>> GOOD EVENING EVERYONE. IT IS 6:30.
[00:00:03]
LET'S GO AHEAD AND CALL THE ORDER THE UMBRELLAS AND PLANNING AND ZONING[ Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Agenda City Hall Council Chambers 141 W. Renfro Burleson, TX 76028 ]
MEETING FOR APRIL 26 THE 2022.ADAM, I DIDN'T ASK, BUT CAN YOU GIVE US THE INVOCATION TONIGHT? THANK YOU.
>> IT'S BY HEADS. DEAR GOD WE JUST THANK YOU FOR THIS DAY AND WE THANK YOU FOR THE RAIN THAT YOU SENT US EARLIER IN THE WEEK AND WHICH MUCH NEEDED AND THIS GREAT WEATHER THAT WE'VE HAD RECENTLY.
WE JUST PRAY THAT YOU JUST WATCH OVER US TONIGHT AS WE MAKE DECISIONS FOR THE CITY.
WE'VE GOT A COUPLE OF ELECTIONS COMING UP THAT YOU WOULD JUST GIVE EVERYBODY THE GUIDANCE TO MAKE THEIR DECISIONS.
I WOULD JUST ASK USING YOUR SON'S NAME, AMEN.
>> STAND FOR THE PLEDGE, PLEASE.
>> THE FIRST THING WE HAVE IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.
THESE ARE ALL ITEMS THAT ARE USED THAT ARE IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK ON SOMETHING THAT IS NOT ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT, YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP, IT'S JUST HOUSEKEEPING MATTERS.
IF YOU COME UP TO SPEAK TONIGHT AT ANY POINT, IF YOU WOULD JUST COME TO THE PODIUM TO YOUR LEFT OR RIGHT AND JUST GIVE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS AND THEN WE CAN PROCEED FROM THERE.
BUT IF THERE IS NOTHING ON THE CITIZEN APPEARANCES WHICH I DON'T SEE ANYBODY MOVING, I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE ON TO THE CONSENT AGENDA.
[2. Consent Agenda All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of the items unless a Commissioner or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the Development Services Director to place each item on the City Council agenda in accordance with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations.]
THESE ARE ALL THE ITEMS THAT ARE ROUTINE IN NATURE.IT'S JUST A MINUTES. THEN A RE-PLAN OF WHISPERING MEADOWS.
BUT IF SOMEBODY WOULD LIKE TO PULL THAT OFF, WE CAN DO THAT.
OTHERWISE, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY JASON AND A SECOND BY DAN, ALL IN FAVOR OF FEED.
RAISE YOUR HAND. THAT'S UNANIMOUS.
WE CAN MOVE TO THE PUBLIC HEARINGS WHICH THE FIRST ONE IS, PUBLIC HEARING 388304,
[A. 8304 Whispering Meadows, Lot 25R, of Whispering Meadows (Case 22-035): Hold a public hearing and consider a zone change request from A, Agricultural district to SFE, Single-Family Estate district for a 2.9 acre site. ]
WHISPERING MEADOWS LOT 25R OF WHISPERING MEADOWS CASE 22-035, TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDER A ZONE CHANGE REQUESTS FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT TO SFE SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE DISTRICT FOR A 2.9 ACRE SITE.>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION, FOR THE RECORD, JP.
DUKAY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRESENTING CASE 22-035.
THIS IS ZONING CHANGE REQUEST.
THE APPLICANT IS MARSHALL MILLER WITH LONESTAR LAND SURVEYING.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 2.9 ACRES AND IS LOCATED 8304 WHISPERING MEADOWS.
THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS AGRICULTURAL.
THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REZONE THE PROPERTY TO SFE OR SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE.
THE REASON FOR THAT REQUEST IS IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THE APPLICANT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT A RESIDENCE ON THE SITE UNDER THE CURRENT ZONING DISTRICT OF AGRICULTURAL BECAUSE THERE'S A MINIMUM LOT SIZE REQUIREMENTS OF THREE ACRES AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE SUBJECT SITE IS APPROXIMATELY 2.9 ACRES.
THUS, IF THE ZONING CHANGE TO SFE IS APPROVED, THEY WILL BE ABLE TO CONSTRUCT A SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE ON THE SITE.
THE PROPOSED USE DOES CONFORM TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.
I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DOES STATE THAT THE VISION IS PRIMARILY NON-RESIDENTIAL.
HOWEVER, IT ALSO ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE MAJORITY OF THE PROPERTY THROUGHOUT THE CHISHOLM TRAIL CORRIDOR IS EITHER VACANT OR RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
CONSIDERING THAT ALONG WITH THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT BEING IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE EXISTING USE OF THE PROPERTY STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST.
THIS SLIDE IS JUST PROVIDED TO INDICATE THE SURROUNDING AREA AND SPECIFICALLY THE ZONING AND THE USE OF THE SURROUNDING AREA.
YOU CAN SEE THE SUBJECT'S SITE IS ZONED AGRICULTURAL WHICH IT WAS GIVEN WHENEVER IT WAS ORIGINALLY ANNEXED INTO THE CITY.
IT WAS PREVIOUSLY DEVELOPED AS RESIDENTIAL AND IS CURRENTLY PROPOSED TO BE DEVELOPED AS RESIDENTIAL IN THE FUTURE.
THEN TO THE NORTH AND TO THE EAST, YOU CAN SEE BOTH DIRECTIONS ARE ZONED AGRICULTURAL AND BOTH ARE DEVELOPED RESIDENTIALLY.
THEN FOR THE SOUTH AND THE WEST, THERE IS NO ZONING AS THEY'RE BOTH LOCATED IN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION.
HOWEVER, THEY ARE ALSO BOTH DEVELOPED RESIDENTIALLY.
FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE, PUBLIC NOTICES WERE MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.
THERE WAS ALSO A NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER AND THERE WAS A SIGN POSTED ON THE PROPERTY.
STAFFERS HAS RECEIVED NO INQUIRIES REGARDING THIS REQUEST.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE FOR 8304 WHISPERING MEADOWS.
THE ACTION MOVING FORWARD FOR THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION IS TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, AND THEN TO POTENTIALLY RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A ZONING CHANGE FROM
[00:05:03]
AGRICULTURAL TO SFE SINGLE-FAMILY ESTATE FOR 8305, WHISPERING MEADOWS.IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS MYSELF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE?
I WILL GO AHEAD AND OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING SO IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK YOU'RE WELCOME TO DO SO.
I'LL JUST ASK WHILE WE'RE WAITING IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS ON THIS.
I DON'T SEE ANY MOVEMENT, SO LET'S CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
IF THERE'S NO QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS I GUESS I WANT TO GIVE ME A MOTION, I CAN ENTERTAIN THAT AT THIS POINT.
>> CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO APPROVE THE ZONING CHANGE FROM EGG TO SFE CASE 22-035.
>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY DAN, ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.
WE CAN MOVE TO ITEM 3B, WHICH IS AACA PARTS AND SUPPLIES LOCATED AT 118 NORTHWEST HILLARY STREET, CASE 21141,
[B. AACA Parts and Supplies located at 118 NW Hillery St. (Case 21-141): Consider a Commercial Site Plan with associated waivers to the Old Town Design Standards, Masonry Construction Standards and the Design Standards Manual for an HVAC business expansion. ]
TO CONSIDER A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH THE ASSOCIATED WAIVERS TO THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS, MASONRY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS, AND THE DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL FOR AN HVAC BUSINESS EXPANSION. JP.>> THANK YOU AGAIN [NOISE]. FOR THE RECORD, JP.
DUKAY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRESENTING CASE 21141.
THIS IS THE ACA OR AACA PARTS AND SUPPLIES SITE PLAN.
THE OWNERS BRAD LEMONS AND THE APPLICANT IS BOOPER ROKUS.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 0.96 ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT 118 NORTHWEST HILLARY STREET.
THE COMPANY NAME IS AACA PARTS AND SUPPLIES THAT CURRENTLY OCCUPIES AND OPERATES OUT OF THE SUBJECT LOCATION.
THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS INDUSTRIAL.
THERE'S CURRENTLY A 9,052 SQUARE FOOT EXISTING METAL BUILDING ON-SITE.
AACA PARTS AND SUPPLIES BEGAN OPERATING OUT OF THIS LOCATION IN 2008 AND PURCHASED THE PROPERTY IN 2013.
THE REASON WE'RE HERE TODAY IS BECAUSE THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNER ARE PROPOSING TO EXPAND THAT EXISTING 9,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING TO INCLUDE A 7,416 SQUARE FOOT ADDITIONAL WAREHOUSE SPACE IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE GROWING BUSINESS.
AS I MENTIONED, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 7,416 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION, WHICH WILL BE TYING INTO THE REAR OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE IMAGE ON THE SCREEN WHERE MY MOUSE IS TRACKING RIGHT HERE.
THIS IS THE EXISTING 9,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING AND THEN EVERYTHING BORDERED IN BLUE IS THAT PROPOSED 7,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION.
AS I MENTIONED, IT'S GOING TO BE TYING IN TO THE REAR OF THAT EXISTING BUILDING AND IT'S GOING TO BE CONSISTENT IN MATERIAL, COLOR, AND HEIGHT OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
SPECIFICALLY, THAT'S GOING TO LOOK LIKE R PANEL METAL MATERIALS FOR THE STRUCTURE ITSELF.
THEN IT'S GOING TO BE COLORED IN A LIGHT STONE.
IT'S GOING TO HAVE AN AVERAGE HEIGHT OF 18 FEET AND IT'S GOING TO BE A SINGLE STORY.
ALL OF THAT, LIKE I HAD MENTIONED, IS IN COMPLETE CONSISTENCY WITH THAT EXISTING 9,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.
THE SITE CURRENTLY PROVIDES 11 PARKING SPACES AND HAS AN EXISTING USE AND A PROPOSED USE OF CONTRACTOR STORAGE AND EQUIPMENT, WHICH IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THE CURRENT INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT.
HERE ARE THE ELEVATIONS OR THE RENDERINGS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE IMAGE AT THE TOP OF YOUR SCREEN, YOU CAN SEE THAT THIS IS THE WEST ELEVATION AND THEN THIS DASHED LINE RIGHT HERE IS SEPARATING THE EXISTING BUILDING FROM WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.
EVERYTHING TO THE RIGHT OF THIS DASHED LINE IS THE EXISTING STRUCTURE.
EVERYTHING TO THE LEFT OF THAT IS THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
SAME THING GOES FOR THE EAST ELEVATION HERE IN THE MIDDLE OF THE SCREEN.
EVERYTHING TO THE LEFT OF THAT IS EXISTING.
EVERYTHING TO THE RIGHT OF THAT IS WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.
NOW FOR THE NORTH EAST ELEVATION, THIS IS WHAT YOU WOULD SEE IF YOU WERE STANDING AT THE REAR OR THE BACK OF THE SITE AND LOOKING TOWARDS THE BUILDING.
THAT IS JUST SIMPLY THE BACK OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
THAT'S WHAT YOU'D BE SEEING FROM THE REAR OF THE SITE.
THEN THE SOUTHWEST ELEVATION, THAT'S THE PRIMARY FACADE.
THAT'S WHAT YOU'D BE SEEING IF YOU WERE STANDING ON HILLARY STREET LOOKING AT THE BUILDING.
INSTEAD OF A DASHED LINE, THERE IS A LINE BUT IT'S NOT DASHED AND YOU CAN SEE IT RUNNING RIGHT HERE.
EVERYTHING TO THE LEFT OF THAT IS PRETTY MUCH THE EXISTING FRONT FACADE OF THE BUILDING.
THEN EVERYTHING TO THE RIGHT OF THAT IS THE PROPOSED ADDITION.
HOWEVER, IT IS NOT FLUSH WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING, THOSE BAY DOORS AND THAT ADDITION WILL BE RECESSED ROUGHLY 100 FEET OR MORE FROM THE FRONT FACADE OF THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THERE ARE SIX WAIVERS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE PLAN.
THE FIRST ONE WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING ABOUT IS TO THE MATERIALS OF THE BUILDING.
THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT ARCHITECTURAL METAL PANELS SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 15 PERCENT OF ANY SINGLE TYPE A OR TYPE B FACADE.
[00:10:06]
THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 100 PERCENT R PANEL METAL ON ALL OF THE FACADES.NOW THERE IS AN EXCEPTION TO THIS.
WE WILL TOUCH ON IT A LITTLE BIT LATER, BUT THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A FOUR-FOOT BRICK VENEER ALONG THE FRONT OR PRIMARY FACADE OF THE BUILDING.
BUT EVEN WITH THAT IN CONSIDERATION, EVERY ELEVATION STILL IS REQUIRING OR REQUESTING A WAIVER TO THE STANDARD.
AS I MENTIONED, THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS GOING TO BE R PANEL METAL WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A FOUR-FOOT BRICK VENEER ALONG THE FRONT.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS WAIVER REQUEST AS THE PROPOSED MATERIALS WERE SELECTED TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY WITH THE EXISTING BUILDING.
THE NEXT WAIVER REQUEST IS TO THE TOTAL GLASS AREA.
THIS IS ALSO AN OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARD, WHICH STATES THAT THE PRIMARY FACADE SHALL BE BETWEEN 40 AND 80 PERCENT OF TOTAL GLASS AREA.
WHAT'S BEING PROVIDED IS UNKNOWN.
THE APPLICANT WASN'T ABLE TO PROVIDE AN EXACT PERCENTAGE, BUT BOTH STAFF AND THE APPLICANT ARE UNDER THE ASSUMPTION THAT WHATEVER IS BEING PROPOSED STILL WOULD NOT MEET THAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
HOWEVER, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS WAIVER BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO PROVIDE A NEW DOUBLE ENTRANCE DOOR WHICH WILL INCREASE THE TOTAL GLASS AREA.
HOWEVER, WE JUST DON'T KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THAT PERCENTAGE WILL BE.
THE NEXT WAIVER IS FOR PARKING.
OUR VEHICLE PARKING REQUIREMENTS COMES OUT TO REQUIRE 15 PARKING SPACES FOR THIS SITE WHEN YOU INCLUDE THE RATIO FOR THE RETAIL AREA AS WELL AS THE RATIO FOR THE WAREHOUSE SPACE.
THE APPLICANT AND THE SITE CURRENTLY ONLY PROVIDES 11 PARKING SPACES AND STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS WAIVER REQUEST, AS THE SITE CURRENTLY PROVIDES 11 PARKING SPACES AND THE STAFF DOES NOT BELIEVE THAT THE PROPOSED EXPANSION WILL INCREASE VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL STAFFING.
THE NEXT WAIVER REQUEST IS TO THE LANDSCAPING.
THIS IS AGAIN, AN OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIREMENT, WHICH REQUIRES PLANTINGS ALONG THE PARKWAY TREE SPACE 40 FEET APART, AS WELL AS A PARKING LOT SCREENING OR SOME SCREENING FOR THE PARKING LOT.
THE APPLICANT IS PROVIDING PLANTER POTS THAT'LL BE LOCATED ALONG THE PRIMARY FACADE.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST AS THE SITE DEVELOPED AS IS DOES NOT PROVIDE ANY AREAS OR ANY ADEQUATE AREAS TO ACCOMMODATE THESE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS, AND THE APPLICANT HAS AGREED TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPING WHEREVER POSSIBLE, AS I PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED IN THE FORM OF PLANTER POTS ALONG THAT PRIMARY FACADE.
THE NEXT WAIVER REQUEST IS REGARDING THE FIRE LANE.
THE DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL STATES THAT ALL GROUND-LEVEL EXTERIOR SIDES OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE WITHIN A 150 FEET OF THE FIRE LANE.
IN LIEU OF EXTENDING OR EXPANDING THOSE FIRE LANES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BUILDING, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO INSTALL AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND STAFF, BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY, FIRE MARSHAL IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS INCREASING THE DISTANCE OR RATHER THE FARE MARSHAL IS IN SUPPORT OF INSTALLING AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM RATHER THAN EXTENDING THE FIRE LANES FURTHER IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THAT MINIMUM REQUIREMENT.
THE FINAL WAIVER REQUEST IS TO THE BUILDING ITSELF.
ACCORDING TO THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS, PREFABRICATED METAL BUILDINGS SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED.
OF COURSE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A 7,416 SQUARE FOOT PREFABRICATED STRUCTURE.
STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THIS REQUEST AS THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL TIE INTO THE REAR OF THAT EXISTING BUILDING, AND IT'S GOING TO BE CONSISTENT IN MATERIALS, COLOR, AND HEIGHT.
NOW, WE JUST RAN THROUGH ALL SIX OF THE WAIVERS THAT WERE PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT.
I THOUGHT IT'D BE IMPORTANT AND I'LL TOUCH ON ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING FOR THE SITE.
I KNOW I'VE TOUCHED ON A HANDFUL OF THEM IN SOME OF MY PREVIOUS SLIDES, BUT THIS WOULD BE ONE MOMENT WHERE WE CAN TAKE A LOOK AT EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM AND THEN MOVE ON FROM THAT POINT.
THOSE IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDE THE INSTALLATION OF A FOUR-FOOT BRICK VENEER TO THE PRIMARY FACADE, TO INSTALL NEW DOUBLE DOORS AS THE MAIN ENTRANCE, TO INSTALL AN AWNING OVER THE MAIN ENTRANCE, TO PROVIDE LARGE PLANTER POTS ALONG THE PRIMARY FACADE, TO CONSTRUCT A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WITH A GATED ENTRY, TO EXTEND FIRE LANES ALONG THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING, TO RE-STRIPE THE EXISTING PARKING SPACES WHICH THERE ARE 11 OF, TO INSTALL AN AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, AND TO REMODEL THE INTERIOR SHOWROOM.
I PROVIDED THESE TWO IMAGES TO GIVE YOU A GENERAL AERIAL
[00:15:05]
SHOT OF WHAT THE SITE LOOKS LIKE CURRENTLY AND WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED.A LOT OF THE RENDERINGS I PROVIDED WERE ELEVATIONS OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING, WHICH OBVIOUSLY INDICATE A LOT OF THE FACADE IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED, BUT DON'T REALLY SHOW MUCH OF ANY OF THE OTHER IMPROVEMENTS.
I THOUGHT THE AERIAL DID A BETTER JOB OF SHOWING THAT.
YOU CAN SEE HERE SEE HOW THE FIRE LANES ARE BEING EXTENDED ON BOTH THE WEST AND EAST SIDES OF THE BUILDING ITSELF.
THEN YOU CAN ALSO SEE HOW MUCH MORE VISIBLE THE PARKING SPACES WILL BE AFTER THEY'RE GOING TO BE DESCRIBED, WHICH ARE HARD TO NOTICE CURRENTLY, AS WELL AS THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE THAT'S GOING TO BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG THAT WEST FIRE LANE AND WILL HAVE ACCESS OFF OF IT.
AS FOR UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE, THE UTILITIES HAVE ALREADY BEEN EXTENDED TO THE SITE AND A FIRE HYDRANT AND A VALVE WILL BE ADDED IN RELATION TO THIS PROJECT.
THE SITE IS ACCOUNTED FOR AN EXISTING DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND NO ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED.
AS FOR TRAFFIC, THE USE OF THE SITE HAS NOT CHANGED AND THUS A TIA WAS NOT WARRANTED.
THIS SITE PLAN WENT TO THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW COMMITTEE LAST WEEK, AND THERE'S REALLY TWO TALKING POINTS THAT WERE DEBATED A LITTLE BIT AND DISCUSSED AND THAT THEY'D WANTED TO CONTINUE THAT CONVERSATION TO HOPEFULLY MAYBE COME UP WITH SOME MORE DEFINITIVE CONDITION TO INCLUDE TO THE SITE PLAN MOVING FORWARD.
THOSE TWO THINGS INCLUDED LANDSCAPING AND THE AWNING.
SPECIFICALLY FOR THE LANDSCAPING, I KNOW THAT THEY ARE PROPOSING PLANTER POTS ALONG THE FRONT.
HOWEVER, SOME OF THOSE QUESTIONS INCLUDED HOW MANY PLANTER POTS, WHAT'S GOING TO BE THE MINIMUM SIZE OF THOSE POTS, AND WHAT PLANTS ARE THEY PLANNING ON INSTALLING IN THOSE POTS? I DID TOUCH BASE WITH THE APPLICANT, WE DISCUSSED THOSE THREE QUESTIONS IN DETAIL.
ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT, HE'S CURRENTLY PROPOSING TWO PLANTER POTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE YOU CAN SEE THE IMAGE ON THE SCREEN IS THE ARROWS ARE POINTING TO, AND THEN THE MINIMUM POT SIZE THE APPLICANT HAD MENTIONED POTENTIALLY A 30 GALLON POT.
THOSE IMAGES ON THE SCREEN ARE 20 GALLON POTS, SO IT COULD BE EITHER THAT SIZE OR ROUGHLY A LITTLE BIT LARGER.
AS FOR THE PLANT TYPE, THE APPLICANT HAD MENTIONED POTENTIALLY DOING SOME SEASONAL PLANTS.
SOMETHING THAT IS SOMEWHAT INTERCHANGEABLE THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, THAT THEY'LL BE ABLE TO ADAPT WITH THE CURRENT WEATHER THAT WE'RE SEEING IN THAT SEASON.
AS FOR THE AWNING, THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW COMMITTEE PREFERRED THE WALL-MOUNTED AWNING THAT YOU CAN SEE ON THIS ELEVATION AT THE BOTTOM OF YOUR SCREEN IN LIEU OF THE GROUND-MOUNTED AWNING THAT YOU COULD SEE PROPOSED ON THE ELEVATION AT THE TOP OF YOUR SCREEN.
FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE, THERE WAS NOTICES MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND THERE WAS A NOTICE PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER.
STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY INQUIRIES REGARDING OR CONCERNING THIS REQUEST.
P&Z'S ACTION REQUESTED MOVING FORWARD IS TO OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING, TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, TO CONSIDER THE WAIVER REQUESTS AND IF THE WAIVER REQUESTS ARE APPROVED, RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR AACA PARTS & SUPPLIES LOCATED AT 118 NORTHWEST HILLARY STREET.
STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION IS THAT OF APPROVAL OF THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN WITH THE ASSOCIATED WAIVERS FOR AACA PARTS & SUPPLIES.
OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW COMMITTEE DID PROVIDE A RECOMMENDATION AND THAT WAS THAT OF APPROVAL UNANIMOUSLY.
IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS MYSELF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE.
>> THANK YOU JP. THIS ALSO IS A PUBLIC HEARING, SO IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, YOU'RE WELCOME TO COME UP.
WHILE WE WAIT I'LL ASK ANYBODY IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.
>> WAS THE OLD TOWN STANDARDS THEY JUST SUGGESTED THOSE OTHER ITEMS, THE 30 GALLONS AND THE TWO AND [OVERLAPPING] AS IS.
THERE WAS JUST LIKE I SAID, TWO ITEMS OF CONVERSATION THAT THEY HAD.
IT WAS SOMETHING THAT THEY WANTED THAT CONVERSATION TO BE CONTINUED.
THEY DIDN'T REALLY NECESSARILY WANT TO PROVIDE ANY DEFINITIVE DECISIONS REGARDING SIZING OR NUMBER OF PLANTS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT.
BUT IT WAS SOMETHING THEY WANTED STAFF TO LOOK AT, DISCUSS WHAT THE APPLICANT BRING FORWARD TO HOPEFULLY COME UP WITH MAYBE A MORE DEFINITIVE IDEA OF WHAT'S DESIRABLE.
>> AS IT IS RIGHT NOW WITH THE WAIVERS PROPOSED, IT'S JUST A LANDSCAPE WAIVER SO THAT THEY COULD JUST DO NOTHING AS IT IS NOW.
[00:20:01]
>> AS A PART OF THE WAIVER, YES, THEY COULD JUST SAY, ''WE'RE NOT GOING TO MEET THE LANDSCAPING WAIVER.'' HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT AND THE OWNER HAVE BEEN VERY FORTHCOMING AND TRYING TO FIND WAYS TO PROVIDE LANDSCAPING WHEREVER POSSIBLE AND THAT IS COMING OUT IN THE FORM OF PLANTER POTS.
>> I APPRECIATE THAT. I'M JUST THINKING, IN THE OVERALL SCHEME, YOU LOOK AT THE OTHER BUSINESSES THAT ARE DOWN THE STREET AND NONE OF THEM HAVE PLANNERS.
I'M NOT TOO CONCERNED ABOUT IF THEY DECIDE NOT TO DO IT OR IF THEY END UP.
THAT'S NOT A BREAKING POINT FOR ME ON THAT.
I JUST WANTED TO KNOW IF OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS COMMITTEE IF THEY JUST APPROVED IT AS IT WAS.
>> YEAH. THEY APPROVED IT AS IT WAS BROUGHT FORWARD.
THAT WOULD JUST BE WITH THE WAIVER TO LANDSCAPING AS WELL AS THE LANGUAGE OF, AND THEY WILL BE INSTALLING PLANTER POTS.
WHAT DOES MEAN? WE DON'T KNOW, AND THAT'S WHY THEY CONTINUE THAT CONVERSATION HOPEFULLY COMING UP WITH A MORE DEFINITIVE IDEA OF WHAT THAT MEANS.
>> IS THAT THE SAME WITH THE AWNING, THE AWNING MIGHT GO UP OR MIGHT NOT?
>> YEAH. THE AWNING WAS ALSO A POINT OF CONVERSATION BECAUSE THERE ARE TWO DIFFERENT ELEVATIONS THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.
THERE'S THE ONE WITH THE RED AWNING THAT'S GROUND MOUNTED AND THERE'S THE OTHER ONE THAT IS WALL MOUNTED.
WHEN THEY SAW THE TWO OF THEM, REALLY THE CONFUSION OF THOSE TWO WAS THE APPLICANT PUT TOGETHER THE ONE WITH THE RED AWNING AS PUT IT TOGETHER QUICKLY JUST TO SHOW THE BRICK VENEER AND THAT AWNING BECAME A POINT OF CONFUSION FOR A LOT OF PEOPLE.
WE DID CLARIFY THAT IF THEY WANTED THE WALL-MOUNTED AWNING WE CAN PURSUE THAT, BUT WE NEED A DIRECTION.
>> WE APPROVE THERE COULD BE AN AWNING OR THERE MIGHT NOT BE AWNING?
>> THE OWNER AND THE APPLICANT HAVE AGREED TO INSTALL AN AWNING AS A PART OF ONE OF THE NINE IMPROVEMENTS OF THE SITE.
THERE WILL BE ONE IF IT IS APPROVED AS PRESENTED WHEN WE GET TO COUNSEL, HOWEVER, I WOULD ASSUME THAT THERE WOULD BE A PREFERENCE BY THE EITHER P&Z OR CITY COUNCIL.
>> I WOULD RECOMMEND PERSONALLY THE WALL-MOUNTED.
I THINK IT MAKES MORE SENSE AND IT'S ALLOWED PER OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS.
THE GROUND MOUNTED IS ALSO ALLOWED, BUT THERE'S ADDITIONAL STANDARDS THAT ARE APPLIED TO THAT, SUCH AS MAKING SURE IT DOESN'T BECOME ADVERSELY IMPACTFUL TO ADA PARKING AND THINGS LIKE THAT.
I THINK THE WALL MOUNTED IS AESTHETICALLY BETTER AS WELL AS PROCEDURALLY BETTER.
>> I AGREE. IT HELPS FIT IN WITH THE OLD TOWN TOO SINCE YOU CAN'T GET THE VENEER OVER THE WHOLE THING.
P&Z WHAT FEELS LIKE MY ENTIRE LIFE.
[NOISE] BUT WE WENT BACK THROUGH THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS, WE'VE GONE THROUGH ZONING CHANGES, WE'VE GONE THROUGH A LOT OF THINGS AND WITH THE MINDSET THAT WE WOULD PUT ALL THESE THINGS AND COUNSEL SAID THE SAME THING, WE WOULD PUT THESE THINGS.
THEN IF BUSINESSES COME IN, THEY HAVE TO MEET THAT OR THEY SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGE THEIR DESIGN, THEY HAVE TO MEET THAT.
THIS I'M NOT OPPOSED, LIKE ADAM SAID, THIS PART WITH THE METAL CITING IT IS WHAT IT IS DOWN THERE.
BUT ISN'T THIS GOING AGAINST WHAT THE CITY WAS TRYING TO DO? IF THERE'S GOING TO BE CHANGE, THIS WOULD BE A GOOD WAY TO GET THEM TO CHANGE, UPDATE INTO WHATEVER WE WANT, THE MASONRY OR WHATEVER IT IS.
IT FEELS LIKE WE'RE SKIRTING AROUND THAT [OVERLAPPING] JUST BE ONE OF THOSE.
AGAIN, I'M NOT SAYING I'M OPPOSED TO THIS, I DON'T WANT TO PUT THAT.
I APPRECIATE DOING THE CHANGES, BUT I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT GOING TO GET OFF ON A RABBIT TRAIL.
OTHER BUSINESSES, WHEN THEY DO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES AND WE'RE LIKE, ''HEY, NOW WE WANT YOU TO DO THIS," WHEN ON THIS ONE, WE'RE NOT DOING THAT.
>> SURE. I THINK ABSOLUTELY THAT'S WHY THAT LANGUAGE WAS INCLUDED INTO THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS SPECIFICALLY, YOU DON'T REALLY SEE THAT REALLY IN SOME OF THE OTHER SECTIONS OF THE CITY.
THAT IS BECAUSE LIKE YOU MENTIONED, IF YOU ARE GOING TO DO NEW CONSTRUCTION ANYWHERE IN OLD TOWN OR IF YOU'RE GOING TO SUBSTANTIALLY RENOVATE YOUR BUILDING, YOU'RE THEN TRIGGERING THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS.
YOU HAVE TO BRING YOUR SITE UP TO CODE.
I THINK THIS IS ONE OF THOSE MOMENTS THAT THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO PUT YOUR FOOT DOWN AND SAY, 'THIS IS THE CHANGE THAT WE WANT TO MAKE.
WE DON'T WANT TO SEE MORE METAL BUILDINGS.
WE WANT TO SEE MASONRY, WE WANT TO SEE EXACTLY WHAT THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS REQUIRE.
HOWEVER, FROM A STAFF POINT OF VIEW IN THIS GENERAL AREA,
[00:25:03]
YOU SEE A WHOLE LOT OF THIS.I THINK WITH THE IMPROVEMENTS THAT THE APPLICANT IS LOOKING TO MAKE, I SEE THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE BEING MORE BENEFICIAL TO THE CITY NOW, THEN POTENTIALLY THE SITE BEING LEFT AS IS FOR AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME.
>> I DEFINITELY DON'T DISAGREE WITH THAT.
THIS IS A 100 DEGREES BETTER THAN WHAT IT WOULD'VE BEEN, BUT 10 YEARS DOWN THE ROAD, ARE WE GOING TO LOOK BACK IF ALL THESE OTHER BUSINESSES HAVE CHANGED IN THIS ONE ISN'T AND WE LOOK BACK ON WHATEVER TODAY IS APRIL 26TH AND SAY, HEY, WE STILL HAVE THIS ONE BUSINESS THAT'S OUT OF PLACE AND THAT'S WHAT THAT CAUSES ME A LITTLE RESERVATION ON IT.
AGAIN, I LIKE THE YAWNING, I LIKE THE ADD-ON.
IT'S JUST FROM THE POLICY SIDE OF IT, THAT'S THE ISSUE. I HAVE A LITTLE HESITATION.
>> IF THAT IS THE OPINION OF THE COMMISSION AS WELL AS COUNSEL, THEN IT WILL BE PUT ON THE APPLICANT TO EITHER BRING THIS ENTIRE SITE UP TO CODE WITH WHATEVER PROCESS OR RESOURCES THAT WILL UNDERTAKE, OR EITHER LOOK FOR ALTERNATIVE LOCATIONS.
THAT'S REALLY BECAUSE AS I MENTIONED, THIS IS IN ORDER TO ACCOMMODATE THE NEEDS OF THE GROWING BUSINESS.
IT REALLY IS KIND OF FINDING THAT BALANCING ACT OF HOW CAN WE IMPROVE THIS SITE WITHOUT MAY BE ADVERSELY IMPACTING THE BUSINESS ITSELF?
>> NO, ABSOLUTELY, I WOULD YOU SAY TO THE STAFF WITH YOU GUYS, WITH BUSINESSES THAT ARE COMING IN OR THAT WANT TO CHANGE, I GUESS IS A BETTER WAY.
THEY DO THIS WITH THE APPLICANTS AS WELL.
I'M GOING TO VOTE FOR IT, BUT I'M NOT HAPPY TO DO IT, BUT THE BUSINESS IS GROWING.
I APPLAUD THAT YOU ARE DOING A GREAT THING, BUT POLICY-WISE, I THINK THIS IS GOING TO BE A SLIPPERY SLOPE.
>> STEP FOLLOWED I UNDERSTAND MR. CHAIRMAN, AND THAT IS ONE OF THE AREAS WHERE WE LOOK FOR DIRECTION FROM THIS BOARD.
IF YOU GUYS DECIDE TO DENY THIS TONIGHT, WE'LL HAVE THAT INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE NEXT BUSINESS OWNER WHO COMES IN WITH A SIMILAR REQUEST SO THAT WE CAN PRESENT.
THIS IS OUR RECENT PAST THAT WE'VE HAD WITH OUR PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
THIS IS WHAT THEY'RE RECOMMENDING.
THEY'RE STICKING TO THE POLICY OF THE REQUIREMENT OF THE OVERLAY DISTRICT, BUT THAT IS WHY IT'S BEFORE YOU TONIGHT FOR THOSE WAIVERS.
AS JP HAD STATED, IF THIS CASE IS DENIED TONIGHT, THEN THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT PLANS THAT WOULD FULLY COMPLY WITH THE OVERLAY DISTRICT
>> YEAH, THAT'S WHERE I HATE THIS, I MEAN, IT'S BLACK OR WHITE.
UNFORTUNATELY IN A LIAR, THERE'S A LOT OF GRAY THAT I GET TO WORK WITH, BUT UNFORTUNATELY, HE DENIED I DON'T GET ANY GRADE COLOR WITH.
AGAIN, I'M SORRY, WHOSE WITH THIS BUSINESS.
I HOPE YOU SEE WHERE MY MINDSET IS COMING FROM THIS.
I APPLAUD YOU WITH YOUR BUSINESS.
I APPRECIATE YOU UPDATING IT, BUT LOOKING DOWN THE ROAD, WHICH IS OUR JOB AS WELL, IT CAUSES ME RESERVATION THAT THE CITY MAY NOT GET TO THE POINT HE WAS TRYING TO GET TO.
THAT'S JUST MAKING ME THINK THIS THROUGH.
BUT AGAIN, I APPRECIATE WHAT YOU'RE DOING WITH THE BUSINESS.
>> YES, SIR. I SAW IN THE PUBLIC MEETING, SO HE WOULD JUST IDENTIFY YOURSELF FOR US, PLEASE.
>> MY NAME IS BUPA BROKERS AND I'LL BE THE CONTRACTOR ON THIS.
I APPRECIATE YOU ALL VERY MUCH OR EVEN CNS VISION, BUT AS JP HAS DONE A GREAT JOB PRESENTING IT.
OUR BIGGEST DEAL THE BUSINESS IS GROWING AND WE WANT TO UPLIFT THE FACIAL PART OF IT TO LOOK AS BEST WE CAN, AND WE NEED THE WAREHOUSE SPACE TO CONTINUE IN, IF WE CAN'T, POSSIBLY WE MOVE SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND I HATE TO DO THAT.
WE'VE GOT SEVEN OF THESE STORES AND IT'S JUST A GREAT LOCATION FOR US AND EVERYTHING.
THEN, OF COURSE, WE'VE UPGRADED EVERYTHING MORE THAN IT IS NOW, FOR INSTANCE, JUST PUTTING INTO FIRE SYSTEM THAT PHARMACY, THAT COST AN EXTRA $200 THOUSAND THAT WE DIDN'T EVEN PLAN ON DOING TO BEGIN WITH, AND THAT WE WOULD NOT DO IF WE DON'T GET TO ADD ON.
THEN WE DON'T HAVE TO, BUT WE DON'T PLAN ON PUTTING IN THE FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM,
[00:30:03]
WHICH WE DON'T PLAN ON DOING NOTHING TO BUILD.THEN WE CAN ADD ON BECAUSE THEN WE'RE LOOKING FOR SIMPLE OTHER PLACE TO GO.
OUR FULL INTENTION IS TO STAY HERE AND MAKE IT LOOK AS NICE AS WE CAN AND BE PRESENTABLE.
>> AND I APPRECIATE THAT. THANK YOU.
>> I WAS JUST GOING TO SAY I THINK WHEN YOU'RE LOOKING AT DESIGN STANDARDS, IF WE WERE TALKING ABOUT A BUILDING THAT WAS DOWNTOWN HERE, JUST RIGHT HERE AND THEY WANTED TO COME IN WITH A METAL BUILDING THAT'S WHY WE HAD THE STANDARDS.
THIS PROPERTY HERE IS NOT GOING TO BE SOMETHING THAT PEOPLE ARE GOING TO BE WALKING AROUND AND VIEWING ALL SIDES OF IT AND THINGS OF THIS NATURE, AND WITH THE OTHER BUILDINGS IN THIS PARTICULAR AREA ABOUT THE SAME.
I REALLY DON'T SEE A PROBLEM WITH IT AT ALL.
I KNOW WHY WE HAVE THE DESIGN STANDARDS WITHIN THE AREA, AND I THINK IT'S FOR AESTHETICS OF PEOPLE WHO ARE GOING TO BE VISITING, PEOPLE THAT COME TO VISIT AND EAT AND PLAY, AND ALL THIS STUFF.
I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.
I THINK IS MY FACT, IT'LL PROBABLY BE AN IMPROVEMENT OVER WHAT IT IS NOW.
>> I DO HAVE A QUESTION ON THE FIRE SYSTEM, I'M ASSUMING SINCE YOU'RE REMODELING THE EXISTING PORTION, THAT IS GOING TO BE OVER THE ENTIRE COMPLEX?
>> YES, OUR WHOLE PLAN WAS TO DO THE ADD-ON, MOVE THE WAREHOUSE BACK, TAKE IT IN.
I CAN TAKE ALL OF THE FRONT SHOWROOM WE HAVE NOW MOVE IT BACK, REMODELED THE SHOWROOM, AND THEN BRING THE SHOWROOM BACK TO THE FRONT.
BUT THEN IN THE END IT WOULD LEAVE US MORE WAREHOUSE SPACE.
BUT THE SHOWROOM WOULD BE TOTALLY FACELIFT THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE.
>> ALRIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE THAT.
>> LET ME GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT THIS POINT AND THEN DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANYTHING ELSE?
>> JP YOU SAID THEY WANTED TO PUT A FOUR-FOOT BRICK VENEER ON THE FRONT?
>> YES, BUT THAT'S NOT IN ANY REQUIREMENTS OR ANYTHING.
IT'S JUST, WANT WE ARE [OVERLAPPING] WANTING TO DO.
>> ALL NINE OF THESE IMPROVEMENTS THAT YOU SEE HERE, MAYBE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM, ARE ALL PROPOSALS BY THE APPLICANT, BY THE OWNER JUST TO TRY TO MAKE UP FOR SOME OF THE WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING PROPOSED, TRYING TO IMPROVE THE SITE IN ANY WAY THAT THEY CAN TO MAKE IT MORE PRESENTABLE, AS HE HAD MENTIONED?
>> AND I KNOW THAT WITH THE OLD TOWN OVERLAY, WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO REQUIRE CERTAIN THINGS BECAUSE WE'VE DESIGNATED IT AS A HISTORICAL THING.
I WOULD LIKE TO PROBABLY SEE THAT PUT IT IN HARD IN THE MOTION SO THAT MAKES SURE AT LEAST THAT GETS DONE.
>> WE APPROVE IT TO THE FOREFOOT BRICK.
>> THE BRICK VENUE. ABSOLUTELY, I PUT TOGETHER AN AGREEMENT WITH THE OWNER IN REGARDS TO THE PHASING OF HOW THESE IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE DONE.
IN THE FRONT SIDE WILL BE THE SECOND HALF OF THAT PHASE, SPECIFICALLY, AS BUPA JUST MENTIONED, IN REGARDS TO BEING ABLE TO MOVE EVERYTHING [NOISE] TO THE BACK AND THEN AFTER THEY'RE ABLE TO THEN INSTALL THAT REAR WAREHOUSE.
THEN THEY'RE GOING TO MAKE ALL THE IMPROVEMENTS TO THE FRONT FACADE.
AND THERE IS A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY THAT WILL BE ON HOLD THAT WILL BE HELD UNTIL ALL THOSE IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN CLEARED BY STAFF.
>> NOTHING WAIVERS THEY'RE ASKING FOR WOULD HAVE ANY ADVERSE EFFECT AS FAR AS THE MATERIALS THAT THEY'RE USING, WE'D HAVE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS AS FAR AS INCLEMENT WEATHER, LIKE A TORNADO OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT?
>> NOT TO MY UNDERSTANDING, SIR.
THERE ARE SORTING OUT TO SUBMIT BUILDING PERMITS THAT'LL BE REVIEWED BY OUR BUILDING DEPARTMENT AND WILL HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE MINIMUM BUILDING STANDARDS THAT WE HAD.
>> THERE WAS NO SAFETY CONCERNS OR ANYTHING.
>> ASSOCIATED WITH IT. THANK YOU.
>> OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON 3D.
>> AND I'LL SAY I GUESS WE NEED IT WITH THE WAIVERS AND THEN WE DO IT WITH THE SITE PLAN ALL IN ONE BUT DO WE NEED TO DO TO GIVE HIM WITH THAT?
>> MR. CHAIR, I RECOMMEND THAT WE APPROVE THE SITE PLAN, ASSOCIATED WAIVERS.
IN ADDITION TO THAT, THE AWNING BE WALL-MOUNTED,
[00:35:02]
AND THAT A FOUR-FOOT MASONRY VENEER BE PLACED ON THE FRONT FASCIA?>> OKAY. WE HAD A MOTION MADE BY [INAUDIBLE]
>> JUST TO MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A PART OF THE NEW ADDITION IS GOING TO HAVE THOSE ROLLING DOORS THAT'S GOING TO BE RECESSED BACK.
THERE'S THE FOREFOOT VENEER GOING TO BE INCLUDED ON THAT OR IS IT JUST THE FRONT?
>> JUST THE FRONT PRIMARY CONSISTING OF THE ADDITION?
>> I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE. THE EXISTING FACIAL AND I SAY MASONRY JUST IN CASE THEY FIND IT DIDN'T WORK AND THEY PUT STONE. SURE, THAT'S FINE.
>> YOU STILL SECOND THAT JASON, HE DIDN'T CHANGE.
>> OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM IN A SECOND BY JASON ON THIS.
HASN'T TELL ME RAISE MY HAND, BUT I'LL DO IT.
ALRIGHT. THAT PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU, GUYS.
NEXT STARS, REPORTS, AND PRESENTATIONS.
THERE ARE ANY COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS? NO EXECUTIVE SESSION TONIGHT.
SO WE CAN BE ADJOURNED AT 7:06. THANKS, EVERYONE.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.