Jun 14, 2022 Planning & Zoning Commission

[00:00:01]

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

IT JUST TURNED 6:30.

SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL IT ORDER FOR TUESDAY, JUNE 14TH AT 2022.

[ Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda City Hall Council Chambers 141 W. Renfro Burleson, TX 76028 ]

STAND FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, PLEASE.

ALL RIGHT. GOOD EVENING, EVERYONE.

THE FIRST THING WE HAVE ON THE AGENDA IS THE CITIZEN APPEARANCES.

THESE ARE USUALLY FOR ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA.

IF SOMEBODY WOULD LIKE TO COME UP, YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO SO AT THIS POINT.

AND WE CAN ENTERTAIN ANYTHING IF THERE IS.

I DO NOT SEE ANYBODY MOVING, SO I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ANY CITIZEN APPEARANCES.

THE NEXT IS WE HAVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, BUT I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND CALL US BACK FOR AN EXECUTIVE SESSION BRIEFLY IF WE CAN, AT THIS POINT.

[6. Recess into Executive Session The Planning & Zoning Commission reserves the right to convene in Executive Session(s) during this meeting pursuant to the following Sections of the Government Code of the State of Texas: Pursuant to Sec. 551.071 consultation with its Attorney: The Planning & Zoning Commission may conduct private consultations with its attorneys when the Planning & Zoning Commission seeks the advice of its attorney concerning any item on this agenda or a matter in which the duty of the attorney to the Planning & Zoning Commission under the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar of Texas clearly conflicts with Chapter 551 of the Government Code. Pursuant to Sec 551.087 Deliberation regarding Economic Development Negotiations The Planning and Zoning Commission may discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information received from a business prospect that the City Of Burleson seeks to have locate, stay or expand in or near the City and which the City is conducting economic development negotiations or to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect; particularly, discussion with economic development specialist regarding potential economic incentive agreement for development of real property.]

OKAY. I THINK WE GOT EVERYBODY BACK.

SO WE'LL COME BACK INTO REGULAR SESSION AND WE CAN GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.

[2. Consent Agenda All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of the items unless a Commissioner or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the Development Services Director to place each item on the City Council agenda in accordance with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations.]

IT LOOKS LIKE THERE ARE SIX THINGS HERE, INCLUDING A LOT OF FINAL PLATS.

HOWEVER, IF SOMEBODY ON THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO PULL ONE OF THOSE OFF AND TALK ABOUT IT, THEY ARE WELCOME TO DO SO.

OTHERWISE I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THE FULL CONSENT AGENDA AT THE SAME TIME.

MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.

SECOND. ALL RIGHT.

WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY MICHAEL.

ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.

AND THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

ALL RIGHT. WE WILL MOVE ON TO ITEM THREE, WHICH IS A PUBLIC HEARING, WHICH IS 2500 SOUTH WEST HULEN STREET.

[A. 2500 SW Hulen St (TOD Mixed-Use) (Case 22-058): Hold a public hearing and consider a zoning change request from “PD” Planned Development district, to “PD” Planned Development district, to allow for commercial and multifamily residential development on 35.20 acres.]

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

GOOD EVENING, CHAIRMAN AND COMMISSIONERS, LIDON PEARCE SENIOR PLANNER FOR THE RECORD PRESENTING CASE 22058 2500 SOUTH WEST HULEN ZONE CHANGE REQUEST.

THE APPLICANT IS TRENTON ROBERTSON MASTER PLAN ON BEHALF OF KALTERRA IN THIS ITEM BEFORE YOU IS AS YOU MENTIONED A PD ZONE CHANGE TO A PD.

SO THIS LOCATION IS IN OUR TOD TRANSIT ORIENTED DISTRICT AND THE ZONING IS ORDINANCE D065-06.

SO OUR COMP PLAN DESIGNATES THIS AREA AND IT SPECIFICALLY CALLS OUT STANDARDS AS BEING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PD ZONING.

SO THE REASON YOU'RE SEEING THIS REQUEST IS IF THE APPLICANT HAD COME FORWARD WITH A SITE PLAN THAT MET THE PD ZONING, IT WOULD JUST BE A SITE PLAN FOR YOUR REVIEW.

THEY'RE PROPOSING DIFFERENT STANDARDS THAN WHAT IS CURRENTLY OUTLINED IN THE COMP PLAN AND THE PD, HENCE YOU'RE SEEING IT AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

ZONING CHANGE REQUEST FICA SITE PLAN.

SO THIS IS JUST KIND OF SHOWS YOU A OVERVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL.

SO IF YOU SEE THERE ON THE EXHIBIT, THE RED STRUCTURES ARE YOUR GENERAL, YOUR TYPE OF RETAIL OR COMMERCIAL TYPE USES, AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME MULTIFAMILY COMPONENTS INTO THE NORTH END OF THE PROJECT.

YOU HAVE A ESSENTIALLY TOWNHOME, SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED, AND THEN YOU HAVE SOME AMENITY CENTERS THERE.

THEY TEND TO HAVE THE ORANGISH COLORED ROOFS, IF YOU CAN DISCERN THAT ON YOUR SCREENS.

SO THE LAST UPDATE FROM THE APPLICANT THAT THE PHASING WOULD MOST LIKELY BE A PHASE ONE.

SO THAT'S THE TOWNHOMES WITH THE CIVIC OPEN SPACE, THAT'S THE AREA IN THE MIDDLE.

YOU SEE THE KIND OF THOSE COURTYARDS RUNNING DOWN THE CENTER TO ALSBURY THAT WOULD BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF ANY COS.

AND THEN THE MARKET WOULD DICTATE WHETHER THEY DEVELOPED THE EAST OR THE WEST SITE AS PHASE TWO.

OBVIOUSLY THIS IS JUST A ZONING CHANGE, BUT JUST PROVIDING THAT FOR INFORMATION THAT IS ALWAYS SUBJECT TO POTENTIAL CHANGE.

SO LOOKING AT THE OVERALL SITE, THE PROPOSED DENSITY IS ABOUT 747 UNITS TOTAL WITH AN AVERAGE DWELLING UNITS OF 21.22 PER

[00:05:04]

SO THIS IS JUST TO BE CLEAR, A CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND OTHER FACTORS COULD AFFECT THIS DENSITY, SUCH AS THINGS AS DETENTION OR ENGINEERING, THINGS THAT WOULD COME LATER DURING THE SITE PLAN PROCESS.

THIS IS JUST TO KIND OF GIVE YOU A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF WHAT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING FOR THIS SITE.

SO STAFF KIND OF HAS WORKED THROUGH A COUPLE REVISIONS WITH THE APPLICANT, A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT PROPOSALS AND JUST WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT SOME OF THE NOTABLE CHANGES. THESE ARE ALSO IN YOUR STAFF REPORT, BUT JUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF ANYBODY LISTENING.

AND THESE ARE CHANGES FROM THE CURRENT ZONING THAT IS IN PLACE.

SO MULTIFAMILY WOULD NOT BE REQUIRED TO HAVE REAR LOADED PARKING.

THERE'S A 65 FOOT MAXIMUM WIDTH FOR OFF STREET PARKING ALONG HULEN AND ALSBURY THAT WOULD NO LONGER BE A SET OF SIX FIVE FEET MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS.

SO OUR ZONING IDENTIFIES A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT MULTIFAMILY COMPONENTS.

ONE OF THOSE IS MULTIFAMILY, AS YOU GENERALLY WOULD THINK, TRADITIONAL TYPE MULTIFAMILY IS NOT NECESSARILY ALLOWED BY, RIGHT.

IT HAS TO EITHER BE AN END CAP OR A LIVE WORKED MIXED USE COMPONENT.

THAT'S GENERALLY WHAT YOU SEE IN A MIXED USE WITH RETAIL ON THE BOTTOM AND RESIDENTIAL ON TOPS.

KIND OF LIKE THE DEPOT ON MAIN PROPOSED PROJECT THAT CAME FORWARD A WHILE BACK.

THE MULTIFAMILY MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE WAS REDUCED FROM 750 SQUARE FEET TO 600 SQUARE FEET.

THE MIXED USE AND MULTIFAMILY APARTMENTS WOULD BE ALLOWED UP TO FOUR STOREYS BY RIGHT.

RIGHT NOW, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING, YOU'D HAVE TO BUILD A PARKING GARAGE AND THERE'S SOME OTHER AMENITIES FEATURES AS A LIST THAT YOU'D HAVE TO INCLUDE IN ORDER TO GET A HEIGHT OF UP TO EIGHT FEET OR UP TO EIGHT STORIES, CORRECTION PARDON ME.

AND THEN INCREASING THE MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE FOR MULTIFAMILY FROM 70 TO 80%.

SO THOSE TOP ONES ARE AN ADDED METAL FINISH AS AN OPTION AND OF A NOTE CHANGE THE WARRANTY FOR CEMENTITIOUS FIBER CLAPBOARD FROM 50 TO 30 YEARS.

THAT WAS BASED OFF SOME RESEARCH PROVIDED THE APPLICANT THAT 30 YEARS SEEMS TO BE THE STANDARD INDUSTRY STANDARD.

SO ALL THOSE ARE KIND OF, I WOULD SAY APPLICANT INITIATED CHANGES WE DID AFTER SOME FEEDBACK.

THEY HAVE ALSO INCREASED THE MINIMUM TREE CALIPER AND LANDSCAPE AND REQUIREMENTS SPECIFICALLY ALONG ALSBURY BOULEVARD AND THEN ALL TOWNHOMES WOULD BE INDIVIDUALLY PLATTED LOTS VERSUS SOMETHING YOU MIGHT SEE WHERE IT'S ALL IN ONE LOT AS A RENTER PRODUCT.

BE OWNER OCCUPIED.

PROVIDED SOME JUST BASIC UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE INFORMATION.

SO DETENTION FOR ANY DEVELOPMENT OVER ONE ACRE IN SIZE IS REQUIRED.

NONE IS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPT PLAN, JUST TO NOTE THAT, AND IT WOULD BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN OF THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO JUST BECAUSE IT'S NOT SHOWN DOESN'T MEAN THEY WOULDN'T HAVE TO DO IT THROUGH THE SITE PLANNING PROCESS.

THE WATER ON THIS SIDE IS PROVIDED FOR A PORTION OF THE CITY OF BURLESON AND A PORTION BY JOHNSON COUNTY SPECIALTY UTILITY DISTRICT.

SO THEY ARE PROPOSING TWO SEPARATE WATER SYSTEMS AT THIS TIME.

AND THEN SANITARY SEWER WILL BE EXTENDED BY THE DEVELOPMENT FROM AN EXISTING SEWER LINE ADJACENT AT THE INTERSECTION OF ALSBURY BOULEVARD AND CANDLER DRIVE.

I GUESS THE BIG TAKEAWAY IS THERE'S TWO SEASONS ON THIS PROPERTY THAT HAVE THE RIGHT TO SERVE WATER, SO THAT'S WHY YOU SEE THAT.

IN TRAFFIC. THEY HAVE PROVIDED INFORMATION TO INCLUDE APPROXIMATELY SOME APPROXIMATE NUMBERS USED FOR THEIR REPORTS, 50,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL.

IT'S JUST AN ASSUMPTION.

THIS IS NOT NECESSARILY HOW IT WILL DEVELOP OUT, BUT 25 SQUARE FEET OF RESTAURANT AND 25,000 SQUARE FEET OF GENERAL RETAIL, 650 MULTIFAMILY UNITS, 144 TOWNHOMES. AND JUST THE ANTICIPATION OF 2027 FOR A BUILDOUT.

SO THEY DID SUBMIT A TIA AS IN REVIEW.

THE REPORT DID INDICATE THAT ACCESS WOULD BE PROVIDED BY FOUR PROPOSED ACCESS CONNECTIONS, THREE CONNECTIONS TO HULEN AND ONE TO ALSBURY BOULEVARD AND THE NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN. AUXILIARY LANES SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG CLEVELAND STREET AND ONE DRIVE ONLY IN ALSBURY.

THE TRAFFIC ENGINEERING CONSULTANT FOR THE CITY HAS NOT GIVEN APPROVAL TO THE TIA.

THEREFORE, NEITHER HAS THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICE DEPARTMENT APOLOGIZE.

THAT'S. THAT'S WHY MICHELLE GOES TO COLLEGE TO SPEAK ALL THOSE BIG FANCY WORDS THERE.

SO FOR THIS CASE, WE DID SEND OUT A PUBLIC NOTICES TO ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITH 300 FEET.

IT WAS PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER AND WE POSTED A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY I PROVIDED TO THE COMMISSION YESTERDAY ONE LETTER IN OPPOSITION THAT WE RECEIVED FROM THE PRAIRIE

[00:10:03]

PRIOR TO THIS MEETING, WE RECEIVED ONE EMAIL WITH A YES AND SUPPORT FROM THE FOR THE PROJECT THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDED.

THERE WAS NO ADDITIONAL ADDRESS OR ANYTHING ASSOCIATED WITH IT, BUT THEY DID PROVIDE THAT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.

STAFF REVIEWED THIS IN ACCORDANCE WITH OUR ZONING AND OUR COMP PLAN AND OUR STANDARDS THERE.

AND STAFF RECOMMENDS DENIAL OF THE ZONING CHANGE PRIMARILY DUE TO THE PROPOSED DENSITY WITHOUT A PROPORTIONAL INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF COMMERCIAL AND RETAIL OR CIVIC OPEN SPACES. THE LACK OF VERTICAL MIXED USE COMPONENTS, WHICH IS A KEY TO THE ZONING IN PLACE, THE PD AND FEATURES THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS A BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC.

FOR THAT REASON, STAFF HAS RECOMMENDED DENIAL.

AND AGAIN, IF THE PROPOSAL HAD MET THE PD, YOU'D BE SEEN AS A SITE PLAN AND NOT A ZONE CHANGE.

THAT IS ALL I HAVE FOR MY PRESENTATION.

I'M OPEN TO ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, LIDON.

LET'S GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:46.

AND I'LL JUST ASK I'VE GOT A CARD HERE, AND I BELIEVE IT'S LINDA KNIGHT.

MR. CHAIRMAN. MR. CHAIRMAN, WOULD YOU WANT THE APPLICANT FIRST TO COME TO THE PODIUM? ACTUALLY, THAT MAY BE A BETTER IDEA.

THANK YOU. MS. KNIGHT, I PROMISE I'LL GET BACK TO YOU, BUT LET ME LET THE APPLICANT COME.

AND THAT MAY OR MAY NOT ANSWER SOME OF THE QUESTIONS.

AND THEN WHEN I OPEN IT UP, YOU CAN COME UP.

YES, SIR. IF YOU WOULD JUST COME HERE AND IF YOU'LL JUST STATE YOUR NAME AND KIND OF WHO YOU'RE WITH.

GREAT. CHAIRMAN, COMMISSION, MAXWELL FISHER WITH MASTER PLAN 2595 DALLAS PARKWAY, FRISCO, TEXAS 725034.

WE'RE REPRESENTING KALTERRA TONIGHT.

KALTERRA, AS THE OWNERSHIP IS, WOULD LIKE TO POSTPONE TONIGHT AND HOLD THE ITEM TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING.

A COUPLE ITEMS. WE WANT TO CONTINUE TO ADDRESS A LETTER THAT CAME FORWARD JUST RECENTLY FROM THE OPPOSITION, FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATION, BUT TO THE LARGEST STAKEHOLDER, WHICH I BELIEVE IS THE LADY THAT SITS BEHIND.

WE'D LIKE TO CONTINUE TO WORK WITH HER.

WE HAD SOME MISCOMMUNICATION ON EMAILS AND WANTING TO ADDRESS SOME OF HER CONCERNS SINCE SHE LIVES IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT.

SO WE'D LIKE TO OPPORTUNITY TO DO A LITTLE MORE DUE DILIGENCE AND THEN COME BACK BEFORE YOU AT A LATER DATE IF IF THE CHAIR AND COMMISSION WOULD OBLIGE.

OK AND SURE, I DEFINITELY DON'T MIND PUTTING THAT TO A VOTE FOR THE COMMISSION TO DO THAT, SINCE WE DO HAVE A FEW PEOPLE HERE THAT SHOWED UP, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND LET THEM ADDRESS QUESTIONS, COMMENTS, AND THEN SO YOU CAN COME BACK AT THAT POINT AND PROBABLY ADDRESS THOSE.

YEAH, THAT WOULD BE GREAT. AND THAT WAY WE CAN HEAR ANY OTHER CONCERNS THAT WE'RE NOT AWARE OF, SO WE CAN POTENTIALLY ADDRESS THOSE BETWEEN NOW AND WHEN WE COME BACK.

PERFECT. THANK YOU. THANK YOU FOR THAT.

OK MS. KNIGHT, IF YOU WANT TO COME UP AT THIS POINT.

THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK TONIGHT.

MY NAME IS LINDA KNIGHT. I LIVE ON THE MY PROPERTY IS ADJOINING TO THE DEVELOPMENT THAT'S FIXING TO GO ON HERE.

WE'VE BEEN WORKING AS FAR AS, I GUESS, A FENCE OR WHAT KIND OF BARRIER TO PUT BETWEEN THE TWO THE PROPERTIES.

AND THEY'RE WORKING WITH ME ON THAT.

BUT MY MAJOR CONCERN IS STILL WATER.

I JUST SAW THAT THE TENSION OF STORM WATER SHALL BE INCORPORATED.

I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE WHAT ALL THAT ENTITLES, BUT ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THEIR PLAT THERE IS A CREEK LINE THAT RUNS QUITE A BIT OF WATER DURING STORM WEATHERS AND STUFF.

IT'S NOT A CONSTANT FLOWING CREEK OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT, BUT DURING STORM IT IS CARRIES A LOT OF WATER.

AND IF THAT IS THE WAY THAT THEY HAVE THE PLAT ON THE CORNER ON THAT NORTHEAST CORNER THERE, THE TOWNHOMES COVER THE CREEK.

AND THAT IS ONE OF MY CONCERNS.

I THINK I'VE ADDRESSED ONE OF THE DEVELOPERS HERE AT BURLESON AND THEY SAID THAT THIS IS KIND OF A WISH LIST OF WHAT THEY WANT, BUT THEY WOULD BE LOOKING INTO THE WATER AND STUFF, HOW THE WATER FLOWED AND THAT THEY CANNOT BLOCK, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, THEY CANNOT BLOCK THE NATURAL FLOW OF THE CREEK.

BUT THAT IS ONE OF MY CONCERNS BECAUSE OF THE WAY THE TOWNHOMES ARE SET ON THAT NORTHEAST CORNER, THAT IT DOES BLOCK THE FLOW OF THE WATER.

AND WITH THAT, RIGHT NOW, THERE'S PLENTY OF FARMLAND AROUND TO ABSORB A LOT OF THE WATER.

BUT WITH THE DEVELOPMENT COMING THROUGH AND THE DEVELOPMENT AND CONTINUED TO TO GROW OUT THERE, WHEN YOU START PUTTING MORE AND MORE CONCRETE OUT THERE, THE WATER AND WATER IS GOING TO GROW AND GROW TO THE POINT THAT I DON'T WANT MY PROPERTY TO BE AFFECTED BY THE BACKUP OF WATER OR EVEN SOME OTHER NEIGHBORS THAT ARE FURTHER UP CREEK FROM ME THAT WOULD BE DEVASTATED BY THAT BACKUP OF WATER AND WOULD ACTUALLY FLOOD THEM OUT.

SO THAT'S ONE OF MY CONCERNS THAT I WOULD LIKE Y'ALL VERY MUCH TO PAY ATTENTION TO WHEN THIS MOVES FORWARD.

[00:15:05]

I CAN'T STOP IT, BUT I DO WANT THAT TO BE LOOKED AT AND TO BE CONSIDERATION OF THE PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN HERE FOR A LONG TIME AND MIGHT CONTINUE TO BE HERE FOR A WHILE LONGER. THANK YOU.

OKAY. THANK YOU, MS. KNIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANYBODY ELSE HERE THAT WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK AT THIS POINT? RIGHT. ENLIGHTENED, I KNOW YOU SAID MENTIONED AN ONLINE SPEAKER CARD.

WOULD YOU JUST PLEASE READ THAT INTO THE RECORD? WE'LL HAVE THAT AS WELL, PLEASE.

YES, CHAIR, WE RECEIVED A ONLINE SPEAKER CARD THIS AFTERNOON FROM A GLENDA BRADLEY AT 258 SOUTHWEST HULEN STREET, BURLESON, TEXAS.

SHE IS SPEAKING FOR ITEM 3A CASE 20 2058.

SHE SAYS WHERE WILL THE DRIVES INTO THE PROPERTY, BE LOCATED? WILL THEY CAUSE CONGESTION FOR PROPERTY OWNERS GETTING OUT OF THEIR DRIVES? SECOND QUESTION OR STATEMENT LANDSCAPING NORTH OR NORTHWEST WINDS BLOW VEGETATION ACROSS THE ROAD TO WHERE LIVESTOCK IS KEPT.

CERTAIN PLANTS ARE VERY POISONOUS TO LIVESTOCK, PARTICULARLY [INAUDIBLE] AND OLEANDER.

ONE OLEANDER LEAF CAN KILL A HORSE.

THAT IS THE END OF HER COMMENT.

OK. THANK YOU.

OKAY? YES.

CHAIRMAN. YEAH, SO WE WILL DEFINITELY WHEN WE COME BACK BEFORE YOU, IF THE COMMISSION WILL GRANT US AN EXTENSION, WE'LL DEFINITELY INCORPORATE AND ADDRESS ALL THE CONCERNS MENTIONED TONIGHT BY BOTH NEIGHBORS AND LOOK FORWARD TO COME BACK BEFORE YOU AT THE NEXT AVAILABLE HEARING.

PERFECT. AND JUST FOR THE RECORD, IF IT DOES GET CONTINUED, THE PUBLIC HEARING WILL STILL BE OPEN.

SO IF OTHER PEOPLE COME, THEY'LL HAVE THEIR OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK AS WELL AT THAT POINT.

I UNDERSTOOD.

BUT PERFECT AT THIS POINT, WITH THE PUBLIC HEARING STILL OPEN, I'LL GO AHEAD AND ASK THE COMMISSION IF WE CAN HAVE A VOTE.

AND I WAS TOLD JUNE 28.

IS THAT CORRECT? BEFORE I SAY THAT, A MOTION TO TABLE THIS UNTIL JUNE 28TH AT 2022.

MR. CHAIR, CAN WE SAY CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONTINUE THE ITEM UNTIL THE COMMISSION'S NEXT MEETING AT JUNE 28TH, 2022? IS THAT FAIR? SURE. ABSOLUTELY.

MR. CHAIR, I'D LIKE TO PROPOSE THAT WE CONTINUE THE ITEM AND CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARING UNTIL THE NEXT MEETING ON JUNE 28TH.

SECOND. IS THAT CLEAR ENOUGH FOR THE RECORD? ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT. IF YOU RAISE YOUR HAND AND THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

OKAY. SO IT WILL BE TABLED UNTIL THE 28TH OF JUNE AT THAT POINT.

ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT.

ALL RIGHT. THE NEXT REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS, IF THERE ARE ANY.

NO, SIR, ANY COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.

AND WE DON'T HAVE ANY OTHER NEED FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION TONIGHT, SO WE WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 654.

ALL RIGHT. THANKS, EVERYONE.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.