINGS AND SAY, HOW MANY BOXES CAN WE CHECK OFF BEFORE WE EVEN TURN DIRT, BEFORE WE EVEN START CONSTRUCTING ANYTHING AS FAR AS PD AND FIRE ADMINISTRATION AND MANY OF US ARE IN AGREEMENT THAT COMMUNICATIONS NEEDS ITS OWN LOCATION AS WELL BUT I FEEL LIKE WE'RE AT A GOOD I KNOW WE'VE ALREADY GONE FORWARD WITH A BOND PACKAGE TO OUR CITIZENS, BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN WE DON'T HAVE TO BE ABSOLUTELY RESPONSIBLE AND DOT EVERY I AND CROSS EVERY T BEFORE WE ACTUALLY SPEND A DIME OF IT.

FROM MY PERSPECTIVE, I SAID IT EARLIER, THERE IS NO QUESTION YOU WE FOLLOW THE MARCHING ORDERS AND WE SUPPORT WHAT, ULTIMATELY, WHATEVER DECISION COUNCIL MAKES, WE RESPECT IT AND WE WILL MAKE IT WORK, AND WE'RE JUST YOU KNOW, THIS IS WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE THESE TYPE OF DISCUSSIONS AS WE YOU ALL ULTIMATELY HAVE TO WRESTLE WITH THE POLICY, BUT WE WILL MAKE WORK WHATEVER THIS COUNCIL WILL IS AND THEN THE COUNCIL THAT'S COMING ON.

I DON'T SEE ANY PROBLEM WITH TABLING THIS THING FOR THE NEW COUNCIL TO COME ON.

THAT YOU'RE LOOKING AT TWO, THREE WEEKS AND AT LEAST, CHIEF, WE CAN HAVE THIS VERY SAME CONVERSATION WITH EVERYBODY NEW THAT COMES ON AND SEE HOW THEY FEEL ABOUT IT.

I KNOW HOW I FEEL ABOUT IT.

I THINK THE MAYOR IS RIGHT.

I THINK WE NEED TO GO AHEAD AND LOOK AT THE POSSIBILITY OF BOTH, THAT'S A SENSIBLE THING.

CAN WE DO IT? I DON'T KNOW.

I REALLY DON'T. I DON'T KNOW ABOUT OUR MONEY, BUT I WANT TO GET THESE OTHER FOLKS INVOLVED IN IT, TOO, AND I DON'T SEE HOW ANOTHER TWO WEEKS OR MAYBE EVEN FOUR IS GOING TO IT'S NOT GOING TO COST US A ZILLION DOLLARS JUST TO WAIT TO GET THEM INVOLVED.

HAVE THE CONVERSATION AGAIN, BECAUSE MAYBE WE CAN HELP YOU.

MAYBE I SAY ME, MAYBE IT'LL BE ME, BUT I THINK THE POINT IS WE WANT TO HELP YOU, SO I HAVE NO PROBLEM TABLING IT.

[02:15:02]

I'M PERCEIVING THAT THERE IS AN IMMEDIATE NEED FOR THE SPACE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TONIGHT.

AM I MISUNDERSTANDING THAT? HAS THAT BEEN OVERPLAYED? THE IMMEDIATE NEED FOR WHITE SPACE FOR THE NINE INDIVIDUAL DORM ROOMS, FOR THE THREE OFFICER QUARTERS, FOR ALL THE WORK WITHIN THIS EXACT SCOPE THAT WE'RE LOOKING AT TONIGHT, WE NEED THAT TO TAKE PLACE PRETTY QUICKLY, RIGHT? WELL, IT'S A FAIR STATEMENT THAT THE SOONER WE CAN GET AN INCREASED CAPACITY ON THE RESPONSE SIDE, THAT IS ACCURATE BECAUSE WHEN WE HAVE MORE THAN WHEN WE HAVE SEVEN PEOPLE FOR STAFFING, WHICH OCCASIONALLY WE WILL HAVE WHAT WE CALL UP STAFFING, THEN THE DECISION HAS TO BE MADE.

DO THEY SLEEP IN A RECLINER? DO THEY SLEEP, YOU KNOW, OUT IN THE COMMAND TRUCK? SO THERE IS A SENSE WITHOUT A QUESTION, WHEN WE THERE IS A SENSE OF URGENCY TO HAVE THAT CAPACITY EXPANDED TO HANDLE THE CURRENT CAPACITY AND THEN TO YOUR POINT WHERE WE WHEN WE START FLIPPING ON IN THE DECADES TO COME, ADDITIONAL RESOURCES IN THERE, THEN IT'S SURELY GOING TO BE NEEDED.

NO QUESTION ABOUT THAT.

IT DOESN'T WARM MY HEART TO THINK THAT OUR FIREFIGHTERS MIGHT BE SLEEPING IN TRUCKS AND RECLINERS.

I WOULD LIKE TO GO FORWARD WITH THIS AS IT'S PRESENTED TONIGHT.

I'VE BEEN QUOTED AS BEING RELUCTANT TO SIGN OFF ON PARTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD CONTRACTS, BUT I THINK THERE'S A WHOLE LOT OF DIFFERENCE IN THAT SITUATION.

I DON'T THINK THAT ANYTHING WE'RE GOING TO DO WITH REGARD TO THE CONSTRUCTION SCOPE THAT'S BEING DISCUSSED RIGHT NOW IN THIS BUILDING IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE REDONE AS AS OFTEN HAPPENS IN A ROAD CONSTRUCTION PROJECT WHEN WHEN PHASE ONE IS BUILT AND PHASE TWO COMES ALONG, PHASE TWO TEARS OUT PART OF WHAT PHASE ONE DID AND ADDS ON TO IT, AND THAT'S EXPENSIVE AND WASTEFUL, BUT I THINK THIS WILL GO UP TO A WALL AND IT WILL STOP AND THAT SCOPE WILL BE COMPLETED, AND IF THERE IS A CHANGE ORDER PHASE TO BE ADDED TO THAT, THEN IT WILL BEGIN ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE WALL AND CONTINUE ON.

IT MAY ADD ROOMS, IT MAY ADD FOOTPRINT, BUT THIS AREA WILL BE TAKEN CARE OF AND IT'LL STAY AS IT IS.

I THINK WE WOULD UNNECESSARILY DELAY THE PROCESS OF GETTING THIS DONE, AND THIS WAS A BOND PROJECT THAT WAS PROMISED AND VOTED ON BY THE VOTERS.

THIS IS TIME TO TAKE ACTION.

IF WE DO DESIGN A LARGER SCOPE, THAT'S GOING TO MEAN TWO DELAYS, ONE IN GETTING FIXED ON JUST EXACTLY WHAT THAT SCOPE IS THAT WE WANT TO DESIGN, AND THEN SECONDLY, AS THAT DESIGN IS CARRIED OUT, IT'S OBVIOUSLY GOING TO TAKE MORE TIME TO DESIGN A LARGER PROJECT THAN IT WILL TO DESIGN A SMALLER PROJECT.

SO ONCE AGAIN, MORE AND MORE DELAYS.

I WANT TO GO FORWARD WITH THIS TONIGHT AND GET THIS RELEASED.

I WOULD LIKE, I THINK, STAFF'S WELL AWARE THAT THIS COUNCIL AND PERHAPS THE FUTURE COUNCIL WILL WANT TO EXPLORE ADMINISTRATION, SPACE NEEDS, ADMINISTRATION, SPACE, LOCATION.

[EXPLETIVE], WE HAVE A BIGGER CONVERSATION THAN THAT IF YOU WANT TO HAVE IT.

THIS BUILDING HERE IS GOING TO HAVE TO GO SOMEPLACE ELSE, AND THAT'S ANOTHER LARGE CONSIDERATION.

PERHAPS THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'LL ALL BE ABLE TO BE FARSIGHTED ENOUGH TO, TO PREDICT OUT WHERE HOW THIS ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE MIGHT BE COMBINED WITH THAT ADMINISTRATIVE SPACE FOR SOME SOMESOME SOMETHING DOWN THE LINE, BUT THE MORE WE DITHER, THE MORE TIME GOES BY AND THIS DOESN'T GET DONE, AND I DON'T THINK THE SITUATION THAT WE'RE IN RIGHT NOW IS A TENABLE SITUATION.

I'D LIKE TO MOVE AHEAD WITH THIS.

GO AHEAD AND CLICK OVER TO THE VOTE SCREEN.

SO WE SEE THE MOTION.

THE NEXT STEP, MAYOR WE DID.

WE DID HAVE A SPEAKER.

MIKE JONES WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COUNCIL AGAIN IF YOU'LL ALLOW.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND DO THAT THEN. MAYOR, COUNCIL AGAIN, AND I APPRECIATE THAT, BUT I MEAN, I THINK THE NEED FOR US WAS SEVERAL YEARS AGO, AND JUST HEARING WHAT WE'RE HEARING AND TALKING TO MY MEMBERS IN THE BACK AND IS, YOU KNOW. THE CONCERN WOULD BE SINCE YOU GUYS HAVE BROUGHT IT FORWARD IS IF WE DON'T TRY TO GO BACK AND DESIGN THE WHOLE THING AND SEE WHAT IT IS AND SEE WHAT THAT COST IS.

BECAUSE LIKE I SAID, I THINK I HEARD LIKE 2.8, SO IT'S LIKE ANOTHER MILLION FOR THAT.

WHAT IS THAT MILLION BECOME? BECAUSE WHEN THERE WAS TALK ABOUT MOVING IT TO STATION 16 ADMIN, IT WAS LIKE 300,000 WITH STATION 16, NOW WE'RE AT A MILLION.

WHAT IS IT IN A YEAR OR SO? AND DOES THAT HAPPEN AS WE GET INTO OTHER PROJECTS? SO WHILE I APPRECIATE THE IMMEDIATE NEED TO GET US OUT, I DON'T THINK A FEW WEEKS BEING HONEST FROM OUR MEMBERSHIP IS GOING TO DELAY THAT NEED SO MUCH THAT WE CAN'T WHERE IF THERE'S CONCERNS THAT IT'S GOING TO COST MORE MONEY THEN MAYBE WE

[02:20:05]

DO LOOK AT DOING THE WHOLE DESIGN AND THEN THAT WOULD GET A COST FOR OBVIOUSLY WE'RE GOING TO HAVE SOME NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS TO SEE IF THEY COULD DO IT BECAUSE THE NEED IS THERE. SO THAT'S JUST FROM OUR MEMBERSHIP THAT, YOU KNOW, THE NEED'S ALREADY BEEN THERE A FEW MORE WEEKS WOULDN'T REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE, AND I'M NOT TRYING TO GO AGAINST ANYBODY. IT JUST AGAIN, THE CONCERN WOULD BE IN TALKING TO THEM BACK THERE AFTER THAT IS WHEN WOULD THAT HAPPEN? BECAUSE WE HAVE THE NEED NOW.

SO IF IT HELPS TO DELAY A LITTLE BIT TO SEE WHAT THAT IS AND WHAT THE DESIGN IS, AND MAYBE THAT'S THE WAY TO GO, BUT AGAIN, I DON'T WANT TO GO AGAINST YOU GUYS.

THAT'S JUST FROM OUR OUR PERSPECTIVE.

THANK YOU. OKAY, SO THE DELAY FOR TWO WEEKS IS BASICALLY TO GET A NEW COUNCIL WITH THE NEW GUYS ON HERE.

WHAT'S THE I THINK WHAT YOU GUYS COULD DO THAT COULD SOLVE THE PROBLEM WHICH SO IT WON'T DELAY.

HOPEFULLY THE CONSTRUCTION PART OF IT IS IN THREE WEEKS YOU HAVE THE BROADER DISCUSSION BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WE'RE NOT ACTUALLY HAVING THE BROADER DISCUSSION WITH THE MATERIALS THAT WE NEED.

OKAY, WHICH IS LET'S LOOK AT ADMIN AND WHAT THAT THEY HAVE DESIGNED, WHICH IS BASICALLY THIS LITTLE CHUNK RIGHT HERE THAT KOMATSU DESIGNED WITH THE CHANGES.

HOW MANY PEOPLE IS THAT GOING TO FIT? HOW MANY ARE WE GOING TO NEED IN A YEAR? RIGHT. SO YOU HAVE THE BROADER DISCUSSION THEN THEN AND HAVE THIS AS AN ACTION ITEM AS WELL.

THIS IS AN ACTION ITEM. THAT'S A DISCUSSION, A PRESENTATION, AND THEN YOU DECIDE HOW YOU WANT TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THAT DISCUSSION.

DOES THAT MAYBE HELP? WELL, THE DRAWING YOU HAVE DOESN'T SHOW ANY ELEVATIONS, AND BRYAN IS TALKING ABOUT ROOFLINE CHANGES AND STUFF LIKE THAT, BUT AGAIN, THAT JUST ROOMS? THEY'RE CHANGING, WELL IT'S NOT EVEN THIS IS THE SIDE THE ADMIN SIDE THAT AND THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT A 25 YEAR PLAN JUST FOR BASICALLY WHAT WE HAVE NOW.

RIGHT. I AGREE. I THINK WE'RE DIGGING INTO THE WEEDS AND IT SHOULD BE TABLED AND I MOVE TO TABLE IT BECAUSE I THINK WE'VE GOT TO GET A LOT MORE INFORMATION TOGETHER AND FIGURE OUT WHERE WE WANT THIS CONVERSATION TO GO, AND I HONESTLY THINK IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITH BUDGET IN CONJUNCTION WITH BUDGET TALKS TOO, BECAUSE WE DON'T KNOW WHAT MONEY WE'RE LIKE, WHERE WOULD THE MONEY COME FROM? THIS WOULD HAVE ALL BEEN IN ADDITION TO BEING HELPFUL WHEN WE WERE TALKING ABOUT THE BOND MONEY IS LIKE, THIS IS GOING TO BE A LOT LARGER THAN WHAT WE'RE THINKING WITH A COUPLE OF MILLION. MS. CAMPOS, DO WE HAVE TO HAVE A SECOND ON A MOTION FOR TABLING? YES, MA'AM. OKAY, IF YOU'LL PUSH YOUR BUTTON TO MAKE THE MOTION, PLEASE.

I SECOND TO MOVE THE TABLE IT TO JUNE 1ST.

THAT'S WHEN ALL THE COUNCIL WILL BE HERE.

JUNE 5TH. JUNE 5TH.

JUNE 5TH.

ALL RIGHT, JUNE 5TH.

OKAY, I HAVE A MOTION BY VICTORIA TO TABLE AND A SECOND BY TAMARA.

LET'S VOTE. PASSES FOUR TWO.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

THAT BRINGS US TO I SAID YES. YES, SHE DID.

YES, YES.

I'M SORRY. THE AGAINST VOTES WERE MAYOR FLETCHER AND MAYOR PRO TEM DAN MCCLENDON.

THOSE WERE THE TWO, AND THEN AND THEN THERE WAS AN ABSENT VOTE.

OKAY, THAT WAS AN INTENSE DISCUSSION.

I HAVE SOMETHING I MESSED UP EARLIER IN MY REMARKS AT THE BEGINNING OF THE MEETING.

THE TIP A COP IS ACTUALLY MAY 11TH, AND SO MY SINCERE APOLOGIES TO THE POLICE DEPARTMENT AND ALL THE AND TO CITY MARKET AND ALL THE AMAZING PEOPLE THAT MAKE THAT HAPPEN, BUT PLEASE PUT THAT ON YOUR CALENDAR FOR MAY 11TH.

TIP A COP CITY MARKET.

THANK YOU. THAT BRINGS US TO ITEM EIGHT CITY COUNCIL REQUEST FOR FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORT'S.

[8. CITY COUNCIL REQUESTS AND FUTURE AGENDA ITEMS AND REPORTS]

RONNIE, NOTHING? HAVE YOU GOT ANYTHING? [INAUDIBLE] RONNIE, YOU GOT ANYTHING? OKAY, DAN, I'M NOT ASKING YOU.

WE'RE GOOD. THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

WE HAVE DISPENSED WITH THE AGENDA.

WE'VE ALREADY DONE EXECUTIVE SESSIONS.

SO IF YOU COULD ADJOURN THE MEETING, MAYOR, BY CALLING FOR A MOTION AND A SECOND WITH NO VOTE.

IS THERE A MOTION TO ADJOURN? SO MOVED.

[INAUDIBLE] ONE MORE GUYS.

ONE MORE. ONE MORE.

[02:25:01]

WE NEED A SECOND, PLEASE.

WE HAVE A FIRST. WOULD SOMEBODY GIVE ME A SECOND? [CHUCKLING] THANK YOU.

I GOT A MOTION BY DAN A SECOND BY RICK.

WE'RE OUT OF HERE AT 8:36.

THANK YOU, MAYOR, COUNCIL.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.