>> I'M GOING TO GO AND CALL THE ORDER THAT BURLESON PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING.
[ Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda City Hall Council Chambers 141 W. Renfro Burleson, TX 76028 ]
[00:00:03]
WE NOW HAVE A QUORUM. I'LL GO AHEAD AND GIVE THE INVOCATION IF YOU'RE PLEASED ABOUT YOUR HEADS.DEARLY FATHER, I JUST WANT TO THANK YOU FOR LETTING US ALL MEET HERE TONIGHT.
I PRAY FOR WISDOM TO DO THE CITY BUSINESS.
I PRAY FOR THE CITY AS STORMS ROLL THROUGH TONIGHT THAT NOTHING DAMAGING BUT JUST THE BENEFICIAL RAIN.
PRAY FOR OUR FIRST RESPONDERS AND CITY STAFF THAT THEY CONTINUE TO DO GREAT THINGS FOR OUR CITY.
THE FIRST ITEM WE HAVE IS THE CITIZEN APPEARANCES.
THESE ARE ITEMS THAT ARE NOT ON THE AGENDA.
IF SOMEBODY WHO WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND ADDRESS THOSE AT THIS POINT, YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO SO.
I HAVE SEVERAL CARDS HERE, SO I IMAGINE EVERYONE IS HERE FOR SOMETHING THAT'S ON THE AGENDA, BUT I'LL JUST OPEN IT UP AT THIS POINT.
I DON'T SEE ANY MOVEMENT, SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
[2. Consent Agenda All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of the items unless a Commissioner or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the Development Services Director to place each item on the City Council agenda in accordance with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations.]
THERE'S FOUR ITEMS HERE THAT ARE ROUTINE IN NATURE THAT WE USUALLY HANDLE AT THE STAFF LEVEL.HOWEVER, SOMEBODY ON THE COMMISSION WOULD LIKE TO PULL SOMETHING OFF, WE CAN DO SO.
OTHERWISE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION FOR THE ENTIRE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> OKAY. I HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY ADAM.
ALL IN FAVOR OF THAT, IF YOU RAISE YOUR HAND.
WE MOVE ON TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE FIRST ONE IS PUBLIC HEARING NUMBER 3A,
[A. 2227 SW Wilshire Blvd (Oncor) (Case 22-048): Hold a public hearing and consider a zoning change request from “A”, Agricultural, to “SFE" Single-family estate dwelling district, to allow for an electrical substation. ]
[B. Oncor located at 2227 SW Wilshire Blvd (Case 22-047): Consider a commercial site plan for an electrical substation. ]
WHICH IS 2227 SOUTHWEST WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, CASE 22048, TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A ZONING CHANGE REQUESTS FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE DWELLING DISTRICT TO ALLOW FOR AN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION.>> GOOD EVENING COMMISSION AND CHAIR.
OF NOTE, I'LL BE PRESENTING A 3A AND 3B CONCURRENTLY.
>> [OVERLAPPING] LET ME OPEN. LET ME CALL THAT ONE THEN IF I CAN.
3B IS ENCORE LOCATED AT 2227 SOUTHWEST WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, CASE 22047, TO CONSIDER A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN FOR AN ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION. THANKS.
>> THANK YOU. FOR THE RECORD, LIGHT IN PAIRS SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF BURLESON.
THIS IS A REQUEST FOR A SITE PLAN AND A ZONE CHANGE RELATED TO THE PROPERTY ON THE SCREEN IN FRONT OF YOU, 2227 SOUTHWEST WILSHIRE.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A ZONE CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURE TO SINGLE-FAMILY STATE AND A SITE PLAN THAT IS REQUIRED TO BE REVIEWED WHENEVER IT IS ASSOCIATED WITH A ZONE CHANGE.
THAT'S WHY YOU'RE SEEING A SITE PLAN, EVEN THOUGH THERE'S NO WAIVERS OR VARIANCES ASSOCIATED WITH THAT.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS AREA IS NEIGHBORHOODS AND THE CURRENT ZONING IS AG.
JUST REAL QUICK, SO AG IS I BELIEVE, ONE OF THE ONLY IF NOT THE ONLY DISTRICT THAT DOES NOT ALLOW A ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION BY RIGHT, BUT ALLOWS A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, BUT NOT ALL ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION.
THAT'S WHY THE APPLICANTS REQUESTING HIS OWN CHANGE.
WE LOOKED AT A COUPLE OF DIFFERENT ZONING DISTRICTS AND WE JUST WENT WITH A SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE AS IT FIT IN THE NEIGHBORHOODS.
IT ALLOWS A SUBSTATION BY RIGHT AND IT IS NOT TOO OUT OF CHARACTER OF THE ADJACENT ZONING BEING THE SF7 AND THE SFA THAT WAS APPROVED EARLIER THIS YEAR BY CITY COUNCIL.
JUST A REAL QUICK, THIS SITE WILL BE ACCESSED BY A GAS WELL ROAD UNTIL THE BEAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION HAS BEEN BUILT OUT AND CONSTRUCTED.
NO NEW ENTRANCES ARE GOING TO BE OFF OF WILSHIRE AT THIS TIME.
THIS HAS GONE THROUGH ENGINEERING AND THE FIRE MARSHAL FOR THEIR CONCURRENCIES FOR THAT TEMPORARY ACCESS.
THERE'S A DETENTION STUDY WAS SUBMITTED AS PART AS THE BEAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION.
THAT INDICATED THAT THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE ANY ADDITIONAL DETENTION REQUIRED FOR THAT SUBSTATION.
AND FOR THE LANDSCAPING PART OF THIS, WATER TRUCKS WILL BE USED TO MAINTAIN THE LANDSCAPING UNTIL THE BEAR RIDGE SUBDIVISION INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED.
SO GO INTO THE SITE PLAN, IT'S A PRETTY SIMPLE SITE PLAN THAT YOU SEE THERE.
THERE'S JUST A SUBSTATION WITH AN EIGHT FOOT WALL AND THEN THEY'RE PROPOSING THESE 69 DIFFERENT HOLLIES.
SHOULD LOOK SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THAT ESC AND THEN THEY'RE NOT ASKING FOR ANY WAIVERS AND EVERYTHING ELSE MEETS OUR LANDSCAPING AND SITE PLAN REQUIREMENTS.
WE DID SEND A PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET.
THERE'S A SIGN AND WE HAVE NOT HAD ANY INQUIRIES FOR THIS REQUEST.
AT THIS TIME STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL FOR THE ZONING CHANGE REQUESTS AND COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN AND I'M STANDING BY FOR ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT EITHER OF THOSE CASES.
[00:05:01]
>> THANK YOU. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:43.
IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO TALK ON THIS, YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP AND I DO HAVE A CARD FOR MR. MYERS.
IF YOU'D LIKE TO TALK, YOU CAN OR IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS. [BACKGROUND] PERFECT.
I'LL LEAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN JUST IN CASE, BUT I'LL JUST ASK PERMISSION IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS WITH THIS SUBSTATION.
I DON'T EITHER. I THINK HE MADE IT OFF PRETTY EASY, MR. MYERS.
LET ME CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:44.
DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY DISCUSSION READY TO VOTE? OKAY. CAN WE DO THIS IN ONE VOTE OR DO-
>> TWO SEPARATE VOTES. LET'S GO FIRST ON THE ZONING CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURE TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATES.
>> I'D LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST CASE 22-048.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY ADAM.
ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.
IT'S UNANIMOUS. NOW ON TO ITEM 3B, THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN.
>> WOULD LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN CASE 22-047.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY ADAM, ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU RAISE YOUR HAND.
THE NEXT ITEM WE HAVE IS ITEM 3C,
[C. 1560 Broad Valley Ct, Lot 15 (Case 22-052): Hold a public hearing and consider a zone change request from SFR, Single-Family Rural district to SFE, Single-Family Estate district for a 4.6 acre site. ]
WHICH IS 1560 BROAD VALLEY COURT, LOT 15, CASE 22052, TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A ZONE CHANGE REQUESTS FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RURAL DISTRICT TO SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE DISTRICT FOR A 4.6 ACRE SITE.>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
FOR THE RECORD, JPDUK DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, PRESENTING CASE 2252 A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS JAMES HILL AND THE OWNER IS BARNEY AND TERESA BASDEN.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT 1560 BROAD VALLEY COURT.
THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SFR, SINGLE FAMILY RURAL.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO SFE SINGLE FAMILY ESTATE.
THE REASON FOR THAT REQUEST IS BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO SUB-DIVIDE THE PROPERTY AND THE SFR OR SINGLE-FAMILY RURAL DESIGNATION LOSES THAT CLASSIFICATION WHENEVER IT EITHER PLOTS OR SUBDIVIDES ITS PROPERTY.
AS I MENTIONED, THEY'RE LOOKING TO SUB-DIVIDE THE PROPERTY, LOOKING TO PLOT THE PROPERTY AND EVENTUALLY DEVELOPED SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES ON THE PROPERTY.
THE SUBDIVISION WILL GO FROM 4.6 TO 2.3 ACRE LOTS.
LIKE I MENTIONED, THAT'S THE ONLY REASON WHY A ZONING REQUEST IS NECESSARY BECAUSE THAT DESIGNATION SPECIFICALLY CALLS THAT OUT.
THE PROPOSED USE DOES CONFORM TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
THE SUBJECT SITE, AS I'VE MENTIONED, IS SFR. IT'S UNDEVELOPED CURRENTLY.
TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST IS ALSO ZONED SFR AND IT'S DEVELOPED THE RESIDENTIALLY.
THEN TO THE SOUTH, THERE IS NO ZONING AS IT'S LOCATED IN THE ETJ.
HOWEVER, THAT IS DEVELOPED RESIDENTIALLY AND THEN ALSO TO THE WEST, IT'S ZONED SFE SINGLE FAMILY ESTATE AND IT IS DEVELOPED RESIDENTIALLY.
FOR PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES, WE DID NOTICE ALL PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET.
WE PUBLISHED A NOTICE IN THE NEWSPAPER AND WE ALSO POSTED A SIGN ON THE PROPERTY.
WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY INQUIRIES OR CONCERNS REGARDING THIS REQUEST.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT OF APPROVAL FOR THE ZONING CHANGE FROM SFR TO SFE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1560 BROAD VALLEY COURT.
>> THANK YOU, JP. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO LET ME OPEN IT AT 6:47.
IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND TALK ON THIS, YOU'RE WELCOME TO.
OTHERWISE, I WILL ASK THE COMMISSION IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS.
I DON'T HEAR ANY OR SEE ANYBODY.
SO LET ME CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE CAN GO AHEAD AND CALL FOR A VOTE IF NOBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS.
>> I LIKE TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE FROM SFR TO SFE AT THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1560 BROAD VALLEY COURT, CASE 22-052.
>> SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY ADAM, ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.
LAST PUBLIC HEARING WE HAVE IS ITEM 3D 3808 SOUTH BERTELSMANN
[D. 3808 S Burleson Blvd, Lot 11, of Spring Valley (Case 22-039): Hold a public hearing and consider a zone change request from SP, Site Plan district (D-094-08) to I, Industrial district for a 2.07 acre site. ]
BOULEVARD 11 AT SPRING VALLEY CASE 22.039, HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A ZONE CHANGE REQUESTS FROM SITE PLAN DISTRICT TO INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT FOR A 2.07 ACRE SITE.>> THANK YOU, AGAIN, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION.
FOR THE RECORD, JPDUK DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRESENTING CASE 22.039, A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST.
THE OWNER AND APPLICANT IS LARRY POOL AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 2.07 ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT 3808 SOUTH BURLINGTON BOULEVARD.
[00:10:01]
THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT SITE IS A SITE PLAN ZONING DISTRICT.THE SPECIFIC ORDINANCE NUMBERS OR WHAT YOU CAN SEE KIND OF WRITTEN RIGHT NEXT TO IT THERE.
THE SITE PLAN ZONING DISTRICT WAS CREATED IN 2008 AND APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL.
IT WAS SPECIFICALLY INITIATED TO ALLOW FOR THE STORAGE OF METAL CONTAINERS ON THAT SITE, AND THAT WAS THE ONLY LAND USE THAT WAS PERMITTED ON THE SITE.
THE ORDINANCE ALSO INCLUDED SOME LANGUAGE THAT ESTABLISHED A 10-YEAR DURATION OF THAT LAND USE.
IN OCTOBER OF 2018, THAT ORDINANCE HAD ESSENTIALLY EXPIRED.
THE APPLICANT HAD REACHED OUT TO STAFF AFTER HE WAS MADE AWARE OF THAT AND WAS INTERESTED IN REZONING THE PROPERTY TO A NEW ZONING DISTRICT RATHER THAN RENEWING THE LIMITED SITE PLAN ORDINANCE THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY CREATED.
AFTER DISCUSSING WITH STAFF THE DIFFERENT OPTIONS THAT HE'D HAVE IN THAT AREA THAT MADE THE MOST SENSE, THE APPLICANT WAS INTERESTED IN REZONING TO INDUSTRIAL AND THAT'S SPECIFICALLY TO ALLOW FOR AN ADDITIONAL USES TO OCCUPY AND OPERATE OUT OF THIS SITE IN THE FUTURE.
THE PROPOSED USE DOES CONFORM TO THE COMP PLAN, WHICH IS THE EMPLOYMENT GROWTH CENTER AND AS YOU CAN SEE, HAS INDUSTRIAL AS A CORRESPONDING ZONING DISTRICT.
THE CURRENT SITE IS ON SITE PLAN.
IT IS UNDEVELOPED. TO THE NORTH, IT IS ZONED COMMERCIAL AND IT IS DEVELOPED COMMERCIALLY.
THEN TO THE EAST ACROSS SOUTH BOSTON BOULEVARD AND I35, IT'S ZONE AGRICULTURAL, BUT IT IS DEVELOPED INDUSTRIALLY.
THERE IS A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL USES ACROSS THE STREET.
THEN TO THE SOUTH, IT'S ZONED AGRICULTURAL, BUT IT'S UNDEVELOPED.
THEN TO THE WEST, IT'S NOT ZONED AS IT'S LOCATED IN ETJ, AND IT IS ALSO UNDEVELOPED.
FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICES, THERE ARE ALL THE PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET WERE NOTIFIED.
THERE WAS A NOTICE IN THE NEWSPAPER AND A SIGN WAS POSTED ON THE PROPERTY.
AGAIN, STAFF HAS RECEIVED NO INQUIRIES OR CONCERNS FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING THIS REQUEST.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT OF APPROVAL TO REZONE THE SITE PLAN ZONING DISTRICT TO I, INDUSTRIAL FOR 3808 SOUTH BOSTON BOULEVARD. THANK YOU.
>> I THINK JP, BEING A PUBLIC HEARING, I'LL OPEN IT AT 651.
I DO HAVE A CARD FOR MR. POOL. IS IT JUST FOR QUESTIONS? OR WOULD YOU LIKE TO MAKE ANY STATEMENTS?
>> I'LL LEAVE IT OPEN JUST IN CASE SOMEBODY DOES.
>> I GUESS I'M JUST CURIOUS, LARRY, ABOUT GOING WITH THE INDUSTRIAL INSTEAD OF A COMMERCIAL.
>> I'M TALKING FOR THE PROPERTY AT 3808 SOUTH BERGSON BOULEVARD.
THE REASON THAT I'M ASKING FOR THAT, THE CITY MANAGER WAS ACTUALLY THE ONE THAT RECOMMENDED THAT BECAUSE WE RENT THIS PROPERTY OUT.
FOR BASICALLY FOR THE LAST 15 YEARS OR SINCE 2008, WE'VE HAD EVEN AT THE TIME THAT IT WAS IN 2008 WHEN WE GOT IT, IT WAS BACK WHEN THE OLD PHIL WAS HERE AND WE HAD THESE FRAC TANKS.
WE HAD AT LEAST OUT TO AN OIL SERVICE COMPANY THAT HAD FRAC TANKS.
THAT WAS THE CLOSEST THING THAT WE COULD GET TO ANY ZONING THAT WOULD FIT BASICALLY THE LAST 14 YEARS, IT'S BEEN TRUCK PARKING AND STUFF IS THAT BECAUSE THAT'S WHAT WAS USED IT FOR.
CURRENTLY, WE'VE GOT AT LEAST OUT BECAUSE WE OWN THE PROPERTY TO THE NORTH OF IT AND WE'VE GOT AT LEAST OUT TO HUDSON BUS SALES, WHICH THEY'RE JUST GOING TO BE SELLING BUSES.
BUT IF NOT, EVERY TIME YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT TENANT, YOU HAVE TO COME BACK IN HERE AND ASK FOR DIFFERENT ZONING AND THE CITY MANAGER IS THE ONE THAT RECOMMENDED TO GO OVER A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL BECAUSE IT GIVES US A LOT MORE FLEXIBILITY.
WE'RE PROBABLY NOT GOING TO DO ANY DIFFERENT WITH THE PROPERTY THAN WE'VE DONE IT FOR THE LAST 14 YEARS.
THIS ZONING JUST FITS IT BETTER BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY ONE THAT GIVES YOU ANY FLEXIBILITY.
>> JP STAFF DOESN'T HAVE ANY ISSUES WITH INDUSTRIAL MAKING IT A WIDE RANGE.
I KNOW IT'S FAR ENOUGH OUT OF THE CITY, BUT THERE WAS NO CONCERNS OF ANYTHING.
>> THERE'S NO IMMEDIATE CONCERNS THAT WE SEE.
OBVIOUSLY, THAT DOES OPEN IT UP A LOT OF OPTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT TO RENT OUT TO DIFFERENT USES.
BUT IF THERE IS SOME DIRECTION ABOUT MAYBE APPLYING SOME CONDITIONS OR APPLYING CONDITIONS TO THE USES THAT WE THINK THE APPLICANT WILL BE UTILIZING AT THE SITE, WE CAN DO SO.
BUT TYPICALLY, CONDITIONS ARE ADDED OR USES ARE REMOVED DURING SITE PLANS ZONING REQUESTS, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT WE'VE BEEN TRYING TO MOVE AWAY FROM.
>> SURE. THAT'S WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY.
I DON'T WANT TO ELIMINATE ANY MORE THAN WHAT WE DID.
I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THE STAFF THERE WASN'T, FOR EXAMPLE, A NUCLEAR POWER PLANT, LIKE YOU MENTIONED EARLIER,
[00:15:01]
THAT COULD GO IN THERE THAT WOULD CAUSE CONCERN THAT IF STAFF HAS STUDIED ALL OF THAT, THAT'S BASICALLY WHAT I WANTED TO KNOW.>> TALKING ON THE PROPERTY AT 3808, WE HAD FULL INTENTIONS WHEN WE BOUGHT THE PROPERTY SEVERAL YEARS AGO TO BUILD ON THE PROPERTY.
WE STILL HAVE INTENTIONS AT SOME POINT IN TIME.
BETHANY WATER IS THE WATER COMPANY THAT HAS ALL THAT WATER FROM THERE PRETTY MUCH ALL THE WAY DOWN THE HIGHWAY 67.
THERE'S A LITTLE TWO-INCH WATER LINE AND WE'RE THE END OF THE WATER LINE.
YOU CAN'T BILL AND THERE'S REALLY NOTHING YOU CAN DO WITH THAT PROPERTY UNTIL SOME POINT IN TIME.
THERE GETS TO BE WATER OUT THERE SO YOU CAN HAVE FIRE FLOW.
SOME TYPE OF PARK AND STORAGE IS LITERALLY BASICALLY ALL YOU CAN DO WITH IT BECAUSE THERE'S NO WATER.
ONCE WE GET WATER, THEN WE HAVE FULL INTENTION TO BUILD AND WE'LL COME BACK IN AND ASK FOR REZONING WERE SAT PLAN OR BUILDING THAT PROCESS.
BUT RIGHT NOW THAT'S ABOUT ALL WE CAN DO WITH THE PROPERTY.
>> THANK YOU, MR. POOL. ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING? LET ME CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 654 THEN.
IF THERE'S NO OTHER QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 3D.
>> I WAS GOING TO WAIT TILL YOU CLOSED IT.
>> I GUESS MY CONCERN IS I KNOW WE WERE TRYING TO MOVE OUT OF THE INDUSTRIAL USES HERE IN TOWN.
THAT'S WHY WE GOT THE OLD TOWN OVERLAY, BECAUSE WE'VE GOT A LOT OF INDUSTRIAL ZONING RIGHT THERE AND THAT'S JUST A BROAD BRUSH.
IT'S THE MOST HEAVIEST USE IS WHEN IS THE ZONING RECLASSIFICATION GOING TO COME AROUND WHERE WE'RE GOING TO BREAK THAT UP INTO LIKE I123.
>> WE'RE CURRENTLY WORKING TOWARDS THAT RIGHT NOW.
WE'RE LOOKING AT JUST THE START OF THE NEXT YEAR.
>> I THINK I THINK THE GOAL WAS TO TRY TO MOVE IT OUT AT OLD TOWN AND GET IT DOWN TO WORK CLOSER TO THE BUSINESS PARK.
>> THEN THE SUBJECT SITE IS ACTUALLY LOCATED ON I35, SO IT'S FAR SOUTH.
IT'S PRETTY REMOVED FROM OLD TOWN.
>> I KNOW WE HAD AN ISSUE WITH A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT WAS A LITTLE CLOSER TO OLD TOWN AND IT WAS GOING TO BE AN INDUSTRIAL USE AND THEN RECOMMENDED TO GO TO A COMMERCIAL USE TO GET IT A LITTLE LESS INTENSIVE.
>> JUST TO GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF THE LOCATION.
>> I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 3D.
>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I RECOMMEND TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE FROM SITE PLAN TO INDUSTRIAL CASE 22-039 SECONDS.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY JASON, ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.
I DON'T BELIEVE THERE ARE ANY NO COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS, NO NEED FOR EXECUTIVE SESSION TONIGHT.
I WILL ADJOURN THE MEETING AT 6:56. THANKS, EVERYONE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.