[2. Consent Agenda All items listed below are considered to be routine by the Planning and Zoning Commission and will be enacted with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of the items unless a Commissioner or citizen so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered in its normal sequence. Approval of the consent agenda authorizes the Development Services Director to place each item on the City Council agenda in accordance with the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendations.]

THERE'S A FEW THINGS ON THIS THAT ARE ALL CONSIDERED ROUTINE IN NATURE THAT ARE USUALLY HANDLED AT THE STAFF LEVEL.

HOWEVER, SOMEBODY WOULD LIKE SOMETHING PULLED OFF.

WE CAN DO SO AT THIS POINT.

IF NOT, I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM NUMBER 2, THE CONSENT AGENDA.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.

>> I SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY DAN, ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.

NEXT TO UNANIMOUS.

WE CAN MOVE ON TO ITEM 3A, WHICH IS A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE ALTA VISTA 2, LOCATED AT 240 CENTER DRY, CASE 21103, TO CONSIDER A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN AMENDMENT WITH A WAIVER TO APPENDIX C.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN, IF I MAY?

>> YES.

>> I KNOW BRENDA'S HERE THIS EVENING.

WE WERE HOPING YOU COULD SAY A FEW WORDS FOR HER SO THAT MAYBE SHE DIDN'T HAVE TO STAY THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE MEETING THIS EVENING REGARDING THE PLAQUE THAT WE HAVE FOR HER TODAY, HONORING HER.

>> BRENDA, DO YOU NOT WANT TO SIT HERE FOR THIS WHOLE THING? [LAUGHTER] [BACKGROUND] I APOLOGIZE.

BRENDA MOVED OFF THE COMMISSION, LAST WEEK WAS HER LAST TIME AND WE DIDN'T HAVE A MEETING, BUT SHE WAS HERE FOR, WHAT WAS IT? PROBABLY SIX YEARS, BRENDA?

>> [BACKGROUND]

>> WE HAD THE HONOR OF WORKING WITH HER FOR THE LAST SIX OR SEVEN YEARS, AS SHE SAID UP HERE.

I KNOW SHE BROUGHT A LOT OF GREAT THINGS AS A REAL ESTATE AGENT AND HAD A LOT OF GREAT QUESTIONS, GREAT CONCERNS.

I KNOW WE ALL LEARNED QUITE A BIT FROM HER SIDE.

I WANT TO PERSONALLY THANK HER AND I APPRECIATE HER COMING BACK.

JENNIFER, DID YOU SAY THERE'S A PLAQUE? [BACKGROUND]

>> HOPE THAT ONE.

>> THIS ONE. OKAY. [LAUGHTER]

>> YOU HAVE IT MR. CHAIRMAN.

>> RIGHT HERE NEXT TO ME. I WAS WONDERING WHAT THIS WAS.

I'LL COME AROUND SO THAT I CAN HAND IT TO YOU, BRENDA.

[BACKGROUND] [LAUGHTER] [BACKGROUND] THANK YOU, BRENDA.

[APPLAUSE] [BACKGROUND]

>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.

>> YES, MA'AM. I'M GOING TO START WHERE I LEFT OFF WITH A WAIVER TO APPENDIX C,

[A. Alta Vista 2 located at 240 Centre Drive (Case 21-103): Consider a Commercial Site Plan Amendment with a waiver to Appendix C, Article V, IH-35 Design Standards for a data mining facility. ]

ARTICLE 5 ON THE IH 35 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR THE DATA MINING FACILITY. ALL RIGHT. GO.

>> THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE RECORD, JP DECAY, DEVELOPMENT SERVICES SENIOR PLANNER PRESENTING CASE 21103, THE ALTA VISTA 2 SITE PLAN AMENDMENT WITH THE MASONRY WAIVER.

JOSHUA FRYE WITH RED LINE DESIGN COMPANIES SUBMITTED THIS APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER, TIM RUBIN WITH BIG STAR DATA MINING, AND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 0.23 ACRES.

I ALSO WANTED TO NOTE THAT THIS CASE WAS ORIGINALLY SCHEDULED FOR THE SEPTEMBER 28TH, 2021 P&Z AGENDA.

HOWEVER, WE ARE UNABLE TO GARNER A FULL QUORUM, SO WE HAD TO RESCHEDULE IT TO TODAY'S DATE.

>> JP, NONE OF OUR SCREENS ARE SHOWING ANYTHING.

SUCH A MATHS MAYBE OR YOU'RE ALL SHOWING A PRESENTATION.

[00:05:07]

WE'LL GIVE IT ONE MINUTE AND WE'LL GET THIS GOING FOR YOU GUYS.

[BACKGROUND]

>> SORRY ABOUT THAT. THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS INDUSTRIAL AND IT'S ALSO LOCATED IN THE I35 OVERLAY OR THE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA 1, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE SPHINX AREA.

IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE TWO IMAGES ON THE SCREEN, THE FIRST ONE OR THE ONE TO YOUR LEFT, WOULD BE THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED SITE PLAN FROM 2019 AND IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE IMAGE ON THE RIGHT, THAT IS AN AERIAL OF THE SITE AS OF RECENTLY.

YOU CAN TELL THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN FULLY BUILT OUT, FULLY DEVELOPED AND THAT ORIGINALLY APPROVED SITE PLAN ALLOWED FOR A 2400 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING.

THE BUILDING IS SINGLE-STORY WITH 12 FEET IN HEIGHT.

THE USE OF THAT BUILDING WAS OFFICE WITH A SERVER WAREHOUSE SPECIFICALLY FOR DATA MINING.

THE SITE PLAN IS BACK IN FRONT OF YOU GUYS AGAIN TODAY BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TWO AMENDMENTS TO THE SITE PLAN.

THE FIRST ONE IS TO CONSTRUCT A 160 SQUARE FOOT ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT SHED.

THE PURPOSE OF THAT SHED IS TO HOUSE ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT.

THEN THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS TO ALSO CONSTRUCT AN ADDITIONAL COOLING TOWER AND THE COOLING TOWER WILL BE UTILIZED TO SUPPLY COOLING SOLUTION TO THE PROPOSED SHED.

I'VE HIGHLIGHTED BOTH THE SHED AND THE COOLING TOWER IN BLUE ON THE IMAGE ON THE SCREEN.

BOTH OF THOSE STRUCTURES ARE CONTAINED BY THAT RED RECTANGLE YOU CAN SEE RUNNING AROUND THE SITE PLAN AS WELL.

THAT RED RECTANGLE IS INDICATING THE EQUIPMENT YARD OF THE SITE.

IT'S ALSO WHERE FENCING AND LIVE SCREENING AND MASONRY SCREENING IS WRAPPING AROUND THAT BOUNDARY OF THE EQUIPMENT YARD.

THERE'S ALSO A MASONRY WAIVER ASSOCIATED WITH THIS SITE PLAN BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING 100 PERCENT MASONITE SITING FOR THAT 160 SQUARE FOOT SHED.

I CERTAINLY WANT TO TAKE THIS MOMENT TO LET YOU KNOW THAT STAFF IS TAKING A CLOSER LOOK AT THE CURRENT MASONRY WAIVER PROCESS.

WE'RE HOPING IN THE NEAR FUTURE, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A NEW DIRECTION FROM CITY COUNCIL OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THIS CURRENT PROCESS.

BUT UNTIL THEN, WE'RE OBVIOUSLY GOING TO KEEP PROCESSING THESE MASONRY WAIVERS AS WE HAVE IN THE PAST.

BUT COMING BACK TO THIS PARTICULAR REQUEST, YOU CAN SEE THE WEST AND EAST ELEVATION OF THE SHED IS MADE UP OF 100 PERCENT MASONITE SIDING.

FOR THE SOUTH ELEVATION, IT'S ALSO MADE UP OF THAT 100 PERCENT MASONITE SIDING.

FOR THE NORTH ELEVATION, THAT'S PRIMARILY JUST THE DOORS TO ACCESS THE SHED, AND SO MATERIAL ISN'T REALLY IN QUESTION FOR THIS PARTICULAR FACADE.

IT'S IMPORTANT TO KEEP IN MIND THAT THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED SITE PLAN WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN 2019 AND IT WAS BROUGHT FORWARD BY THE SAME APPLICANT AND OWNER THAT ARE BRINGING FORWARD THESE AMENDMENTS TODAY.

THAT ORIGINAL SITE PLAN ALSO REQUESTED AND RECEIVED TWO WAIVERS TO THE I35 OVERLAY AND SPECIFICALLY THE I35 OVERLAY SCREENING REQUIREMENTS.

THE FIRST WAIVER THAT WAS REQUESTED AND GIVEN WAS A ROLLING DOOR ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING SO THAT THE BUSINESS COULD SWAP OUT SERVERS EFFICIENTLY AND AS NEEDED.

THE SECOND WAVER THAT WAS REQUESTED WAS TO CONSTRUCT AN EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL RATHER THAN A 12-FOOT MASONRY WALL.

THE I35 STANDARDS REQUIRES THAT ANY EQUIPMENT BE COMPLETELY SCREENED.

IN THIS CASE, A LOT OF THE EQUIPMENT WAS ROUGHLY 12 FEET TALLER, AND SO THE APPLICANT THOUGHT IT'D BE BETTER TO BUILD AN EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL RATHER THAN A 12-FOOT MASONRY WALL.

THE APPLICANT HAD PROVIDED ADDITIONAL LIVE SCREENING TO ASSIST IN THAT MITIGATION OF THE EQUIPMENT.

TO GIVE YOU A VISUAL OF WHAT THAT SITE LOOKS LIKE FROM A STREET VIEW TODAY,

[00:10:01]

YOU CAN SEE ON THE LEFT THERE'S THE ROLLING DOOR, AND THEN TO THE RIGHT, THE ARROW IS POINTING TO THE EQUIPMENT YARD WHERE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO CONSTRUCT THE SHED AND THE COOLING TOWER AND THEN THERE'S THAT EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL.

DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THAT EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL, THAT IS WHERE THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING TO PLANT TWO OAK TREES AS ADDITIONAL SCREENING.

[NOISE] HERE ARE THE BUILDING, THE RENDERINGS OF THE SHED THAT'S BEING PROPOSED HERE TODAY.

ACCORDING TO THE APPLICANT, THE MATERIAL AND THE COLOR IS CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING MAIN BUILDING.

AS FOR LANDSCAPING, THE SITE IS CURRENTLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LANDSCAPING STANDARDS AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING TO PLANT THOSE TWO LIVE OAK TREES FOR A SUPPLEMENTAL AND ADDITIONAL LIVE SCREENING FOR THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES.

AS FOR PARKING, NO NEW ADDITIONAL PARKING IS REQUIRED AS THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS NOT GOING TO INCREASE ANY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC AND IT'S NOT GOING TO REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL STAFFING SO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PARKING AMOUNT, IT WILL STILL BE ADEQUATE WITH THIS REQUEST.

AS FOR SITE CONFORMANCE, THE AMENDMENTS DO NOT CHANGE OR DO NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT SITE CONFORMANCE AT ALL.

THE SITE PLAN AMENDMENT IS STILL IN COMPLETE CONFORMANCE WITH THE INDUSTRIAL AND I-35 OVERLAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

AS FOR UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE, THERE WILL BE NO PUBLIC UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE NEW EQUIPMENT SHED AND THE COOLING TOWER.

ADDITIONAL DRAINAGE MITIGATION IS NOT REQUIRED BECAUSE THE ORIGINAL DRAINAGE PLAN ACCOUNTED FOR ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA AND FOR TRAFFIC.

THE PROPOSED USE FOR THE EQUIPMENT SHED WILL NOT GENERATE MORE TRAFFIC TO THE SITE AS I PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED.

THERE WAS A PUBLIC HEARING ASSOCIATED WITH THIS REQUEST AND SO A PUBLIC NOTICE WAS MAILED TO PROPERTY OWNERS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND A NOTICE WAS PUBLISHED IN THE NEWSPAPER AND STAFF HAS NOT RECEIVED ANY INQUIRIES FROM THE PUBLIC REGARDING THIS REQUEST.

STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE WAIVER GIVEN THAT THE ACCESSORY BUILDING WILL BE PRIMARILY OBSCURED BY THE EXISTING SCREENING WALL AND THE PROPOSED LIVE SCREENING.

ACTIONS REQUESTED ARE TO OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING, CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING, CONSIDER A MASONRY WAIVER REQUEST AND IF THE MASONRY WAIVER REQUEST IS APPROVED, RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR ALTA VISTA 2.

IF YOU'VE ANY QUESTIONS, MYSELF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE.

>> THANK YOU, JP. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING SO LET'S GO AHEAD AND OPEN IT AT 6:42, AND IF ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO COME UP AND SPEAK ON THIS, YOU'RE MORE THAN WELCOME.

I DO HAVE A CARD FROM A MR. ROB, HOPE I SAY THIS RIGHT, FIESLER.

>> FIESLER.

>> YOU ARE HERE FOR QUESTIONS OR WOULD YOU-

>> I'M JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS MIGHT HAVE.

>> PERFECT. I'LL ASK THE COMMISSION IF ANYBODY HAS ANY ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS IN REGARD TO THIS.

>> HOW TALL IS THE COOLING TOWER? DID IT JUST SAY IT WAS ABOVE 12 FEET?

>> THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED COOLING TOWER, I BELIEVE WAS SLIGHTLY ABOVE 12 FEET AND TO MY UNDERSTANDING, THE ONE THAT'S BEING PROPOSED HERE TONIGHT IS A LITTLE OVER 13 FEET.

>> THERE'S THE REQUIREMENT THAT THE TWO OAK TREES ARE GOING TO BE PLACED IN FRONT OF THAT.

>> THAT'S NOT ACTUALLY A REQUIREMENT.

THE APPLICANT HAD RECEIVED ALLOWANCE TO CONSTRUCT THE EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY SCREENING WALL PREVIOUSLY AND JUST HAD ALSO PROPOSED ADDITIONAL LIVE SCREENING AS AN ADDITIONAL MITIGATING FACTOR TO THE SITE OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURES, AND THE APPLICANT IS ALSO REQUESTING TO DO THAT AGAIN HERE.

WHEN RECEIVING THAT WAIVER PREVIOUSLY, IT ALSO APPLIES TO THIS NEW REQUEST AND THE APPLICANT HAS JUST PROPOSED TO ADD ADDITIONAL SCREENING WITH THE REQUESTS WE SEE HERE TODAY.

>> HAS ANYTHING BEEN ERECTED SINCE THE WALL WAS BUILT OR IS THAT STILL YET TO BE?

>> NOT TO MY KNOWLEDGE. I BELIEVE IT WAS ALL CONSTRUCTED AT THE SAME TIME BUT IF YOU'RE MORE AWARE, I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT COULD PROBABLY ANSWER THAT FOR YOU.

>> YEAH. IF YOU WOULD JUST COME UP HERE AND MAKE SURE THAT MICROPHONE'S ON AND IF YOU WOULD JUST STATE YOUR NAME FOR US, PLEASE.

>> ROB FIESLER. WHAT WAS YOUR QUESTION AGAIN, SIR?

>> I SEE THE EIGHT-FOOT WALL AND FROM THE PHOTOS THAT WERE PRESENTED,

[00:15:06]

I REALLY DON'T SEE ANYTHING.

I MEAN, IF YOU GO BACK TO THE PHOTO OF THE ACTUAL, I DON'T REALLY SEE ANYTHING BEHIND THE WALL SO WHAT ARE WE SCREENING? CAN YOU POINT TO WHAT WE'RE SCREENING?

>> IT'S ALL BACK HERE. YOU CAN'T SEE IT BECAUSE IT DROPS BEHIND THIS WALL SO EVEN THOUGH THE TOWER CAN BE 12 FEET, THIS EIGHT-FOOT WALL [INAUDIBLE] WHEN YOU WORK FROM THIS SIDE, THERE'S ACTUALLY MORE TREES HERE IN FRONT AND WE'RE GOING TO PUT TWO MORE IN WITH THE PLAN BUT YOU CAN'T SEE ANYTHING [INAUDIBLE] BUT YES, IT'S ALREADY DOUBLED.

YOU JUST CAN'T SEE IT.

>> BUT YOU'RE GOING TO BUILD SOMETHING THAT'S FIVE FOOT ABOVE THIS WALL, RIGHT? IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE PROPOSING?

>> NO, IT WON'T BE FIVE FEET ABOVE THE WALL BECAUSE THE WAY THE BACK SITS, I THINK IT'S LIKE TWO FEET SUNKEN DOWN FROM WHAT THE TOP OF THE WALL SO THE WALL WAS ACTUALLY TEN FEET TALL COMPARED TO WHAT GOES DOWN UNDER THE GROUND RIGHT THERE IS THE WAY IT LOOKS.

SO IT WOULD BE ABOUT THREE FEET TALLER THAN THE WALL AND IT WOULD BE TOWARDS THE BACK END OVER THERE WHERE THAT TREE ALREADY IS.

WE'RE GOING TO PUT MORE TREES RIGHT THERE SO YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO SEE IT AT ALL AS IT IS.

>> JUST FOR A POINT OF CLARIFICATION, SO THERE IS AN ELEVATION CHANGE AND THAT'S WHY YOU ARE NOT ABLE TO SEE THAT PARTICULAR COOLING TOWER BECAUSE IT IS TOWARDS THE REAR OF THE SUBJECT SITE.

BUT THEY HAVE EXISTING SCREENING BEHIND THE WALL SO THAT'S PART OF THE REASON WHY YOU CAN'T SEE THE EQUIPMENT THAT'S BACK THERE CURRENTLY.

>> WE'RE JUST TRYING TO BE COMPLIANT HERE IS WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO. [OVERLAPPING]

>> YES, SIR.

>> THANK YOU.

>> I'LL JUST SAY I DON'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT, ESPECIALLY WITH THE EIGHT-FOOT MASONRY WALL THAT YOU HAVE THERE, LIKE YOU SAID, A COUPLE OF FEET ABOVE IT THAT YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THE TOP OF THIS COOLING TOWER.

BUT ESPECIALLY IF YOU HAVE THESE TREES, I SEE THERE'S ONE YOUNG TREE PLANTED HERE IN THE CENTER.

IF YOU'VE GOT A COUPLE MORE OF THOSE THAT WILL GROW OVER THE TIME AND WITH THE UPKEEP WITH THOSE, I THINK THAT WILL LOOK FINE ESPECIALLY FOR THIS PART.

I MEAN, THIS ISN'T CENTER STREET, IT'S NOT A MAJOR THOROUGHFARE GOING THROUGH THERE.

BUT I APPRECIATE YOU STEPPING UP AND AT LEAST PUTTING EXTRA LANDSCAPING IN THERE.

>> WELL, WE WANT OUR OFFICE TO WORK GOOD AS WELL.

>> SURE. DOES ANYBODY ELSE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

>> THANK YOU.

>> SIR, YOU WANT TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? DO YOU MIND?

>> YEAH, I'M CURIOUS. THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT THE MASONRY AND THEN THEY SAID MASONRY IS A FIBERBOARD.

IT'S NOT THE SAME AT PRODUCT.

A LOT OF TIMES WE PUT IT UP DEPENDING ON THE WALL STOWED CONFIGURATION.

YOU GET BOEING ROT STUFF.

USUALLY, THEY'LL PUT DECKING BEHIND IT, BUILT PAPER STUFF, I GUESS.

I'M CURIOUS WHAT BUILDINGS THEY'RE GOING TO BE DESIGNING AND CONSTRUCTING NOW.

>> OKAY.

>> ONE FOOT, YOU CAN KICK THROUGH MY SCENARIO.

>> OKAY, IT'S NOT STRONG [OVERLAPPING].

>> NOT AT ALL. I'M WORKING ON THE HOUSE.

I'M GOING TO REPLACE ALL THE PLACES THAT STARTING ON THE OUTSIDE.

>> TWO BACK UP. [LAUGHTER] TALK ABOUT THAT. THANK YOU.

>> [OVERLAPPING] IS GOING TO BE THE TRUE FIBERBOARD TO MAKE THAT STUDY.

IT'S CHEAP MATERIAL. IT GOES WELL.

>> NO, IT'S NOT. I DON'T UNDERSTAND BUILDING CONSTRUCTION THAT WELL. I KNOW IT'S NO.

THERE'S SOME METAL THAT HAS THE LOOK THAT MATCHES THE WALL IS WHAT IT IS.

THE LAWN LOOKS THE SAME, FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND.

I DIDN'T DESIGN IT.

I'M JUST HERE ANSWERING QUESTIONS ABOUT STUFF.

HE'S TALKED TO THE ARCHITECT AND THE DESIGNER MORE THAN I HAVE.

>> ALL OF THE MOST RECENT PLANS THAT I'VE RECEIVED IN CONVERSATIONS THAT I'VE HAD WITH MR. FRY, ALL OF THE PLANS INDICATE A MASONITE SIDING FOR THAT SHED.

>> THERE'S NO WEIGHT GOING TO BE ON IT OR IN IT.

IT'S JUST GOING TO BE A HOLLOW SHELL TO STORE STUFF INSIDE.

IT'S NOT LIKE IT'S EVER GOING TO BOW OR DO ANYTHING INSIDE THERE.

>> [INAUDIBLE] BEHIND IT?

>> YES. FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND, YES.

I'VE SEEN THE ENGINEER DRAWINGS, THERE IS DECKING AND STUFF TO SPOT EVERYTHING.

IT'S BASICALLY GOING TO HAVE A WOOD FRAME THAT IT'S BUILT ONTO.

IT WON'T BOW OR BUCKLE.

[NOISE]

>> JUST AS A FRIENDLY REMINDER.

AS A RESULT OF RECENT STATE LAW, THE MATERIAL THAT'S PROPOSED IS AN APPROVED BUILDING MATERIAL PER THE BUILDING CODE.

THIS BODY DOES NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO

[00:20:04]

REGULATE THE TYPE OF MATERIAL THAT IS PROPOSED IN THIS MANNER.

>> NO. AS I SAY, JENNIFER, YOU TOOK THE WORDS OUT OF MY MOUTH.

UNFORTUNATELY, WE HAVE NO POWER SINCE THE STATE LEGISLATURE TOOK THAT AWAY FROM US.

BUT THIS BRINGS UP CONCERNS.

I DEFINITELY DON'T WANT YOU GUYS TO BUILD A BUILDING IF IT'S COME TUMBLING DOWN EITHER.

I'M SURE YOU GUYS DEFINITELY DON'T WANT THAT.

>> NO, WE DON'T.

>> ENGINEERS WILL HAVE A HEYDAY WITH THAT.

UNFORTUNATELY, SINCE THE LEGISLATURE CAME IN A COUPLE OF SESSIONS AGO AND SAID, CITIES DON'T HAVE ANY MORE POWER TO DO THAT, IT HURT US DOING THAT.

>> JUST ANOTHER POINT OF CLARIFICATION.

INITIALLY, THERE WAS DISCUSSION REGARDING A METAL STORAGE CONTAINER, AND JUST BE AWARE OF THAT.

IN LIEU OF JUST A STRAIGHT METAL STORAGE CONTAINER, THE APPLICANT HAS PROPOSED TO ENCASE THAT STORAGE UNIT AS PROPOSED.

JUST BE AWARE OF THAT. STAFF HAS EVALUATED THIS WITH THE APPLICANT IN QUITE A BIT OF DETAIL.

AS WE NOTED, WE JUST WANT TO REMIND YOU ABOUT STATE LAW.

>> OKAY, THANK YOU.

>> I'M SURE WE'VE GONE OVER THIS AND I DON'T WANT TO GO OVER IT AGAIN TODAY, BUT IF THIS BODY HAS NO AUTHORITY TO MAKE ANY OF THOSE DECISIONS, I'M NOT SURE WHAT WE'RE NEEDING A WAIVER FOR IN THE FIRST PLACE THEN.

>> I CAN PROVIDE CLARIFICATION FOR YOU.

AS JP NOTED, STAFF IS IN THE PROCESS.

WE PREPARED A PRESENTATION THAT WILL GO BEFORE CITY COUNCIL IN EXECUTIVE SESSION ON OCTOBER 18TH REGARDING THIS PARTICULAR ITEM, REGARDING MASONRY WAIVERS AND THE DIRECTION THAT COUNCIL WOULD LIKE STAFF TO PROCEED.

CURRENTLY, WE HAVE A MASONRY ORDINATES THAT STAFF AT OUR LEVEL, WE CANNOT DEVIATE FROM, WE DON'T HAVE THE AUTHORITY OR ORDINANCE IS VERY SPECIFIC.

IT STATES THAT MASONRY WAIVERS ARE REQUIRED TO BE ACTED UPON BY COUNCIL.

OUR PREVIOUS COUNCIL HAS PROVIDED US THAT DIRECTION.

BUT AS YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A NEW MAYOR AND WE HAVE SOME NEW COUNCIL MEMBERS.

AS JP NOTED, OUR STAFF, WE PREPARED A PRESENTATION FOR COUNCIL ON THE 18TH.

IT'S QUITE LENGTHY.

WE WILL EVALUATE ALL OF THE MASONRY WAIVERS THAT HAVE BEEN BOUGHT BEFORE COUNCIL AS WELL AS YOU AND WE'LL HAVE THAT CONVERSATION REGARDING DIRECTION.

WE'RE PREPARED FOR IT.

IF WE NEED TO AMEND OUR ORDINANCE, WE WILL DO SO.

>> YOU'LL HAVE FUN, JENNIFER. [LAUGHTER] ANYTHING ELSE? THANK YOU AGAIN.

WITH THAT, OPEN PUBLIC HEARING STILL, WOULD ANYBODY ELSE LIKE TO TALK? LET ME GO AHEAD AND CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6:53 JUST ASKING IF ANYBODY ELSE HAS ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS.

IF NOT, I WILL ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON ITEM 3A.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE SITE PLAN FOR ALTA VISTA, TO LOCATE IT FOR 20 CENTER DRIVE CASE 21-103 WITH THE MASONRY WAIVER.

>> SEC.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY DAN AND A SECOND BY ADAM.

ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND. THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

MOVING ON TO ITEM 4A WHICH IS REPORTS AND PRESENTATIONS FOR 210 SOUTH MAIN STREET

[A. 210 S Main Street located northwest of the W Eldred and S Main Street intersection (Case 20-101): Consider a Commercial Site Plan for a Station 330 restaurant. ]

LOCATED THE NORTHWEST OF WEST ELDRIDGE AND SOUTH MAIN INTERSECTION.

THIS IS CASE 20-101 THAT CONSIDER A COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN FOR A STATION 330 RESTAURANT. JP.

>> THANK YOU, MEMBERS OF THE COMMISSION FOR THE RECORD.

JP UK DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRESENTING CASE 20-101, THE STATION 330 SITE PLAN.

THE OWNER IS YOURANG LLC WILL BE REPRESENTED BY NEIL ABRAHAMSON AND THE APPLICANT IS JOHN BEGGERLY WITH ABP ARCHITECTURE.

THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 0.53 ACRES AND IS LOCATED AT 210 SOUTH MAIN STREET.

THE CURRENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITE PLAN WITH A BASE ZONING OF CENTRAL COMMERCIAL.

ON AUGUST 16TH OF THIS YEAR, CITY COUNCIL APPROVED THE REQUEST TO REZONE THE SUBJECT PROPERTY FROM RESIDENTIAL TO SITE PLAN WITH A BASE ZONING OF CENTRAL COMMERCIAL.

THE SUBJECT SITE PREVIOUSLY CONSISTED OF 204, 208, AND 216 SOUTH MAIN STREET.

IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT THE IMAGE ON THE SCREEN, THIS IS A FAIRLY OUTDATED AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, BUT YOU CAN SEE THE THREE LOTS, 204, 208,

[00:25:01]

AND 216, RUNNING ALONG SOUTH MAIN STREET RIGHT THERE.

HOWEVER, AN AMENDING PLAT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT AND WAS APPROVED EARLIER THIS YEAR, WHICH UNIFIED ALL THREE OF THOSE LOTS INTO A SINGLE LOT THAT NOW CONSISTS OF 0.53 ACRES AND IT HAS ALSO BEEN READDRESS TO 210 SOUTH MAIN STREET.

THE SITE PLAN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT HERE TODAY IS IN 11,048 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT.

THE RESTAURANT WILL INCLUDE A LARGE DINING AREA.

IT'LL HAVE AN OUTDOOR BAR AREA AND A COVERED COURTYARD PATIO.

THE BUILDING WILL BE ROUGHLY 30 FEET IN HEIGHT, SINGLE-STORY, AND IT WILL ALSO HAVE A 46-FOOT CLOCK TOWER AS AN ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT.

THE SITE PLAN WILL ALSO BE PROVIDING 59 PARKING SPACES.

AS I MENTIONED, THE USE IS A RESTAURANT AND THE USE OF RESTAURANT IS ALLOWED BY RIGHT IN THE SITE PLAN ORDINATES.

SPEAKING OF RESTAURANT, THE APPLICANT INTENDS ON UTILIZING THIS LOCATION TO LAUNCH A NEW RESTAURANT CALLED STATION 330.

THE DESIGN FOR THE STATION 330 BUILDING IS BASED ON EARLY 20TH-CENTURY RAIL STATIONS.

TO GIVE YOU A BETTER IDEA OF WHAT THE BUILDING WILL LOOK LIKE, HERE ARE SOME OF THE RENDERINGS.

TO PROVIDE A SENSE OF SCALE AND LOCATION TO THE SURROUNDING AREA, THE WHITE BUILDING THAT YOU CAN SEE IN THE BOTTOM TWO PICTURES IS DALTON'S CORNER.

THE PICTURE ON THE TOP LEFT OF THE SCREEN WOULD BE THE ELEVATION FACING SOUTH MAIN STREET.

THAT'S THE MAIN FACADE.

AS I MENTIONED, THE ARCHITECTURAL THEME IS THAT OF AN OLD RAIL STATION.

THESE WERE ALL IMAGES THAT WERE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT AS DESIGNED CONCEPT INSPIRATION.

NOW FOR THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS, THE OLD TOWN DESIGN STANDARDS STATES THAT THERE ARE UNRESTRICTED MATERIALS THAT MAY BE USED WITHOUT LIMITS AS LONG AS THEY'RE USED IN A MANNER THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CHOSEN ARCHITECTURAL STYLE.

THE MATERIALS THAT ARE CONSIDERED UNRESTRICTED INCLUDE BRICK, STONE, CAST STONE, CERAMIC TILE, AND STUCCO.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE EAST ELEVATION OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING INCLUDES A MIXTURE OF 95 PERCENT BRICK AND FIVE PERCENT CAST STONE MATERIAL.

THE SAME MATERIAL PERCENTAGES ARE BEING PROVIDED FOR ALL OF THE BUILDING'S ELEVATIONS.

HERE IS THE NORTH FACADE OF THE BUILDING AND THIS WILL BE FACING THE ON-SITE PARKING LOT IN-BETWEEN THE SUBJECT BUILDING AND DALTON'S CORNER.

HERE'S THE SOUTH ELEVATION.

THIS FACADE WILL BE FACING WEST ELDRIDGE STREET.

JUST LIKE THE OTHER ELEVATIONS, WILL BE MADE UP OF 95 PERCENT BRICK AND FIVE PERCENT CAST STONE.

THE FINAL ELEVATION.

THIS IS THE WEST FACADE.

THIS WILL BE FACING THE 20-FOOT ALLEY RUNNING IN BETWEEN THE PROPERTIES AND THE WEST ELEVATION ALONG WITH EVERY ELEVATION, IS PROPOSING 100 PERCENT PERMITTED MASONRY MATERIAL.

THE OLD TOWN DESIGN CENTERS ALSO REQUIRES THAT SITES WITH NEW CONSTRUCTION SHALL PROVIDE PLANTING IN THE PARKWAY AND 200 SQUARE FEET OF LANDSCAPING FOR EVERY 20 PARKING SPACES.

CONSIDERING THIS, THE LANDSCAPING PLAN IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 1,570 SQUARE FEET OF PLANTING IN THE PARKWAY AND TWO ORNAMENTAL TREES IN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS.

THE APPLICANT IS ALSO PROPOSING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS THAT WILL INCLUDE SHRUBBERY AND SEASONAL COLORS TO BE LOCATED WITHIN LANDSCAPING ISLANDS AND AROUND THE TRAIN CAR, THAT'LL BE LOCATED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PARKING LOT.

AS FOR PARKING, THIS SITE IN THIS LOCATION TYPICALLY WOULD NOT HAVE TO REQUIRE ANY PARKING BECAUSE IT'S LOCATED IN THE OLD TOWN OVERLAY.

HOWEVER, WHEN THE APPLICANT BROUGHT FORWARD THE ORIGINAL ZONING REQUEST TO REZONE THE PROPERTY FROM RESIDENTIAL TO A SITE PLAN WITH A CENTRAL COMMERCIAL BASE, CITY COUNCIL IMPLEMENTED A HANDFUL OF CONDITIONS ON THE SITE, AND ONE OF THOSE CONDITIONS REQUIRED THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE 25 PARKING SPACES ON-SITE AND 34 PARKING SPACES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY ALONG WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS RESTAURANT.

AS YOU CAN SEE, THE APPLICANT HAS PROVIDED 25 SPACES ON-SITE AND 34 SPACES IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

I'VE INDICATED BOTH OF THOSE TYPES OF PARKING WITH THE TWO COLORS, THE BLUE AND GREEN.

YOU CAN SEE ON YOUR SCREEN.

THE ALMOST BLUE RECTANGLE YOU CAN SEE AT THE TOP,

[00:30:02]

THAT IS THE ON-SITE PARKING LOT, AND THAT WILL CONTAIN 25 PARKING SPACES AND THEN THE GREEN LINE YOU CAN SEE RUNNING ALONG SOUTH MAIN STREET AND THEN RUNNING ALONG WEST ELDRED STREET ARE THE 34 PARKING SPACES LOCATED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.

I JUST MENTIONED ONE OF THE CONDITIONS OF THE CERTAIN AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES THAT NEED TO BE REQUIRED.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OTHER ONES.

ONES TO NOTE HAD TO DO WITH OCCUPANCY LOAD, AS WELL AS ENTERTAINMENT ACTIVITIES AND HOURS OF OPERATION OF THOSE ACTIVITIES.

THEN ALL OF THOSE USES YOU CAN SEE LISTED ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF YOUR SCREEN, THOSE ARE ALL USES THAT HAD BEEN RESTRICTED OR THEY'RE NO LONGER PERMITTED TO BE ALLOWED AT THIS PARTICULAR SITE.

AS FOR SITE CONFORMANCE, THE SITE PLAN IS IN COMPLETE CONFORMANCE WITH THE CENTRAL COMMERCIAL AND THE OLD TOWN OVERLAY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.

WATER AND SANITARY SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF BURLESON AND A NEW FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE ADDED TO THE SITE.

A VALLEY GUTTER WILL BE CONSTRUCTED TO TAKE ADDITIONAL STORM WATER RUN OFF ALONG ELDRED STREET TO MAIN STREET AND FOR TRAFFIC AND TRAFFIC ASSESSMENT INDICATED THAT IT'S CIA WAS NOT WARRANTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BURLESON DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL.

THE ACTION REQUESTED IS TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN FOR STATION 330 RESTAURANT LOCATED NORTHWEST OF THE WEST ELDRED AND SOUTH MAIN STREET INTERSECTION.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, MYSELF AND THE APPLICANT ARE AVAILABLE.

>> OKAY. THANK YOU, JP.

THIS NOT BEING A PUBLIC HEARING, I CAN JUST OPEN INTO THE COMMISSION IF ANYBODY HAS ANY QUESTIONS.

JP, YOU TOUCHED ON THE COUNCIL REQUESTED SEVERAL ADDITIONAL THINGS IN ORDER FOR THIS TO GO THROUGH, AND THE SITE PLAN CONTAINS EACH OF THOSE INCLUDING PARKING, LANDSCAPING, IT BEING CONSIDERED A RESTAURANT, NOT A BAR HOURS?

>> YES. SO REALLY, THE ONLY CONDITION THAT DIRECTLY APPLIES WITH A SITE PLAN THAT YOU GUYS ARE LOOKING AT RIGHT NOW IS THE PARKING.

>> PARKING PORTION.

>> YEAH.

>> OKAY. ANYBODY HAVE ANYTHING? I CAN ENTERTAIN A MOTION ON 4A THEN.

>> CHAIRMAN I MOVE TO APPROVE THE COMMERCIAL SITE PLAN CASE 20-101.

>> I SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY CHRIS.

[LAUGHTER] THANK YOU. I JUST HEARD A NAME.

I HEARD OF VOICE DOWN THERE.

ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND, IT'S UNANIMOUS. ALL RIGHT.

NEXT WE HAVE IS ITEM 4B,

[B. High Country located south of Hidden Vistas Blvd and Overland Dr with an approximate address of 342 Landview Dr (Case 21-101): Consider a preliminary plat for High Country, Lots 1X, 78X, 1-78, Block 1;Lots 1-20, Block 2; Lots 1-25, Block 3; Lots 1X, 1-26, Block 4; Lots 1X, 1-29, Block 5; Lots 1-20, Block 6, Lots 1-20, Block 7; and Lot 1X, Block 8, within the City of Burleson. ]

WHICH IS HIGH COUNTRY LOCATED SOUTH OF THE HIDDEN VISTA BOULEVARD AND OVERLAND DRIVE WITH AN APPROXIMATE ADDRESS OF 342 LAND-VIEW DRIVE.

THIS IS CASE 21-101 TO CONSIDER A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR HIGH COUNTRY LOTS 1X-78X ONE THROUGH 78, BLOCK 1 LOTS ONE THROUGH 20, BLOCK 2 AT ONE THROUGH 25, BLOCK 3 LOTS 1X AND ONE THROUGH 26, BLOCK 4 LOTS 1X, ONE THROUGH 29, BLOCK 5 LOT 1X ONE THROUGH 20, BLOCK 6 LOT 1X ONE THROUGH 20, BLOCK 7 AND LOTS 1X, BLOCK 8 WITHIN THE CITY OF BURLESON. MOUTH FOLDED.

>> THANK YOU, COMMISSIONER. GOOD EVENING.

LIGHT ON PARIS PLANNER DEVELOPMENT SERVICES PRESENTING CASE 21-101.

ALSO BE CONCURRENTLY PRESENTING SOME INFORMATION FOR CASE 21-102, WHICH IS THE FINAL PLAT FOR PHASE 1.

WHICH WOULD NORMALLY BE A CONSENT ITEM, BUT WE DID NOT WANT YOU TO TAKE ACTION ON THE CONSENT ITEM WITHOUT HAVING TAKEN ACTION ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THAT'S WHY YOU'LL SEE SOME SLIDES ABOUT THE FINAL PLAT.

THIS IS PROBABLY A FAMILIAR FOR SOME OF THE COMMISSIONERS.

THIS WAS ORIGINALLY BROUGHT FORWARD AND APPROVED IN 2018.

IT'S APPROXIMATELY 77 ACRES JUST SOUTH OF HIDDEN VISTA BOULEVARD AND OVERLAND DRIVE.

THE APPLICANT IS A PELOTON LAND SOLUTIONS AND THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY PLAT.

THEY CAME THROUGH IN 2018 FOR ZONE CHANGE FROM SINGLE-FAMILY 16 TO PD.

THE SITE IS CURRENTLY ZONED PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE PRELIMINARY PLAT CONTAINS EXACTLY 218 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FIVE HOA OPEN SPACE LOTS.

LIKE I MENTIONED, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WAS APPROVED BY CITY COUNCIL IN JUNE OF 2018.

THE REASON THAT YOU'RE REHEARING THIS CASE AND SEEING IT AGAIN, IS THAT THAT PRELIMINARY PLAT IS ESSENTIALLY EXPIRED THAT HAPPENED DUE TO SOME CONSTRUCTION PLAN DELAYS, JUST SOME CHALLENGING ENGINEERING ON THE SITE AS WELL AS COVID-19

[00:35:03]

IMPACTING THE APPLICANT PROCESS.

WE BROUGHT THIS BACK FOR THE COMMISSION AND YOU'LL GO TO CITY COUNCIL AS WELL AS PLAT.

THE PRELIMINARY PLAT HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE YOU SAW IT IN 2018.

IT'S STILL PROPOSING A SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOME PROJECT.

MOST OF THE LOTS ARE LEAST 60 FEET IN WIDTH OR MORE, AND THEIR AVERAGE LOT SIZE IS ABOUT 9,300 SQUARE FEET.

ALL LOTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN DEVELOPMENT.

AS YOU MAY NOTICE IN SOME OF THE PICTURES, IT LOOKS LIKE SOME LOTS AND SOME INFRASTRUCTURE HAS BEEN DONE.

THAT'S BECAUSE MOST OF THE PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION IS ALMOST COMPLETE AND PHASE 2 CONSTRUCTION PLANS ARE UP.

THE REVIEW IS ALREADY UNDERWAY AND PREPARING TO ENTER THE FINAL STAGES.

WITH THAT, NO CHANGES TO THE TIA DRAINAGE PLAN WERE WARRANTED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL AND THAT'S BECAUSE THEY'D ALREADY REVIEWED AND APPROVED AND NOTHING CHANGED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL OTHER THAN JUST BRING IT BACK FORWARD BECAUSE IT EXPIRED.

THIS SHOWS THE PHASE 1 AND THE FINAL PLAT.

THOSE LOTS ARE HIGHLIGHTED IN THE BLUE THERE.

THERE WAS ONE CHANGE TO THIS SUBMITTAL AND THAT HAS TO DO WITH A STUB OUT ON THE ROAD.

IF YOU SEE ON THE SCREEN WHERE IT SAYS SUBJECT PROPERTY AND SEE WHERE THE ARROW GOES JUST SOUTH OF THAT THEY'VE INCLUDED ESSENTIALLY WHERE PHASE 2 STREET WILL WALL LINE.

YOU CAN SEE THAT HERE ON THE PLAT IN THE SAME AREA.

OTHER THAN THAT, THE LOTS ARE PRACTICALLY THE SAME.

THERE'S 132 RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND TWO HOA OPEN LOTS.

FOR THIS, WE'RE JUST REQUESTING THAT YOU RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE PRELIMINARY PLAT AS WELL AS AFTER THAT SUBJECT TO APPROVAL, WE WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT FOR PHASE 1.

I'M HERE IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE SUBMITTAL AS WELL AS THE APPLICANT.

>> GREAT. THANK YOU. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ON THE PRELIMINARY OR THE FINAL PLAT FOR THESE? LET ME TAKE A MOTION FIRST ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IN CASE 21-101.

>> CHAIRMAN, I MOVE TO APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY PLAT, CASE 21-101.

>> I SECOND.

>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY DAN.

ALL IN FAVOR, IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.

IT'S UNANIMOUS AND NOW LET'S TAKE A MOTION ON.

[BACKGROUND] THANK YOU.

LET ME CALL ITEM 4C THE FINAL PLAT OF THE HIGH COUNTRY LOTS 50 THROUGH 77,

[C. Final Plat of High Country, Lots 50-77, 77X, Block 1; Lots 4-12, Block 3; Lots 1-26, 1X, Block 4; Lots 1-29, 1X, Block 5; Lots 1-20, Block 6, and Lots 1-20, Block 7, located approximately at 342 Landview Dr within the City of Burleson (Case 21-102): Consider approval of a final plat for High Country, Phase 1. ]

77X BLOCK 1, LOTS FOUR THROUGH 12, BLOCK 2 LOTS ONE THROUGH 26, 1X BLOCK 4 LOT ONE THROUGH 29, 1X LOTS FIVE, ONE THROUGH 20, BLOCK 6 AND LOTS ONE THROUGH 20, LOT SEVEN LOCATED APPROXIMATELY AT 342 LAND-VIEW DRIVE WITHIN THE CITY OF BURLESON CASE 21-102 TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF A FINAL PLAT FOR HIGH COUNTRY PHASE 1.

MATT YOU JUST WANTED ME TO SAY ALL THAT AGAIN, DIDN'T YOU? [LAUGHTER].

NOW, I'LL TAKE A MOTION ON THE ITEM 21-102.

>> MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THE FINAL PLAT OF HIGH COUNTRY LOTS 50-77 AT ALL, CASE 21-102.

>> I SECOND. [LAUGHTER]

>> WE HAVE A MOTION MADE BY ADAM AND A SECOND BY DAN.

ALL IN FAVOR IF YOU'D RAISE YOUR HAND.

THAT'S UNANIMOUS.

THANK YOU, GUYS.

THE NEXT IS A COMMUNITY INTEREST ITEMS.

[5. Community Interest Items This is a standing item on the agenda of every regular meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission. An "item of community interest" includes the following: expressions of thanks, congratulations, or condolence; information regarding holiday schedules; honorary recognitions of city officials, employees, or other citizens; reminders about upcoming events sponsored by the city or other entity that is scheduled to be attended by a city official or city employee; and announcements involving imminent public health and safety threats to the city.]

I DON'T KNOW IF THERE ARE ANY, JENNIFER.

>> I'LL JUST STAND RIGHT HERE.

I JUST WANTED TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION FOR A MOMENT.

JUST TO MAKE SURE YOU'RE AWARE THAT THE MONTH OF OCTOBER IS COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH.

IT'S CELEBRATED ALL THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND OUR MAYOR HAS PREPARED A PROCLAMATION FOR YOU AS PLANNING COMMISSIONERS.

I WILL E-MAIL THE PROCLAMATION TO YOU ALL THIS EVENING.

BUT I DO HAVE A HARD COPY FOR YOU AND I JUST WANT TO READ SOME INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROCLAMATION TO THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU DO FOR THE RESIDENTS AND STAFF HERE IN BURLESON.

WE DEFINITELY APPRECIATE YOU-ALL TREMENDOUSLY.

WE KNOW IT'S NOT EASY TO DEVOTE YOUR TIME AND WE APPRECIATE YOU.

BUT AS THE PROCLAMATION READS, IT SAYS, "THE MONTH OF OCTOBER IS DESIGNATED AS NATIONAL COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES AND IT'S A CELEBRATION FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE OUR PARTICIPANTS AND DEDICATION OF OUR PLANNING COMMISSIONERS, AS WELL AS OUR CITIZEN PLANNERS THAT HAVE CONTRIBUTED THEIR EXPERTISE TO THE CITY OF BURLESON." OUR MAYOR FLETCHER HAS PROCLAIMED OCTOBER AS COMMUNITY PLANNING MONTH.

[00:40:05]

WE APPRECIATE YOU ALL WE WANT TO SAY THANK YOU AND I WILL E-MAIL YOU THE PROCLAMATION.